System in sig
X1900 XTX Crossfire 700/900
955XE @ 5.8Ghz 380FSB 1:1 3-2-2-4
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1140254590
Printable View
System in sig
X1900 XTX Crossfire 700/900
955XE @ 5.8Ghz 380FSB 1:1 3-2-2-4
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1140254590
great score! congratz.
over here in germany the magazine "pc games hardware" last month published the new "world record" in aquamark they did - 139087 points. :P owned them
I think you owned them, Fugger :fact:Quote:
Originally Posted by AquaMark
It is 3 years old at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
I know, but still, it is just funny to read those things :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Hicks
impressive result Fugger....:clap:
over 7k more than my actual record:slobber:
Give me, give me!Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
Very impressive Fugger:)
Wow. Thats the highest Aquamark I have ever seen (which I think was 115kish).
Awesome stuff :fact:
Yes, I am curious how long the run took exactly...?
I am figuring up around 30 seconds or so...by the FPS and how many frames are in the run...
what is this trick, I would like to try it on my X1900XTX as well. My cpu and ram is a huge bottleneck. I can't even break 87k in aquamark. Boo for my old and slow cpu!
With insane scores like this it's a wonder XS doesn't take on the Aquamark3 forums on hwbot. We're first in everything else (bar 3dMark 06... for now (it's a stupid benchmark anyway lol)). We need a top 10 adverage above 117,812 to get first place.
EDIT:
Oh and awsome benching Fugger.. sir.
but it is the actual wr???:confused:
according to hwbot... yes.
just..
Aquamark - 148111 aquamarks - wkmgt - Aquamark3forums
Processor: Athlon 64 FX-60 @ 2600mhz - (compare to other entries with same processor)
Videocard: 2x GeForce 7800 GTX 512MB *SLI* @ 550/850mhz - (compare to other entries with same videocard)
Description: A64 FX-60 Vapochill LS / 2 x 7800 GTX 512s Water
Verfication: no verification image or link found.
Options: claim as yours
Nice FUGGGER. AM3 is very strange. I have 125k at 2.8ghz 500/1180 then I ran 567/1180 3.1ghz and scored like 300 points lower. I tried at 3.2 581/1300 yesterday and it errored out :(
Errored out? Do you have the patch?
Otherwise, awesome fugger, get those x1900's past 800 core already!
Quote:
Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337
what patch??
If your massive overdraw crashes, theres a patch.
I have no idea where it crashed but it was like BAM error not very far in. I suspect AM3 didn't like my clocks very much as it ran fine at 3.1ghz before.
I have not run aquamark in a long time. Maybe I should.
nice result!
Amazing score!
Very fast cards!:sonic:
hipro, where are you at, i want to see some aquamark with a 4.1 dothan :D
yeah hipro.. these wimpy 16.5k CPU Scores can be had from FX-55's i wanna see a 20k DOthan CPU score..
nice score fugger.. i'd be weary tho.. 16.5 isnt that high of a CPU score.. there are plenty higher out there.. need to go FASTER still
and fugger....its been bothering me...so close to 150k
think you have another 300 points in there?
I know the dual core AMD processors have lower CPU scores in AM3 than the single cores. I'm assuming that Intel behaves the same.
Bottom line, 1 great overall score -- Congrats :toast:
wow nice job fugger.
Nice am3 score charles :toast: Too bad the arc isn't up anymore :(
Who do I have to talk to to get the database restarted?
no one ARC closed their doors.. the people @ Massive development just up and left shop it seems..
there was the only "ARC" left put up by some folks over at a dedicated AQ3 forum.. and then ofcourse the HWBOT idea.. which i think XS Should do. but there is no way that i know of to get the ARC back up unless you have a way to host it
Who knows? Massive is defunct. Why not, as someone has suggested, start an hwbot ranking for XS?
Even after Massive bit the dust, they were still claiming that Aquamark would be back and that they were working on an updated version. That was months ago though. Who knows?
I also suggest the hwbot ranking idea for XS. My crappy score is already dedicated to Aquamark3forums though. But, we do need some competition in the Aquamark bench. We're a bit ahead, with some in reserve....
Nice one Fugger though... Crossfire showing some of it's potential, finally.
wow, forgot im redgistared here...
it would be nice to have some competition. mmouse is the only other person with a crosfire system, and hes in the HWbot rankings. he might just beat you to 150k also, but i doubt hes got what it takes to do it...
:( 292 points short :(
Not bad w/ single XTX :slobber: :up:
Perkam
Wasnt that almost a year ago tho Sir?Quote:
Originally Posted by wkmgt
i believe it was more than months ago.. unless Massive posted on the AQ3 forums and i didnt see it.
either way i enjoy AQ3 still much more than 3dmark cuz its shorter(and with scores of 140k+) its really short.
Welcome to XS NCC :p:
thanx B2B
we did try contacting massive about the right to the program to modify it and update it, but they dont even want to own to to making it any more
well we missed out on buying the whole site up by about 2 days.......
and the rest would just be programming
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncc-1709
its a shame too.....
"no i dont have spyware on my computer":rolleyes:
an hwbot team would be cool for XS to have...just wish i had the CPU and graphics card to run it again....
well ive got a data base of sorts going. but its not ideal. im still working on it to make it easyer to use and host it online so it does it automatically.
absolutely, high jump :toast:
great work fugger :toast:
Nice score! wow, impressive... What is the WR at?
btw, do you have x1900xt's? or x1900xtx's?
As far as I know that is the current WR.
xtx slave, master card is unreal.
http://www.massiveincorporated.com/s...twork_home.htmQuote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
?
AM3 is still the best benchmark for 3d/CPU IMHO. Anytime I got my best Pi time, that same config was always the best CPU score in AM3. The CPU performance was by far the most accurate benchmark, not only for being a true DX9 gaming engine, but because it wouldn't change along side graphics changes. You could run an MX200 or a 7800GT and get the same CPU score, then worry about graphics seperately.
There needs to be another real-world bench like AM3.
P.S. - I got the lowest A64/nvidia score in the ARC without underclocking. 438 total on a 6800Ultra, venice 3200+ @ stock. Took around 8 hours total to boot and run, but some guy managed to get 8 overall on the old ARC on a TNT2 M64 16mb and a 200Mhz PII.
A few of us would really like to know what you used to overclock those cards and at what stable settings fugger.
Thanks:)
Looks like I got bumped to #2
performance settings, lod 0
is that 16 bit? remarkable score, a lot higher than the previous records.
lod 0.....lod doesn't effect AM3 much anyway.
There's a link to my score in my sig.
You guys are totally crasy!:worship:
Thanks Silly -- I just hit it....
http://wkmgt.150m.com/wkmgt150.html
Damn, thats an insane score
damn. AQ3 was a great benchmark, Fugger is there any way that you could gt the ARC back up?