New Beetle's Celeron M420 SPi Results

By New Beetle

U20s on air modPI result:eek:

M/B：AOpen i975Xa-YDG Mod / BIOS：R1.03
M/B Bed： V-TEC ARC Bed Rev.3.3
CPU：Celeron M420 / 7609A961
CPU Cooling：Thrmalright SP-94＋DELTA-FFB0812EHE x2
Chipset Cooling：Normal Heatsink
Memory：CORSAIR PC2-5400C4 512MBx2 / CL4-3-2-4
VGA：ATI XPERT 98 PCI 8MB
HDD：IBM-DTLA-307030 / U-DMA 5 (ATA100)
PowerSuplly：Zippy-460WS #2 （3.3V Rail mod)
Vcore：1.592V / Vddr：2.45V/ Vio：3.60V / Vcca：2.45V
OS：Windows Server 2003
Remarks：On air @Room temp 16℃ / FSB265MHz @boot up / Graphite sheet

On Air modPI 1.5 XS 1M: 19.672s @3216.6MHz (FSB268.0MHz x 12)
http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.png

Under Dice:
M/B：AOpen i975Xa-YDG Mod / BIOS：R1.03
M/B Bed：V-TEC ARC Bed Rev.3.3
CPU：Celeron M420 / 7609A961
CPU Cooling：「Kuri Pro２」+　DICE
Chipset Cooling：Normal Heatsink
Memory：CORSAIR PC2-5400C4 512MBx2 / CL4-3-2-5
VGA：ATI XPERT 98 PCI 8MB
HDD：IBM-DTLA-307030 / U-DMA 5 (ATA100)
PowerSuplly：Zippy-460WS #2 （3.3V Rail mod）
Vcore：1.552V / Vddr：2.45V/ Vio：3.60V / Vcca：2.45V
OS：Windows Server 2003
Remarks：DICE / FSB280MHz & 282MHz @boot up / Graphite sheet

modPI 1.5 XS 1M: 18.671s @3410.2MHz (FSB284.2MHz x 12)
http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.png

modPI 1.5 XS 8M: 3m18.953s @3390.0MHz (FSB282.5MHz x 12)
http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.png

modPI 1.5 XS 32M: 15m37.219s @3387.1MHz (FSB282.3MHz x 12)
http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.png


Under LN2
modPI 1.5 XS 32M: 15m34.312s @3397.0MHz (FSB283.1MHz x 12)
http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.png

Its been quite a long time since Ive seen anything from New Beetle...

Impressive Air results. 3216MHz.

Dry Ice a little higher, but LN2 no change really...

Like the Air results very much so though ;)

Man now they even have celerys that can own AMD's flagship :(
Whats this world coming to?

can i ask, what was limiting the Dice and LN2 results? FSB like the yonahs? or just simply didnt scale on the better cooling?

impressive results and as Philosophy said, amd = owned :rolleyes:

conroe here we all come :p:

targ

damn this is another celi blowing away AMD and this on AIR
One of the best air-cooling show-offs I've ever seen, your results show that you won't gain that much with extreme cooling - you think this will be a general behaviour of the new intels? I have the slight feeling it will...
I mean 200MHZ for what effort? Maybe it's fun to play around with LN2 but I think ALL you need for this one is a good phase change for sure.
Times are over you gained 500 MHZ and more with better and better cooling. Call me wrong but that's my opinion 'bout the future.

Think its down to the board...

With this being a 420, has 12x multi. Dumo had 3576MHz & 19.234 secs from this 430. Using the 13x multi. 275 being this FSB. Thats with DI too.

Maybe the cpu's but, I think its the board...

Any news on a Celery using 14x multi? Celeron M 440 1.86GHz? That should provide nice MHz figures overclocks.

Just shows you, the Japanese are insane Super PI kings :D Just 0.400 secs or there abouts from Dumo using DI and New Beatle using Air. Dumo had 360MHz extra too.

Using DI, still not as fast as Dumo... 166MHz slower, New Beatle is half a second faster though...

Not taking anything from Dumo's overclocking job though. 100%+ overclock aint too shaby :D

Very impressive

fastest celery ever :)

:eek:

only 3.4Ghz Celeron can do 15min35 pi_32m ？
even a Yonah with high fsb cannot do that.
if 3.4G pi_32m=15min35sec , then pi_1m must be 17sec
besides... Tyrou's T2600 @ 3830mhz pi_8m=3min10sec
http://www.tyrou.net/screens/310766-8.png
this CM420 @ 3390mhz pi_8m=3min18sec ??
possible ?
I have a lot of CM430/420 in hand, normally, CM is 2sec slower in PI_1M than a Yonah with the same settings.
so ... imagine what will happen in pi_32m ?

When are these mobile Celeron's due out?

Thanks...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorWang

only 3.4Ghz Celeron can do 15min35 pi_32m ？
even a Yonah with high fsb cannot do that.
if 3.4G pi_32m=15min35sec , then pi_1m must be 17sec
besides... Tyrou's T2600 @ 3830mhz pi_8m=3min10sec
http://www.tyrou.net/screens/310766-8.png
this CM420 @ 3390mhz pi_8m=3min18sec ??
possible ?
I have a lot of CM430/420 in hand, normally, CM is 2sec slower in PI_1M than a Yonah with the same settings.
so ... imagine what will happen in pi_32m ?

