DFI RD600 , ASUS 965 975 chipset X1950Pro Crossfire Comparison

DFI RD600 will be available in few days, so I compare with the popular of three crossfire chipset.


Motherboard

RD600 chip----DFI ICFX3200
965 chip------ASUS Commando
975 chip------ASUS P5W64

CPU: E6600
Momery: Corsair DDR2 1111 CL4
VGA: PowerColor X1950Pro 512MB
Power: Zippy 850W



RD600 Crossfire 3D Mark

3D06

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/RD600-06.JPG

3D05

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/RD600-05.JPG

3D03

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/RD600-03.JPG

3D01

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/RD600-01.JPG









975chip Crossfire 3D Mark

3D06

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/975-06.JPG

3D05

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/975-05.JPG

3D03

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/975-03.JPG

3D01

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/975-01.JPG







965chip Crossfire 3D Mark

3D06

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/C-06.JPG

3D05

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/C-05.JPG

3D03

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/C-03.JPG

3D01

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950Pro-CF/C-01.JPG











Comparsion:

3D Mark 06
RD600---------9675
975chip-------9665
965chip-------9447

3D Mark 05
RD600---------19038
975chip-------19073
965chip-------18262

3D Mark 03
RD600---------30737
975chip-------30729
965chip-------29498

3D Mark 01
RD600---------61540
975chip-------62560
965chip-------61392

Nice tests, thanks.

Could you possibly show the details of the 3DMark2001 runs? Strange how that suffers so much while the others are dead even against i975.

hmm 965 isn't doing well at all heh.

Some Crossfire pictures.

RD600

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950PRO-CF/RD600-1.JPG

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950PRO-CF/RD600-2.JPG

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950PRO-CF/RD600-3.JPG


975chip

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950PRO-CF/975-1.JPG

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950PRO-CF/975-2.JPG


965chip

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950PRO-CF/965-1.JPG

http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/X1950PRO-CF/965-2.JPG

mee want RD600!

nice tests.. :) I think the 956 chips have done great running 16x and 4x on crossfire setup.. :) hehehe..

:woot:

nice tests andre many thanks!

Interesting results, thanks for taking the time to post :toast: .

Regards

Andy

nice results there, so the 965P is good enough for crossfire :toast:

i never thought 965 would be so close to the others. thanx for the tests andre. i wonder how a 16x 16 board would fare with this same set-up?

thanks for the test andre!

I don't understand the 01 performance of the rd600...why in this test is so close to the 965 while in the other tests is better then the 975?

Marco

Maybe u can throw in this test a i680 board as well.. :D

thanks for sharing

Good amount of info, thanks for sharing!:)

Hi Andre great work!
Why not test the Asus Commando with one frequency adapted to its characteristics. All we know that chipset 965 do not go well in the range from 400-500 Mhz. You could make also a one bench at 550x7=3851 in order seeing if he improves? Thanks and good job.
p.s. Excuse my bad english.

Remind me again what's so great about RD600? And don't say asynch RAM, please. :)

Wow! 975x :stick: rd600

tought that rd600 would be stronger in 3d

i975X is greate........

thx for sharing the results.

Was it chipset limitation of 16x 4x on 965 or something else is the problem why 16/4X is made?

SLI is also crap on 965 due to 16/4x :/

Andre, as others have said great comparison. Nice and clean :toast: Helps me with the decision on if Im going RD600 or not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Omastar

Remind me again what's so great about RD600? And don't say asynch RAM, please. :)

---

indeed...

thanks for the benchies Andre. :)

Thanks for sharing! :)

Nice tests! :toast:

If you could test with x1950xtx would be even better, maybe 1950pro doesnt pull enough performance to notice differences between chipsets.

Regards!