The fudzilla screenshot is considerably different than the one you linked, for one, it's a quad-core part. Also, I doubt an April 2005 date is accurate since in 2005 we had no inkling about K8L/K10. ...
Type: Posts; User: Furen; Keyword(s):
The fudzilla screenshot is considerably different than the one you linked, for one, it's a quad-core part. Also, I doubt an April 2005 date is accurate since in 2005 we had no inkling about K8L/K10. ...
Meh, that's a horrible prank, lol.
Here's a link to, SUPPOSEDLY, an overclocked Agena running at 3GHz from its 1.9GHz stock:...
Obviously he's talking about the DSDC (QuadFX) platform. If you use two quad-core CPUs in the same motherboard you have 8 cores. DSDC is basically AMD's answer to Intel's ability to MCP its chips....
64KB instruction + 64KB data = 128KB of L1
You get an independent L1 per core so it's 2x128KB per dual-core CPU.
As I understand it, AM2+ motherboards will support current AM2 chips, future AM2+ chips AND AM3 chips. AM2 motherboards will only support current AM2 chips and future AM2+ chips (not sure about AM3,...
I think The Inquirer is wrong. While that website does claim that the core name is Brisbane, it also claims they're 90nm parts and rev F (Windsors are rev F, Brisbane will supposedly be rev G). I've...
Not because there is no need but rather because they take significantly more fab space while yielding minimal performance improvements (and in many apps no improvement at all). AMD is still fab-space...
Wow.
First off, the "base clock" means absolutely nothing. The HT link operates at 1000MHz REAL clock. It also transfers on the rising and falling edge of each clock, hence the "double-pumped"...
It's full duplex AND double pumped, so it does have an "Effective" (how I hate these) 2GHz rate in each direction. Of course it's only 16-bits wide so still quite "inferior" to Intel's 64-bit,...
