MooWaHahaha! ROTMFFLMFAO!Originally Posted by ted3
MooWaHahaha! ROTMFFLMFAO!Originally Posted by ted3
Originally Posted by Movieman
qft!Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
You sure, I thought E4xxx was 800MHz FSB?Originally Posted by Vassili
Originally Posted by Movieman
qft!Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
Must be getting mixed up with Celerons...
CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W
That's pretty cool. Starting at an effective 200 fsb instead of a 266 fsb and having a multiplier of 12.
I'm excited to see people's results.
Yup.. Should do 3.2GHz "out of the box" with stock cooling and cheap-ass PC4300 DDR2.....Originally Posted by Noob-ftw
CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W
I would have bought this instead of my week 25 E6300, but I need a dual core.Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
It IS a dual core CPU....Originally Posted by Noob-ftw
Just missing VT technology... No biggie...
CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W
Its a few seconds faster then my old barton was when overclocked so I do hope its the cheap celeron of the future or theres not much point to it.
Is there a spec sheet for this. Personally having tried dual core I wouldnt go back to single core even if it overclocked 100%
^^
I have no idea where all you guys are geting the "E4300 is single core" crap out of... It's a Conroe CPU with slower FSB and no Virtualization Tech. With the same multi as E6600, it should be a breeze to OC it past 3GHZ...
CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W
Originally Posted by Gam3Ra
it's $40 - $60!when old P4&celeon sold out.
1/3 cost of Conroe single core A64 killer
but it comes too late.i dont want single core CPU any more
Last edited by wy4711; 11-02-2006 at 05:31 PM.
The e4300 won't be out until the first quarter of 2007, but my guess is that CPU will be the best allendale for OCing. With DDR2 800 memory at stock speeds it could potentially pull a 100% OC.
How much does the Virtualization technology add to performance?
depends greatly on what you are doing. If it is say running VMware, it'll double your performance. If you are just gaming. It wouldn't matter at allOriginally Posted by Phosphate
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
I will keep my DOTHAN thank you... Specially now witht he X1950 PRO AGP coming....... The good thing about it is the OCing that is going to be great....
Alex
This might end up being the gamers CPU to get then.Originally Posted by nn_step
I was wondering the same thing but since you were doing such a great job of explaining it I stayed out.Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
I think the Single Core Conroe-L E1000 series got mixed up with the Dual Core E4300. Conron as the other guy Called them might be a great name and pretty good description. It was a Conron tested and not a Conroe-L, why?
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060921-7801.html
So the Pentium 1000 and Celeron 400 series aren't dead yet.Originally Posted by ARS
http://digitimes.com/mobos/a20060919PR207.html
So what he tested was in fact the New Celeron 4xx and NOT a true Conroe-L that "desperately" needs its cache.Originally Posted by DT
Originally Posted by Movieman
qft!Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
That depends! There are plenty of Dual Core patches out there. I'd honestly be shocked if folks really do hit much more than 3GHz with these processors that are re-cycled from the failure bin! That's all Celeron and Durons have always been.Originally Posted by Phosphate
They should be priced to sell and fill a void that Intel needs to fill.
Originally Posted by Movieman
qft!Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
Ya when I heard about the X1950 pro AGP . I got a large on my face . I will keep my dothan also . holidays around my house are going to very much fun with all the gaming computers . We can have a very merry LAN xmas.Originally Posted by AgonxOC
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4252
Last edited by Turtle 1; 11-03-2006 at 08:25 AM.
no it's not!Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
it's a single core. just look at the cpuz screen.
and yes cpuz is reading it correctly. those new single core "Core" based chips will be the new pentiums and celerons when intel runs out of netburst chips.
I think these chips will clock insane. the 800mhz bus, tiny L2 high multi and so cool.
combine these chips with mobo's natively capable of 1066mhz fsb and those chips will run an easy 1066 fsb with stock cooler and only very little extra vCore. and that price it's clocking heaven
Last edited by zert; 11-03-2006 at 10:37 AM.
Desktop
Intel Wolfdale E5200 @2.9Ghz
MSI P6N SLI Fi
Gigabyte Radeon HD4850ZL @ 680/2000
2GB Crucial BallistiX D9GMH 800 4-4-4-12 1T
250GB & 400GB Western Digital SATA2
Sound Blaster Audigy2 ZS
Enermax Liberty 500W
Air Cooling (Arctic Freezer 7 Pro)
Originally Posted by luihed
I know Conroe-L is single core but E4300 is dual.... It got mixed into the thread, when somebody tried comparing the two.... So, you're right, and..... I'm right...Originally Posted by zert
CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W
Damn...Originally Posted by Phosphate
Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
Bike: ZX6R
don't be so rude with optyOriginally Posted by LagunaX
I did 33.6sec quite easily with a A64 3200+@2.5GHz and poor tccd @250 2.5-3-3-6
this new cpu performs like a good K8 with 1M of cache
edit : at least, stock frequency
but no cold bug so oc is going to by interesting on this cpu
Last edited by metalazzo; 11-03-2006 at 04:53 PM.
A64 @2.7~2.8GHz should get you less than 30secs in 1M. And 3GHz somewhere north of 27secs.
I don't check my PMs very often.
Here's a review of the Conroe L with 1 mb cache runnning @ 2.8 GHz . Its a bit more powerful than a AMD 64 and should O/C to 3.6 easily
http://www.oc.com.tw/article/0611/re...le.asp?id=5555
Bookmarks