http://img493.imageshack.us/img493/1...d6600gt4cl.gif
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4493685
http://img491.imageshack.us/img491/2...d6600gt3bi.gif
http://img491.imageshack.us/img491/3...600gt018gv.jpg
Printable View
Goodjob.......Im getting 16500 with my Opty @2.8ghz and 575/1150 24/7 settings, and working on 18k ALL STOCK AIR :)
Ахренеть!
Слив защитан :)
Сэм эта пять! :toast:
тока не давай им дрова! ;)
Бу-га-га :D
Nice job, that P4 is doing really well in GT1. Very strong looking system you have :toast:
Nice scores. Looks like P4's are staring to make a comeback. Can we start seeing some WR's on P4 in 3d? Get that chip under some better cooling. With that chip @ 5.6ghz and the cards at 650/1400, you should be able to get 20k.
Has made one more attempt... 650/1400 : http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4494468
I think that 20k will be on 670-680/1400 and 5.2 - 5.3Ghz. It is enough hard task for me to make more than 650 and 5.2 under such conditions, but possible I shall try it in the near future.
The biggest problem is 16x+4x... In 03 it it is not appreciable almost, and in 05 result very strongly suffers, especially in fist test. You can see a difference i955 & i975 - 16x+4x & 8x+8x: http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/65nm975x-10.htm
I have counted my result if it was on 8x+8x :)
in 2k3 it will be about 20800 marks :) and in 2k5 it will be about 9150 :)
( my result in 2k5: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1598220 :( )
Nice job showing off just how nice Nvidia and Intel work together in 03.
good job
And here has come intel
sli on an intel chipset! finally!
did you need any tricks to get it working?
how well do they scale compared to a single card?
good job :toast:
english please :nono: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by xooler
I experiment it few months: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...?t=77860&pp=25Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
Yes, for this purpose the NV driver which is necessary can to work on intel chipset.Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
On one card the result hardly is less 12k in 2k3.Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
Do not swear on it please, xooler is good guy, simply did not know how to express it in english. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
so a 60-70% boost over a single card, thats nice!
what driver is necessary? the 81 detonator?
and about xooler, im not upset about it, hence the :D smiley
we have 20k members from everywhere in the world, and they all manage to post in english, some in good, some in bad english.
there are many online translators like babelfish and google.
and i know you speak english xooler :D
its not perfect, but its good enough to understand what you mean.
so please dont feel ashamed about it and kep posting in english :toast:
happy holidays btw! :toast:
It works only with Forceware 66.72 , 66.77 and 66.81 without any problems, and already with 66.93 does not work. And in all these Forcewares there is no support 7800, a maximum that can work, it is 6800U. All other drivers have been specially modified for work with Intel and they differ from usual versions.Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
hmmm isnt it possible to replace the necessary files for 7800 support in the drivers without making them block sli on other chipsets?
Oh yeah that's some raw power over there :clap:
But to be honest, intel always--->great @ 3dmark03...
good job :toast:
how many minuses ther in russia? nice memory speed btw :S i max out 690/1385 :slapass:i wait some hardcore minuses outside :p:
The first driver with 7800 support is 75.90... I have spent a lot of time for experiments with replacement of files from different versions, but anything good has not left from this. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
Now it's about -10C :)Quote:
Originally Posted by sponge bob
I saw memory better than me: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4005141 Though at me only Samsung 2.0nS... And I know people with GPU more than 700Mhz... I could put both cards under phase-change system, but me laziness. :(
saaya
Yes,i can write in english,it's true. But i can't translate my previous post.
It looked like - Upload done!
It's A+ Sam. :toast:
Only don't give them firewood! ;) ( it's such Russian proverb :D )
Bu-ga-ga :D
no thing xooler, just wanted to make sure you dont start posting only in russian now ^^
Today has tested for the sake of interest single card in 2k3: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4501099
It seems to me is quite good result :)
nice score their sam Asus P5WD2-Premium/SLi / 2 x 7800GTX http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4465247
Nice work BigSam ! :toast: You're pretty good with nvidia cards, know how to bench.
Regards
Andy
Main Test Results
3DMark Score
(3DMarks)
???????
19341
CPU Score
(CPUMarks)
Not enough CPU tests run
Not enough CPU tests run
Detailed Test Results
Game Tests
GT1 - Wings of Fury
(fps)
????
437.8
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon
(fps)
163.7
152.4
GT3 - Troll's Lair
(fps)
134.7
118.9
GT4 - Mother Nature
(fps)
133.9
126.8
anyone want's to guess ;)
Impressive GT1, that P4 puts my aircooled FX-55 @ 3.04Ghz to shame :)
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1135722155
kutteke, what GFX are you using ?
