-
Six-Core Thuban Benchmark leaked
-
I've made a bench on Win 7 64bit (with 32bit cinebench.exe):
http://i42.tinypic.com/2ilki2b.png
http://i39.tinypic.com/2w6ugd1.png
Cinebench
Thuban: 12642
Deneb: 9023
(approx. +40%)
Vantage CPU (perf.)
Thuban: 14533
Deneb: 9570
(approx. +50%)
-
These had to be the most predictable benchmarks in history :D
Can someone please run Superpi on this to see if there's a (very slight) performance hit for the added cores?
-
I am tempted to buy a 1090T on day one now, but I know I should wait for chips manufactured at a later date. Heck, anything is better than my PII 940 now LOL.
-
The synthethic benchmarks aren't very impressive, they are what are expected. Basically, you got 50% more Cores, and have 50% more performance in applications that scales well with as many Threads you can add. The only thing that remains to be seen is the impact of still use 6 MB Cache L3 instead of 9 as you have less Cache L3 per Core should you be using all six on Full Load.
Overclocking results should also be interesing as with 50% more Cores, you are also going to consume 50% more power at same Voltage and Frequency. This means that you are seriously going to push the Motherboard and Power Supply.
-
whats with the corespeed?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zir_blazer
The synthethic benchmarks aren't very impressive, they are what are expected. Basically, you got 50% more Cores, and have 50% more performance in applications that scales well with as many Threads you can add. The only thing that remains to be seen is the impact of still use 6 MB Cache L3 instead of 9 as you have less Cache L3 per Core should you be using all six on Full Load.
Overclocking results should also be interesing as with 50% more Cores, you are also going to consume 50% more power at same Voltage and Frequency. This means that you are seriously going to push the Motherboard and Power Supply.
The fact that it's still use 6 MB Cache L3 is not a big deal on desktop. Just take a look at the Phenom II X4 8xx which uses 4MB L3. Actually you can only see max. 1-2% performance drop in the worst cases.
Phenom X4 - 0.5MB L3 / core
Phenom II X4 800 - 1MB L3 / core
Phenom II X4 900 - 1.5MB L3 / core
Phenom II X6 1000 - 1MB L3 / core
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Glow9
whats with the corespeed?
What kind of corespeed? It's 2.8 as you can see on the CPU-Z shot.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zir_blazer
The synthethic benchmarks aren't very impressive, they are what are expected. Basically, you got 50% more Cores, and have 50% more performance in applications that scales well with as many Threads you can add. The only thing that remains to be seen is the impact of still use 6 MB Cache L3 instead of 9 as you have less Cache L3 per Core should you be using all six on Full Load.
Overclocking results should also be interesing as with 50% more Cores, you are also going to consume 50% more power at same Voltage and Frequency. This means that you are seriously going to push the Motherboard and Power Supply.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...he,2416-5.html
the cache doesn't need to be any bigger. it's only help marginally in gaming.
we just OC (NB/L3) anyways leading to much higher performance lol
people always tend think phenom II is cache hungry when it is not at all.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Oliverda
What kind of corespeed? It's 2.8 as you can see on the CPU-Z shot.
the 798.2
-
Waiting for them
Overclocking this 6-cores under ln2 should have more fun
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Glow9
the 798.2
Cool 'n Quiet ;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Glow9
whats with the corespeed?
Cool N Quiet
-
ahhhhh Thx guys. Makes sense now.
-
u know u o/c too much when u dunno what cnq is haha
-
thanks for the compare Oliverda
-
Can't wait to see overclocked 6 core results.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
i found nemo
u know u o/c too much when u dunno what cnq is haha
I've always disabled it, especially when I had my first 650i it kinda made OCing flakey so I just scrapped it. Is it better now?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Oliverda
What kind of corespeed? It's 2.8 as you can see on the CPU-Z shot.
and what is with the "turbo-mode"?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Glow9
I've always disabled it, especially when I had my first 650i it kinda made OCing flakey so I just scrapped it. Is it better now?
only if u mess with k10stat but that's still alot of messin' around. personally i never use it.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chri$ch
and what is with the "turbo-mode"?
turbo mode is for single threaded apps where it will (on the 1055t) overclock 1 core 500mhz to 3.3ghz instead of stock 2.8ghz ...
-
are you sure? if yes its a "turbo-flop"!
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
crazydiamond
turbo mode is for single threaded apps where it will (on the 1055t) overclock 1 core 500mhz to 3.3ghz instead of stock 2.8ghz ...
Maybe it will be applicable for the dual-threaded applications as well. There are many dual-threaded applications.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Oliverda
Maybe it will be applicable for the dual-threaded applications as well. There are many dual-threaded applications.
true after i wrote it i realized it could have been worded much better to still get the concept across lol
-
I wonder if the extra turbo multiplier will be available to use under some MB workaround...