hmmm, very interesting indeed.
hmmm, very interesting indeed.
Originally Posted by pcdoc1
Well, that's what i meant by next-gen. Faster FSB speeds. And i think we need it. Sometimes ya gotta read between the lines, i guess. It wasn't that they wanted us not to have it because it was working already, more that it DIDN'T work. The chipset revision confirms this, and why in the first place I mentioned the chipsets "sucking".
Anyhoo...
That's a great write-up FCG.
fantastic work FCG and Tony!Originally Posted by freecableguy
BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 UNOFFICIAL THREAD
BIOSTAR TPOWER BOLT MOD FOR HEATPIPE AND HEATSINK
BIOSTAR TPOWER I45 BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE
ABIT IP35 PRO HEATPIPE MOD
ABIT IP35 PRO BIOS FLASHING PROCEDURE
IP35 Pro: 9650@4000Mhz, par overclocker; Freezone Elite; 4Gb GSkill DDR-800@DDR-1068 (2 x 2gb); XFX 8800 GTS; Areca 8X PCIe in Raid 0 working at 4x speed; 4-250 Gb (single platter) 7200.10 drives; Giga 3DAurora case with side window.
Great value & finding !
Vote sticky !
I don't understand all.. you talking abaout is that, 7x400 and 8x400 is the same performance?
I understand the default multiplier issue, but what about on an X6800? I'm assuming that whatever multiplier you set becomes 'default' and no overclocking of the NB core clock happens?
same or very similar performance, but very different levels of stability depending on the default multiplier of the CPU.Originally Posted by Gam3Ra
say you have a E6400 that has a default multiplier of 8.
well, you take the default multiplier, divide it by the multiplier you set, and then multiply it by the FSB you set, and then you get the Northbridge chipset clock.
so 8/8 x 400 = for 400 mhz or 1600 mhz on the chipset clock.
but then just lower the multiplier to 7, and stability should change cause your stressing the chipset even more.
8/7 x 400 = 457 mhz or 1829 mhz on the chipset clock.
even though all you did was change the multiplier.
so the default multiplier is the leas stressful multiplier to use, but it's also the most limiting in most cases, cause it's easier to do 7x 500 then it is to do 8 x 500.
upon learning all this, I think now its way easier to spot problems when overclocking conroes, so thanks FCG
Wow, this info is great, thanks for share Tony and FCG
Nice explanation also.Originally Posted by Kunaak
Interesting stuff, I'll just keep default multi on from now on all 965 boards.
Yup. So, in confs like this, the NB might be crying (that was without vmods and stock passive/pipe heatsink)
E6600 @ 6x500 = 3.0GHz
NBCC = (9/6)*500 = 750MHz (3000MHz data rate)
Tony, which BIOS did you use? 507 or something else?
well, I still have to wonder about things like this...Originally Posted by corvus_corax
see, so far, I cannot even begin to guess how things like EIST, effect the chipset clock... cause EIST actively changes the Multiplier in windows.
so I assume, getting 6 x 500 wouldnt be too hard, if you did it from within windows, by adjusting the multiplier with a tool like Systool, or or Crystal CPUID, then clockgening your way up...
I think the NBCC would stay the same... atleast, theres no way for me to test this idea yet... Sisoftsandra... like always, does not detect changes within windows, and will not read anything other then its boot up speeds.
so does this apply to all 965 chipsets or just the P5B so far?
good findings Tony and FCG
Is this true for 975 too ?
Comp 1 : NCASE M1, Asus Z170I PRO Gaming, Intel i7-6700K, G.Skill 2x4Gb 3466MHz, Samsung 950 Pro (512), Samsung 840 Pro (256), WD Red (5TB), Asus nVidia GTX 980 4Gb, Silverstone SX600-G, LG 34UM95
Comp 2 : Commodore Amiga 4000D, Cyberstorm MK2 68060 50Mhz 128Mb, Cybervision 64 4Mb, FastATA MK-VI, Indivision AGA MK2cr
Comp 3 : Commodore Amiga 600, Vampire 600 V2 128Mb, Indivision ECS, 32Gb CF
amazing news tony & FCG
but all this is only for the p5b or works also for the ds3,ds4,dq6 etc?
Pc Server: Amd Opteron 170 Dual Core 2000@3100Mhz, Dfi Lanparty Nf4 Sli-DR AD0, 2x1Gb Crucial Ballistix 280Mhz Cas 3-3-3-8 , Nvidia XFX 8800 GTS 512Mb , Matrox RT X100 Pro Video editing Card , Dexatek Sphere DVB-S Card , 4x1000Gb Western Digital 7200 Sata In Raid , 4x500Gb Western Digital 7200 Sata In Raid, 2xSamsung 20x Dvd-Rw , Thermaltake 1500Watt Mod , Dell 24' Lcd Black and much much more
Pc Desktop: Intel E8400 3000@4200Mhz, Asus Maximus Formula SE , 2x1Gb Crucial Ballistix Tracer Pc8500 D9GMH , Nvidia XFX 8800GTS 512Mb , 1x200Gb Maxtor 7200 Eide , Nec Dvd-Rw 3520, Ocz Powerstream 600Watt........
Pc Desktop 2: Intel Q6600 G0 2400@3800MHz , Dfi DK P35 T2RS , 2x1Gb Crucial Ballistix Tracer Pc8500 D9GMH , Nvidia Zotac AMP 8800GT , 1x200Gb Maxtor 7200 Eide , Thermaltale 750Watt Mod .......
Pc Laptop: Dell Xps Gen2 , Centrino Sonoma 2,0Ghz , Ram DDR2 Kingston 2x1Gb 533Mhz , Nvidia 6800Ultra 256 Gddr3 , Ibm 60gb 7200 , Lcd 17'UltraWide With TrueLife, DvdRW-Dual....