Many thanks Andy ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
Several days ago I have casually dropped one of cards and enough the big piece of GPU have broken away. The card continued to work after that, but I have decided to change them all for others. I could not find precisely same, but very interesting cards have got... 6600 non GT with Samsung 1.6nS. Standard frequencies - 450/1000. They are not bad overclocked and I think that it is possible to receive quite good result... But while they do not wish to work in SLi. More truly they work, but result very low. I cannot understand while what the reason. I already have tested very many various cards from various manufacturers in SLi-mode (on intel :)), but never saw such.
its all about drivers, use +6600GT ID and u see hugh boost ;)example, if u install 6600GT drivers on 6200 u see huge boost in games and 3dmarks, its same , like u told they scoor low ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Sam
sponge bob
Drivers identical for all cards. :) I think that a problem in BIOS. There is no information in "VENDOR" line. This line is empty.
It was my dream and I have made it.
http://img384.imageshack.us/img384/3023/66gtwr3pe.gif
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4540470
Very nice oc m8. The WR isn't it?
Congrats
SLI with Intel that is Really nice :woot:
Good job :)
Nice man. The return of the P4? :D
Many thanks for congratulations.
Probably I shall repeat attempt when I shall put new radiators for memory and I shall necessarily repeat if these cards will live up to 975 chipsets. :)
So It is just regular driver that is used for the benches?
If not, it would be nice to have these drivers so we can give you a run for your money :D
Very nice bro, congrats!
So where can I get these modded 81.85's?
To Big_Stan :
Well done.
Very cool set.....
However, i would like an explanation :D
You did use previous 6600 GT cards to set the record....or the 6600 non gt but but 1.6 ns chips and 450/1000 standard frequencies??
Will it help if you would use 6600 non-GT 256 Mo cards with 1.6 ns chips :) ??
Very impressive score for 6600 GT......20K...damned
Grats :woot:
hey, sweet score
Yes, I used previous cards. After long searches I have not found anything better. At these cards - 2.0nS Sams memory... I tried 6600 non GT (Galaxy Edition) with 1.6 memory, but anything good at me it has not turned out, though it too a world record: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4522800Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbie_User
I have tried to explain all in this theme: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=77860 I do not know where and who else has these drivers. I only know that I have a NDA - promise which I cannot break.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lando95
Who did you geet the Driver from? Nvidia??? Intel ???Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Sam
BTW I dont se anithing great about being in top 20 with a 955 system if you are the only one that has the driver.
I unless spoke that it is great? You saw in my messages a word - "GREAT"? :) I have simply shown the fact of work and have shown that it is competitive with a platform from AMD. Guy, I am nothing... :) and if to you do not like my result I can clean it even from the signature and I can put there something like this: 1. PlaceFX5900 3DMark03 = 9616 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2740262 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosfer@tu
Excuse me if I have offended someone, I did not want it.
Nosfer@tu
I think that you only want to achieve that Big_Sam would publish the driver...
These of the driver not from Intel and not from Nvidia. It is just necessary to have brains in a head then and you all has turned out.
And you only impudently elicit the driver, made by others. These the driver will not be will be distributed, about what more than once spoke Big_Sam.
You try to kick up a row to receive the driver is not correctly. The driver has not only Big_Sam, use Google and you will find other results...
You havent offendet me ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Sam
I just hate the fact that it will never be possibel to take down the record you made :D
I dident think og it as a way to show that an Intel platform can preform just as good :(
And maybe Im just pissed because you took that record for FX 5900 cards :D
Sorry for my harsh post :(
Now forget me and my sad redd :slapass: from back in the days when you took that record :D
Wish you the best and hope to see more records from you ;)
Ahh, NDA, I understand now. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Sam
Nosfer@tu, Lando95,
I understand that probably I am not right, showing all results on these drivers, as to the bull a red cloth. But believe to me, I was in equal conditions with all of you, beginning search of these drivers, and a red cloth for me were such messages as these:
http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2631&p=6
http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/65nm975x-10.htm
And it's many others... :)
You do not represent on how much it would be interesting to me to see results of such known Intel fans , as for example Fugger and many many others :)
I think I do now :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Big_Sam
And BTW I am still waiting for the guy I sold my 5900 Creative to caontact me when he sells it again.
I REALLY want to beat you WR :) With the same Cpu and Mhz of cource. It would be 2 easy with 5 Ghz :)
It is very pleasant for hearing, it's already business conversation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosfer@tu
That 5900, I searched for a long time and has tested many cards including usual 5900, Ultra and ХТ before to find it. Finaly, i have found pair in 5900XT from Aopen which worked practically equally... 560Mhz - GPU and 900Mhz - mem with stock cooling. I flashed one of them with new BIOS from 5900 non XT, that has enabled to work memory on frequencies 1080 - 1100Mhz. GPU without problems worked on 720 with Vmod and my phase-change :) I have made some trial tests then has decided to change thermal compound. When I again turned everything on, nothing worked. It was found out later, that the card was rejected and GPU has come off. :( I have published one of results which I had. I think I could reach more. My purpose was 10k :). On the second card I did not have not enough time and forces and I have presented its friend. But I am assured that he will give it for tests if it there will be a necessity. :)
Nosfer@tu
Yesterday I have casually found out pair photos of that 5900. :)
http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/9995/5900019xm.jpg
http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/4564/5900023hp.jpg
here are some pictures of my card :)
www.kirkkirk.dk/Vmod.doc
Mine was not an XT thoug :)
Nice pictures. :) PCB of your card precisely same as mine. The real 5900 had identical PCB with 5900 Ultra. Were usual 5900 which used PCB from 5900XT, and I used BIOS from such card for my 5900XT. :)
tehres a big performance increase from sli on 955 to sli on 975?y? isnt 16x and 4x about the same as 8x and 8x?
975 is faster than 955 about 10 - 20 % depending on a situation.Quote:
Originally Posted by grimREEFER
http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/65nm975x-10.htm
3dmark 03: 11975
3dmark 05: 5167
opteron 144 0536 cabye 1,66v 3106 mhz
2x256 mb corsair BH5 @258 mhz 3,3v
DFI nf4 SLI-dr
160gb Hitatchi sata
All watercooled (by asetek) + alcohol ~ -0*
6600GT by leadtek @680/1386
my single 6600GT result :slapass: :stick:
Lol hehehe!!Quote:
Originally Posted by xooler
Good job dude!! :cool: :cool: :cool:
Well done man.
Finally our record has been broken and congrats on the 20K I knew it was possible with a 6600GT.
sponge bob
I also tried a single card
03Mark - 12276 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4501099
In 05 result enough bad, I have bad GPU and on 650 I have not held on up to 5000 a little. I think that on 680 it would be not bad.
yes i saw that... how btw can u get ur memory so high ? cap modd? my memory @2,3v is optimal... over this just heats it up and no go , powercircuit sucks...Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Sam
ill go for new round... i just saw that my hdd was ~ 1*c :slobber:
and LOL i forget to clock my cpu higher :p: and anyways ur 5,3 ghz p4 is awsome in 03e ... what is ur max spii 1m time ? i can get 26,5 only
I did nothing with memory. Cards so worked at once. To me advise to make Vmem mod and speak that there is a chance to receive 1500.Quote:
Originally Posted by sponge bob
So... :) now my first run 2 x 6600GT on P5WD2-E (i975)
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/951/97505m9vt.gif
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1783963
I think - not bad for the first run :)
Nice Intel power over there, Big_Sam ... how's 3DM03 on i975 ?
wow really nice...
and what about NF4 with Asus P5ND2?
Thanks for sharing your latest project! I really enjoy watching your work.
And very nice scores, too! :clap:
very nice! bring some more home for intel!
stick thoes cards on a 975X chipset with 8x/8x slots instead of 16x/4x and you should scale even higher :)
Thanks for congratulations. :)
Has made some attempts in 03 and 05, on 77.72 and 81.85. My system obviously works better on 81.85 in 03Mark, and in 05... for the present has not understood. It seems to me that any small problems with mine CPU phase-change and consequently I could not pass tests on FSB=377Mhz yet. I think that I shall repeat attempts. :)
http://murenacat.com/sam/files/05_8907.gif
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1795281
http://murenacat.com/sam/files/03_20627.gif
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4614587
I think that in 05 I can reach up to 9000, and in 03 up to 21000 :)
Still wished to tell, that P5WD2-E very good device, with one enough greater bug. Distance between PCI-E too small for installation of qualitative cooling system. Between my Zalman-700 and a plate from another Zalman on a underside of the next card there is a distance of less millimeter.
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/2497/p5wd2e1ti.jpg
very nice stuff inside, nice mem speed :O i maxed out 1406
go for 21k @03 ;)
nice stuff i may need to run some more 66gt's runs been a wile but nice 03there:)