It's not what you think ;) More info tomorrow.......
http://img24.echo.cx/img24/6027/fx3xu.jpg
Printable View
It's not what you think ;) More info tomorrow.......
http://img24.echo.cx/img24/6027/fx3xu.jpg
Intriguing...
"Revision: SH7-B3"
*rubs chin thoughtfully*
Give us some SuperPi results!! :D
One last shot before I go to bed......
http://img167.echo.cx/img167/4749/579ob.jpg
so... it is time.. :D
Lets see some nice overclocks tomorrow :)
I'm wandering if it will differ from FX-55 San Diego..
Nice!I think it's time to sell the FX-55 if the FX-57 hasn't got the cold bug.
Thank you s7e9h3n! I think I love you! Been waiting for you special FX for a long time, and I believe I was one of the first ones to guess you had this baby! Thank you for picture post, that was beautiful! Hope you have time to OC that chip! But don't post too much, I got to read for my C++ exam on monday!!
:woot:
looks like a normal FX-57 San Diego :stick:
wonders why does he says it is special, screenshots didn't show anything like that :confused:
Of course, I know it is exciting to test FX-57 SD :woot:
but i don't see anything unusual
There is no normal FX-57! A FX-57 is S P E C I A L
he said it was a special FX, so the special part was that it was a FX-57. Most of us apriciate a post like this!
That's a really nice CPU you've got there m8. And it couldn't have arrived at a better moment, it's my birthday today so i hope to see a small package here soon :D
you lucky b@#@#$@!!!!:D:D:D
Give us some benchmarks if possible!!
SSE3 on 130nm....hmmm
That paint isn't dry yet bro? :lol:
*waits patiently* ;)
It's not 130nm, it's not Sledgehammer and it's not S940... Ignore CPU-Z readings.
Nice chip btw :)
:cool: you shouldn't need sleep when you have such a beautiful cpu in your hands :D
So what's the "it's not what you think" part?
If I think it's a bugged FX-55, does that mean it's an FX-57? :p:
*ponders*
well, everything points to it being a typical (if you can call them that in the first place) FX-57... cpu-z is misreporting, like it did with the san diego fx-55's, but instead says 57.. :p:
hmmm.. maybe it's an ES?
Agreed. How can you sleep at a time like this?Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
:D
Looks to be a nex gen Opteron. Will wait to find out :D
Why s940 though ??? :(
Perkam
maybe he's not.. he's playing with it now and laughing at us.. "lol dumbass!! u think i'll sleep now??"Quote:
Originally Posted by chunkylover77
=.=
How the world did you get away with saying that without dancing banana's covering it lol omg...that's not appropriate language ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by babyelf
Perkam
COUZ mis-reports, same as the SD FX55.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
I don't remember steve told me he got fx57:D
:D Nice riddle here - is it a downclocked FX-59 ??? :lol: :lol: :lol:
:toast:
http://img53.echo.cx/img53/7003/screenshot0736lc.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Finally, complete family till fx59 :D ..
CPU-Z bug ... just look at CBID. Normal 939 FX-57.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
hmm I am really interested to see what is behind this ... :stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
We will know soon enough...
I think it's time to wake Steve up :)
yep, its arrive !
now we all need to sale the fx-55 and buy 57, and it will be expensive
nice one u ve picked up :D
but i saw some shots b4 from windwithme on vrforums :)
seEn
The title only says "Fx" things that make you go mmmmmmh! http://forums.bigfootcomputers.com/i...fj/naughty.gif
give us some results!! Run every benchmark there is.
Did his shots look real? ;) I'll let you guys in on a little secret: He was lying......Quote:
Originally Posted by andL64
LOL! It's a closed loop now :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Tinker
s7e9h3n
Well talk already :) Is it FX-57 after all?
So are the FX57 going to be a 90nm San Diego? The new FX55 San Diego just came out. I'm selling my two FX55's to buy one of them or if the FX57 San Diego are coming out soon I will wait?
The FX57 will be a San Diego core, but it's not coming anytime soon......Quote:
Originally Posted by extremecorvette
*patiently awaits OC results*
dude, within the link I posted, its named in the post above steven's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Badong
it claims to be, it looks identical to the SD FX-55s but says 57 insteadQuote:
Originally Posted by Badong
-.- i hate you......ok now tht i got tht out of my system *sits with absolute_0 awating OC results*
Some people have been posting in the next two months it will be out and cost about 1200-1000
@s7e9h3n....lets bench and compare notes... :D You alwats the first one to test....nice :)
Heres just for fun :toast:
http://img233.echo.cx/img233/8479/screenshot0023oc.jpg
Its FX 57. We need to help VVJ from cbid to add amd power now! and p-rating feature on his cbid program.
