Search:

R7 1700 is 65w @ 3.0base (but spends 99% of its time @ 3.2 all core) , and these are not top bin chips, So that 31/36 SKU should be easily doable @ 125-140w

Yes! I have, but no I am not sure about the QVL. I don't think it's part of the hard copy manual.

I've run into issues with IGP on this combo. It seems geAPM is activated on this BIOS which is...

Will certainly post up some results. I'm doing a proper writeup for another forum, so will link also.

Just powered it up now and shoved win 10 onto it. All good so far.

Not much to play with in...

yes! , the ex.computer tower, which has the 320M-C as linked above

Mine has arrived at my front door :up:

iirc there's two version of 7300, a lower clocked Kaveri and a richland

I misread it saying up to 4Ghz. I thought that was the base speed.

So correcting for that, not so bad, but its still only showing a ~5% incease in IPC in this bench, Multithreaded. That surely...

That cinebench score is slower than the 6800K, so unlikely to be correct.

Should score in the high 300's if AMD's perf targets are to be believed.. which are quite modest anyway.

http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=193_1555

$659 AU here for BF4 Version..

figures I have show Vanilla version should be around $620

I think you need to come for a...

Lab501 Review:

http://lab501.ro/placi-video/amd-radeon-r9-290x-vs-nvidia-gtx-titan


Looking pretty win so far

thanks Flanker

curious what's the Stock VID on these @ normal/Turbo ?

Well, perhaps ironically, AMD have had larger increases in performance over their own previous generations than Intel.. Comparing say, Thuban - Bulldozer - Piledriver VS Sandy - Ivy - Haswell. ...

Yeah, so it seems..

Have they gone nuts?

Ha, tech report review has been sabotaged. Better have a read for lols before someone fixes it!

Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk 2

Over the hump of aaugust now! .. no OCing?

No one else with a 9370 to play with?

:cool:

Pointless comparison / speculation.. GK104 scaled poorly between 670 and 680 also.. and it should have scaled better than 7950/7970 since there's also a difference in TMU count. By your logic, Titan...

Well done comparing the[extremely short lived] 65nm 965 to the Athlon.

http://techreport.com/review/8295/amd-athlon-64-x2-processors/15

Athlon X2 4200+ 193W
Athlon X2 4800+ 201w

Pentium...

The 4.4/4.7ghz FX9370 is $399

First, thanks very much for sharing this with us. It's very interesting.

Some quick dirty tests on an FX 8320 @ 4Ghz, before I go to bed.

..Definatly an improvement in super pi, which despite...

No. Particle is right. For all intents and purposes, a CPU presents a purely resistive load. Power in = heat. end of story.

Also right about the 'temperature' confusion. See it all the time.

Yes.

Just because someone writes an article, doesn't make it fact.

It's a terrible article. Look at the comments section even.

LOL are you joking?


Its graphically retarded, yet performs Like :banana::banana::banana::banana: even on high end graphics cards. Pretty good indication of a hack job!

Where have you seen direct clk v clk comparison of trinity vs bd?

I have a desktop trinity chip + fx 4170 so I can do the comparison if need be.

No , its no surprise theres no visible differences between bulldozer and piledriver, its the same architecture.

ah, Core 2 was around 70-80% higher IPC than P4. Irrelevant however.

the 20% was more like Yonah to Conroe. , which is the true evolutionary transisiton, as mentioned already.

This was a huge...