Search:

Did you gain any MHz by disabling HT? What's your highest freq. with HT on?

"3DMark05 & 06 CPU-tests were ok @ 6 GHz"

ouch!

What kind of instrument is that (the white big thingie)?

Maybe a stupid question, but will there be ATI chipsets for nehalem (since they 'gave' intel CF)? That would make this soup look even more weird...

Or some of the PR folks plays EVE-Online.. :P

I'm pretty sure the Q9100 wont feature 2x6mb cache. Sometimes the ES chip got more than the retail. Was the same with some of the first conroes...

Nice work!

phenomenal results

oh crap, I mean very intelpressive! :up:

Now that's some true Cu pr0n. net weight?

Considering that current 65nanos does 5.0GHz in 3D, I assume 45nanos could do even better.


Afaik, the talk about HT on Penryn was 100% BS, TheInq admited it was a false rumour.

5.2-5.3GHz quad in 3D? Gonna take som serious Barcelona power to compete with that.

Now that's one serious cascade. Impressive!

That CPU would love to share it's love/heat to the water loop along with it's friends in the case.

Really nice E66 chip you got there! Not bad for a $300 CPU.

Nice Pi numbers, only a few from WR there too.

AMD need atleast 4GHz on air to get close to the performance of a 3.6GHz E6600.

Is the heat output holding back the Kentsfield or is it the CPU "itself"?

Tell me, if a CPU can do 32M Pi at that speed, how far from a stable 3DMark06 run are you?

There's a difference between B1 and B2 in speed? How can that be?

Very nice OPB. How about some 3D?

Changing the multi will not affect the temperature. :rolleyes:

That's just amazing for such a fairly cheap CPU. 1.9v through 65nm isn't that bad either. :D
Not to be forgotten, 576FSB, respect.

Close, but Coolaler got 9s flat.
Still, a very nice overklock, show us some 3D will ya! :)

Nice memoryclocks.
This o/c should be in the "chilled air" category imho. None the less, very good for a $300 chip.

To bad Kentie will only be $999 XE cpu's for a long time.