you are backing an opinion with facts. personally i doubt that nodes will permit faster clockspeeds over the next few years. if there is any trend it's probably slower. bulldozer mainly has room for...
Type: Posts; User: Chumbucket843; Keyword(s):
you are backing an opinion with facts. personally i doubt that nodes will permit faster clockspeeds over the next few years. if there is any trend it's probably slower. bulldozer mainly has room for...
yeah, but leakage is backing up my point. you can make it smaller but leakage will negate any benefits of it.
btw, you need high gate capacitance to attract a big charge to the channel so you need...
SRAM numbers translate fairly well especially if it doesn't need to be ultrafast. yeah, 10% smaller sounds right. how a 28nm BD would take advantage of that is another topic though.
you don't have...
that's is not a real measurement though. the width of a transistor gate is not the same as the length and is changed depending on how faster the transistor needs to be. also, it's common to see...
http://i.imgur.com/tCp90.gif
i dont understand the advantage of going from 32nm to 28nm. i haven't seen performance numbers on GF's 28nm processes but i doubt it's worth the time and effort for the gains.
wow. it is a completely static world with terrible shadows and shading. what a bunch of marketing crap.
e-beam should be able to do 15nm-ish. btw, there are some cutting edge techniques that have been used to create sub-20nm SRAM i.e. nanoinjection lithography.
actually, the two processes are fairly independent of each other so 28nm problems dont spell doom for 20nm.
It's very like that they do but it's not as functional as you are thinking and it's purely for research purposes. i cant confirm they do because i dont work there and they have not published anything...
http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/6148/1300154451929.jpg
http://www.anandtech.com/Gallery/Album/754#3
read bullet #4.
exactly, somewhat like netburst. i doubt there will be a large IPC increase and if there is then bulldozer would probably be very power hungry. Both of these increase transistor size which means...
funny, most people i know (US citizen) in a way feel honored that people from all parts of the world choose to come here to learn and work here when it comes to skilled labor like being a doctor or...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NA8A2kmCfFI&feature=related
Bill Bruford
Allan Holdsworth
Jeff Berlin
Dave Stewart
These guys are badass.
if you want to get technical this only accounts for half of the power consumption. furthermore, it is only a rough estimate because every transistor has unique properties.
my best guess is that...
switching from gate first to gate last would take a lot of time. how much is difficult to say but definitely far too long to be competitive.
the higher the voltage, the less likely it will...
yes, this dinky little microcontroller will destroy anything TSMC or GF could manufacture.:)
actually resistivity of semiconductors decreases with higher temperatures so one might assume that higher temps are better.
yes, it does run "regular" threads.
no, WCG or BOINC would require special coding to make full use of MIC. if there were such a processor that ran at that speed and required little programmer...
i thought it was pretty funny.
in case you didnt get the reference.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lM2uYnq_-4k
do you have experience doing this? i have no experience in the industry but i have books written by people who are and they would strongly disagree with this statement. just think about it for a...
the answers are free and on the internet.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1006/1006.4147v4.pdf
they will become a commodity when no one can make them faster. we have been waiting for that quite a long time.
not exactly.
a commodity is a good where no one makes a significantly better...
nope, still one die shrink. they would not all the adopt use multigate transistors because it is faster. they used it because it was necessary to continue moore's law.
it is a misconception to...
