Search:

aeneon got 1066mhz cl5 DDR2 with 1.8V(!) for nearly a year now.

this is NOTHING new.

plus they are (of course) not using micron chips.

you should try gameswelt.de if you can read the site.

download without registration and easy more then 25Mbit/s, got it after 3 minutes.

hes fully right, it's the same thing as i wanted to say, but well i didn't realised that many don't look at the thread title before posting.

Of course you can have some CF stutters even with...

cadaveca, what you tell is simply impossible.

you can't bring 200fps to stuttering in cf/sli.

If you have 200fps with CF, even in the WORST situation, means when both cards pump out 1 image...

So WHEN will this come ?
maybe after g80 memory bugs are fixed ?

=> cheap method to push out more 88GPUs when Price/performance is much better for ati(at least here in europe)

By the time REAL...

there is a tool for setting rendering mode, but it does not come from nvidia. It's 3rd party.

you can't make ati responsible for not open the rendering modes if nvidia also does not do it.

SLI...

saaya plz tell me where nvidia let the customers choose the rendering mode.

nvidia does ?
they don't !

there is a tool that let's you choose the profile, but that does not come from nvidia.

Anyway, you can change it with Ati by just renaming the executable... it's...

well, that's a good question.

if you keep in mind, that the frame from the second card comes close after the first, this "line" should appear much more often if there is micro stuttering.

but...

which gf9 ?
true gf 9 ?
gx2 gf9 ?



880ultra is only like 25-35% faster, but well 50% is really not much...

ok, then i understand it.
8.1 had all those problems.

with newest driver at least crysis does not have this problem anymore.
i can link the frametimes if anyone wants to see.

which driver was used ?

i just ask, as crysis is mentioned on the website while already is proven, that crysis has no more "Micro stuttering" problems at all with the 3870x2.

don't know about...

maybe it's just OCed 3850, who knows.

fact is : stock 3870 gpu clocks + lower vram clocks for more then stock 3870 price -> useless.

click me

wonderful expensive card with crappy cooler, low clocks.

just ignore him. there are no 3870 with gddr3 (that someone would care about)

for europe he is absolutly right.

2600xt 256mb(512is useless for this card) is same price like 8500GT here, while 8500GT is even slower then 2400xt !

8600gt costs 50%(!!!) more then 2600xt.
...

oh yeah there is this 1 new gigabyte card with gddr3. Wonderful.

And now ?

it's not cheaper then gddr4 cards, it's not cooler, it's not faster.

Nobody would buy it, so why should i care ?

3850 faster then 3870 ?

yeah, now i will believe in those benches :rolleyes:

all 3870 are gddr4, at least all i know.

cooler looks nice, but why should someone want that hot air in his case ?

in same production process (and this new chip WILL use the same) and with 100% working Transistors then it is in fact equal.

the question is : how ?

it's nearly same architecture like G92(also same pcb ?), so why should it be faster with less shaders ?




hmm 100-110$ against 170$+ is VERY fair.

come on, you...

source ?

you really think nvidia will bring down so many if they are still with 65nm ?

Maybe they have dumb customers, but they aren't stupid.

we all know about 2900xt and 250W would be even...

why should it ?

64 shaders, 256bit and not special high clocks.

dont exspect something better then 3850.

pretty much same like 8800gs or 3850 from the benchmarks posted here at XS

i'm always asking myself why this 1billion number is so popular...

come on, gts g92 allready has 750million, so whats 33% more ?

compare that to 7900gtx with only 278million -> nearly 200% more...

not 1 slot, as you see there are 4xdvi -> double height

@ topic : length does not matter for me, but this cooling does not look quiet at 200W....

i want 3 slot super silent with hot air out of...