As the title says.
Homepage
Results.
32 Bit Version
Rendering (Single CPU): 368 CB-CPU (Higher is better)
Render time - 71.6 seconds
64 Bit Version
Rendering (Single CPU): 480 CB-CPU (Higher is better)
Render time - 54.8 seconds.
Printable View
As the title says.
Homepage
Results.
32 Bit Version
Rendering (Single CPU): 368 CB-CPU (Higher is better)
Render time - 71.6 seconds
64 Bit Version
Rendering (Single CPU): 480 CB-CPU (Higher is better)
Render time - 54.8 seconds.
thats a 30% boost right? not bad at all!
was the 32bit version run under the old winxp or winxp-x64 ?
If it really makes that much of a performance difference, then I might have a reason to install winxp x86-64. :stick:
nice im getting 64bit windows when i get my venice
I have just run both, 32-bit and 64-bit on Server2003 64-bit Edition
289x10=2890MHZ DDR554 5-2-2-2.0-1T (just for kicks as memory speed and L2 cache size don't really matter much here)
64.2s (32-bit) vs 48.6s (64-bit)
Nice, 24% boost !!! It's time for software developers to switch to 64-bit, don't ya think :D ?
Hmmm...would love to see and AMD vs Intel on this software considering A64 SHOULD give it some leeway against Intel's Encoding and Multi-tasking prowess.
Perkam
P4 HT eats alive single core A64 in that benchmark!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
Then perhaps the challenge lies in AMD X2 vs Pentium D ??Quote:
Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
Perkam
As far as we have seen, AMD X2 4800+ manages a bit better result than Pentium XE 840... At least in 32-bit version :)
the x2 wins, not a real challange from a performence pov, but when you look at availability and price/performence it looks good for intel, sinificantly cheaper and not much slower...
id like to see a 840 vs 4800+ compare with the 64bit version :D
My AMD64 (x2 Opteron 252) outperformed my Intel (x2 Xeon 3.6GHZ) with EMT64 on Linux 64-bit. I guess it should be the same with WINDOWS XP 64.
________
Rhode Island Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
in what tests? compiling? how much faster was the opteron? did it have numa enabled?
nice rigs you have there :D
hmmm you need some decent memory though it seems... there is registered memory based on winbond ics that do 2-2-2 and there is other stuff based on micron ics that do 2.5-2-2 :)
with that much memory and interleaving enabled you should see a nice difference with faster memory timings i think.
32 Bit version in WinXP32Quote:
Originally Posted by Der_KHAN
64 Bit version in WinXP64
Since it's Sunday and I got some spare time :D , I re-run Cinebench benchmark. This time on 32-bit OS as well as 64-bit OS... For comparison ;)
This is @ 306x10=3065MHz DDR576 5-2-2-2.0-1T. Both OSes are on optimized in EXACTLY same way... Same services disabled, same tweaks...
Cinebench 32-bit on Server2003 32-bit - 60.5s
Cinebench 32-bit on Server2003 64-bit - 60.3s
Cinebench 64-bit on Server2003 64-bit - 45.8s
I thought, someone might find it interesting ;)
Lets see Intel guys post result. Is this not their benchmark? Let us see how they can beat the 64-bit record. Are they shy or what?
Honestly, It doesn't take much for P4 HT to wipe the floor with that 60s I just did... 4GHz is more than enough to make it happen :lol:
My friends Dual 275 Opteron did this bench in 26.3 seconds (the 32 Bit version) Man can you imagine with the 64 Bit version !!! I phone him. :banana:
yeah give him a call! :D
thx a lot michal! very interesting :toast:
I can't get XP x64 installed (the betas worked fine!). Maybe I'll try 2003 server.
Eric
On air
266x14 3.73Ghz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=31043
Vapochill @ 1.45v
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=31044
sweet!!! thx for posting more results charles :toast:
im curious how an amd dual core compares to this
14-SIXTY on that multiplier???
Can we have a comparison between AMD 64bit and Intel 64bit? I'd like to see the speed up each one has...
Dual 275 Opterons at stock speeds + 64 Bit. :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
20.9 seconds
Multi CPU score = 1257
at stock? thats only 2.2ghz right? :eek: is this with numa?
this is 2 dual core cpus though, can you run with one dual core a64 at stock and at the max oc speed please?
2 x 275 Dual Core Opterons yes. So 4 physical 2.2 GHz cores. Renders the picture in 4 parts. OC results are a problem. Machine delivered to customer already :)
Yes numa is enabled.
whats numa?
This benchmark is still Intel's. DUal core AMD has closed the gap tremendiously. I'm sure Intel dual core will see even more boost with 4-threads running.
Non Uniform Memory Access. Basically it means that in say a mutli Opteron setup each CPU can also access the memory attached to the other CPU if need be. It results in huge memory bandwidth i.e sometimes like 11K in Sandra.Quote:
Originally Posted by Der_KHAN
Not all Operating Systems support it. WinXP 64 Bit does and WinXP with SP2 is supposed to.
i think you dont even need sp2 to have it enabled, you need an extra patch to get it going though i think.
and it gives you up to 12Gb/s in sandra :D
thats with 2 cpus, with 4 cpus its 16Gb/s or so iirc
Sheik: Any tests with O/C'ing the dual 275's? I am looking into getting a dual 270 setup and clocking it at 275 or higher speeds. I would be running watercooling with 4 heatercores.
Or anyone else have experience with DC opteron OC?
Sorry my mate no longer has the machine. :( But, with the right board they should OC very well.
Not really...Quote:
Originally Posted by agenda2005
http://techreport.com/reviews/2005q2...2/index.x?pg=9
Notice X2 4800+ is about 6-7% faster than PEE 840; or X2 4200+ is about 11-12% faster than PD 840 ;)
now the question is... what is the right board :) ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheik
an nf7-s overclockable equivilent would be sweet :banana:
Cinebench2003 64bit
A64 x2 4600+@3050mhz
http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/...bench64bit.jpg
:woot: :woot: :woot:
So...
12% faster than 64bit Pentium EE 840 at 4212mhz with Vapochill
Impressive :toast:
Why are people saying that Hyperthreading is what makes the Pentium 4 beat AMD's? HT is simply cutting the pie into different sizes. You still have only one pie. You arent getting extra processing power with HT! There are other factors coming into play when the Pentium 4 single core beats the Athlon64 single core. If someone could prove me otherwise and cinebench with and without HT enabled, that would be great.
Personally, for me, 78 seconds with 32bit, and 61 seconds on 64 bit. 22% performance gain :banana:
Intel P4's have multiple execution units, it can execute code simultaneously.Quote:
Originally Posted by robberbaron
Dudes X2's own P4D's up, down, sideways and backwards -- Don't even try and compare the two.
X2's have a multiplier ratio of around 1.65:1 compared to a P4D, meaning to match a 3000Mhz X2 you need ~4950Mhz from a regular non-EE P4D.
The only good P4D is the EE which has hyperthreading and if you loop 4 instances of Cinebench it will win.