Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 48 of 48

Thread: simple test of new Conroe-L

  1. #26
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by ted3
    Conron! Only 512kB cache, is it an AMD in disguise?? =)

    Seems like Intel is holding back too much, with 1MB L2 this would have been interesting for budget gaming. Doesnt really matter for me how well this Conron clocks, the cache will be too limiting.
    MooWaHahaha! ROTMFFLMFAO!
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  2. #27
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Vassili
    No it is not:
    Conroe-L =
    Single core
    800Mhz FSB
    512KB L2 cache

    Core 2 Duo E4300 (1.80GHz/533MHz FSB/2MB L2 cache)
    You sure, I thought E4xxx was 800MHz FSB?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    43

    Must be getting mixed up with Celerons...
    CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    494
    That's pretty cool. Starting at an effective 200 fsb instead of a 266 fsb and having a multiplier of 12.

    I'm excited to see people's results.

  5. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by Noob-ftw
    That's pretty cool. Starting at an effective 200 fsb instead of a 266 fsb and having a multiplier of 12.

    I'm excited to see people's results.
    Yup.. Should do 3.2GHz "out of the box" with stock cooling and cheap-ass PC4300 DDR2.....
    CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    494
    Quote Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
    Yup.. Should do 3.2GHz "out of the box" with stock cooling and cheap-ass PC4300 DDR2.....
    I would have bought this instead of my week 25 E6300, but I need a dual core.

  7. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by Noob-ftw
    I would have bought this instead of my week 25 E6300, but I need a dual core.
    It IS a dual core CPU....
    Just missing VT technology... No biggie...
    CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    296
    Its a few seconds faster then my old barton was when overclocked so I do hope its the cheap celeron of the future or theres not much point to it.

    Is there a spec sheet for this. Personally having tried dual core I wouldnt go back to single core even if it overclocked 100%

  9. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    43
    ^^
    I have no idea where all you guys are geting the "E4300 is single core" crap out of... It's a Conroe CPU with slower FSB and no Virtualization Tech. With the same multi as E6600, it should be a breeze to OC it past 3GHZ...
    CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W

  10. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by Gam3Ra
    That is VERY good result for 1core 512L2 nonOC'd
    Run your's Conroe's on 2.4ghz and you will see ~20+ SuperPI's (2cores 2/4MB L2 shared)
    With overclock (this will be monster with that FSB and little L2, small temperature = very good OC) this CPU will hit good PI, and if it's 80-100$ range will be good (A64 killer).

    it's $40 - $60!when old P4&celeon sold out.

    1/3 cost of Conroe single core A64 killer

    but it comes too late.i dont want single core CPU any more
    Last edited by wy4711; 11-02-2006 at 05:31 PM.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    The e4300 won't be out until the first quarter of 2007, but my guess is that CPU will be the best allendale for OCing. With DDR2 800 memory at stock speeds it could potentially pull a 100% OC.

    How much does the Virtualization technology add to performance?

  12. #37
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Phosphate
    The e4300 won't be out until the first quarter of 2007, but my guess is that CPU will be the best allendale for OCing.

    How much does the Virtualization technology add to performance?
    depends greatly on what you are doing. If it is say running VMware, it'll double your performance. If you are just gaming. It wouldn't matter at all
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  13. #38
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    277
    I will keep my DOTHAN thank you... Specially now witht he X1950 PRO AGP coming....... The good thing about it is the OCing that is going to be great....


    Alex

  14. #39
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    650
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    depends greatly on what you are doing. If it is say running VMware, it'll double your performance. If you are just gaming. It wouldn't matter at all
    This might end up being the gamers CPU to get then.

  15. #40
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
    ^^
    I have no idea where all you guys are geting the "E4300 is single core" crap out of... It's a Conroe CPU with slower FSB and no Virtualization Tech. With the same multi as E6600, it should be a breeze to OC it past 3GHZ...
    I was wondering the same thing but since you were doing such a great job of explaining it I stayed out.

    I think the Single Core Conroe-L E1000 series got mixed up with the Dual Core E4300. Conron as the other guy Called them might be a great name and pretty good description. It was a Conron tested and not a Conroe-L, why?

    http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060921-7801.html

    Quote Originally Posted by ARS
    DT also reveals that Conroe-L will be sold under the venerable Pentium and Celeron brand names. The Pentium-branded parts, which will be labeled with the E1000 sequence, will all have an 800MHz FSB and 1MB of L2 cache. The speed ratings are as follows: E1020 at 1.40GHz, E1040 at 1.60GHz, and E1060 at 1.80GHz.
    So the Pentium 1000 and Celeron 400 series aren't dead yet.

    http://digitimes.com/mobos/a20060919PR207.html

    Quote Originally Posted by DT
    The Pentium E1000 series will initially come in three models–E1060, E1040 and E1020–with respective core speed of 1.8GHz, 1.6GHz and 1.4GHz, indicated the makers. Specifications for the Celeron 400 have not been released, but the series will feature 512KB L2 cache and a 533MHz FSB, the makers added.
    So what he tested was in fact the New Celeron 4xx and NOT a true Conroe-L that "desperately" needs its cache.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  16. #41
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Phosphate
    This might end up being the gamers CPU to get then.
    That depends! There are plenty of Dual Core patches out there. I'd honestly be shocked if folks really do hit much more than 3GHz with these processors that are re-cycled from the failure bin! That's all Celeron and Durons have always been.

    They should be priced to sell and fill a void that Intel needs to fill.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  17. #42
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,533
    Quote Originally Posted by AgonxOC
    I will keep my DOTHAN thank you... Specially now witht he X1950 PRO AGP coming....... The good thing about it is the OCing that is going to be great....


    Alex
    Ya when I heard about the X1950 pro AGP . I got a large on my face . I will keep my dothan also . holidays around my house are going to very much fun with all the gaming computers . We can have a very merry LAN xmas.

    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4252
    Last edited by Turtle 1; 11-03-2006 at 08:25 AM.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Belgium, EU
    Posts
    502
    Quote Originally Posted by mzs_biteme
    It IS a dual core CPU....
    no it's not!
    it's a single core. just look at the cpuz screen.
    and yes cpuz is reading it correctly. those new single core "Core" based chips will be the new pentiums and celerons when intel runs out of netburst chips.

    I think these chips will clock insane. the 800mhz bus, tiny L2 high multi and so cool.
    combine these chips with mobo's natively capable of 1066mhz fsb and those chips will run an easy 1066 fsb with stock cooler and only very little extra vCore. and that price it's clocking heaven
    Last edited by zert; 11-03-2006 at 10:37 AM.
    Desktop
    Intel Wolfdale E5200 @2.9Ghz
    MSI P6N SLI Fi
    Gigabyte Radeon HD4850ZL @ 680/2000
    2GB Crucial BallistiX D9GMH 800 4-4-4-12 1T
    250GB & 400GB Western Digital SATA2
    Sound Blaster Audigy2 ZS
    Enermax Liberty 500W
    Air Cooling (Arctic Freezer 7 Pro)


    Quote Originally Posted by luihed
    I like my rams like I like my women.... naked and tight

  19. #44
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by zert
    no it's not!
    it's a single core.
    I know Conroe-L is single core but E4300 is dual.... It got mixed into the thread, when somebody tried comparing the two.... So, you're right, and..... I'm right...
    CPU: i3 540 @ 4.3GHz, Mobo: Gigabyte GA-H55M-D2H, Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 48, RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Gold 1333MHz, Video: GTS 250, PS: Raidmax Modular 630W

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    eu/hungary/budapest.tmp
    Posts
    1,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Phosphate
    The e4300 won't be out until the first quarter of 2007
    Damn...
    Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
    mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
    Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
    Bike: ZX6R

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    wine city
    Posts
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by LagunaX
    Ugh, those superpi times look like an opteron 165/170 at 2.7-2.8ghz!

    Get Coolaler to put his tuniq tower 120 on it and see how far it can go on air!
    don't be so rude with opty
    I did 33.6sec quite easily with a A64 3200+@2.5GHz and poor tccd @250 2.5-3-3-6
    this new cpu performs like a good K8 with 1M of cache
    edit : at least, stock frequency
    but no cold bug so oc is going to by interesting on this cpu
    Last edited by metalazzo; 11-03-2006 at 04:53 PM.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    408
    A64 @2.7~2.8GHz should get you less than 30secs in 1M. And 3GHz somewhere north of 27secs.
    I don't check my PMs very often.

  23. #48
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,533
    Here's a review of the Conroe L with 1 mb cache runnning @ 2.8 GHz . Its a bit more powerful than a AMD 64 and should O/C to 3.6 easily

    http://www.oc.com.tw/article/0611/re...le.asp?id=5555

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •