http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=5754
Printable View
It's great that they keep Cinebench alive, it's quite useful for us 3D users =)
Cool, can't remember what I got with the previous version, but with this one I scored a 1.97x multicore speed up from single to both cores on my x2 4400, from 1816 to 3585.
Well you can't compare older versions to newer ones its just like 3D Mark in a sense sort of.
BTW Glad its out, been hearing about this for a while and no release date was on it.
The scaling is very good.Seems X2s scale better than Conroe in Cinebench 10Quote:
Originally Posted by flippin_waffles
I remember Movieman looking for cinebench 10...he wanted to compare his setup vs penryn numbers out in cinebench 10...:)
Good memory!:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoc
Just grabbed it..
Will try this out tonight and see how the clovers do against the 45nm cpu's.
Yea, the old guy wants to beat Intels showcase machine!:rofl:
hey MM here is the thread about the 45nm V8 (penryn) scores... http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=147085Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
22,936 in rendering at 3.00ghz with 16gb of FB-dimm memory...
i want to see your numbers tonight :D
:wasntme: Only 4 gig here but we'll do our best.Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoc
Penryn is a little faster at same clock speed:
yeah.. 9% in cinebench...:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
This is the best I can do on air.,.362 on the memory, errors at 363:
Give us more!Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Something to fight for ... your max OC score :D !
22,564 is it..one more mhz on the ram and I get errors..Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
That's 9x362 on 333 FBDimms and stock volts on air in a 72F room.
To beat Intels score I'd need to volt mod the cpu's or get faster memory.
Working on the memory..;)
Thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
I'm getting 2986/5825 @3148MHz Win XP x64, but I can go over 3.2GHz on my CPU for that test so over 6000 multi is doable on aging A64 :)
I just ran on a single quad at 3.5ghz on Vista x64..
http://www.njkidxs.org/cinebench10.jpg
Slowpoke!:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
You need a dualie for this puppy pal!
Those gamers just get croaked..
Like trying to run a race with one leg vs two!:ROTF:
( Yes all, he is a friend and knows I'm just yanking his chain!)
BLAH BLAH BLAH:rofl: Hey you only beat me on one bench:p:
some Supertalent FB-Dimms like Victor Wang :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
You don't think I'm crazy enough to try and compete in SP1M do you?Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
Although you might be very surprised how well this workstation can do in super p1..
We can try wPrime if you'd like?:rofl:
http://www.wprime.net/hall.html?q=32M
Working on getting something a little faster than those..:wasntme:Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoc
I ran the tests and it says the my X2 scales 1.90xQuote:
Originally Posted by informal
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Two clovertown machines here, one on water, one on air.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
The chips and the memory in the air cooled one are better by a long shot.
Even at an additional 18C the air cooled machine will out do the WC machine.
It's also on a better board, EATX SM X7DAE vs the WC machines ATX X7DAL-E..
Yea, it's a beast!:D
brutal benchmark, I like it. 2.01 minutes for me.
E6550 - 7 x 533, 1.33 volts.
Oh! I can't believe that my X1950Pro(GT) is almost as fast in OGL test as your's 8800GTS :confused: To be precise 5665 on much slower CPU...Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
Is Vista OGL driver so broken or simply AMD did good job improving their driver?