It's an old habit I've had since I first started programming - which got reinforced by the fact that C89/90 doesn't allow declarations inside the for-loop statement.
I'm slowing trying to break...
Type: Posts; User: poke349; Keyword(s):
It's an old habit I've had since I first started programming - which got reinforced by the fact that C89/90 doesn't allow declarations inside the for-loop statement.
I'm slowing trying to break...
BKT is pure integer work. No memory, almost entirely L1 cache.
HNT is a mix of everything from integer, floating-point, cache, memory...
I can't say how well each test stresses the integer...
Yes it should drop between tests. But only for a split-second - most of the time it isn't even noticeable.
That's because it kills off the old threads for the old task and recreates them for the...
LOL! What did you do? :)
At least the timer sanity check caught it. So it isn't completely broken. :D
Got a new laptop:
http://www.numberworld.org/y-cruncher/benchmarks/v0.6.1/prealpha/pi_1b_2012_11_26_haruka_small.png
This thing actually beats my i7 920 @ 3.5 GHz... by a fairly large margin...
Just a quick update. I've updated the charts on my website. But I haven't updated them here on XS. I'll get to that later.
Let me know if I missed your submission. It's been a long time since I'm...
TBH, I wrote the FMA and XOP code-paths long before Bulldozer was released. Both would be available in 256-bit, including both FMA3 and FMA4. I had no idea that 256-bit would actually be worse than...
Sorry guys. I've been busy for a while and kinda neglected both the program and this thread. :(
I'll try to get the lists back up to date in the new week or so.
The issue with it not...
It's been a hella long time since I posted here. I can almost smell the dust. Life's been catching up with me so I haven't had much time to give the program (and this thread) any love.
I've...
Been busy as hell these few months. But I finally found the time to update some of the charts...
There was some discussion of it. I've bounced a few emails back and forth between Massman. But...
Charts updated! Those are some pretty insane results. :D
Wow... seems like that took a while.
Interesting. The error code 1167 according to Microsoft is:
So my guess is that the drive is un-mounting and re-mounting randomly. (even for a split second is enough)
How are you connecting...
That's interesting. I do remember seeing a similar result on a different forum. Have you tried at the larger sizes? Like 1 billion?
Another thing is that the AVX binary is indeed tuned for Sandy...
I'd also add that the % number only applies to the series summation. There's still several more steps at the end.
Another thing is that it isn't quite linear when you're using swap. As you get...
Woah... Can't imagine how long that will take. How are the 4 hard drives combined? Some sort of raid0 or spanning?
Nice! I think that's the first non ES Bulldozer result I've seen so far.
...
Wow!!! :shocked:
Is that 100b on a laptop?!? If so, that's a first! This needs a special mention when it put it in the charts! :D
20 days, that must have been an agonizing wait... :yepp:
I guess this took enough...
We've been running this since December and it finally finishes... (after about 10 hard drive failures...)
10 Trillion Digits of Pi!!!
...
That's pretty. :D I think we have a winner here! :cool:
Charts updated!
4 failures out of 7 in 3 years? :eek: What do you do to them? Target practice? :up: jk :D
Or did you buy them all at the same time and possibly from the same (bad) batch? I've seen this happen...
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "storage setup". If you were refering to the raid that I mentioned a few posts back, the current version already has raid-0 support. (You just have to find it...
Oh wow... 4.7 GHz! 1.6v...
I think that's the best single-socket non-sandy result so far. :D
I'll update the lists later.
Another bump and an update.
It looks like some Bulldozer benchmarks have been leaked. :yepp: This confirms that the AVX binary works on Bulldozer.
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1630624...
From what I've seen, memory reliability (per bit) goes up with the size. Such that the (per module) failure rate stays constant.
Obviously, the manufacturers can't make larger and larger ram modules...
Depends on what you're using them for. :wasntme: I want 4 x 8GB. :D
Been a while since I've posted... So I thought I'd bump this thread.
There hasn't been much news regarding the program lately.
As I've mentioned before, it's in the middle of a large rewrite that...