:welcome:I curious how the new Nehalems are doing compared to other multicore/Dual processor systems :p:
Asus z7s with 2x Xeon L5410@2,8Ghz, Vista 64, 4x2Gb FBDimm
Printable View
:welcome:I curious how the new Nehalems are doing compared to other multicore/Dual processor systems :p:
Asus z7s with 2x Xeon L5410@2,8Ghz, Vista 64, 4x2Gb FBDimm
P5Q3 Deluxe+e8600+2x1gb ddr3-1600+4870x2
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7...ot33rx9.th.jpg
Intel skulltrail platform @4400 aircooled.
2x 9775 exreme edition
2x 2gb kingston fbdimm
geforce 9800gx2
http://images.hardware.info/usersys/...s/005732-7.jpg
http://www.isarapix.org/pix79/1227967912.png
Nehalem UP, still at stock.
Single- and multicore scores, and multicore speedup are completely off tangent due to the Nehalem quirks.. One, the single core runs at a higher frequency than all the cores do due to Turbo mode. Two, Hyper-Threading. So Hyper-Threading is actually yielding more than 0.11x higher thread parallelism, it's just that the one core is clocked up when it works alone so that number is useless. :p:
http://bildr.no/thumb/312362.jpeg
i didnt know if i was supposed to post the stock settings, but here is my 24/7 settings
and i have no idea if the score is good or bad..lol
here's my QX9650 and 4.4Ghz vs i7 920 at 3.7Ghz no turbo
just a qwick test whit a singel qx9775.
need a beter psu to use the second qx9775.
all @ stock, mem ar 4 x 1 gb kingstone @ 319,2 mhz, 5:4 , 5-5-5-15-20
man the i7's are the heatQuote:
Originally Posted by safan80
how do you test with cinebench? do you just push start all tests? this is what I get and it looks weird. My setup is
CPU: intel e6750 2.66ghz
Mobo: gigabyte p35 ds3r
Gfx: 320mb evga 8800gts
RAM: 2gb crucial ballistix at 666 mhz 4-3-4-12 (stock can't really remember the timings)
I got:
2217 - Rendering 1 CPU
5198 - Rendernig X CPU
1.91 - Multiprocesser speedup
OpenGL - 117 (The opengl one is really low...)
Edit: NVM! Just realized there's no OpenGL support for Windows 7. What about the CPU scores?
Btw I"m on windows 7 is that maybe why...
crazlunatic, you need to post scrteenshots when posting benches. Just click "Run All Tests". Run it at default settings. You can OC if you like. That's up to you how far you wanna push it. Hope that helps you. BTW, Win7 is a beta. There's no real reason to run benches on beta's as there is nothing to compare them to. They will have bugs with no fixes, and any comparisons drawn would just be guessing. I;d install XP or Vista or both and run these benches. You want to bench with release software. Beta's could cause anything.
Now here is one I just did, and wow are those 8 threads a beast with this program...
:wasntme:Quote:
Originally Posted by T_Flight
Scaling...I like scaling. :yepp: Nice one! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
BTW, I'm getting the rest of my watercooling stuff tomorrow...fun times ahead! :yepp:
CINEBENCH R10
************************************************** **
Tester : shane
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz
MHz : 3.6
Number of CPUs : 8
Operating System : WINDOWS 32 BIT 6.0.6001
Graphics Card : ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>
************************************************** **
Rendering (Single CPU): 8990 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 56769 CB-CPU
Multiprocessor Speedup: 6.31
Shading (OpenGL Standard) : --- CB-GFX
************************************************** **
Thats with the R11 Engine,
this is base r10
CINEBENCH R10
************************************************** **
Tester : Shane
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz
MHz : 3.6
Number of CPUs : 8
Operating System : WINDOWS 64 BIT 6.0.6001
Graphics Card : ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Resolution : <fill this out>
Color Depth : <fill this out>
************************************************** **
Rendering (Single CPU): 4424 CB-CPU
Rendering (Multiple CPU): 25876 CB-CPU
Multiprocessor Speedup: 5.85
Shading (OpenGL Standard) : --- CB-GFX
************************************************** **
so to compare, r11 32bit is almost double what r10 is in 64bit.
Competing in "The Raptor Bowl", over at The Raptor Pit, and came up with this last night on water cooling...
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t...hallen/CB4.jpg
Here is mine:
I may as well jump in here with my Quad !!!!
4.2 470fsb and 2gb of ram at 470 4-4-4-12
I have to retest now i have some GOOD RAM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...lmcwade/43.jpg
edit of topic but i see my 2900xt is scoring higher in the openGL everone else's cards and there is 280gtx's in some of the rigs whats gives there !!!!!
Here's mine. :D
this is whit 2 qx9775 @ stock
^^^ Um, this section is call "Xtreme Benchmark" - please keep stock scores out of here (regardless how impressive they look) ;)
is this better for you,i know its not a big deal:DQuote:
Originally Posted by miahallen
Here's my Phenom II 940 @ 3.75Ghz (NB @ 2500, ram at 500Mhz 4-5-5-12).
--Matt
HMM, looks like Rol-Co's 32,282 is the number to beat yes?:D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
When did you get a i7 since you loved your q6600 so much?
Also you need to make sure everyone is running the same edition and not using the cinebench cheats.........
BTW: When someone beats my score i will post mine.