from here
http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread...39#post1451939
is ths allen-dale? fsb 333mhz! that's really like conroe xe.....:slobber: ,but xeon processor.:slobber:
http://www.coolaler.net/merom.gif
Printable View
from here
http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread...39#post1451939
is ths allen-dale? fsb 333mhz! that's really like conroe xe.....:slobber: ,but xeon processor.:slobber:
http://www.coolaler.net/merom.gif
low 17s..... drooollllllllll
pics of the setup?
is that 3ghz with 1333fsb AND 1.2v vcore AND 4mb cashe? that's insane
i just noticed... that's NOT an engineering sample!
:O is this stock ke?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waus-mod
YUP,stock...no oc,xeon support fsb1333.:slobber:
OMG... oc it :D that is damn fast.... really fast
Mayb the xeon will be the s939 opteron like amd:cool: what socket?
@Hicookie
:slobber:
Can you ask that guy which board and bios he's using:) ?
the board is es version,and he could't respon us , which socket 771 or 775?Quote:
Originally Posted by the farmer
allen-dale? or woodcrest? dualcore ? or quad-core?:stick:
i will ask him..if he could tell us some informations.:slobber:
this is most likely woodcrest.
allendale is conroe with 2M of L2 of cache.
(or was it single-core conroe?)
either way, it is a crippled conroe :-P
but woodcrest not..
17sec stock superpi is kinda mad lol :D
ths just defual setup,ddr2-667 without any tweak. so fast
Allendale is the low cache version of memrom/Conroe and so not Xeon which tend to have large cache sizes. I think Woodcrest is the name of the large cache server based version of Conroe.
I think Allendale also is 1066fsb so whatever this chip is it is not Allendale ! Looks like a 1333Mhz 4Mb Conroe ....
Regards
Andy
This looks like a Woodcrest-based Xeon, which would make it dual-core and S771.Quote:
Originally Posted by hicookie
And if the 3GHZ @ 1.2V are anything to go by, well, lets just hope Conroe cores will do as well ... :fact:
Actually I think Woodcrest was supposed to come out at 2.93GHz and so this would be a close match ..so I change my mind and it is Woodcrest :)Quote:
Originally Posted by incurable
Regards
Andy
Thx.Quote:
Originally Posted by hicookie
I think it's dualcore woodcrest and LGA771-Sockel
thank,the guy won't to tell more..
that's should be woodcrest,5160- 3.00GH
which board? he won't to tell,just said"es"
cpu&mobo all the es version, he told.
its woodcrest, this is the highest end Core macroarchitecture CPU which will be resleased in Q3, so thats pretty nice :p
EDIT: now someone go overclock one d@mnit. Just one more multiplier and you got the XE there...
Why publish and not tell which board :confused: .Quote:
Originally Posted by hicookie
Correct.
Thx for sharing these impressive info :clap: .
maybe because you aint supposed to have the board :D
Nice chip, hopefully we get some more info soon.
It's a newer chip because it has de 6F4h steppings which is the newer B0 stepping according to The Coolest:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
omg :D
However, conroe xe is supposed to be 3.3Ghz :D
Chip Number-Clock-Cache-Bus-Core
Cloverton Not yet Not yet 2X4MB 1066 4/4
Woodcrest 5160 3GHz 4MB 1333 2/2
Woodcrest 5150 2.66GHz 4MB 1333 2/2
Woodcrest 5140 2.33GHz 4MB 1333 2/2
Woodcrest 5130 2GHz 4MB 1333 2/2
Woodcrest 5120 1.86GHz 4MB 1333 2/2
Woodcrest 5110 1.60GHz 4MB 1333 2/2
Woodcrest LV 5148 2.33GHz 4MB 1333 2/2
That is simply insane.
Intel said in their earniong release call that they are already building inventories of Conroe , Merom , Woodcrest and availability should be no problem in Q3 ( July-August ) when they are launched.
well, Intel pretty much said they were going down the :banana::banana::banana::banana:ter for Q1 and Q2, so they gotta say something good to the investors to keep their stock from going south. HAving said that, I still expect their stock to fall pretty bad, and then guess whos gonna buy it right before Conroe comes out :banana:.
Just like I said months ago. Conroe XE will pull sub-16 seconds stock at 3.33Ghz. Expect many systems OC'ed with good memory and tight(er) timings to go sub-12 seconds on SPI 1M. The champs will be in the low 9 second range. :)
we'll have to wait and see, don't make sense that Presler only overclocks to ~4G on air, and yet you suggest Conroe can make nearly the same speed with less than half the pipe length.
thats what the market calls "progress" ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownTown
the reason presler hits 4G on air might have something to do with with heat and power requirements
Well, netburst didn't work out as intended, TDP was high even at 65nm. I hope and believe that most 2.4-2.66GHz++ Conroes will do at least 3.5-3.6GHz on air. We'll see said the blind to the deaf.
And BTW: does it make sense that Presler maxed out at 3.8GHz (std. speed) and Conroe's temperarily max is 3.0/3.3GHz? It makes one wonder..
Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
:woot:
Are you serous?, thats relly insane.
Very very very nice hicookie. :toast:
Is that SuperPi 1M world record, isn't it?
Looks like someone have been sleeping a lot lately. Check the WR thread ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by BitpowerPM
Oh :) :(
But the old record with Prescott @ 7,x GHz has been around 17,xxx seconds, right ?
My guess
It might be a Conroe 2.4 @ 333FSB.
My 2.16 @ 2666 333FSB scores 18s pi
http://fugger.netfirms.com/conr1.jpg
umm, yeah about that...?
So how did that overclocking go, 1.136V is an interesting number...
can you post a 32m or ask him to post a 32m superpi run when possible.
:worship: has merom same core?Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
yes merom/conroe it's exactly the same core
In what board are you running that fugger?
the vcore is real? 1.13v :banana: @2.66
yeah, way to be a :banana: :banana: :banana: and just drop that in there like that with no explanation :p:.
No comment. Check the vcore on the original image in the first post.
BTW, that is not my top speed. :D
Nbench is so owned by Intel now. 2K5 pfft...
What chipset does that board use ?? i975 ? i965 ?Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Anyway awesome to see you finally fired your conroe up :)
Let the Intel Core technlogy break loose :D
HC, did not mean to hijack your thread.
In the first image I see one obvious difference in that chip and it is not an ES chip from the CPUID string posted in everest. if it were an ES Merom or Conroe it would have @ 000 and it does say "ES = no"
That might be a very early retail 3Ghz 333FSB chip.
Fugger I know you cant say much, which is sad. But is there any way you could tell us whether this board is currently on the market or not?Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
I wish you luck and Hicookie thanks for the results, they look awesome. I am trying to hold out until Woodcrest Xeon for my CAD/Photoshop/Main work rig and for a couple servers at work. This is awesome because I waited and am now being rewarded. WHOOOO :woot:
End of June early July. I will ask what the part number will be and permission to say.
Which socket will it be?
Which socket will it be?
Lga775, it says in the screenie
Oh sorry, didn't read properly :( and I still can't see it, or do you refer to your cpu-z shoot? Thought this was Xeon and not Conroe?
Sweet.
/me makes a note in calendar. Less than 90 days :woot:
damn, really impressive
Great to see you running Conroe:toast: Can you get higher FSB with lower multy? Or is this as much the MB can handle?Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Anyway its nice to see that we get 333FSB. Means the midrange Conroe cpu's have room to scale up:banana:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Intel-Xeon-3-0...QQcmdZViewItem
hehe, he wants a lot for it though :rolleyes: can't guess why :p:
edit:
dam that's not even it!!
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Processor Class: Intel Pentium D
he wants £900 for that!?!?! LOL
i think it is a Intel Xeon MP 7041 / 2x 3.00GHz / 200MHz FSB / 2x 2048kB Cache / 604-pin
Fugger, what mobo are you using to get that conroe to work?
no,the guy ensure ths is woodcrest 5160 3G default frequency,:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
ths is server xeon,not desktop.
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/news.php?tid=587650
16s @ 3,1 GHz !!! :banana: :banana:
can we see some 32m runs ???
OMG, that's fast :D
somebody that sees what mobo this is?
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/attachments...Tbon9szX2M.jpg
That is a 2.13Ghz chip that is doing a 40% plus overclock on air cooling and producing Superpi scores in the 16s bracket.
And will cost $240.
AM2 will have to be good and will have to be CHEAP. However maybe the people who say AMD for games an Intel for 2d benches are right and we should not get excited.
Regards
Andy
I knew that ;)
just wanna know on what mobo
it looks like a gigabyte northbridge heatsink. Dunno though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Extera
Me want, me want!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Wootage big time!:woot:
I love how they have such an amazing cpu but are too cool to get something better than a 7800GT.
maybe they pixellated it in order to prevent you from seeing what it is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Extera
Not at all, anyone saying AMD for Games and Intel for 2d benchmarks can't read. Conroe was faster on these rigs tested in Games and Apps. The only folks who aren't excited is AMD.Quote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
If we have learnt anything over the last two years it is that performance is no longer the only goal, for years Intel have been getting slammed for being to hot and hungry for power, this is the main reason I think x2s are better than p-ds
X2’s are faster
X2’s use less power
Intel’s are cheaper
So it is clear that x2’s win 2/3 of the main things we want in our cpus with Intel winning 1 thing “price” which is arguably the most important and probably saving Intel from losing more market share than it has.
Now I think it is safe to say that Conroe is going to be faster that x2 & am2 even die hard amd fan boys have said that Conroe will not wipe the floor with am2 it will probably be even or slightly faster. So it is safe to say that Conroe will be 1-20% faster.
I also think Conroe is going to be fantastic with power consumption, Intel are the ones pushing performance per watt of power consumed. On the other hand it seems amd’s way forward now is to ramp up clock speeds. The rolls will reverse and amd will be the high powered high GHz one
And if Intel release Conroe anywhere near the prices they have said they will they will keep there lead with price
Conroe will be faster
Conroe will use less power
Conroe will be cheaper
I know a lot of amd fan boys will not like this but at least you can be sure in the knowledge that amd will take the lead back and Intel fan boys can be sure that Intel will probably take the lead back after that and so on.
any more news on that xeon cpu?
its lv model es 333fsb socket 771, right?
Xeon 5160 - 4M 1333FSB 3ghz
Xeon 5150 - 4M 1333FSB 2.66ghz
Xeon 5140 - 4M 1333FSB 2ghz
Xeon 5120 - 4M 1066FSB 1.86ghz
Xeon 5110 - 4M 1066FSB 1.6ghz
Q3 Lauch, work in 5000 series chipset with Dual Independent FSB :eek: and FBDIMM memory technology.
Merom/Conroe NGMA type core. This should be super fast in PCMark, and if we get overclockable boards like the ol PC-DL, then we are going to be in for some fun with this platform. I just doubt we will ever see dual x16 graphics, maybe dual x8 so crossfire should work. I have been thinking about this for my next setup after Conroe but we have to wait on the boards being invented.
wow, that's impressive!
So very true, no good having high performance server chip for overclockers with no "foundation" to launch from. I hope someone like Asus or even Iwill come to the party and with 2 x 16x CF or Sli support. Also, for my sake availability down here in OZ. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by markodude