Because it has a much stronger position than CNN. And it's entirely different market really. How many people run multiple OSes on a single machine?
Why do you think it's different?
Type: Posts; User: m^2; Keyword(s):
Because it has a much stronger position than CNN. And it's entirely different market really. How many people run multiple OSes on a single machine?
Why do you think it's different?
I don't know why are so many people negative about this site.
It does not do wonders. It doesn't claim to be capable of this. There are serious accuracy issues that have to plague all such tools...
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ISO-updates-C-standard-1400814.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C1X
C++ was updated recently and now C gets a polish too. A good year. :)
Nonsense. They didn't have the income in the first place, so they lost at most a hope to get it.
No, no and no.
Actually I agree with this.
They did the same with The Witcher 1. I was planning to buy it, but because of lack of decent hardware I delayed it and after reading the news, I lost my interest.
I find the shakedown schemes to be...
What? If these people are not allowed to post it on GitHub or whatever, then it's closed source, shared with selected partners.
I believe the can use CUDA regardless of this. They just don't want to implement a technology controlled by the competitor.
I wonder.. how about a CUDA->OpenCL compiler?
^^^ I just want to make things clear to all of you who go to the internet for legal advice... the above statement completely false.
Or rather - there may or may not be a country where it's...
Thanks. Not that it explains the thing, but it's still better than the wsj article.
Something is broken on that site, the article ends with "The latest move turns webOS into an open-source platform, meaning ..."
I want to know what do they mean because there's a huge difference...
This is mostly true in Poland too.
With the exception that it doesn't apply to software and that you can't give stuff to strangers - so you can use P2P only as a 100% leech. Though both...
Sadly, ads business is getting increasingly sophisticated and I'm seeing a growing number of adds well embedded into websites, so even with dedicated Greasemonkey scripts it's hard to remove them.
...
Shameless plug:
I made a comparison of Webp Lossless, PNG, JPEG2000, JPEG-LS and BCIF on web-sourced PNGs.
Click.
Shameless plug:
I made a comparison of Webp Lossless, PNG, JPEG2000, JPEG-LS and BCIF on web-sourced PNGs.
Click.
@ Chrome vs Chromium
Only Google knows what they add to Chromium. ;)
That's why using Chrome was never an option. And while I am sure that quite a few people look at their hands, the choice of...
Windows is installed on 95% of PCs AND workstations. And people hack it too, just much less then Adobe products. Hint: it's harder for them.
It's just that somehow Adobe software gets targeted the most. Maybe malware makers just like it?...
http://www.ghacks.net/2011/11/24/google-showing-ads-in-chrome-browser-is-this-the-beginning-of-the-end/
I looked into replacing FF with Chromium and watched the project to know when it's ready,...
The stuff is not illegal. Means of obtaining it are. And in other cases they are legal too, but there are other lawless actions involved like distribution.
http://occupyflash.org/
I clicked on 3 images and all were PNGs...but it doesn't matter:
I never used it, but I just did quick and dirty tests, it indeed looks OK. On 1 image it was visually lossless. And only 375%...
As to JPEG - it depends, it's OK for photos, but not for graphics, sharp edges look bad even at 90%.
After thinking about the new webp developments for quite some time today, I have mixed...
https://code.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_lossless_alpha_study.html
There are no good comparisons yet.
You can find a number of bad ones here.
Yeah, right.
Except that they happily censored for the Chinese government for a couple of years and pulled out just after they discovered that Chinese were hacking them.
