Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33

Thread: WCG Bench?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,060

    WCG Bench?

    Can someone do this?

    CPU Z:2700 2k1:27952 2k3:12282 2k5:5763 PCM05 AQ3
    Opteron 165 s939_____OCZ RAM/PSU_____BBATI X800xl

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    NW Ohio
    Posts
    3,334
    Not sure what your looking for, but here it is on my 'ho @ stock speeds with tons of stuff going.

    8/27/2006 2:15:11 AM|| 4796 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
    8/27/2006 2:15:11 AM|| 22023 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
    Donate to XtremeSystems!

    Workstation: Intel Core i7 4770, Asus Maximus VI Gene, 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3-1866, eVGA SC GTX Titan, 256GB Crucial M4, Corsair HX850, Corsair H100i. Corsair Carbide 350D
    Fileserver: 2x AMD Opteron 2425HE, Supermicro H8DME-2, 24GB DDR2-667, Supermicro 846TQ 24bay Chassis, Redundant 920w, 256 Crucial M4 boot, 20TB Storage
    Notebook Asus Zenbook UX32VD-DH71, Intel Core i7 3517u, 10GB DDR3-1600, 256GB Crucial M4, Geforce GT 620M

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,060
    For some reason I was thinking there was a D20L Bench, but it was just the one you do in BOINC. Are people using optimized clients in WCG?

    CPU Z:2700 2k1:27952 2k3:12282 2k5:5763 PCM05 AQ3
    Opteron 165 s939_____OCZ RAM/PSU_____BBATI X800xl

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,060
    8/27/2006 2:20:34 AM|| 3730 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
    8/27/2006 2:20:34 AM|| 12020 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

    CPU Z:2700 2k1:27952 2k3:12282 2k5:5763 PCM05 AQ3
    Opteron 165 s939_____OCZ RAM/PSU_____BBATI X800xl

  5. #5
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    NW Ohio
    Posts
    3,334
    Yep optimized here. I never changed anything since the last time I ran Rosetta. Just attached to WCG.
    Donate to XtremeSystems!

    Workstation: Intel Core i7 4770, Asus Maximus VI Gene, 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3-1866, eVGA SC GTX Titan, 256GB Crucial M4, Corsair HX850, Corsair H100i. Corsair Carbide 350D
    Fileserver: 2x AMD Opteron 2425HE, Supermicro H8DME-2, 24GB DDR2-667, Supermicro 846TQ 24bay Chassis, Redundant 920w, 256 Crucial M4 boot, 20TB Storage
    Notebook Asus Zenbook UX32VD-DH71, Intel Core i7 3517u, 10GB DDR3-1600, 256GB Crucial M4, Geforce GT 620M

  6. #6
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    1,154
    Running Crunch3rs optimised files, like WesM63 I just detached Rosetta and added WCG. Running Allendale E6400 ES@405x8=3.243GHz.

    27/08/2006 09:10:18||Benchmark results:
    27/08/2006 09:10:18|| Number of CPUs: 2
    27/08/2006 09:10:18|| 5756 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
    27/08/2006 09:10:18|| 26716 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
    27/08/2006 09:10:18||Finished CPU benchmarks
    Asus P9X79 Pro | i7 3820 @ 4.875GHz | 4x4GB Corsair DDR3-1600| 3x 6970 Lightnings watercooled| Corsair 1200W PSU | Mountain Mods Ascension case |

  7. #7
    Xtreme Teddie
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Southend on Sea UK
    Posts
    77
    With a quorum of 3 that WCG uses sometimes you are lucky and the average is over three with crunch3r 5.5, others not. In other words sometimes you get what you claim.

    The more who use 5.5 the higher the average.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    835
    Quote Originally Posted by carl.h
    With a quorum of 3 that WCG uses sometimes you are lucky and the average is over three with crunch3r 5.5, others not. In other words sometimes you get what you claim.

    The more who use 5.5 the higher the average.
    Agreed Carl, I've noticed that I'm getting more instances of getting my full credit claim since you guys have been over at WCG

    Keep installing that client folks!
    DC Prostitute - Crunching In Memory of My Dad

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,060
    So I should re-install using cruncher or it doesnt really matter?>

    CPU Z:2700 2k1:27952 2k3:12282 2k5:5763 PCM05 AQ3
    Opteron 165 s939_____OCZ RAM/PSU_____BBATI X800xl

  10. #10
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Zirconia,NC
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Adywebb
    Agreed Carl, I've noticed that I'm getting more instances of getting my full credit claim since you guys have been over at WCG

    Keep installing that client folks!

    Is that BOINC points or WCG points??? Aren't they two entirely different things???

    I have taken 6 of my boxes and will monitor them closer than the rest. 4 are DC 3800's and the other are single core 3000's. 3 of the DC are opt and one not and one of each for the 3000's.

    Benchmark for opt 3800=4476/14554, non-opt=2440/4507
    Benchmark for opt 3000=4403/14296, non-opt=2444/4532

    early result for me on the DC3800 is a dead even point production. I only have about 4 days on the project so these #'s may change dramatically.

    I am running the Aids project as it "seems" to me to produce more points in preliminary information.

    The X2's are the biggest thing I have at the moment
    mike

    ROADTRIP For my DAD 09-11-07 and MA 10-28-11

    comhar a neartú agus a leathnú

  11. #11
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    835
    Quote Originally Posted by mike047
    Is that BOINC points or WCG points??? Aren't they two entirely different things???

    I am running the Aids project as it "seems" to me to produce more points in preliminary information.
    I was talking Boinc points Mike - WCG points are calculated by multiplying Boinc Credit Granted by 7 (1 Boinc Point = 7 WCG points)

    I know its confusing having 2 different points systems flying around, but thats due to WCG starting as a non-boinc project years ago using the UD Agent - even today only about 15% of members use Boinc

    As regards Aids units producing more points, I think its only seems that way because they take 3-4 times longer to crunch - overall the points for each type crunched should be around the same.
    DC Prostitute - Crunching In Memory of My Dad

  12. #12
    XSDCMF
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    5,473
    My latest bench in WCG

    8/27/2006 12:48:44 PM||Benchmark results:
    8/27/2006 12:48:44 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
    8/27/2006 12:48:44 PM|| 6138 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
    8/27/2006 12:48:44 PM|| 28547 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

    ~~~~~~

    Switched out the E6400 from the DS-3 ( it has to go back ), and dropped in an OEM E6600. Slowly making my way up, after having a few problems OCing, initially. I'm at 3420 and rising.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~

    Benching in BOINC is not what it used to be, but then again I would have built this system even if I'd never heard of BOINC...

    This quoram system is wierd. I usually only get about a fourth, or so, of what is claimed for a finished result. It almost seems as what is the point of using a C2D machine ( or the like ). However, ya gotta remember that though you may not be getting the higher credit per result ( usually ), you'll be ripping thru results very quickly. So it adds up and the CPUs do show their worth.
    Crunching to Crush Cancer
    Somebody, Stop Me!



  13. #13
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    if a couple P1's crunched the same WU as you, your granted credit goes down the hole in a hurry.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  14. #14
    XSDCMF
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    5,473
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil
    if a couple P1's crunched the same WU as you, your granted credit goes down the hole in a hurry.
    Yeah, I know...

    Like Ady and Carl said, the more good machines on these WUs, running 5.5.0, the better.
    If the number of decent crunchers started outnumbering old slugs that would be a very good thing!
    Crunching to Crush Cancer
    Somebody, Stop Me!



  15. #15
    Here to help
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,977
    Isnt this quorum benchmark much worse than the rosetta one??????? Faster cpus subsidise all the slower ones!!!

    Is it as crude as you get the slowest time the fastest time one from the middle and then do a mean average and every one gets those points?

    Regards

    John.

    "Thermodynamics is a funny subject. The first time you go through it, you don't understand it at all. The second time you go through it, you think you understand it, except for one or two points. The third time you go through it, you know you don't understand it, but by that time you are so used to that subject, it doesn't bother you anymore".

  16. #16
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by pythagoras
    Isnt this quorum benchmark much worse than the rosetta one??????? Faster cpus subsidise all the slower ones!!!

    Is it as crude as you get the slowest time the fastest time one from the middle and then do a mean average and every one gets those points?

    Regards

    John.
    You got it right John. I think this time we go in totally understanding the rules of the game and know that we're not going to rocket to the top due to the quorum system but we will get there and the project has good goals and on top of that has a pick and choose to make itself more adaptable to the members.We'll have some fun, do a good project and come together as a group again.
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,493
    Agree MM. Currently I am on the HIV and the HPF2 thing. Suggest that every one may want to pick two not only one. Some of these projects seem a bit small and they may occasionaly run out of work.

    Please note: the cancer project uses 750 MB of ram per WU ! So if you have only 1 MB of ram and runnig windows stay clear. If you are running a dual processor and have 2 MB of ram you may be able to get away with it. Otherwise, you will be swapping to HD.

    The quorum will affect the credits yes. So far 50% of claimed credits after 32 WUs. Not bad at all.

    And we can make it to the top position in 18 months if we manage to pull 100K per day.
    Dual Clovertown @ 3.2 GHz (stock Vcore), 4x1GB 667 FB-DIMMS, SM X7DAE, Silencer 610 PSU, Windows server 2K3 EE.
    (professionally built & generously hosted by movieman)

    AMD64 X2 4400+ @237x11 (1.39v), Corsair TwinX2048-3500LL @2.5-3-2-6-1T (2.75V), MSI K8N Neo4, Tagan 420W PSU, Windows XP Pro SP2.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Zirconia,NC
    Posts
    1,073
    If I can make 60k+ ppd on the AMD stuff I run, the guys with the real tools will be able to make real headway. If Victor will play, we can get to the top.