St s7e9h3n showing to us the ultimate cpus from amd YOU lLUCKY guy that can play with all those babies... and we simple mortals we can just imagine to have one of those cpus :(
It could be something else. Something unexpected... It might not even be the FX-57... Wasn't the FX-57 slated for release in June?
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowing
:confused: So is the FX57 going to get any better thant he FX55 if they are both going to be a 90nm core and only 200mhz apart?
god i gotta search my family tree for ppl at AMD....got cousins and uncles at microsoft and IBM...lol i have a huge family
It's the new skt, w/ddr2, probably, and the dualcoreFX.
its going to be binned higher, i don't think they will do much more than that on such a new process.Quote:
Originally Posted by extremecorvette
Ok all, let me settle this once and for all before any bickering arises from this thread.......Ladies and gentlemen, let me present my cpu....... :p:
http://img231.echo.cx/img231/6043/fx574am.jpg
Sorry if I dissapointed anybody, but this in fact IS an FX55. ;) This cpu was one of a few "special" fx55's hard-coded by AMD's DVT (Design Verification Testing) team as an FX57. These cpu's were mainly used to test the bios compatibility of the upcoming FX57 without acutally using one of the few ES's. I believe this was the type of cpu that WWM was trying to pass off as the "uknown" fx-57 when he posted. It now becomes obvious why he never posted a picture of his cpu when asked. :nono: for knowingly misleading XS members :slapass: .
I'll post screenshots of it's default settings when I get home (I think I need to remount my evap though, since temps seem unusually high). So is this cpu not special anymore??? :p:
June is a little optomistic..... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowing
So that's why the low voltage ratings. You work for Sapphire or DFI. THanks.
So far I know that the FX57 is a 90nm Sledgehammer rev E version ADAFX57DAA5BN. It's 2.8GHz, 89W
LV ratings? It's rated the same as an FX55 Diego. And are you implying I work for Sapphire or DFI? If I did work for sapphire, trust me - I wouldn't be using a 6600GT and if I worked for DFI, I wouldn't have a hole in my pocket for the 5 ultra/sli d's I've killed :DQuote:
Originally Posted by cadaveca
No that's cpuz's error. It in fact is a San Diego.Quote:
Originally Posted by extremecorvette
I was kinda close then...just it was intentionally bugged. Anyway, you think they could flash it into an FX-61 and you run it under a phase change? If for no other reason just to say you had a program legitimately read a processor as an FX-61 a VERY long time before it ever came out (if it ever comes out).
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
on the other cpu's you got. not that one. that's why you got the big tray "from santa".
and yeah, you'd have that hardware as personal, becasue pride is everything, and your an overclocker that kills hardware. Guys that work at tech companies don't all make millions, ya know ;)
I don't know if I should consider what you said as an insult or not :p: because my only pci-e card is a 6600gt and while it's nothing to brag about, I don't think I should hang my head because of it :D And I'd like to think of myself as an above-average oc'r :DQuote:
Originally Posted by cadaveca
What would be the purpose of running it under phase? I promise you, there aren't any fx-61 cpu's floating around. The whole reason this was done was to test compatibility with the already announced fx-57. I don't beleive anybody has even though ahead to an fx-61 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
So how much longer do I have to wait for the 57? I'm just getting my 2-Stage 3-Compressor Cascade system done. I have dual evap, one for the CPU and one for my X850XT PCI, It should hit -95C under full load on both evaps
I know the FX55 130nm didn't like it cold but the FX55 90nm are suppose to? What do you know about the 57?
AFAIK, you're better off with the FX55 .13 at the moment. I don't believe anybody's tested a 55BN @ -100, but the .13's on average didn't have a problem @ that temp. BTW what stepping 55's do you own?Quote:
Originally Posted by extremecorvette
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
I will test fx55 BN @-100c soon, 4600+ as well. :toast:
Of course they do :cool:, the question is will San diego fx55's like theQuote:
I know the FX55 130nm didn't like it cold
extreme cold. ;)
Stephen, you must introduce me to your friends that keep hooking you up. I'm sure they would like me as well ;)
I await patiently ;) :woot:Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
:confused: Shouldn't FX-57 be released in Q2 2005? Now we are close to the end of Q2.........
:toast:
My feeling's on this are that Stephen works at one of the companies that checks AMD's chips out for them. I dont know if he tests these chips himself or he just works in the company. Of course I could be talking out my ass. Good stuff Stephen. Have fun with that awesome chip. And what is this? You are not an XIP yet? Will have to talk to Saaya about that. You bring XS all these AMD chips first and then test them for us. That is an XIP if I ever heard of one. Good stuff. I am awaiting your results on the 4400 x2 as that is the chip I want very badly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
ammm s7e9h3n today is the tomorrow of yesterday :D
and you promise more info today :toast:
You saying that the SD 55s can run 3.2GHz on air? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Not that it would be a 61, but just imagine having a chip from AMD that, for all intensive purposes, read as an FX-61. :p: If nothing else you could stir up some talk at some forums about a clockspeed ramping breakthrough at AMD...
Why do you cover some parts of CPU? Don't you think that by saying how many of which CPU do you have AMD can find out who you are? i see no point in hiding parts of CPU ...
SErial number... i believe it protects the warrenty.
Not gonna happen.....Quote:
Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER
Ummm, if AMD was going to go to the trouble of researching every batch of cpu's they hand out just to find my source, then they'll have deserved it. Plus, who said I named all of the cpu's I got? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref
Hehe, didn't think of that. One problem - the FX-61 most likely won't be .09 :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
;) BTW the 4400's gonna have to wait awhile since I'm having issues (again) with my SLI-D. I think somehow there's ice inside the socket. I don't know how it's possible, but some of the flowable silicone (to prevent shorts) I use may have frozen. :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by chunkylover77
cant wait to see some more results......no other board??:)
I've gotta k8n neo2 nf3, but I'd honestly rather buy a new sli-d and rma this one....Quote:
Originally Posted by SIOUX
s7e9h3n where do you live? I'll donate my board ( DFI NF4 ULTRA) to you for testing if you live in "walking distance" ! ;)
Only jesus could walk across the atlantic to america :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by furyfax
How many DFI SLI-Ds have you been through now?... why don't you try the Abit AN8 Ultra they should be on the market very soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Let me put it this way, I've been through more DFI SLI-D's in the last few months than all of my RMA's combined in the last few years. Maybe there's a reason they've discontinued this board :rolleyes: I continue to go back to the board since there's simply no other mobo in it's class when it performs correctly.Quote:
Originally Posted by bugeyes
Well s7e9h3n, I had an intuition that it was a FX-55. In your thread with 'Santa loves me more (dunno if it is), your first post said something about FX from a special RMA.
So guess we should've know that :(
When was the last time you saw someone RMA a cpu and get a test sample in return :p: The rma process my cpu's got through isn't the same as consumer-level RMA. It's internal, so you never know ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowing
I've updated my sig to reflect my new cpu :p:
Well... you're nF4-less right now and I'm CPU-less on the nF4 for same rmasons... no water, but still too far to walk :p:
Maybe that paint will be dry by the time you get your new MB ;)
I've been itching to try something out ;) I think I may just do that with a new board tonight.......Quote:
Originally Posted by EMC2
nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
it's curious that you've been through so many DFI boards though. i guess it really can't be beat, but i think DFI definitly should have waited an extra month to get some of the last quirks out :stick:
A lot of the problems have to do with the IC's around the socket and the mount for my mach2. I run into problems with condensation if I don't mount the evap tight enough, but on two occasions when I mounted the head too tight, a couple of IC's got crushed. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzimark
s7e9h3n..your fx55/57 should do this easily with tccd... ;) and get ultra-d ( not the sli one) with chipset 0452...probly NE have it as refurb..
http://img149.echo.cx/img149/1429/screenshot0091uk.jpg
care to elaborate or i might pick your brains in another time as i plan to dust off my mach2 stock unit with amd64 kit for DFI NF4 SLI-D laterQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Thats one RARE cpu you got there my friend.
Just waits for the Mach II to get put into action :D
Oh btw, sorry bout the heat. I was out before having a few beers. I'l get to it tomorrow. Pm me with the name.
Hey eva, yeah I really hate the mach2 mounting kit. It's a :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: to install and reinstall. What I was talking about is the flat piece which mounts to the mobo. I had shaved off the little "feet" on the piece which sits over the socket to get better contact with the cpu. This, in turn, means that I can't tighted that piece too much or some IC's around the socket may get crushed..... :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Easily :rolleyes: with a -60C vapo maybe ;) However, I did pick this up yesterday:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
http://img88.echo.cx/img88/121/dfimod6xi.jpg
ah i see...which part did you have to shave off and by how much ? thanks for the heads up!Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
You know, those four little "feet" on the plate which mounts to the mobo. It seemed as if one or two of the feet would always end up sitting on top if an smd, and that would make the whole mount lopsided. So I just decided to file the feet off entirely and use some cork-seal between the plate and the mobo....Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
I see... such a pain heh