I knew this.
OK I was not very carefull :( while I was looking this large table but I became confused cos of many choices.
I think no reason for second line (10 X 255 = 2550 MHz RAM 9:10) cos...
Type: Posts; User: MrSeanKon; Keyword(s):
I knew this.
OK I was not very carefull :( while I was looking this large table but I became confused cos of many choices.
I think no reason for second line (10 X 255 = 2550 MHz RAM 9:10) cos...
OK I understand cos I do not use RAM dividers.
If my RAM cannot run 1:1 I prefer to relax timings or FSB.
Your approach is different.
Thanks. :)
Questions:
Look attach photo:
Of course I had a 3200+ 754 socket....
But I choose 3500+ cos of I set 11 multiplier.
I see best choice 9.5X260 --> 2470MHz (9th line)... :confused:
5th line shows...
