Dudes! He just posted 8sn SP 1M and you're still talking about AMD vs. Intel?!?!
Dudes! He just posted 8sn SP 1M and you're still talking about AMD vs. Intel?!?!
It's roughtly 25s total for each of the 4 instacnes of Super PI 1M, he was taken screenshots at 3 distinct time indexes.Originally Posted by SamHughe
My PC (It get's the job done)
|CPU: Core i7 970 Gulftown B1 Stepping 3.2/133 @ Stock | Heatsink & Fan: Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme + Yate Loon Fan | Motherboard: ASUS P6X58D-E Intel X58 Chipset + ICH10R BIOS 303 | Memory: 3x2GB Patriot PV236G1600LLKB DDR3-1600 8-8-8-24 RAM | Video Card: eVGA 02G-P4-2670-KR GeForce GTX 670 2048MB GK107 | Case: Antec P183 |Power Supply: Corsair CMPSU-750TX 750W ATX v2.2 |Optical Burner: LG WH14NS40 | Hard Drive 1: Intel SSDSA2MH160G2K5 160GB (149GB) G2 SSD SATA2 | Hard Drive 2: WD SSC-D0256SC-2100 256GB (238GB) SSD SATA2| Hard Drive 3: Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB (465GB) 7200RPM 16MB SATA2 | Hard Drive 4: Seagate ST3500320AS 500GB (465GB) 7200 RPM 32MB SATA2 | Hard Drive 5: Samsung HD103UJ 1TB (931GB) 7200 RPM 32MB SATA2 | Hard Drive 6: Samsung HX-DU020EB 2TB (1862GB) 5400 RPM 32MB USB2.0 | Sound Card: Auzentech X-Fi Prelude 7.1 | Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 Digital 5.1 | Monitor: Dell 3007WFP-HC 30inch S-IPS LCD 8ms @ 2560x1600 60HZ | Mouse: Logitech G500 | Keyboard: Logitech G510 | ISP: Rogers Ultimate 150/10 Mbps | Cable Modem: Hitron Gateway CDE-30364 | OS: Windows 7 Pro SP1 64Bit | Web Browser: Firefox 20/Chrome 26/Internet Explorer 10 | GPU Drivers: ForceWare 306.97 64Bit WHQL |
hehehehOriginally Posted by alpha0ne
Looks like the CPU-Load History graph would suggest otherwise.Originally Posted by coldpower27
i was wondering about this, do you add them up or something to get the results to compare to a single core, or how does that work?Originally Posted by coldpower27
OC 2.7g@cinebench2003
fast than 2.4g 2sec
mickeymouse has one but i think he had like one 7900GT at the time or something or atleast thats the only score i remember seeing from him wiht that, he was running at 3ghz and got like 7k something on 3dm06 with the single GTOriginally Posted by XFxGeforced
DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D [6/23 BIOS]
AMD Opteron 148 [CAB2E 0546GPMW] [257x11.0 @ v1.500] & Zalman CNPS7000B-CU
OCZ EL Platinum Rev. 2 2x512[207FSB @ 2-3-3-6 @ v2.80 1T]
DFI Ultra-D [6/23 BIOS]
eVGA 7800GT [470 / 1100]
Western Digital Caviar SE 250GB Serial ATA
Antec SmartPower 2.0 SP-500 ATX12V 500W Power Supply
Originally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer
Oh.... I really doubt it.
I think I just pooped a little.
PC Lab Qmicra V2 Case SFFi7 950 4.4GHz 200 x 22 1.36 volts
Cooled by Swiftech GTZ - CPX-Pro - MCR420+MCR320+MCR220 | Completely Silent loads at 62c
GTX 470 EVGA SuperClocked Plain stock
12 Gigs OCZ Reaper DDR3 1600MHz) 8-8-8-24
ASUS Rampage Gene II |Four OCZ Vertex 2 in RAID-0(60Gig x 4) | WD 2000Gig Storage
Theater ::: Panasonic G20 50" Plasma | Onkyo SC5508 Processor | Emotiva XPA-5 and XPA-2 | CSi A6 Center| 2 x Polk RTi A9 Front Towers| 2 x Klipsch RW-12d
Lian-LI HTPC | Panasonic Blu Ray 655k| APC AV J10BLK Conditioner |
spi@quadcores
change cores to single
spi@singlecore
singlecore is no better and make slower
ljwkefhklwehfkljef....i just shat myself....
...twice
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3200mhz 1.4v // Asus P5W DH Deluxe // eVGA Geforce 7950GX2 // 2GB Corsair XMS2-6400C4 @ 441mhz 4-4-4-12 // X-Fi XtremeMusic // 2 x 150GB Raptors (Raid-0) // 2 x 750GB Cuda's (Raid-1) // OCZ GameXStream 700watt
very nice indeed...
i||uSi0n^
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 *G0*
ASUS P5W DH Deluxe
G.Skill 2GBHZ DDR2-800Mhz (Dual Channel)
XFX Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB DDR-III XXX Edition
SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme Music
Seagate 500GB 7200.10 S-ATA-II 300 NCQ 16 MB Cache
Pioneer DVD-RW DVR-112D
Antec P180 Casing
Zalman CNPS9500 LED
Antec True Power Trio 550W Power Supply
Windows Vista Ultimate Edition 32-Bit
Samsung 206BW 20" Widescreen LCD
oc 2.8g@cinebench2003
broke 17s
this is sweet. I just wish I knew how much it was blowing everything out of the water..... I'm not a benchmarker in the past. or currently. but maybe the future.
I think that beats my XP Barton 2800+ @ 1.3 GHz someone touched the compy without permission..
oc 2.9g@cinebench2003
16.4S
oc 3.0g@cinebench2003
16.0S
Just for reference,Originally Posted by coolaler
The Quad Core PowerMac G5 2.5Ghz scored 1102
You've just gone mad.
This is the point were fast gets another meaning, Intel....
dual dualcore to be exact. Anyone got the benches hanging around for some comparrison?Originally Posted by cMw
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
As amazing as that cpu is, i think i might just go with E6600 this year and prolly E6800 or X6900 next year. I still prefer higher clock dual core since OC ability should be better, less heat. Hate to be a stickler, but the super pi 1M score wasnt that good, and it will prolly be $999. In that case, i think i am going for a X6900 4Ghz (or more) air 24/7 Well if its not $999 then count me in.
Last edited by theteamaqua; 06-20-2006 at 10:30 PM.
E6600 @ 3.6
IN9 32x MAX
EVGA 8800Ultra
750W
That's just brutal cinebench results!!
Intel FTW!
Beanna
Originally Posted by ethernalOriginally Posted by ethernalI would think that software needs to be (re-)written to take full advantage of four cores and beyond.Originally Posted by accord99
AskAboutComputers.com
Brutal, really brutal. You could play 2 games at the same time, and run Rosetta twice, and don't feel it :p
weyland.be | system specs
I'll eat my shorts when AMD/ATI can come out with something that can counter an C2DX8000 with QuadSLI 7950GX2 on a Intel 975X chipset board when official Forceware drivers come through.
Bookmarks