Really nice to see the older X25-V almost getting past 300 TB barrier.
So, by now can we seriously say that all Corsair Force drives have no LTT enabled unlike the OCZ drives ???
Printable View
Really nice to see the older X25-V almost getting past 300 TB barrier.
So, by now can we seriously say that all Corsair Force drives have no LTT enabled unlike the OCZ drives ???
m4 update:
458.5929 TiB
1498 hours
Avg speed 90.95 MiB/s.
AD gone from 110 to 88.
P/E 8040.
MD5 OK.
Still no reallocated sectors :)
Attachment 119690Attachment 119691
Kingston V+100
63.8101 TiB
246 hours
Avg speed 76.62 MiB/s.
AD gone from 166 to 134.
P/E ?.
MD5 OK.
Attachment 119688Attachment 119689
142.7370 TiB written
41.04 MB/s
MD5 ok
05: 0
B1: 61
E7: 45%
E9: 88576
EA/F1: 146880
F2: 192
293.45TB Host writes
Reallocated sectors : 6
MD5 OK
33.5MiB/s on avg (41 hours)
Attachment 119703 Attachment 119704
I think it would greatly benefit this thread if we also test some USB or similar drives with "dumb" flash controllers because this is quite unknown at the moment while we successfully proved that some SSDs really can last a lot of time etc. What do you think ?
m4 update:
465.8988 TiB
1521 hours
Avg speed 90.92 MiB/s.
AD gone from 88 to 84.
P/E 8166.
MD5 OK.
Still no reallocated sectors
Attachment 119736Attachment 119735
Kingston V+100
69.8459 TiB
269 hours
Avg speed 76.38 MiB/s.
AD gone from 134 to 129.
P/E ?.
MD5 OK.
Attachment 119738Attachment 119737
So, M4 too crosses 500TB...:) And its showing no signs of slowing down...:D
Whoa, B.A.T, you have the mystery Crucial/Micron SMART attributes showing up now! You said you tried to flash to the new firmware but the updater said it couldn't do it? That's exactly what caused my mystery attributes to show up too (though my updater said it couldn't happen because the firmware was already flashed).
It sure looks like that. I didn't think about it when I posted the screenshots. The firmware updated failed and SSDLife shows v 0002 so I don't know what happend.
Any volunteers for the USB "dumb flash controller" test ?
@bulanula
This is the SSD endurance test, not the USB-Stick endurance test, anyways, there is no way to test USB drives using my software, it disables USB drives and there is generally no way of reading SMART from such drives. (so, no reporting)
--
296.49TB Host writes
Reallocated sectors : 6
MD5 OK
34.07MiB/s on avg (25hours)
21304GB written "Last 7 days" according to SSDLife.
M225->Vertex Turbo 64GB Update:
238.64 TiB total
753.8 hours
5411 Raw Wear
110.39 MB/s avg for the last 56.72 hours (on W7 x64)
MD5 OK
C4-Erase Failure Block Count (Realloc Sectors) from 2 to 3
(Bank 6/Block 2406; Bank 3/Block 3925; Bank 0/Block 1766)
Attachment 119755
m4 update:
473.1481 TiB
1545 hours
Avg speed 90.90 MiB/s.
AD gone from 84 to 80.
P/E 8296.
MD5 OK.
Still no reallocated sectors
Attachment 119767Attachment 119768
Kingston V+100
The Kingston dropped out again so I got the log fixed with help from Anvil and startet up the test again. I'll post tomorrow because the test had only gone for a couple og hour last night before it dropped.
m4 update:
477.6755 TiB
1558 hours
Avg speed 90.94 MiB/s.
AD gone from 80 to 77.
P/E 8372.
MD5 OK.
Still no reallocated sectors
Attachment 119795Attachment 119796
Kingston V+100
The Kingston dropped out again during the night. I'm going to halt the test until I'v found out what causes this problem. It could be the MB starting to protest after 2 months of torture, but I don't know.
Next update from me will be monday.
299.01TB Host writes
Reallocated sectors : 6
MD5 OK
33.25MiB/s on avg (48 hours)
20960.5GB written "Last 7 days" according to SSDLife.
Is SSDLife Data monitor using GB as it is labelled, or is it really GiB?
I'm assuming GiB as GB doesn't add up.
Can someone confirm what is correct?
EDIT:
M225->Vertex Turbo 64GB Update:
244.72 TiB total
768 hours
5525 Raw Wear
110.27 MB/s avg for the last 15.65 hours (on W7 x64)
MD5 OK
C4-Erase Failure Block Count (Realloc Sectors) from 3 to 4
(Bank 6/Block 2406; Bank 3/Block 3925; Bank 0/Block 1766; Bank 0/Block 829)
Attachment 119802
It is probably using GiB as that is what Windows uses by default etc.
It is GiB. It converts the sector count SMART readout, which are 512 bytes.
300.41TB Host writes
Reallocated sectors : 6
MD5 OK
(next update will be Sunday)
C300 Update
332.3TiB host writes, 1 MWI, 5606 raw wear indicator, 2048/1 reallocations, 63.05MiB/sec, MD5 OK
SF-1200 nLTT Update
194.25TiB host writes, 140.188TiB NAND writes, 32 MWI, 2243 raw wear (equiv), wear range delta 3, 56.1MIB/sec, MD5 OK
Charts next post, sorry for the big delay!
Host Writes So Far
Attachment 119837
Attachment 119838
Normalized Writes So Far
The SSDs are not all the same size, these charts normalize for available NAND capacity.
Attachment 119839
Attachment 119840
Write Days So Far
Not all SSDs write at the same speed, these charts factor out write speeds and look at endurance as a function of time.
Attachment 119841
Attachment 119842
Host Writes vs. NAND Writes and Write Amplication
Based on reported or calculated NAND cycles from wear SMART values divided by total writes.
Attachment 119843
Attachment 119844
Attachment 119845