Pc Tablet: Toshiba Portege M200 , Centrino 1,5Ghz , Ram 2x512mb 400Mhz , Nvidia 5200 , Ibm 60gb 7200 ....
Tony and FCG: Thanks for all the hard work and incredible explanation.
All crunching 24/7, both cores 100% loaded
e6600es @ 3.8 (423) / p5W64WSPro / Noctua120 / Gskill 6400 / NV 7950 / 3 x Rptr150 Raid 0 / OCZ GmStr 700 / X-Fi
e6700 @ 3.6 (400) / p5b Dlx / Big Typhoon / Corsair 6400 / PCP&C Silencer 750
e6300 @ 3.465 (495) / p5B Dlx / Scythe Infinity / GSkill 8500 / Mushkin 550 PSU
e6400 @ 3.2 (400) / p5b Dlx / ThermalRight SI-128 / GSkill 6400hz / SunBeamTech 550 PSU
e6300 @ 3.08 (440) / gb S3 / Intel Stock Cooler / Gskill 6400hz
Like all the xtreme HELP you find at XtremeSystems?
Please HELP Xtreme Systems HELP fight Aids and Cancer on the World Community Grid!
Join the XtremeSystems WCG Team
Guys this is fact for all intel chipsets, 845 and up, they all work the same.
Chipset overclocking has probably caused no end of memory RMA's...I needed to ignite a spark in a few minds as i got testing this P5B, Kris was the first to add some info and come 4am my time we had enough for a second post.
Kris and I both have 6400's P5B Deluxe and 0507 or later bios files flashed, boards are unmodded and the rigs are not special in any way, infact Kris is testing on his multimedia rig so lets just hope all this chipset clocking has not damamged his OS instal
To get back on track, you have to realise with Intel platforms its not just set the multiplier push the fsb and go, there is a lot more to it than that. I also hope we have shown why Intel platforms are actually quite bad for memory reviews, the chipset strap and core clock has HUGE effects on stability as well as memory performance, infact some of the reviews out there showing dimms not doing rated speeds...im sorry but the chipset was crapping out and not the ram, you need to retest!!
We are looking to find the latency settings next, and see if we can force latency changes.Second to find is what effect forcing strap changes (like BSEL manipulation) has on the chipset clock etc, we all know a lower strap increases core clock but what else does it do. I am sure all this could be added into memset at some stage but what we need is it available from bios. I feel a huge begging email being sent to Oskar asking for a ton of options on his next Intel board...lets hope he comes thru
I will need to update my initial guide with the new info we found as we now know NB Core clock and how its found. If any of you guys what to add some to the article get posting, either here or on BE, i will add it in the mix and credit the authors as needed. We need to crack intel overclocking wide open so that everyone has a good idea of what is going on and why.
T
Last edited by Tony; 09-08-2006 at 05:44 AM.
Got a problem with your OCZ product....?
Have a look over here
Tony AKA BigToe
Tuning PC's for speed...Run whats fast, not what you think is fast
Sorry, but my english is very bad.. I read the topic. 400FSB 1:1 with the memory is faster that 401 1:1, but who is better.
Good info to know if the P5W DH bios ever allows us to change the multiplier.
Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 L723A930
3.6GHz 24/7
ASUS P5K Deluxe Mobo
Thermalright Ultima-90
Sapphire HD 2900 XT
2x1G Mushkin XP2 DDR2 800MHz
OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU
Antec 900 Case
2X WD Raptor
Vista
400 1:1 is faster than 401 1:1 due to an internal latency change happening at 401fsb.Originally Posted by Gam3Ra
Got a problem with your OCZ product....?
Have a look over here
Tony AKA BigToe
Tuning PC's for speed...Run whats fast, not what you think is fast
Very good reading guys
Though I dont see any BW decrease from 400 until 485FSB 1:1 9 defult multi, only BW gets higher (as it should) all the way to 485. Infact i get the BW decrease after 485FSB. Then it changes dramaticly to REALY low numbers like 300mb/s in sandra. Only latency seem to improve after that. dont know why though .
The whole world's hip and thats not cool !
Rip Van Hippy
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected ?
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak
-------------------------
I have always wonderd, why doesnt my DS3 boot up at 6 x 450, and struggles with 7 x 450, but does 8 x 450 with ease.
last night, after reading this, and learning the math on it... and testing alot, I find the bios seems to have a limit, of 499.
after 500 mhz exact on the NBCC, it will rarely if ever boot.
which I only found out last night from testing multipliers and FSB.
so it seems there may be actual allowable limits in BIOS, that hold various boards back abit.
like maybe gigabyte doesn't want this board at higher then 2 ghz on the NBCC...
its a very interesting thing to learn about, cause now I can more completly see where problems come up now, without blindly wondering if the board or ram are the problem.
however I have a interesting Question as well...
how does EIST effect the NBCC?
if you boot up at 8 x 400, then EIST takes the multiplier down to 6X during Idle, does the NBCC change, or stay the same?
if it stays the same, regaurdless of multiplier, then the key to overclocking really high, for say a E6700, would be to use clockgen in windows, while booting up with the default multiplier, and adjusting the multiplier from within windows...
assuming of course the NBCC stays the same, once actually in windows, and doesnt change with the multiplier.
Changing the multiplier in Windows also changes the NBCC on the fly. However, as far as I can tell EIST does not change the NBCC when temporarly throttling up and down on the CPU speed. Because the set multiplier really does change in the same sense as when it is manually selection via software/BIOS. That's about the best explaination I have so far. EIST is a completely different beast than manual multiplier selection and it shares about nothing in common with what we see in BIOS.
-FCG
Bookmarks