Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 55

Thread: DFI roadmap Intel s775

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    393
    That Crossfire platform is looking sweet. *Sick of SLI at the moment*

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    488
    Quote Originally Posted by Owen1978
    Does anyone know if there are any issues with running 4GB with Conroe?
    No, the i975x chipset runs always at 2T so there are no issues with 4 dimms

    My Rig:
    Intel Core 2 Duo E6400
    2x512mb Micron PC3200 OEM D9DQW "Fatbody"
    Biostar TForce P965 Deluxe
    MSI/Medion GeForce 6700XL (Cheap )
    Chieftec 360W (in search for someting better)
    WD 160GB S-ATA

  3. #28
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Stafford, UK
    Posts
    810
    Quote Originally Posted by DaWaN
    No, the i975x chipset runs always at 2T so there are no issues with 4 dimms
    Really?! That kinda sucks performance hit?

    I wanna run 4 x 1Gb though, so that's cool I guess...

    VENOM: DFI LP LT X38-T2R ~ Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.00GHz ~ 4GB OCZ Blade LV DDR2-1150 ~ Radeon R9 380 4GB ~ Crucial C300 64GB ~ Seasonic X-750 ~ Dell U2913WM 29" ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
    LAIKA: Alienware Alpha R2 ~ Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz / 2.80GHz ~ 16GB Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2133 ~ GeForce GTX 960 4GB ~ Crucial MX300 275GB ~ LG OLED55B7A 55" TV ~ Win 10 Home x64
    BLADE: Razer Blade 14" (2013) ~ Core i7-4702HQ @ 2.20GHz / 3.20GHz ~ 8GB DDR3-1600 ~ GeForce GTX 765M 2GB ~ Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 500GB ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
    E-MAIL

  4. #29
    Xtreme Bandwith Whore
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    2,361
    Seeing coolers post re: the MSI 975 Plat seems to be owning eveything with the conroe. 460 fsb bus on that sucker? I really don't know what dfi can do to improve Msi and Asus's ability. Although DFI made great 939 Boards, they have quirks in them that piss you off. I m curious as to what comes out of it in the intel camp. June huh? Means theey will be here in aug.

  5. #30
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    No Intel North chipset on anyone of them?.......Not good......
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  6. #31
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5
    No Intel North chipset on anyone of them?.......Not good......
    There are 975 chipset DFI's coming out as well Hipro.

    Regards

    Andy

  7. #32
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    There are 975 chipset DFI's coming out as well Hipro.

    Regards

    Andy

    Ahhhh........Thank god we'll play a bit......
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  8. #33
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by Nasgul
    I'd take the fallowing instead:

    1-ASUS
    2-ASUS
    3-ASUS
    4-ABIT
    5-GIGABYTE

    I won't accept nothing less.

    But for a 6th choice? I'll take an ECS.

    You are prejudged here, wait till it hits the market. It MAY be a killer, since DFI reputation on socket 754/939. They didn't focus on the intel-market at that time, that is the main reason why you don't have high expectations I guess.
    But I thought the DFI 925x was pretty good? *Please correct me if I am wrong*
    AMD Opteron 148 CABYE 0543 FPBW || DFI LanParty nF4 SLI-DR AD0
    2x 512MB OCZ PC3500 Limited Edition Winbond BH-5 || 2x 512MB Corsair PC3200LL V1.1 Winbond BH-5 || 1x 256MB Mushkin PC3500 LV2 Winbond BH-5
    SAPPHIRE X800GTO2 @ 16P 600/570, Voltmodded, GPU=1,7V/VDD/VDDQ=2,3V
    Zippy PSL-6720P(G1) GAMING ,POWER - I love it!

  9. #34
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    I could be a BETA tester of the 975 one........
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5
    I could be a BETA tester of the 975 one........
    Don't forget to report here!
    AMD Opteron 148 CABYE 0543 FPBW || DFI LanParty nF4 SLI-DR AD0
    2x 512MB OCZ PC3500 Limited Edition Winbond BH-5 || 2x 512MB Corsair PC3200LL V1.1 Winbond BH-5 || 1x 256MB Mushkin PC3500 LV2 Winbond BH-5
    SAPPHIRE X800GTO2 @ 16P 600/570, Voltmodded, GPU=1,7V/VDD/VDDQ=2,3V
    Zippy PSL-6720P(G1) GAMING ,POWER - I love it!

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,730
    It's obvious that the first posters are from the AMD world...there DFI is regarded very highly.

    Not so on the Intel side altough there have been some remarkable Intel based DFI boards .

  12. #37
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Two words:

    OSKAR WU

    period.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    384
    my dfi 939 rox, love it!

    i hope there is an intel one just as good for when i try out conroe.

    buyin the 1066 ram will be the killer.... so expensive
    Intel i7 950 4GHZ
    OCZ Reaper 1600mhz 6-8-6-20
    Gigabyte UDR3 X58
    2x Nvidia 460 GTX 1GB in SLI
    2x OCZ Vertex 2 120GB Raid 0
    620w Corsair PSU

  14. #39
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by Pandamonia
    my dfi 939 rox, love it!

    i hope there is an intel one just as good for when i try out conroe.

    buyin the 1066 ram will be the killer.... so expensive
    Hopefully we can get 800 ram and clock it up.

    Intel dudes don't have the history with DFI that AMD guys do, so naturally they are pessimistic. I do believe these new line of Conroe-compatible DFI boards will be the first that Oskar Wu has designed. Now that the Intel forum is being flooded with long-time AMD fans, naturally there is going to be some disagreement about what board makers will put out the best Conroe-compatible board. I hope DFI does, knowing Oskar's reputation with AMD boards.

    But yeah... not looking forward to spending $450+ on ram.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    384
    £350 in uk! which times that by 1.9 is what we pay in $!

    personally if there is more than 2 colours on a mobo i think it looks rubbish.

    im lovin the yellow and orange.

    blue and silver for intel wud own.

    DFI OC options on here rock!
    Intel i7 950 4GHZ
    OCZ Reaper 1600mhz 6-8-6-20
    Gigabyte UDR3 X58
    2x Nvidia 460 GTX 1GB in SLI
    2x OCZ Vertex 2 120GB Raid 0
    620w Corsair PSU

  16. #41
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Torin
    Intel dudes don't have the history with DFI that AMD guys do, so naturally they are pessimistic. I do believe these new line of Conroe-compatible DFI boards will be the first that Oskar Wu has designed. Now that the Intel forum is being flooded with long-time AMD fans, naturally there is going to be some disagreement about what board makers will put out the best Conroe-compatible board. I hope DFI does, knowing Oskar's reputation with AMD boards.
    Ummm...Just in case you didn't know....Oskar Wu designed the ABIT BH6, BP6, and IS7 - all considered some of the best INTEL boards of their respective generations. Oskar has more of a history with Intel than most Intel "dudes" do

  17. #42
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Stafford, UK
    Posts
    810
    Quote Originally Posted by Pandamonia
    buyin the 1066 ram will be the killer.... so expensive
    Quote Originally Posted by Torin
    Hopefully we can get 800 ram and clock it up.
    But yeah... not looking forward to spending $450+ on ram.
    Err... what are you guys talking about?

    Conroe = 266MHz quad pumped

    So you only need dual channel DDRII-533 (PC4200) for full bandwidth at stock speeds.

    VENOM: DFI LP LT X38-T2R ~ Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.00GHz ~ 4GB OCZ Blade LV DDR2-1150 ~ Radeon R9 380 4GB ~ Crucial C300 64GB ~ Seasonic X-750 ~ Dell U2913WM 29" ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
    LAIKA: Alienware Alpha R2 ~ Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz / 2.80GHz ~ 16GB Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2133 ~ GeForce GTX 960 4GB ~ Crucial MX300 275GB ~ LG OLED55B7A 55" TV ~ Win 10 Home x64
    BLADE: Razer Blade 14" (2013) ~ Core i7-4702HQ @ 2.20GHz / 3.20GHz ~ 8GB DDR3-1600 ~ GeForce GTX 765M 2GB ~ Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 500GB ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
    E-MAIL

  18. #43
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by Sumanji
    Err... what are you guys talking about?

    Conroe = 266MHz quad pumped

    So you only need dual channel DDRII-533 (PC4200) for full bandwidth at stock speeds.
    Thank you for clearing that up for me.

    Now all I can say about Conroe is:

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by irev210
    it is shared L2 cache, not seperate. The E6600/E6700+ have 4MB L2 cache, the lower models have 2MB L2 cache.

    Lower models have 2MB L2 because it is much cheaper to make.
    well not exactly the Cores are identical. but because the Cache is 50% of the whole size errors might occur there (in former times the Cache was even bigger). because of this manufacturers add extra Cache so that they can disable some Rows but still have the full size. if there are far to many errors this isn't helping any more and so there are the models with less cache.
    (hope I didn't screw something up?)

    but errors can occur in one of the Cores as well and that's why I wonder why there aren't any Single Core Conroes.

    this supports my theory that Meroms are selected Conroes. Single Core CPUs then might be used in cheaper Notebooks (with Core 2 Solo).

    so, btt... I'm really looking forward to seeing how well the DFIs will perform. up to now with Intel you only have these choices:
    1. Asus
    2. Asus
    3. Asus
    4. Asus
    5.... etc

    and especially I want to see how well the nVidia and Ati chips will do hope there'll finally be a competitor to the 975X (ICH7R *pah*) ^^
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  20. #45
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Stafford, UK
    Posts
    810
    Has anyone else seen the Intel roadmaps on Dailytech? Apparently 975X doesn't have a replacement slated... so might have to go for P965 boards if we want ICH8.

    Suman

    VENOM: DFI LP LT X38-T2R ~ Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.00GHz ~ 4GB OCZ Blade LV DDR2-1150 ~ Radeon R9 380 4GB ~ Crucial C300 64GB ~ Seasonic X-750 ~ Dell U2913WM 29" ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
    LAIKA: Alienware Alpha R2 ~ Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz / 2.80GHz ~ 16GB Ballistix Sport LT DDR4-2133 ~ GeForce GTX 960 4GB ~ Crucial MX300 275GB ~ LG OLED55B7A 55" TV ~ Win 10 Home x64
    BLADE: Razer Blade 14" (2013) ~ Core i7-4702HQ @ 2.20GHz / 3.20GHz ~ 8GB DDR3-1600 ~ GeForce GTX 765M 2GB ~ Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 500GB ~ Win 7 Ultimate x64
    E-MAIL

  21. #46
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Sumanji
    Has anyone else seen the Intel roadmaps on Dailytech? Apparently 975X doesn't have a replacement slated... so might have to go for P965 boards if we want ICH8.

    Suman
    I've heard talks of 985....

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by irev210
    Lower models have 2MB L2 because it is much cheaper to make.
    They are actually probably just standard dies where part of the cache is faulty and so is disabled.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Strive for peace w/Acts of War
    Posts
    868
    Quote Originally Posted by Vassili
    They didn't focus on the intel-market at that time, that is the main reason why you don't have high expectations I guess.
    But I thought the DFI 925x was pretty good? *Please correct me if I am wrong*
    Yes, thank you for seeing my point Vassili.

    when the Oskar Wu was at ABIT, ABIT was always trailing ASUS by a couple of notches, but never better than ASUS.

    So, with or without Oskar, ASUS will always be better and we'll all remember him as: Oskar Who?

    I like better ASUS than any other, I don't see anything wrong with that, just like there are lots of you that like "X" better than "Y".

    ASUS has not let Intel overclockers down ever, I seriously think they're going to let the rivals take their reputation as being the absolute best for Intel systems.
    ASUS P5B Deluxe P965 BIOS 1236 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 8MBL2 @ 3.15GHZ | G.Skill DDR2 800 F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ & XTreem DDR 800 D9GMH - 4GB RAM Total | 4:5 Ratio @ 350fsbx9 | Tuniq Tower 120 | BFG GeForce 9800GTX | Seagate 2x 250GB Perpendicular HDDs RAID-0 | PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W EPS12V | Samsung TOC T240 24" LCD Monitor |

  24. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Portugal =)
    Posts
    18
    asus=v-mods!

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Girona (Catalonia) - Between Italy, France and Spain
    Posts
    411
    The one with i975 and the one with ATI RD600 look really good.

    I have always had ASUS mobos for Intel processors. I'm sick of voltmodding mobos. Now is the time for me to try several other brands: DFI, Albatron (if supports Conroe), MSI... they all look good.

    DFI, in my opinion, can do very good things. In 939 boards they did an awesome work. I just expect a similar board for Intel, full of tweaks and capable of providing huge vcore and vdimm values.

    Looking forward for the Infinity 975X/G and the RD600 to be released.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •