So.................
KHX3000/256 double sided...
is it?? What can you all tell me about code on IC??
C
btw, easiest way to remove HS is to stick in the freezer for 10 minutes... easy.
Printable View
So.................
KHX3000/256 double sided...
is it?? What can you all tell me about code on IC??
C
btw, easiest way to remove HS is to stick in the freezer for 10 minutes... easy.
DW-50
BH-6 is more likely... but I could be wrong so dont count on me.
DW-45's are BH-5 for sure.
I dont think that is bh-5, but the best way to find out is just stick it in and try tight timings!
From what I've been told the two large circles and the small dot mean it's BH-6 or BH-5. My khx3000 is also double-sided, alternating chips but look like the pic.
- 50 == 5.0 ns and - 45 == 4.5 ns? just guessing. Perhaps Kingston's website may help.
My khx heatspreaders just popped off, they were barely touching three out of the 8 chips.
Sorry, but guess-work is all I have so far. Mine are up to 242, 5-2-2-2 @ 3.1v, so far anyway.
Its got the 2 dots, so its either bh5 or bh6. I think its bh-6 though because its DW-50, like STEvil said.
Well actually, I would like to take back what I said. Im not for sure but Im pretty sure it is bh-5. I dont speak german, but in the middle of this page it says wd-50 is bh-5. http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/...ges/847399/16. If someone who speaks german can double check that would be good, but Im pretty sure your in luck charlie!
Jrocket - not German, that's a language further north, looks like Belgian, perhaps Danish???
I looked around and it appears kingston v53742 0251p01 d328dw-50 is BH-5 relabeled
If you do a Google search type in: d328dw-50
Specificly at this Site
is 0251 a date of mfg???
like December 2002?? Sounds right for BH-5 :D
Charlie: What's the model number on the HS? I've had 4 sticks of KHX3000 and they've all been BH5.
If the model number is: 9905193-023.A01 then it's BH-5 according to Kingston tech support. There was also a model number that ended in .A00 they also confirmed was bh5 but I lost the email.
9905200-017.A00
Good news?
C
looks like BH5 to me
I threw ONE stick in the P4S800D-E and have it running 3D Mark loops @ cas 2-2-2-5 2.85V, 228FSB.
Well, it's obviously not CH-5 right? Sound like typical BH-5?
C
These are TwinMOS and Buffalo modules.
Are the Kingston marked different somehow?
probably either BH-5 at that voltage
now running Sandra burn-in (mem b/w, cpu arith, cpumulti) looping at 232mHz, 2.85V, cas 2-2-2-5
C
Actually that's Dutch not German... I think.Quote:
Originally posted by Jrocket
.>>>>>>>>>>
I dont speak german, but in the middle of this page it says wd-50 is bh-5. http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/...ges/847399/16. If someone who speaks german can double check that would be good, but Im pretty sure your in luck charlie!
The BabelFish translator doesn't do Dutch. :(
Copy and paste the bit you want translated and I'll translate it for ya ;)
With that date marked on the chips and the performance it must be bh-5
Relabled Kingston chips can be a hassel to identify. But the date and performance of your chips makes it alot easier. The label given by Kingston (DW-50) was not given to any specific chip, but rather as a widespread marking over a variety of similar performing (not overclocked performance, but cheap performance) chips. The twin-dot marker on the chips (in the spots on that chip) are an identification of Winbond DDR. The dots themselves don't refer to any revision by Winbond, only that they are made by Winbond. The date, Week 51, 2002, is the most obvious (besides performance) way of getting an idea of what the chips are. Not many CH-5 chips were around in 2002, and even less (if any) were in circulation then. On the otherhand, in 2002/early 2003, Winbond BH-5 chips were widely available and comparatively cheap for the performance they offered. Plus, CH-5 chips cannot (except in iissues of extreme rarity) hold a tRCD of 2, especially above 200MHz. So you basically already identified your chips. Possibly BH-6, but more likely BH-5.
There are those who say the older chips, from 2002, scale better under voltage then those produced in the mid-to-early-second-half of 2003.
It is not Danish.. And i dont think it is Belgian.. It is more likely Dutch:DQuote:
Originally posted by sjohnson
Jrocket - not German, that's a language further north, looks like Belgian, perhaps Danish???
yes it is dutchQuote:
Originally posted by S!1v3rB@cK_Dk
It is not Danish.. And i dont think it is Belgian.. It is more likely Dutch:D
Damn you got a very good stick there, that is above average for 2.85v unless its overvolting.Quote:
Originally posted by charlie
now running Sandra burn-in (mem b/w, cpu arith, cpumulti) looping at 232mHz, 2.85V, cas 2-2-2-5
C
Mine only does 220 2-2-2-5 at that setting (but its with both sticks in DC).
Quote:
Originally posted by Silversink
I looked around and it appears kingston v53742 0251p01 d328dw-50 is BH-5 relabeled
If you do a Google search type in: d328dw-50
Specificly at this Site
Charlie, Send me the stick and I will take a magic marker and relable them once more to read, BH-5 on them for yah if that would ease your mind :DQuote:
Originally posted by Speed_Mechanic
Relabled Kingston chips can be a hassel to identify. But the date and performance of your chips makes it alot easier. The label given by Kingston (DW-50) was not given to any specific chip, but rather as a widespread marking over a variety of similar performing (not overclocked performance, but cheap performance) chips. The twin-dot marker on the chips (in the spots on that chip) are an identification of Winbond DDR. The dots themselves don't refer to any revision by Winbond, only that they are made by Winbond. The date, Week 51, 2002, is the most obvious (besides performance) way of getting an idea of what the chips are. Not many CH-5 chips were around in 2002, and even less (if any) were in circulation then. On the otherhand, in 2002/early 2003, Winbond BH-5 chips were widely available and comparatively cheap for the performance they offered. Plus, CH-5 chips cannot (except in iissues of extreme rarity) hold a tRCD of 2, especially above 200MHz. So you basically already identified your chips. Possibly BH-6, but more likely BH-5.
There are those who say the older chips, from 2002, scale better under voltage then those produced in the mid-to-early-second-half of 2003.
ROFLQuote:
Originally posted by Silversink
Charlie, Send me the stick and I will take a magic marker and relable them once more to read, BH-5 on them for yah if that would ease your mind :D
Who would ever go against the proof that Silversink gives us! haha :ROTF: