I have been running benches to try to determine the best overall timings for my RAM in my system.
I already know what is best for CAS-TRCD-TRP timings (lower = better obviously)
But i am messing with TRAS right now, trying to figure out the best possible setting.
Now normally i'd assume lower = better, but does it?
I'd love to be able to run games & 3DMark forever to test this, but it's simply too time-consuming to do to figure it out.
So i've been running SuperPI & Everest.
I run each bench at least 4 times & average the results for consistency.
With SuperPI, lower TRAS = better.
But with the Everest benches, it doesn't seem that way.
What i'm wondering is if anyone knows what will translate into real-world performance better.
I'll post my SuperPI & Everest average for 5-5-5-10 vs. 5-5-5-9:
SuperPI 1.5 XS 1M:
5-5-5-12
16.8595
5-5-5-10
16.8435
5-5-5-9
16.8400
Obviously, lower - better.
But here's Everest's averages:
(Higher is better excepting latency bench)
5-5-5-10
read - 14450.75
write - 7656
copy - 6589.75
latency - 61.9
5-5-5-9
read - 14430.5
write - 7654.25
copy - 6576.25
latency - 61.825
With the exception of latency, all Everest scores are better with a 10 TRAS than a 9, opposite of SuperPI...
Input would be appreciated
Bookmarks