Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 106

Thread: So D9GKX is better than D9GMH?

  1. #76
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,933
    Quote Originally Posted by Philosophy
    I wouldnt know my mobo max's @ 460ish with my D9's
    4-4-3 though 2.1V
    run 4-4-4 @ 2.4v

  2. #77
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    97
    If D9GKX is better than D9GMH, then how come not very many people have the OCZ DDR2-900 Platinum EPP?

  3. #78
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Yay for Cheese
    If D9GKX is better than D9GMH, then how come not very many people have the OCZ DDR2-900 Platinum EPP?

    because thats a new ram with hardly any marketing?

    Anyways GKX is typically better then GMH, but not always, giel has tons of D9 GCT(lower binned then even GMH) that does better then GKX.

    Remember, they are all the same modules, so just because micron binns them as GMH or GKX doesnt mean that corsiar or ocz or gskill cant bin them on their own.

    That is how team sells GMH that is faster then GKX, they bin them like crazy.

    edit - Thanks very much to jmax for the part number of D9GCT!!
    Last edited by Revv23; 10-11-2006 at 10:27 PM.

  4. #79
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    597
    Revv23, D9GCT

  5. #80
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by jmax_oc
    Revv23, D9GCT

    Thank you sir!!!


  6. #81
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    It is this simple on average (this is spec from micron):

    D9GCT is 533
    D9GMH is 667
    D9GKX is 800

    of course you can sort the ics and get better results (not average as i posted above).

  7. #82
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178
    Any idea what chip is used in CELL SHOCK PC6400 4-4-4-12?
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  8. #83
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    597
    I saw somewhere the price for D9GCT, GMH and GKX chip...
    Can anyone help me finding this post ?

  9. #84
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Salt (Girona), Spain
    Posts
    230
    Quote Originally Posted by Ibinco
    Any idea what chip is used in CELL SHOCK PC6400 4-4-4-12?
    From what i read D9GMH for 6400, D9GMH or D9GKX for 8000 C5 and D9GKX for 8000 C4.


  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178
    gracias por el info Cordovader
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  11. #86
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Holy Land Profile: Sexy Overclocker
    Posts
    779
    You can't go act like a noob and ask "D9GMH vs. D9GKX, which is better?".
    The D9GKX are not "better" then D9GMH, although from what I've seen it can operate at higher frequency when it goes to voltage ratio.
    But when you look at maximum frequency, you can clearly see one is not better then the other, and if you look closer you will notice that some D9GMH can way outperform any D9GKX.
    Basically, both are great.

  12. #87
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    With active cooling (80mm fan blowing directly on the sticks) is o.k. to put 2.6v for 24/7 use on either bins?
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. #88
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hhw
    Posts
    4,036
    I orderd some OCZ2TA1000VX22GK two dayes ago at a dutch online retailer, didn't get a confirmation email so I called them twice today as they went out off stock 20 minutes after I placed the order and posted it here... yet no one repleid

    Anyway, twice they told me that yes they had it in stock and I seemed to have gotten their only pair. It was internally packaged and probably already shipped out to the postal service but I haven't gotten a confirmation email because they didn't get the shipping number yet.

    I got a funny feeling though... Hehe well it will be the most expensive single part I bought upto now and hopefully from now on

    Hoping my D9GMH will be exceptional lol, for the rest I concur with Mr. Popo uptil now no signs off one being consistently better then the other afaik
    Last edited by Marvin_The_Martian; 10-17-2006 at 01:50 PM.

  14. #89
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by nicepun
    With active cooling (80mm fan blowing directly on the sticks) is o.k. to put 2.6v for 24/7 use on either bins?
    maybe...

    2.4 is high, 2.6 is really high, i run mine at 2.7v... will they live long and prosper?

    Well, my fingers are crossed. .


    For the record G.S. Tech reccomends no higher then 2.4 for 24/7 IIRC

  15. #90
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    1,692
    Micron seem to have quite lazy employees working in their "binning department"

    These modules are based on MT47H64M8B6-37E (3.7ns, D9GCT) icīs and Brain Power B62URCE 1.0 PCB.

    With 2.2V they can do 6hr+ HCI Memtest at 400MHz and 3-3-3-4 settings.

    With higher voltage (2.65V) they can easily pass SuperPI 8M calculation at 470MHz with 3-3-3-4 settings. Additional cooling is required of course.



    http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=134632



    Hand picked pair?
    Certainly, but the difference between the best and the worst pair was hardly worth of mentioning.


  16. #91
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Camping your spawn :)
    Posts
    1,732
    Nice set there stilt..

    I wish I had a decent mobo to allow this Kit of team 667 GMH to got their freak on..

    This dam DS3 is also holding my 6300 back as well

    One day ill get a p5b Deluxe in hands and see what these babies can really do..
    Join the XS WCG team and do your part to help save the world..
    ^^^Click here to start folding for the soon to be number one team in the world..^^^

    Main rig: Gigabyte DS3/6300@3.2 7950 GX2/Server:Expert/165@2.9/PCI vid/Wifes:ASrock Dual SATA2/3800@2.4/X800XTAIW/Kids:165@2.7/X850XTPE

    "A computer beat me in chess, but it was no match when it came to kickboxing"
    -Emo Philips

  17. #92
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    i got some inside info:

    D9GCT is 533 cheapest one can also take high volts
    D9GMH is 667 best for high volts and tight latencies
    D9GKX is 800 bad for high volts and tight latencies (best for low volts)

  18. #93
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Camping your spawn :)
    Posts
    1,732
    ^^^HMMM verrrry interesting^^^
    Ive been trying to figure this out forever, thanks for putting this into perspective..
    Join the XS WCG team and do your part to help save the world..
    ^^^Click here to start folding for the soon to be number one team in the world..^^^

    Main rig: Gigabyte DS3/6300@3.2 7950 GX2/Server:Expert/165@2.9/PCI vid/Wifes:ASrock Dual SATA2/3800@2.4/X800XTAIW/Kids:165@2.7/X850XTPE

    "A computer beat me in chess, but it was no match when it came to kickboxing"
    -Emo Philips

  19. #94
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Holy Land Profile: Sexy Overclocker
    Posts
    779
    Quote Originally Posted by metro.cl
    i got some inside info:

    D9GCT is 533 cheapest one can also take high volts
    D9GMH is 667 best for high volts and tight latencies
    D9GKX is 800 bad for high volts and tight latencies (best for low volts)
    This "inside info", is already well known.
    D9GKX are pretty good under low V's.
    But, D9GMH loves the "extra" V's.

  20. #95
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by metro.cl
    i got some inside info:

    D9GCT is 533 cheapest one can also take high volts
    D9GMH is 667 best for high volts and tight latencies
    D9GKX is 800 bad for high volts and tight latencies (best for low volts)

    MT47H64M8B6-5E (D9GCW, CL3)
    MT47H64M8B6-37E (D9GCT, CL4)
    MT47H64M8B6-3 (D9GMH, CL5)
    MT47H64M8B6-25E (D9GKX, CL5)

    As far as I know all of the IC´s listed above are based on the very same Revision D design, which in this case is packed in B6 casing (60-pin FBGA 10x10).

    There shouldn´t be any technical difference between these IC´s, they are just rated to different frequencies and IDD parameters (latencies).

    The difference should be as similar as the difference between Winbond BH-5 & BH-6
    Last edited by The Stilt; 11-02-2006 at 03:33 AM.

  21. #96
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    Quote Originally Posted by The Stilt
    MT47H64M8B6-5E (D9GCW, CL3)
    MT47H64M8B6-37E (D9GCT, CL4)
    MT47H64M8B6-3 (D9GMH, CL5)
    MT47H64M8B6-25E (D9GKX, CL5)

    As far as I know all of the ICīs listed above are based on the very same Revision D design, which in this case is packed in B6 casing (60-pin FBGA 10x10).

    There shouldnīt be any technical difference between these ICīs, they are just rated to different frequencies and IDD parameters (latencies).

    The difference should be as similar as the difference between Winbond BH-5 & BH-6
    i knew the same thing before, but talking to someone at RD from a well known ram manufacturer he told me this, my guess is that they are binned in a diferent way, so the whole this is better couse is rate for 800mhz isnt true when overclocking, i've been told that ghm can do 1200mhz 2.4v if cherry picked on 965 platform (cas 4)

  22. #97
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    jkt
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Popo
    You can't go act like a noob and ask "D9GMH vs. D9GKX, which is better?".
    The D9GKX are not "better" then D9GMH, although from what I've seen it can operate at higher frequency when it goes to voltage ratio.
    But when you look at maximum frequency, you can clearly see one is not better then the other, and if you look closer you will notice that some D9GMH can way outperform any D9GKX.
    Basically, both are great.
    Sry noob question, how come 3ns chip oc better than 2.5ns chip?

  23. #98
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Holy Land Profile: Sexy Overclocker
    Posts
    779
    Quote Originally Posted by bengkiam
    Sry noob question, how come 3ns chip oc better than 2.5ns chip?
    You need to understand everything on your PC is consuming power.
    So, when you use less V's for one thing, you can use more for the other.

  24. #99
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    820
    so whats the list of ram that currently come with GKX

  25. #100
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    jkt
    Posts
    15
    Ok, so the simple explaination is a 3.0v D9GMH will outperform a 3.0v D9GKX with maximizer, right?
    Last edited by bengkiam; 11-03-2006 at 06:07 AM.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •