i think terrace posted too much :(
@chew*: can we still expect better performance via bios updates and such in the future is that really it ???
Type: Posts; User: Sn0wm@n; Keyword(s):
i think terrace posted too much :(
@chew*: can we still expect better performance via bios updates and such in the future is that really it ???
chew* seems quiet ....
ill wait to see what he has to show us once nda drops and then ill make my judgment
interesting post to say the least!!
when you say 6+ is possible on phase .. do you mean single stage -30c or so ??? or closer to dry ice territory in the -50c or so range ???
how can anyone even catch half of those numbers ???
amd took all of us by surprise with this idea :D
thanks for posting
and since it says that fx is at the door in the comic does it mean that the launch is near???? :D
thanks :D
that was classy .....
shows your ignorance ....
why dont you leave this thread and buy a sandy bridge cpu instead ????
don't you think your taking this anxious waiting a bit too far???
i mean really???
just because amd doesnt give benchmark far ahead before a release smells like trouble???
and since no...
benchmarks shouldnt be too long to appear i guess
of course .. and the issue still presented itself a couple times after it got updated
happened to me .. once i close and re-open firefox it works without problems ....
same thing here ...same black box
LOL @ all the assumptions
but the reason i made that post was because it was flanker ... and the way he worded it was that he knew someone who was under nda or he was himself .....
so that's why i asked
did you get this from someone who signed an nda???
if so can you share with us on its legitimacy ????
5ghz stable sounds good
ive got a question ... how can turbo be only 400mhz when its 500mhz on the server platform on all 16 cores ????
if by any chance bulldozer only perform like phenom II ... id call that an epic fail .... we didnt wait this long for what a rehash could have gave us far earlier
wasnt the 50% more performance throughput oriented from the memory controler improvement + higher speed ..
so this renders half of your logical performance analysis wrong
this goes with the spirit of the thread http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4-9E7TM-0k
i cant understand why people are paying to see a movie .. yet are too busy texting while watching the movie ....
:(
no problem
and enjoy that bike throughout this summer
since amd is aiming to go towards a more multi purpose cpu/gpu combo i think your idea about lots of smaller cores coupled to a specialised core isnt so bad at all .... coupled with a next...
bulldozer ???
thanks for the info