Printable View
Heres..
Heres 55BN with 1.65V :D and no opti..
http://img275.echo.cx/img275/7812/cp...andiego8dr.jpg
And compared to 55 130nm...
http://img264.echo.cx/img264/8775/cp...ushkin21fh.jpg
http://img279.echo.cx/img279/4959/fx55s19wb.jpg
Lobby low...
http://img224.echo.cx/img224/9839/screenshot0554du.jpg
Pure speed :D
http://img283.echo.cx/img283/5688/screenshot0545an.jpg
Will try with tccd...
Dude, why is one 940 and one 939? And I see no "San Diego", just "Claw Hammer" and "Sledge Hammer". It even says 130nm in CPU-Z. You don't mean "BN" as in "San Diego", do you? Cause if you do... : slapass :
Edit: Jesus, I'm confused - big time. Why does both this one and OPB's say S940 and "Sledge Hammer" when BN is supposed to be E4 "San Diego" and 939, right? Smelly...
Edit 2: Ahhh... CPU-Z being slow as always. Sorry, for ever doubting you.. hehe
Nice, the TCCD should net you some nice speed. I hope this thing outdoes the Clawhammer!
Hahahhaa, this chip just came out. Dont doubt Centvalny. CPU-Z is the one in error.Quote:
Originally Posted by krille
Ugh, Newegg is really slow right now. Go ahead and search on newegg when its working for 2.6ghz and San Diego. You'll see that the FX55 San Diego has been out.
cbid..
very nice dumo, very nice.
just out of curiosity, how does the clawhammer do in sPI at the same speeds? :toast:
claw wont run @ that speed...with single phase and no opti...Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzimark
that is very nice results dumo, well done (:
:(Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
maybe 3.1 or 3.2ghz then? :buddies:
24.5 at 3420?
I get 25.0 at 3250 unpatched
No, you can't compare. He's running WinXP with all eye-candy on. Probably NO optimizations for superPi performance... he's just showing relative stability with the 1M run.Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
C
Is this a standard vapochill ls or has it been modded?
What temps did you get on full load with the clawhammer fx and the san diego fx?
Congratz bro Dumo :slobber:
coba kemaren ikut lomba oc di Indo, menang deh lo..
(if only u join the CPU race last week in Indo, i believed u'll take the trophy) :lol:
btw, how come u got such high temp w/ Smartguardian? :rolleyes:
Its a Smart Guardian Bug with sub zero temps. If u go below 0 it start count @ 256ºC (like 256ºc is 0ºc and 255ºc is -1ºc, and so on....)Quote:
Originally Posted by wedfighter
ic now..thx to _silence_
Thats true enough, because my initial impression was that the lobby score seems low for the speed too.Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
Nice OC, one question though. Why did you cover up the batch numbers on chips?
Heres comparo to fx claw...all candies on and no opti. See the difference on vcore...
http://img216.echo.cx/img216/7725/1sd8qd.jpg
http://img216.echo.cx/img216/5645/1claw2ls.jpg
http://img216.echo.cx/img216/5313/1sd52of.jpg
http://img216.echo.cx/img216/4221/1claw24ke.jpg
what cooling are you using btw?
vapo ls..
those are some very nice clocks man. especially for a vapo ls. usually ive seen a round 3.1 -3.2 with a vapo ls. looks like the new FX's are an improvement. though more cpu samples are needed to reallly be able to confidently make that statement.
This is true, but it at least gives us something to look forward to.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxxxRacer
If I can ever convince myself to drop the cash on one, I wanna pickup a VapoLS for my current A64 rig...just cus after I mod/modded the Vapo case it'd look fricken pimp underneath my modded PC61. :cool:
Congrats Cent, saw your results on [H] previously, just wanted to throw you another congrats. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxxxRacer
I think quit a lot of people reach 3300mhz on LS with a Clawhammer. We hit 3350mhz with Vapo LS on a Claw??? :)
What is the max. stable of your fx55 San Diego ?