Notes!!
Tyan 'k8we' 2895, 2x 285 Opterons@3187mhz each 'x4 cores' cooled by swiftech water cooling, 2gig Mushkin PC3200@3-3-3-5-1t 'micron baised ic's', 2x evga 7900gt's @740/880@1.47v cooled with zalman vf900-cu's, 2x ocz powerstreams 520w=mobo+cpu's+ram, 600w=7900gt's, fans and raptors.
Special thanks to EVGA Marketing for the cards!! Told ya 12k would fall on my rig.
Now wheres are those quad sli cards? ;)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=279171
says zalman vf900s ;)
:eek:
Looks like we're gonna need to pull out some dual Conroe rigs to match up to that. :p:
Thats insane
Congrats on the score :)
WHats possible on that rig with QUad SLI? 15k?
Pics of the setup?
Am I the only one tired of seeing mickeymouse quad core scores in the quasi-bench we call 3dm06? :shrug:
4K CPU, not bad ;)
Time to freeze this mouse.
yeapQuote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
and 3rd on the ORB :D
What will happen if you`ll set up this rig with 7900GTX SLI or QuadSLI and get it under Cascade/LN2 !!! ???
I was wodering why mickeymouse isn't posting here anything?
Anyway, awesome air scores :)
Very nice.
I hope the next 3DMark doesn't depend as much on CPU power.
Almost 2FPS in RedValley2 :woot:
Awesome work MM :toast:
:toast: Those are some crazy 7900gt scores. GJ man.
He's selling the cards and moving on. You'd never legitly touch his 06 score though. The CPU power is just too much!
If he really wanted to he could just get his 3.7ghz FX60 back and beat you by a mile, but we are still waiting on the GPU mousepots. air vs phase isn't very fair.
he is banned.Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi
anyway, great stuff MM!
Conroe did 11,500 on air (both CPU and cards), see sig for proof of score. This was with air on the CPU vs. his water plus only half the cores. To say dual Conroe is needed is mad.Quote:
Looks like we're gonna need to pull out some dual Conroe rigs to match up to that.
not bad on that result there mm, now put that cpu up with some gtx's and see what you cant do with king's score :O
Good luck Willis, wich cpu?
8 cores :cool:, nice score btw
Greets
Why doesn’t he then? He has enough cash to feed half the population of Africa.Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
oh god here we go again...
I am not going to start a argument, I was just asking a question *cough fanboy cough*
yall, he got a good 06 score. it doesnt matter how much money he has to spend on his rig. dont be jealous, like me. :)
Comparing 7900gt's to x1900xt CF?Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
If you threw the same cards in that opteron system it'd go a hell of alot further than a single conroe. Conroe didn't come close to that cpu score.
Of course, due to the price difference, it's 100% unfair to compare the 2. That opteron system costs more than the down payment on a Bently.
However, that CPU score is too much for conroe to overcome, plain and simple.
p.s. Ahmad, the only 3dmark that doesn't depend on CPU now is 3dmark03. 01,05, and 06 all take a powerful processor/processors to hammer out good scores.
Yeah 2.16 Ghz Conroe lightly OCed on stock heatsink and volts versus dual 285 Opty system at 3.2 Ghz on watercooling hmmmm.Quote:
Originally Posted by DilTech
I think the Conroe did a pretty good job. Maybe give it 3.8 Ghz and some crazy ram speeds will give the 2x285 setup a run for its money ;)
Conroe looks to be well ahead of AMD but if AMD can have 4 cores then of course that evens it up and so it looks like it will be an interesting battle in the months ahead.
Having said that lets leave it till then before getting into arguments about what beats what as this thread is tending towards "the video card I have not yet got with the cpu I have not yet beats the stuff you have .." and the 3dmark team section is mainly about reuslts not words so when the stuff arrives make it scream and then post results.
Regards
Andy