Search:

Yields for a fully enabled GK110 must be decent if they're so eager to drop prices and increase demand. A price drop would be nice though.

Uh no. I upgraded to Win 8 during the BF4 beta and it was a night and day difference. Something is seriously hosed on Windows 7 in that game. Lots of hitching/stuttering and lower fps than Win 8.

When a new card gets released all the cards before it don't magically get slower. Of course, if the only reason you buy graphics cards is for the ego boost of "having the fastest!" then yeah it's...

Titan owners shouldn't care what NVidia does in the future. Whether they drop the price or introduce a faster card it doesn't change anything about the card they already own. If NVidia has enough...

Their benchmark reviews are pretty mediocre. Techreport or Hardware.fr for performance reviews. Anandtech for architecture discussion and analysis.

The laptop is fully capable of displaying the native resolution in games etc. It's only the UI that is restricted.

They also announced a thunderbolt to Gig-E adapter for $29. Problem solved.

I need to move wherever you're living cause here $50 buys maybe one or two meals.

They're referring to GTC. They will most likely talk architecture and HPC. Don't get your hopes up for any consumer product info or release schedules. Should still be interesting though.

The PCB ends there, there isn't anywhere to move the connectors.

If you're only concerned with benchmark graphs yes but Tweaktown wasn't complaining about help with benchmarking. Check the first page of the review.

It's your money :)

So a card that dips to 20 fps once but is above 40 otherwise is worse than a card that dips to 35 often? You need to do some sort of "average time spent below x fps" analysis to get the true minimum.

I don't think his backside has internet access.

If there is a GK110 then in the unlikely event it's even ready now yields would be far below GK104. It would be rather stupid to sell a large low yielding chip into the consumer segment when you can...

There's obviously an HPC chip in the works and it's very late. They were targeting end of 2011 for a pilot rollout to the Titan supercomputer. They had to fall back to Fermi.

I only know ONE person who plays PC games and he has a 5850 running at 1920x1200. Everyone else I know has no clue what Geforce, Radeon, CUDA, Eyefinity or all this other mumbo jumbo is about.

Those settings are interesting but the vast majority of people with $500 graphics cards are not running 30" or multi-monitor setups. Talk about niche of a niche of a niche :)

Lol...

Oh nice, thanks. Will be interesting to see how aggressive they are with turbo and if it's a good alternative to straight overclocks.

He said neither of those things, you're trying too hard. PowerTune is a clock limiter, boost increases clocks. Different approaches to the same goal.

The Powertune limit is user configurable...

The truth is that overclocking a chip makes it faster? What a revelation!!

So what card does AMD have left to play now? Pitcairn is proof that they have a very efficient architecture but Kepler looks to be right in the mix on all fronts.

Why do people keep saying this bollocks? GPU architectures and chips aren't designed in a few months. 2-3 months later launch guarantees nothing.

That would be absolutely insane. Believe it when I see it.