http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2...windows-8.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/cfs-file.ashx/...0_62D6F77A.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Microsoft
You have to watch the video as well.
Printable View
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2...windows-8.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/cfs-file.ashx/...0_62D6F77A.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Microsoft
You have to watch the video as well.
yeah sooooo fast, considering there's a video cut on 00:34 sec..:ROTF:
the chart shows no boot time less than 15 seconds, but the movie made it look like 5 seconds, lol
i do hope the new hibernate file is much more dynamic and smart, i never did like wasting a few GBs of my SSD, so i left it off
also the first pie charts show that 42% of the population waste money by not shutting off their PCs. and the reason we can do such a thing with phones is because in their idle state they us a few milli-watts, so low its registered as 0 until we start tracking a dozen phones on the same killawatt meter, lol.
Neverending startup times and Blue Screen of Death are two of the biggest trademark horrors created by M$... I sure would be glad at least one of them would die.
Seriously, my bios take more times for boot of windows itself ( thanks to raid AHCI ).. i don't even see the "loading" splash screen... the only thing, i need wait the windows animated logo have finish (3 sec ), and then im on the desktop, ready to work. but if i disable it, it take even less time.... ( its allready so short, i have finally re activate this animation.. im not at 1 second less )...
Now for peoples with "standard HDD". It is really time MS work on this boot time ...
my w7 boot up is pretty quick with 2 g2's in raid0 but waiting for my mobo to "check" everything then post/raid config :banana::banana::banana::banana: takes 10x longer then the ~15 sec windows startup(9-11 on fresh os)
15 sec is fast ??? Meh .. wait till you see this -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUD_NZFFb64
EUFI hibernate using nand is amazing isnt it, i dont see what this shows.
also i remember when i got a raptor and was on windows 98se, it booted instantly, it posted, flashed and then on the desktop so i dont see how using hybernate with SLC and intels on board nand speed up tool on a clean instal shows anything or even a basic ssc would boot quickly on a fresh instal in a few seconds.
as long as I can still fully "restart" my system I will be happy. I never use hibernate as it seems to cause more problems than it's worth so I hate the idea of being "forced" into it. Most of the time I restart my system it is because I want to fix an error by forcing the program to boot again, you can't do that with a hibernate image.
cool idea MS but im far from sold.
when will Win8 launch
Windows 8 - get it now, boot fast - frag faster.
I don't understand this obsession with boot speed at all.
Make the OS stable and not requiring all these restarts after updates and boot time becomes irrelevant. ;)
You can always put your PC into sleep mode, only drawing a few watts of power and it takes only seconds for it to snap out of it when needed.
I too restart only once a month or so, or after some important update, which is very annoying.
using sleep mode, less than 10s to desktop for me.
gee.. booting time on a OS is the least of my concerns..
windows has much bigger problems than booting time, fix the bloody inconsistencies with the damn os, who gives a :banana::banana::banana::banana: about booting times
People still turn off computers around here? We need more WCG crunchers :D
I could careless if windows took 54 min to boot. Use sleep mode and forget about boot times