Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 38

Thread: SSE/2 Optimization Guide W/ Pics

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Arizona State
    Posts
    1,099

    SSE/2 Optimization Guide W/ Pics

    First exit out of boinc


    Download the latest version here http://calbe.dw70.de/boincw.html
    Use SSE for P3 and AMD Athlon XP/socket A semprons, and use the sse2 for all cpus on the socket 754, 939 or AM2 platform along with all Pentium 4's


    extract the files into C:/programfiles/Boinc folder, then say yes to all


    open up boinc and watch your benchmarks skyrocket

    Q6700
    MSI P35
    8GB OCZ
    2xHD 2900 XT
    PCP&C 1kw

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    311
    System restart is required to see difference in benchmark (on some systems)
    nice guide
    sticky.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    136
    the link isn't working for me.
    I have a new girlfriend, her name is Rossetta.

    FC BARCELONA CHAMPION OF THE WORLD!!!

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    179
    ya the link is down right now

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    22
    All the links to crunchr3 redirect to the boinc site. Perhaps someone can share the download files so the rest of us can optimize?

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    179
    I can email it to people if they like. Just give me a PM.

    P.S. I only have the SSE2 optimization downloaded so i can't really help anyone out with the others.
    Last edited by G3n3R@1; 06-03-2006 at 09:10 AM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    145
    just wanted to say that these optimizations really improved my scores:
    cpu test does:
    4620 floating point MIPS(Whetstone) per cpu
    8979 integer MIPS(Dhrystone)per cpu

    im on an opty 165 @ 2.7 hopefully to be 3ghz once i get my RD-30 setup

    ps. thanks general for the optimizations, much appreciated.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    381
    Quote Originally Posted by mrkram
    just wanted to say that these optimizations really improved my scores:
    cpu test does:
    4620 floating point MIPS(Whetstone) per cpu
    8979 integer MIPS(Dhrystone)per cpu

    im on an opty 165 @ 2.7 hopefully to be 3ghz once i get my RD-30 setup

    ps. thanks general for the optimizations, much appreciated.
    Im at 2.900 with opti 165 and i get 5xxx/16xxx points. Run the benchmark again
    Thermaltake Xaser 3 V2000a ALU
    Phenom x4 905e
    4G ddr3
    Ati radeon HD 4850 sapphire
    OCZ Vertex turbo 30G

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3
    @bobbywindel

    Cows to the rescue? We've got Crunch3r's clients there.

    http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/...82224#25882224

    Please host them somewhere yourself if you can, otherwise my ISP will kill me.

  10. #10
    XSDCMF
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    5,473
    Quote Originally Posted by DPC_Megaflix
    @bobbywindel

    Cows to the rescue? We've got Crunch3r's clients there.

    http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/...82224#25882224

    Please host them somewhere yourself if you can, otherwise my ISP will kill me.
    Thanks, Mr. Cow, that was nice of you.
    Crunching to Crush Cancer
    Somebody, Stop Me!



  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Camping your spawn :)
    Posts
    1,732
    Quote Originally Posted by Malkec
    Im at 2.900 with opti 165 and i get 5xxx/16xxx points. Run the benchmark again
    im also @ 2.9 and ionly got this
    7/6/2006 5:25:56 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
    7/6/2006 5:26:55 PM||Benchmark results:
    7/6/2006 5:26:55 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
    7/6/2006 5:26:55 PM|| 4955 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
    7/6/2006 5:26:55 PM|| 11777 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
    7/6/2006 5:26:55 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks
    Join the XS WCG team and do your part to help save the world..
    ^^^Click here to start folding for the soon to be number one team in the world..^^^

    Main rig: Gigabyte DS3/6300@3.2 7950 GX2/Server:Expert/165@2.9/PCI vid/Wifes:ASrock Dual SATA2/3800@2.4/X800XTAIW/Kids:165@2.7/X850XTPE

    "A computer beat me in chess, but it was no match when it came to kickboxing"
    -Emo Philips

  12. #12
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Can someone send me this update to cooperxs AT gmail DOT com - i`ll host it.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,108
    Core i7-920 @ 3,8GHz 24/7 1,30v watercooled
    Gigabyte X58 UD5
    3x1GB G.Skill DDR3-1333
    MSI 7900GTO
    Corsair HX520W


  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    978
    Awesome!
    I went from
    ~2700/5400 per CPU
    to
    5017/16648 per CPU!!!!

    Stunning job!

    UPDATE!
    I just got a "new" file from Fr3ak and my new score is slightly better at 5159/11883 per CPU! Cool...
    Last edited by shaolin95; 06-21-2006 at 10:10 PM.
    *CPU: Xeon X5650 @ 4.3 Ghz | Cooler: Thermaltake Water 2.0 Extreme
    *Asus Rampage III Formula | RAM: 36GB DDR3 (Tracer LED + Hyper X Savage)
    *Video Cards: Gigabyte Aorus 1080ti
    Sound Card: Sound Blaster Z | PSU: Corsair HX1000W | Display: BenQ PD3200u | JVC RS520 projector
    *Case: CoolerMaster HAF X (932 side panel) | Others: Roccat Kone AIMO | Roccat Alumic | Logitech G15 |Cameras: Sony A7R3 | RX100 V

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    254
    Just done this update :

    6240 floating point MIPS
    22425 integer MIPS

    Now, we'll see what Conroe can do to Rosetta
    Comp 1 : NCASE M1, Asus Z170I PRO Gaming, Intel i7-6700K, G.Skill 2x4Gb 3466MHz, Samsung 950 Pro (512), Samsung 840 Pro (256), WD Red (5TB), Asus nVidia GTX 980 4Gb, Silverstone SX600-G, LG 34UM95
    Comp 2 : Commodore Amiga 4000D, Cyberstorm MK2 68060 50Mhz 128Mb, Cybervision 64 4Mb, FastATA MK-VI, Indivision AGA MK2cr
    Comp 3 : Commodore Amiga 600, Vampire 600 V2 128Mb, Indivision ECS, 32Gb CF

  16. #16
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    997
    Went from 1309/1571 to 1984/2893 on my P4 3.0Ghz (5.2.13 client - HT on) - thanks muchly Pretty low benchmarks, but its my work PC & usually has a screenful of apps open & QMC'ing @ 100% too - it has a tough life lol. Thanks for the mirrors guys :thumbsup:
    Last edited by jimwah; 07-07-2006 at 09:38 AM.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    392
    I'm getting:

    Object not found!

    The requested URL was not found on this server. The link on the referring page seems to be wrong or outdated. Please inform the author of that page about the error.

    If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster.
    Error 404
    calbe.dw70.de
    Sun Jun 25 05:33:57 2006
    Apache/2.0.53 (Linux/SUSE)
    NEW: ASUS GTX670 and extra 6GB Mushkin 998805

    i7-930 @ 4.2 | ASUS Rampage III Extreme 1005BIOS | Noctua NH-D14 | 12GB Mushkin 998805 6-8-6-24 | ASUS GTX670 | Dell 2407WFP | SB X-Fi Fatality | Corsair SP2500's | Samsung SH-S183L | Silverstone OP1000 | Coolermaster HAF-X | Rock Solid 2+ Years!

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by FlyBoyGeo
    I'm getting:

    Object not found!

    The requested URL was not found on this server. The link on the referring page seems to be wrong or outdated. Please inform the author of that page about the error.

    If you think this is a server error, please contact the webmaster.
    Error 404
    calbe.dw70.de
    Sun Jun 25 05:33:57 2006
    Apache/2.0.53 (Linux/SUSE)
    Yes the link is down apparently, you may now use my own

    http://nonphxn.net/Rosetta_Essential/

    Happy folding

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    136
    are there any mac optimizations?
    I have some emac's a a server that could use them.
    I have a new girlfriend, her name is Rossetta.

    FC BARCELONA CHAMPION OF THE WORLD!!!

  20. #20
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    1,039

    Question What am I doing wrong???

    I suspended (and "snoozed") the units that were running then exited BOINC. (Did all this starting by clicking on the B on the taskbar - by the clock.)

    Downloaded BOINC_5.5.0_SSE2 to my desktop. Unzipped it to C:\program files\BOINC.

    Re-started computer and disabled hyperthreading. Ran benchmarks. NO change. Turned off computer. Re-started computer and ran benchmarks. NO change. Re-started computer and enabled hyperthreading. Ran benchmarks. NO change.

    CPU is a P4 630 if that matters......



  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    1,039
    I think I finally figured it out. Benchmarks improved a lot.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    217
    Holy crap my cpu benchmark scores flew up, very nice!
    Dimastech Easy Dual v2.5 (black)-----Silverstone Strider 1500w-----ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-----Intel 2600K-----Corsair Dominator GT (4x4GB) DDR3 2000-----2x Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD's-----2x GTX Titan 6GB SLI-----Dell 3008WFP

    Watercooling Loop: EK Supreme HF Rev. 2 - Acetal-----2x EK-Titan Acetal connected via EK-FC Terminal Dual Parallel-----2x Swiftech MCR320 Drive Radiators w/ built-in MCP35X Pumps-----EK-MultiOption RES X2 - 250 Advanced-----6x Scythe GT 1850rpm Fans-----Primochill LRT 3/8" ID - 5/8" OD (Red)-----Bitspower Carbon Black Fittings-----Distilled Water + PT_Nuke PHN + Feser Base Corrosion Blocker

  23. #23
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    I gather these optimizations don't actually gain any crunching performance because Rosetta simply does not use SSE regarless what client one uses, meaning the optimizations only alter the way credits are granted?

    Doesn't this make ranking systems pointless if the optimized clients are credited on different basis?
    You were not supposed to see this.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,421
    The long and the short of it is that the benchmark process was/is unfair and didn't accurately reflect the power of a given computer. As such Rosetta devised a new credit scheme that doesn't rely on benchmarks, optimized or not.

    As to whether the ranking system is relevant: IMO it is relevant inside a given projects individual scope, however when viewed globally in the aggregate it is entirely irrelevant, as that would imply parity among the separate projects which there really isn't - optimized or no.

    -SS

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    896
    Why is this thread still sticky if WCG XS is anti optimized?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •