Search:

Hehe, looks like my speculation was not that far of the mark :D
But it does make sense for them to release it on mobile first with the huge pickup of gaming laptops vs gaming desktops. Unless AMD...

That is nothing new, really. Only editors that do not have a clue about the industry would insist on 20nm GPUs, just because an available node was never skipped by nVIDIA before (32nm does not count...

Does GM107 has an ARM core?

I think the surprise he is talking about is the 6-pin connector on the image...

Well, Mantle driver is not the same thing as BF4 patch is it?

Those numbers are part of a "standard", they are not necessarily rigid limits. So yes, a GPU board can exceed it, although with probable effects on system stability. It will depend on the motherboard...

Energy prices will rise faster than your monies...

As I said before, if you are only a gamer, yes, Titan is hugely overpriced. But Titan was never meant to be a pure gaming card. For that you had the GTX780, which is not that far away from it....

Because energy prices stay the same for 30 years.... riiiight. I guess some people will soon be surprised/shocked. Held on to your seats "eXtremers", you are in for a bumpy ride...

You are aware that there is something called evolution and energy efficiency right? 40W today is an enormous amount of energy to spend with a light bulb. The only reason why you keep seeing Watts...

You are missing the point. If a GTX780 with little OC beats Titan, a GTX780Ti (which is coming in mid-November, cut the crap about "who knows when) might possibly beat 290X.

Besides 290X is...

IMHO, a comparison with Titan is not valid, since its not just a GPU. Its a cross between GeForce and Tesla, and that's why it mandates such a high price. If gamers bought it, its their problem, but...

Keep in mind that Gibbo is the owner and/or works for OcUK. He is barely impartial here.
I remember him hyping up the Radeon HD6970 and we all know how it ended....

Keep in mind that Gibbo is the owner and/or works for OcUK. He is barely impartial here.
I remember him hyping up the Radeon HD6970 and we all know how it ended....

Err, who talked about Fermi? You are the one raising a topic from 2/3 generations ago, where things got bad for nVIDIA, hence you seem to be the one without much to hold on to.

Hmm....



http://videocardz.com/46558/amd-radeon-r9-290x-r9-290-european-pricing-unveiled

If it would be a GTX790, dual GK110, I think we would have heard about it by now... nVIDIA was never that good in keeping secrets.

GK180 a.k.a. fixed GK110 with all 2880 cores active. Yawn.

Curious... 2304 was exactly the number of cores rumored for the GTX680 for a while... I wonder if it is really GK110 or something else..

Heavy OCed where? I see 1006Mhz, which is supposed to be stock.

Errr.. Look at the 4th post above yours ;)

Maybe the big catch is Kepler has some sort of hyperthreading?
Taken from Beyond3D: http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=58668&page=85


...

I still cannot believe nVIDIA would call GK110 to a Dual GK104 card. Makes no sense. They give the name GK1xx to chips, not SKUs.

Well, if this is true, I'll go ahead and say this is probably no Kepler, but a Fermi derivative, as a stop gap solution. Might even be something on 40nm and not 28nm...

Can that be because he said GTX 6xx? :P
A GTX 6xx doesnt really need to be GK100 :P