Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345
Results 101 to 104 of 104

Thread: XS Unite to get official SLI drivers for Intel

  1. #101
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by maverik-sg1 View Post
    I think that a better purchase would of been a 680i based motherboard and 2x 8800GTS 320MB units.

    I think with the release of that board Nvidia did finally do something right as performance is equal to best 975 boards around.
    Your kidding right? The 680die board?
    I tried EVGA, Abit, Asus ....... after 10 sets of memory.
    Corsair, GeIL, OCZ, Crucial, Muskin & 4 board RMA's
    ....... I went back to Abit AW9D-Max 975i, faster raid anyway
    on four drives, and it can handle 9 internal drives.

    Do you look at benchmarks?
    Not to mention...high numbers on my nvidia cards under phase cooling
    look like...well poo. On the ATI cards 27K on 3D05 looks like watching
    a HD DVD ....... no way to make the ATI cards drop quality for speed.

    8800GTS's how about 8800 GTX's SC or Ultra's?
    Not that it matters if your a nvidia fanboy your mind will never
    change. But the 2900's are way under rated for having all the
    world records on futuremark. I really have loved nvidia cards
    since the TI4800's but being stuck with their junk chipset just to
    use their cards! If the X38 can do SLI or CF I may still stay with ATI,
    not sure yet.
    ThermalTake
    Asus Rampage Extreme X980@4000
    3 X 4072 Viper Extreme 2000
    4 X EVGA 580 GTX's
    2 X 64 gig Crucial Real SSD Raid 0
    4 X SG 7200 32meg
    Plextor DVD/R, 2 X 1100w
    Toshiba 32" LCD TV

    HeatWare beast_usa

  2. #102
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Sacred birth place of Watercooling
    Posts
    4,689
    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaattttttttttttttttttt ttt
    Quote Originally Posted by skinnee View Post
    No, I think he had a date tonight...

    He and his EK Supreme are out for a night on the town!

  3. #103
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    468
    Well thanks for that attack - much appreciated.

    Not a fanboy just looking at the overall picture:

    Firstly it's now 2007 nearly 2008 - must we still look at 3dm05?

    I accept what you are saying and everyone has personal preferences, at this point in time I chose Nvidia over AMD.

    In a world where phase cooling, DI or Liquid nitorgen cooling is not something that everyone uses - Consider under air or even regular watercooling that people will use for gaming and normal PC use and the AMD GPU's have a distinct set of flaws:

    Consume too much power (much more than 8800 ultra for example)
    Generate too much heat (see above)

    What I am trying to say is that with the extra heat and power consumtpion using the cooling that 99% of the global population engage in (regular air or water cooling) the current AMD Line up will not live up to the hype generated in your post - certainly not much room to overclock or in real gaming perormance - it's no secret that todays cards (even the best ones) are not up to true DX10 gaming performance.

    In a world where we should all be doing our part to prevent global warming these factors 'should' be considered when purchasing any new products (not just PC parts) and in all honesty AMD have been weighed measured and left wanting in all this - hence why their fastest product is priced against the GTS.

    I don't dispute you claims about WR's etc.... but those are in abnormal conditions that regular joe's simply do not use - couple that with driver tweaks, personal tweaks etc and the result is often skewed to what the real world results would be.

    In the same way I embraced core 2 back in september last year after 4 years of AMD A64, I would swap my Nvidia cards in a heartbeat if I really thought there was something better out there.

    I apologise for going off topic here somewhat as this thread is not about all that.
    Last edited by maverik-sg1; 09-03-2007 at 01:24 AM.

  4. #104
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    29
    Well not meant as an attack sorry

    I just hear the same stuff from all the fanboys.

    They are slower, hotter, eat to much power

    I use water & phase on the cpu, my video is always air.

    I just don't see it my cards
    XFX 7800 GTX ..........35C NF4 SLI (cost $850)
    XFX 7900 GTX EE ......43C Intel SLI (cost $1300)
    XFX 7950 GTX2 EE......65C Intel SLI (cost $1650)
    ATI X1900XT ............60C CF.........(cost $922)
    Sapphire HD2900XT....43C CF.........(cost $987)

    Power hungry well kind of...they just need clean power.

    Benchmarks you can't tweak them.....that's what I was saying.
    All run HD DVD quality LOL
    Water CPU & Air video (they did hit 49C)
    3D05 24609
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3354006

    So as you can see from all my cards in only couple years.
    Nvidia is by far my favorite, but these new 2900 are just good
    cards. And people just need to see it's the truth.

    Again no attack sorry about that........

    I to begged nvidia to release the drivers, I sat on those 79's & 7950's
    so long just in-case they did......I just wasn't willing to spend $1800+
    to end up hacking drivers to work. So I went ATI and I'm very pleased
    with the cards.
    ThermalTake
    Asus Rampage Extreme X980@4000
    3 X 4072 Viper Extreme 2000
    4 X EVGA 580 GTX's
    2 X 64 gig Crucial Real SSD Raid 0
    4 X SG 7200 32meg
    Plextor DVD/R, 2 X 1100w
    Toshiba 32" LCD TV

    HeatWare beast_usa

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •