:stick: :nono:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8925312
Printable View
:stick: :nono:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8925312
:banana: omg p4 power!
wow
Incredible score - but appears that it's bugged. Too bad - but almost 56k is insane enough!
Hi, principino1984, thank you for starting the thread of my 3DMark:)
This score is obtained accidentally!!!
After I got the preceding score 55178 normally,
I raised FSB@377MHz and try Nature.
...Soon the display was freezed...
I thought that my system had downed,
but then, the system recovered and showed this score!!!
I think that this score is buggy, beyond tweaking,
but ORB server received it flawlessly...
So I decided to publish both scores, 55178 & 57382;)
I believe that I can't get such a score again...
...before Yonah/Merom/Conroe:rolleyes:
Screenshots and more details are here:
http://www.oohashi.jp/c-board/c-boar...ne;no=4266;id=
sorry in japanese, as usual.
Edited:
And after you all enjoyed this score, I may cancell publishing 57382:)
Don't give up so quickly on your 670 Kyosen-san! Gambare!
Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 994.5 FPS :eek: :slobber:
run the Forsaken , incomming ,quake2
the system will break 1000fps :toast:
Congratulations on your Overclock + awsome scoreQuote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
the same thing happened with Lobby low a few weeks ago.
screen froze, and then the system recovered showing a score 50fps above our best!
hipro has to show some back up scores now.
congrats :)
p.d. i dont know what to say if the orb acepted it, it is ok i think.
Absolutely incredible score...didn't expect the single core P4's to pack that much of a punch.
But the 57k is very much bugged. This nature bug has been reported here and there ever since 01 came out.
57k is just incredible! :eek:
Well it sounds bugged but it's only 12Fps more in Nature than macci currently has. Either his reference board is really something special or he knows something no one else does ;)
Your 55K score is absolutely fantastic :toast:
Well...he says in the description that its bugged, heh. A sudden 110 fps gain out of nowhere doesn't make much sense either. I remember Bowman and some others saying they got near 50 fps gains out of nowhere on Nature on 9700pro-grade cards back in the day due to instability. Macci's got high FPS because of dual core...
It's still an absolutely incredible score, nonetheless. :toast:
Some nice overclocking but if the score is bugged then etiquette would normally be that it is removed after being shown as an interesting score.
Regards
Andy
Good morning, everyone,
Yes, I know it from very first, so done it:)Quote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
When you get conroe that will be a very small score indeed :cool: It is nice to see 3dbenching from Japan (especially at 7GHz!)..we need to see more :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
Regards
Andy
True class, kyosen. :up: Cannot wait to see more! Perhaps a 7G+ Presler will do the trick while we're waiting for Conroe? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
No problem man.. ;) I decided to post it anyway 'cause you made an awesome score, even if this one is bugged the other one is fantastic!Quote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
Congrats! This scores I can only make in my dreams... but luckly I don't dream 3dmark01 :banana: :D
ONce again... CONGRATS!!!
Marco
KNEW YOU COULD DO IT !!!! :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
CONGRATS !!! :eleph: :eleph: :eleph:
Looking forward to your yonah thread man :) If it was anything like your dothan thread, its going to be another LEGENDARY ACHIEVEMENT !! :woot: :woot: :woot:
Perkam
Nice run Kyosen:toast:
Awsome p4 work kyosen and you have much honor and integrity to to say it's a bugged score and remove it. That's CLASS :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Quote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
^^ χ 1000
So P4 hasn't saw all of his power still.....
Crazy Japanese man there very good work....:toast: :toast: :toast: :woot:
Credit for taking down the score for thinking that it could be bugged...
Good clocking though and good luck in the future, if you are going for a full un-bugged run ;)
yeah, respect kyosen for deleting a bugged run.
So it has come to this: Pentium4, Pentium-M and AMD FX battling at the top of the orb :D
http://222.151.144.134/c-board/file/..._2006Mar15.jpg
No insulation to the pot there????:D
:woot:
Very great run on P4 + ATI hardware.
Prescott is still good processor.
:clap:
If u wait long enough before booting up u will have a insulated tube too :DQuote:
Originally Posted by GoriLLakoS
I think macci has something to remove also... ;)
http://img465.imageshack.us/img465/2281/119rh.jpg
Yeah, bugged Nature there. Otherwise I'd think his Drago low would be much higher as well.
Congrats on the amazing P4 run Ky :D
macci's run isn't bugged but it seems he knows something about benching a CF setup that no one else does. Maybe a driver/registry tweak. He got Pedro to share, I wonder if we can coax him into doing the same :)
Too bad Jason didn't mention his card clocks, it's really pretty important when comparing ORB results that don't have them by default.
this shows the true class of an overclocker like kyosen :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
I still just love the thought of Macci waking up in the morning, driving to work and benching :)Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
Insane gfx clocks I guess...
Nothing out of the ordinary about Macci's score...other than that he's the only person out there who bothered do an optimized A64 dual core + crossfire run...now for how long will he be? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
nice score...57K....but like u said its bugged so guess its too bad...but 55K aint bad either..lol..
If it's not bugged then why would every test be lower except nature? Regardless of CPU bottlenecking on other tests, I would think Drago Low would be a lot higher as well... Doesn't seem right still
I was thinking same as well, all are lower except for nature..
Im not saying its bugged or anything, just seems wierd to me as well..
But its macci hes da man, if he thought it was bugged im sure hed do the same as kyo and take it down also..
.6599 Ati2dvag.dll same as everyone else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
Unless the is some trickery with the version which is highly unlikely macci's run was using the same public version of Cat 6.2.
I asked Jason about his run,
860/840, RD580, 3689Mhz FX60 LOD +3 = 676FPS Nature.
macci's run
774/870, ES RD580, 3443Mhz FX60 LOD +? = 766FPS
Now you tell me whats happening here if it's the same driver. +4 might give a few more FPS but no where near enough to make 90FPS ;)
Jason's run is interesting...if he had the same clock for clock power as Macci, I don't think anyone could deny that he'd be at 56k at least, probably past 57k. He might need to try different Cat AI settings. No offense to him, but his single card 01 is definitely lagging too...
u are right ghz there must be a tweak or something :D
Jason hit 50.2k last night isangle card "mastercard" at 890/810 only wiht a dualcore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
If Macci has some sort of special tweak thats fine. Would be nice if he shared it ;)
Should be closer to 51-52k with that sort of CPU/GPU power IMHO. Then again, if he used WinXP again it wouldn't be a surprise. His 05 score is amazing, would be nice to see him go for more. :D