---

Haven't you ever wondered why Tyrou's Pi & perhaps yours were so slow?
New Beetle is the King of the Kings with respect to Pi.
Besides, we, @Team Japan, posted how we run Pi here in XS so many times...

A bit of surprise to see such comments from XIP like you;)

FYI, 1M Ranking, 8M Ranking, 32M Ranking

Cheers:toast:

fredyama

from what ive heard, its the moble and celly chips that are having an FSB wall issue, the desktop chips should be better and therefore scale a lot better with decent cooling.

and as better boards come out im sure the FSB issue will be reduced alot (DFI anyone?)

targ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PRTeamJapan

Haven't you ever wondered why Tyrou's Pi & perhaps yours were so slow?
New Beetle is the King of the Kings with respect to Pi.
Besides, we, @Team Japan, posted how we run Pi here in XS so many times...

A bit of surprise to see such comments from XIP like you;)

FYI, 1M Ranking, 8M Ranking, 32M Ranking

Cheers:toast:

fredyama

---

mine T2400 @ 282_11 pi_32m=17min15sec, meanwhile pi_1m=19.08sec
http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/...32m+1.425v.jpg

I tried 284_11 pi_1m=18.9sec, meanwhile pi_32m may be arround 16min55~17min05

so... how can a CM420 pi_1m = 18.5sec runs pi_32m=15min34sec?
that's what i'm wondering.

i'm just a little bird and wanna to figure out why .
system optimize ?
win2003 helps ?
close some threads in taskmanager ?
set pi running with real-time prio ?
set affinity ?
or someother ways ?

hope to learn :clap:

Guess Who made the frontpage: http://www.xtremesystems.com/index.php ;)

Congrats on the amazing celeron run New Beetle :up:

And VictorWang, I don't think its fair comparing a Yonah with a Celeron Yonah, despite you being one of the best Yonah ocers around.

Perkam

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by perkam

Guess Who made the frontpage: http://www.xtremesystems.com/index.php ;)

Congrats on the amazing celeron run New Beetle :up:

And VictorWang, I don't think its fair comparing a Yonah with a Celeron Yonah, despite you being one of the best Yonah ocers around.

Perkam

---

i don't know whether CM runs faster in pi_32m and I'll check out tomorrow.
still have a CM430/420 in hand.

but...I'm expecting someone sharing the way to run soooo fast in pi_32m :toast:

Oh My Godnesssssss !!!!!!

:toast: @New Beetle. Everything he does is sick.

What's the top model of CM Yonah ?
What's it cost ?
Where to buy it ?
:) :) :) :) :)

Yeah, if anyone was thinking about getting a Yonah Core solo,....might as well get a Celeron 420/430 instead. Since the Core solo reportedly costs nearly as much as the Yonah T2300.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PRTeamJapan

Haven't you ever wondered why Tyrou's Pi & perhaps yours were so slow?
New Beetle is the King of the Kings with respect to Pi.
Besides, we, @Team Japan, posted how we run Pi here in XS so many times...

A bit of surprise to see such comments from XIP like you;)

FYI, 1M Ranking, 8M Ranking, 32M Ranking

Cheers:toast:

fredyama

---

tyrou don't know not optimized these benchmarks :( , damage because the frequency is very good :toast:
but it would be necessary that it gives itself the means of making it and that doesn't seem to be its priority :cool:

Exelent results :toast:

indeed, that celeron is véry fast

AMD GOT PURE OWNED!!!!

wow with a celeron too!!! i would be very interested in seeing what a vapo would do with it.

New Beetle
IMPRESSIVE tweaking!
is not the celeron,is not the mhz or anything else..
Japan way!
Hi class clockers! :D

This CeleronM chip just screaming for more cooling...

http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/9...shot0492tn.jpg

great superpi results Dumo, and great Celeron :toast:
well done !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VictorWang

so... how can a CM420 pi_1m = 18.5sec runs pi_32m=15min34sec?
that's what i'm wondering.

i'm just a little bird and wanna to figure out why .
system optimize ?
win2003 helps ?
close some threads in taskmanager ?
set pi running with real-time prio ?
set affinity ?
or someother ways ?

hope to learn :clap:

---

I have had the same thought in my mind!

Is celeron M indeed faster than yohan core duo?!

This is all freakin' amazing...I can't wait to see if AMD actually has something up their sleeve with AM2...'cus if not....well....we already know where things are going. :cool:

Any pics of the motherboard bed? The setup?

Thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bennah

Any pics of the motherboard bed? The setup?

Thanks.

---

Yep, please take a look at New Beetle's HP for AOpen air set up with his ARC Bed.
Here is more details of his ARC Bed by Vigor.

nice dumo,its over 100% oc :)
are intel going to relase an celeron whith conroes architecture?

Celly ownage :D

Can anyone give a link to some guide of system optimalization for SuperPi by TeamJapan (english preffered :-))? I looked for it, but couldnt find anywhere :(

I saw a kyosen's run of 1M - 30secs with Winch @ 2577 and with the same clocks, same mobo, same OS best what I could get was 32 secs :( My system was tweaked as much as I could but it wasn't enough I suppose.

Lets all stop speculating and see some REAL results! Bring on the game benchmarks! :D

can one of these chips work with the ct-479 adapter? on a p4p800se?

Quote:

---

can one of these chips work with the ct-479 adapter? on a p4p800se?

---

No ! (new479 has different pin placement than old479 ...)