    As MM said, we know what to expect as we go in..
    mike

    ROADTRIP For my DAD 09-11-07 and MA 10-28-11

    comhar a neartú agus a leathnú

  19. #19
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    835
    Quote Originally Posted by pythagoras
    Isnt this quorum benchmark much worse than the rosetta one??????? Faster cpus subsidise all the slower ones!!!

    Is it as crude as you get the slowest time the fastest time one from the middle and then do a mean average and every one gets those points?

    Regards

    John.
    Not quite John - everyone in the quorum gets the credit claimed of the middle scoring one.

    Heres an example of one of my recent results, note that the fastest CPU did it in half the time of the others but claimed 60% less credit as it wasn't using an opti, so it isn't always the slowest CPU that can bring things down

    Workunit Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
    faah0767_ bdb820_ mx1hef_ dry_ 05 Valid 08/24/2006 20:05:32 08/25/2006 02:20:26 3.21 62 / 172
    faah0767_ bdb820_ mx1hef_ dry_ 05 Valid 08/24/2006 20:02:24 08/27/2006 03:24:17 7.23 172 / 172
    faah0767_ bdb820_ mx1hef_ dry_ 05 Valid 08/24/2006 19:58:42 08/27/2006 21:30:59 6.88 172 / 172
    DC Prostitute - Crunching In Memory of My Dad

  20. #20
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Zirconia,NC
    Posts
    1,073
    mike

    ROADTRIP For my DAD 09-11-07 and MA 10-28-11

    comhar a neartú agus a leathnú

  21. #21
    Here to help
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,977
    Quote Originally Posted by Adywebb
    Not quite John - everyone in the quorum gets the credit claimed of the middle scoring one.

    Heres an example of one of my recent results, note that the fastest CPU did it in half the time of the others but claimed 60% less credit as it wasn't using an opti, so it isn't always the slowest CPU that can bring things down

    Workunit Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
    faah0767_ bdb820_ mx1hef_ dry_ 05 Valid 08/24/2006 20:05:32 08/25/2006 02:20:26 3.21 62 / 172
    faah0767_ bdb820_ mx1hef_ dry_ 05 Valid 08/24/2006 20:02:24 08/27/2006 03:24:17 7.23 172 / 172
    faah0767_ bdb820_ mx1hef_ dry_ 05 Valid 08/24/2006 19:58:42 08/27/2006 21:30:59 6.88 172 / 172
    Is that middle score the mean or the median?

    Regards

    John.

    "Thermodynamics is a funny subject. The first time you go through it, you don't understand it at all. The second time you go through it, you think you understand it, except for one or two points. The third time you go through it, you know you don't understand it, but by that time you are so used to that subject, it doesn't bother you anymore".

  22. #22
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    835
    Quote Originally Posted by meshmesh
    Agree MM. Currently I am on the HIV and the HPF2 thing. Suggest that every one may want to pick two not only one. Some of these projects seem a bit small and they may occasionaly run out of work
    The HPF2 project is not running at the moment as there is a problem with the units - they are beta testing them at the moment to iron out the bugs.
    Theres no problem just running one project - all you need to do is go to your boinc device profiles at WCG and tick the "If there is no work available for my computer for the projects I have selected above, please send me work from another project" box

    Quote Originally Posted by meshmesh
    Please note: the cancer project uses 750 MB of ram per WU ! So if you have only 1 MB of ram and runnig windows stay clear. If you are running a dual processor and have 2 MB of ram you may be able to get away with it. Otherwise, you will be swapping to HD.
    Although 750MB is the minimum spec, in reality it doesn't use anywhere near that much, its just put there as a precautionary measure - I run several windows machines with 1MB of ram, including a dually with only 1MB and have had no problems so far.
    DC Prostitute - Crunching In Memory of My Dad

  23. #23
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by mike047
    Holy Points Batman! Now how the hell am I going to catch you?
    ( The answer is I won't! )

    Hey guys, did I see LP there? Who is that? Our lady friend from Las Vegas??
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    835
    Quote Originally Posted by pythagoras
    Is that middle score the mean or the median?

    Regards

    John.
    Median, if it had been the Mean then in my example everyone would have got 135
    Last edited by [XC] Adywebb; 08-27-2006 at 02:42 PM.
    DC Prostitute - Crunching In Memory of My Dad

  25. #25
    Here to help
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,977
    I really do not see how an xtremesystems team would ever go for a points system like this.

    If the points are as stated I could buy 100 $50 sloths off ebay and score 100x the points that someone on here could score with 1 state of the art system, overclocked to the max.

    Wheres the incentive?

    Regards

    John.

    "Thermodynamics is a funny subject. The first time you go through it, you don't understand it at all. The second time you go through it, you think you understand it, except for one or two points. The third time you go through it, you know you don't understand it, but by that time you are so used to that subject, it doesn't bother you anymore".

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •