D²OL Benchmark - DBench 1.1 !!!

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-14-2005, 11:45 AM
bachus_anonym

D²OL Benchmark - DBench 1.1 !!!

Hey guys,

Did you have any idea that there's actually a benchmark for D²OL project ???

I didn't until now - DBench 1.1

I haven't had a chance to check it out - gotta go now - but let's see what those crunchers are capable of!

Shall we ???

Michal
03-14-2005, 12:07 PM
Jeff

Cool! :up:
03-14-2005, 12:16 PM
[XC]thewildblue

Pimp it for new members !!!!
03-14-2005, 12:28 PM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by thewildblue

Pimp it for new members !!!!

yeah tell them to more accurately benchmark, they have to run the actual D2OL program for at least a year. :stick:
03-14-2005, 12:37 PM
haPpydUde

Sweet, good idea. This will probly get a little more ppl intrested in this GJ :toast:
03-14-2005, 12:56 PM
Rodzilla

bachus... OMG man!!!! That is the coolest find ever! You are truly the man!

Unlike me you don't post that much here... but when you do it's absolute gold! (I try and make up with quantity over quality :lol: )

Thanks a lot! Now we all have some more stats to drool over! :slobber:
03-14-2005, 03:02 PM
chunkylover77

I ran the benchmark but how do I see the results?
03-14-2005, 03:20 PM
Jeff

Should be in the DBench.txt file that's in the DBench directory.
03-14-2005, 03:40 PM
chunkylover77

I did not install it. Just ran it from winrar. It does not have an installer. Any ideas?
03-14-2005, 03:40 PM
bachus_anonym

1 Attachment(s)

Allright... Since you guys seem to be shy, then I'll be the first to post sample result :D
This is one of my full-time crunchers at it's 24/7 setting:

DFI NF4/A64 Winchester 3200+ @ 2615MHz DDR580 7-3-3-2.5-1T ---> 149 seconds

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26603&stc=1

@chynkylover

I just extracted contents of that archive to this folder: SengentD2OL\D2OL\res\data\bin\

This benchmark needs either Gridwin.exe or Dockwin.exe to work... Those two apps are in that above mentioned folder...
03-14-2005, 03:46 PM
haPpydUde

Chunky do what i did just copy the stuff in that folder to your bin directory. It will find the grindwin and dockwin in the same directory and run it :toast:
03-14-2005, 03:57 PM
angrysquirrel

Now we need to find whats better to crunch with, AMD, Cyrix, Intel, PowerPC, or SPARC!

Good find!
03-14-2005, 04:00 PM
chunkylover77

1 Attachment(s)

Thanks bachus and Happy I got 152
03-14-2005, 04:17 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

bachus... OMG man!!!! That is the coolest find ever! You are truly the man!

Unlike me you don't post that much here... but when you do it's absolute gold! (I try and make up with quantity over quality :lol: )

Thanks a lot! Now we all have some more stats to drool over! :slobber:

Thanks Rod :toast:

Actually, I just asked on the Official D2OL forums and one helpful fellow gave me the link ;)

I was looking for a little proggy like that for some time and finally found it...

I really wonder what those Xeon rigs need to complete this one... I mean, two CPUs mean 4 instances... So let's say, just run one instance and divide the time by 4... Am I right ???
03-14-2005, 04:41 PM
Jerunk

1 Attachment(s)

Barton 2500+@ 2.4ghz .. 11 x 218

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=26611
03-14-2005, 04:47 PM
Jeff

Here's the result from my dual 3.2GHz Xeon rig with HT enabled and running only one instance of DBench...

Code:

Target: SARS IV Candidate: nci_340557.aq Number of Atoms: 15 Rotatable Bonds: 0 1: 355 -5.88 00:12 11: 332 -5.91 00:12 2: 345 -5.87 00:12 12: 353 -5.88 00:12 3: 351 -5.88 00:12 13: 340 -5.88 00:13 4: 359 -5.85 00:13 14: 367 -5.87 00:12 5: 351 -5.88 00:12 15: 350 -5.85 00:12 6: 345 -5.87 00:12 16: 349 -5.91 00:12 7: 356 -5.88 00:13 17: 337 -5.85 00:13 8: 355 -6.17 00:12 18: 325 -5.88 00:12 9: 359 -5.91 00:12 19: 352 -5.88 00:12 10: 346 -5.88 00:13 20: 342 -5.85 00:12 14 Mar 2005 06:32:07 PM 0 nci_340557.aq SARS IV 15 0 -6.17 -5.85 00:04:05 2 29791 00:00:40 00:04:48 Total Time: 288 seconds

200MHz x 16 with BH-5 at only 200MHz(2-2-2-6)
03-14-2005, 04:59 PM
Jerunk

AMD looks pretty good so far.
03-14-2005, 05:28 PM
haPpydUde

How do you run it on multiple cpu's? This is really only good for you single cpu boys so far. Still nice to have something
03-14-2005, 05:29 PM
Rodzilla

Hmmmm... How would we run this on HT P4 or Xeons? ... to get an acurate measure.
03-14-2005, 05:34 PM
haPpydUde

lol same thing i was thinking rod :D
03-14-2005, 05:46 PM
haPpydUde

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

I really wonder what those Xeon rigs need to complete this one... I mean, two CPUs mean 4 instances... So let's say, just run one instance and divide the time by 4... Am I right ???

I missed that lol :rolleyes: Dividing by 4 is unrealistic 2.5~3 mabye but no way a 3.2ghz xeon with ht preforms 4x better then single 3.2ghz without ht. I rember reading somewhere that a p4 @ 3.2 with HT preforms like a p4 @ 4ghz in d2ol somewhere... But better then dividing to get unreaslistic results someone with some skill could purhaps modify this program. ;)
03-14-2005, 05:53 PM
Jerunk

Or perhaps we could all run 2 instances at the same time? And add the scores?
03-14-2005, 06:11 PM
Rodzilla

No... I just tried it with 2x benches running at the same time...

On my P4E @ 3.74GHz I got...

One showed 332 sec and the other 337. It maxed out the CPU. 1 copy used 50%.

So if you average them together you get 334.5 sec. Divide that by 2 (Because each node is averaging 1 Cand every 334.5) and you get 167.25

This is the only way to get an accurate score. Run 2x or 4x at the same exact time. You have to start them as close together as possible. I started them within 1 sec of eachother.
03-14-2005, 06:13 PM
Rodzilla

Also... you only need to copy Dockwin.exe and Gridwin.exe into the same dir as the bench... this way you can keep the 2 separate.
03-14-2005, 06:31 PM
Rodzilla

So on my dual XEON LV rig @ 3.2GHz and mem @ 228MHz 2-2-2-5... I get...

378+377+379+376=1510

So I average 4 cands evey 377.5 Sec
or 1 every 94.375 sec :cool:
03-14-2005, 06:33 PM
Big Deel

1 Attachment(s)

A64@2908mhz...loose timings
03-14-2005, 06:50 PM
bachus_anonym

4 Attachment(s)

WOW! This benchmark is sooo fun... I just benched most of my rigs here :D

1. AXP-M @ 225x11.5=2.60GHz 11-2-2-2.0-1T DualChannel

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26621&stc=1

2. AXP-M @ 200x12.5=2.50GHz 11-2-2-2.0-1T DualChannel

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26622&stc=1

3. AXP-M @ 200x12.5=2.50GHz 11-2-2-2.0-1T SingleChannel

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26623&stc=1

4. A64 Winnie 3000+ @ 301x9=2.71GHz 7-3-3-2.5-1T DualChannel

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26624&stc=1

@Big Deel....

NICE beast you got there, buddy :thumbsup: What A64 chip is that exactly ?

BTW, are you spying on me or sth, becasue I have exactly same wallpaper on my A64's desktop :lol:
03-14-2005, 06:55 PM
Rodzilla

So far it looks like AMD rules... kicked my P4 in the arse...
03-14-2005, 07:34 PM
Rodzilla

2 Attachment(s)

This one's for you Disposableteen... :up:

303+303=603

So I average 2 Cands every 303 sec... or one every 151.5 sec

That's on the XtremePC running @ 3.95GHz with the mem @ 233 3-4-4-8

And it's only going to get a whole lot better when the parts for the mods get here. My mem is running for shat right now... but not for long! :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26626&stc=1
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26625&stc=1
03-14-2005, 07:43 PM
Disposibleteen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

This one's for you Disposableteen... :up:

303+303=603

So I average 2 Cands every 303 sec... or one every 151.5 sec

That's on the XtremePC running @ 3.95GHz with the mem @ 233 3-4-4-8

And it's only going to get a whole lot better when the parts for the mods get here. My mem is running for shat right now... but not for long! :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26626&stc=1
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26625&stc=1

Nicely done, i wish i could afford more mods, my cash stash has run dry though, im going to buy a case and thats the last thing i can afford. Ill get RAM and a real psu in 2 weeks though so then i should be good to go. Cant wait to see what my little northwood can do tommorrow!
03-14-2005, 07:53 PM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disposibleteen

Nicely done, i wish i could afford more mods, my cash stash has run dry though, im going to buy a case and thats the last thing i can afford. Ill get RAM and a real psu in 2 weeks though so then i should be good to go. Cant wait to see what my little northwood can do tommorrow!

151.5 sec... Buying a case isn't going to get you there any faster sparky. Think about it. :up:
03-14-2005, 09:30 PM
Helheim

1 Attachment(s)

XP-M 2400+ @ 2.1Ghz
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=26630

My P4 3.06 @ 3.2 Ghz was over 400 but now it's crashed and won't boot again so I can't post a pic, seems kind of slow though.
03-14-2005, 10:02 PM
Dissolved

i get 163 seconds with my rig in the sig.
03-14-2005, 10:05 PM
jikdoc

131 seconds with fx55 @ 3.16g using 2225 utt @ 242
03-15-2005, 03:18 AM
STEvil

XP-M @ 11.5x225.4 2-2-2-10 = 181 seconds.

Got a crapload of stuff running, including winamp, IRC, and about every messanger program known.. as well as about 15 web pages.. not bad :P
03-15-2005, 01:12 PM
Rodzilla

More scores peeps!!!!!!!!
03-15-2005, 01:19 PM
Jeff

Dropping down to no HT with my 3.55GHz Xeon rig and running one instance of the benchmark resulted in a 199s run. Definitely not as quick as the AMDs... thank http://smly.org/smly/angel.gif for HT. ;)
03-15-2005, 01:31 PM
Rodzilla

Jeff... post some scores using my method... i want to see what your Xeons do :D
03-15-2005, 02:13 PM
Jeff

Ok, how's this:
541s+479s+504s+520s=2044s
so on average that's 4 results every 511s
or 1 result every 127s.

(if I didn't totally confuse myself that is) ;)
03-15-2005, 02:16 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

Ok, how's this:
541s+479s+504s+520s=2044s
so on average that's 4 results every 511s
or 1 result every 127s.

(if I didn't totally confuse myself that is) ;)

How come you get "only" 127s with your 3.55GHz DX and Rod gets 94s with his 3.2GHz DX ???
03-15-2005, 03:02 PM
Jeff

Absolutely no idea? :confused:
03-15-2005, 03:13 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

Absolutely no idea? :confused:

Rod.... Did you cheat ??? Come on, you can tell your mommy :lol: :ROTF:
03-15-2005, 03:16 PM
Jeff

I think I ran that with 8 instances of D2OL running. ;)

Here's my new result when I run only the benchmark program. :am: ;)

334s+339s+335s+336s=1344s
so that's 4 results every 336s
or 1 result every 84s on average.
03-15-2005, 03:19 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

I think I ran that with 8 instances of D2OL running. ;)

Here's my new result when I run only the benchmark program. :am: ;)

334s+339s+335s+336s=1344s
so that's 4 results every 336s
or 1 result every 84s on average.

yeah, Jeff... usually, you need to turn off other applications, including D2OL itself, to get a better score :lol: :ROTF:

( damn, I'm in good mood today... does it show??? :) )

BTW... Awesome score! 84s :slobber: Why didn't I get one of those DX :brick:
03-15-2005, 03:26 PM
Jeff

Ok, since I'm playing the role of town idiot today... why does everyone refer to these rigs as DX rigs? :confused: It's probably an Intel thing and these are my first Intel rigs. http://smly.org/smly/newbie.gif

And yes... it shows! http://smly.org/smly/moon2.gif
03-15-2005, 03:28 PM
bachus_anonym

I think DX would be for Dual Xeon... that's my understanding at least ;)
03-15-2005, 03:30 PM
Jeff

http://smly.org/smly/idea.gif

Thanks. :toast:
03-15-2005, 03:35 PM
matt9669

Looks great - I'll have to try it! Very nice find! :up:
03-15-2005, 03:35 PM
Beat_Slayer

1 Attachment(s)

My all use rig in sig but @ 225 FSB! (My PSU is :stick: me)

So one result every 169.5s!
03-15-2005, 03:56 PM
bachus_anonym

1 Attachment(s)

This is very lousy result I got from another one of my 24/7 crunchers:

My girlfriend's Dell Insiron 5150 laptop 3.06GHz HT :sick: DDR266 ---> 437s

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26672&stc=1

VIVA LA LAPTOP DOCKING !!!

P.S. I think it's about time to have a little talk with her about Dell Inspiron XPS Gen 2 :stick:
03-15-2005, 05:07 PM
Rodzilla

^^^^ Your score would have been 437.25.
03-15-2005, 05:18 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

^^^^ Your score would have been 437.25.

ooppsseeee :banana: 437s it is! still pretty weak, though :mad:
03-15-2005, 05:30 PM
Rodzilla

slower bus speed... :(
03-15-2005, 05:56 PM
Helheim

Doesn't anyone have any Semprons to test?
03-15-2005, 06:10 PM
Rodzilla

I do! Give me a min...
03-15-2005, 06:14 PM
jikdoc

which rig did you bench 127s on jeff? i ask because it's the closest score to my fx55 that i could compare. if i'm guessing correctly DX @ 3.55 is roughly equal to single fx55 @ 3.16. it'd be great to see how a dual opty system benches.
03-15-2005, 06:16 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by jikdoc

it'd be great to see how a dual opty system benches.

... if we could only be able to find someone that has one... :(

I would love to see the result on that one, too.
03-15-2005, 06:33 PM
Rodzilla

1 Attachment(s)

ok...

AMD Sempron 2400 @ 10X Multi 190fsb = 1.9GHz
Mem @ 190MHz 2-2-2-5

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26676&stc=1

I have another Sempron I'm testing... lose timing vs really tight
03-15-2005, 06:43 PM
BigPanda

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

Hey guys,

Did you have any idea that there's actually a benchmark for D²OL project ???

I didn't until now - DBench 1.1

I haven't had a chance to check it out - gotta go now - but let's see what those crunchers are capable of!

Shall we ???

Michal

Awsome will post mine results tomorrow
03-15-2005, 07:03 PM
Rodzilla

1 Attachment(s)

I couldn't get the timings any tighter on the 2nd Sempron... so here it is anyway.

AMD Sempron 2500 - 10.5X Multi 184fsb = 1.93GHz
mem @ 184MHz - 2.5-3-3-6

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=26678&stc=1
03-15-2005, 07:22 PM
Rodzilla

Ok... this is weird!!!!!!!!!! I did a mem timing test with this bench...

I used my Dual LV Xeon rig running at 3.2GHz.

I got 94.375 sec running the mem at 2-2-2-5

and at 3-4-4-8 I got 94.125 Sec :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

I improved my score by relaxing the timings? :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
03-16-2005, 04:36 AM
RocKer

I dont get it to work,put it in the same map as Dock.win Grid.win then klik on the bench prog but nothing is happing,waited for 5 min still nothing,what did i do wrong,help.

Do you guy's let D20L run when you do the bench?

Its on my xp-m rig.
03-16-2005, 07:42 AM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocKer

I dont get it to work,put it in the same map as Dock.win Grid.win then klik on the bench prog but nothing is happing,waited for 5 min still nothing,what did i do wrong,help.

Do you guy's let D20L run when you do the bench?

Its on my xp-m rig.

Close D2OL.

Run the app I have attached. When you run the exe file it will default to the desktop... just run the DBench.exe file in the D2OL_Bench folder on your desktop. Thats all you need to do.

Check out this page on how to use the stock bench.
http://homepages.opencominc.com/smichael/dbench.html
03-16-2005, 07:52 AM
Rodzilla

Never mind :( It's too big to attach and I don't have access to a ftp for posting programs anymore... so... just read the web page I posted... you will figure out what you are doing wrong... You can just copy Dockwin.exe and Gridwin.exe into the folder you extracted the bench files to. Use DBench.exe to launch the bench.
03-16-2005, 07:55 AM
Disposibleteen

hopefully i can finally get my rig operational tonight, got a new HSF sitting in my car and waiting for 7 oclock to roll around so i can finally go home and install it. Will post some benchies when i get it OCed a little bit
03-16-2005, 08:11 AM
Jeff

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

Never mind :( It's too big to attach and I don't have access to a ftp...

Try again...
03-16-2005, 10:32 AM
frodo

ok... that is quite addicting, first time i got 244... (very weak i know) and this time i got 240, this is on an AXP-M running @ 200x9 *like stock... just higher mem bandwidth*

i should have this rig RE-watercooled with the entire system cooled (CPU, NB and GFX) and with the NB wc'd i hope to be able to get a higher stable OC (as thats why ive had to remove my good 2.5ghz oc :(

the paintjob on my new case should be ready tomorrow... then i can start installing the watercooling in it, and get it all done tomorrow :D

take care people
03-16-2005, 10:46 AM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

Close D2OL.

you're kidding, right? :stick: :slap:
03-16-2005, 10:46 AM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

Try again...

Cool! You opened it back up? :up: I'll do it when I get home.

Doesn't anyone find it strange that I got a higher score when I relaxed the mem timings on my DX rig??? :confused: :confused:
03-16-2005, 10:48 AM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmaa

you're kidding, right?

No... You have to close D2OL... I know that sounds preposterous... :D

But if you don't you will 2X the number of Gridwin.exe running... and they will all be at the same priority... so they will fight for CPU time.
03-16-2005, 10:49 AM
Jeff

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

Doesn't anyone find it strange that I got a higher score when I relaxed the mem timings on my DX rig??? :confused: :confused:

Yes and no Rod. When we were doing the Sandra memory benchmarks there were some really strange things going on there. I don't know what to think honestly. :shrug:
03-16-2005, 10:51 AM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

Doesn't anyone find it strange that I got a higher score when I relaxed the mem timings on my DX rig??? :confused: :confused:

I think what that means is memory timings (or even bandwidth in general to a point) don't mean squat to D2OL. The higher score was probably just random +/-
03-16-2005, 10:54 AM
Jeff

BTW... Daddy has the night to himself tonight so I plan on doing some benchmarking. I'm also going to look up what I need to do the Vcore/Vdroop mods and stop by the parts store for a minute. :devil: ;)

Throwing a benchmark into the D2OL fray is *DANGEROUS*! I used to bench SETI@Home for weeks on end trying to get the nth bit of performance needed to take another step. :D Hell... I may have to get an AMD rig just to bench D2OL. :lol: (wish I was kidding really... :()
03-16-2005, 10:56 AM
Rodzilla

Well this is good news and bad... (I'll have to do more testing first... )

If we can't run tight timings then it's no big deal... as it doesn’t gain us anything. We can relax the timings and OC more. :D

But... this also eliminates one way for us to tweak and get more out of our rigs...

We will have to test this more... It was late when I ran that test and I was uber sleepy.
03-16-2005, 10:59 AM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

Throwing a benchmark into the D2OL fray is *DANGEROUS*!

You're not saying you think it might not be accurate are you?

I think it will be dead on as all it's doing is using the same exact candidate and running it through D2OL's own engine...
03-16-2005, 11:48 AM
Jeff

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

You're not saying you think it might not be accurate are you?

:lol: Think you've become accustomed to my temporary negative exterior Rod. :lol: I was saying it's dangerous because it makes me want to keep tweaking away until I get the best benchmark result I can possibly get.

As far as accuracy... I'm with you. It's the actual engine running actual work... can't get much more accurate than that. :up:
03-16-2005, 11:52 AM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

:lol: Think you've become accustomed to my temporary negative exterior Rod. :lol:

No... just dont reed dat good sometime... lol.
03-16-2005, 12:02 PM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

No... just dont reed dat good sometime... lol.

yeah... pooped, popped.. what's the difference ;) :with:
03-16-2005, 12:27 PM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmaa

yeah... pooped, popped.. what's the difference ;) :with:

Come up here and say that!! :stick:
03-16-2005, 12:30 PM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

Come up here and say that!! :stick:

don't worry.. i'm comin :toast:
03-16-2005, 01:31 PM
Rodzilla

Ok... I ran another test on my Sempron rig running @ 1.9GHz and 2-2-2-5 on the mem.

@ 2-2-2-5 it gets 222sec
@ 2.5-3-3-6 it gets 223sec...

So in short I don't think mem timings mean shat to D2OL.
03-16-2005, 02:55 PM
Jeff

The only thing I'd recommend to people with farms is that they setup their systems with decent timings anyways. You never know when D2OL will close shop and it sucks having to reconfigure all your rigs when you change projects.

But as always, this is just my 2¢ so take it for what it's worth. ;)
03-17-2005, 12:24 PM
Paladin

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

it sucks having to reconfigure all your rigs when you change projects.

LOL, you love it and you know it! :hehe: If D2OL found the cures for all it's targets and a new project came, you'd retweak for the new one. It's part of the sickness.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff

makes me want to keep tweaking away until I get the best benchmark result I can possibly get.

;)
03-17-2005, 12:47 PM
shmaa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodzilla

Ok... I ran another test on my Sempron rig running @ 1.9GHz and 2-2-2-5 on the mem.

@ 2-2-2-5 it gets 222sec
@ 2.5-3-3-6 it gets 223sec...

So in short I don't think mem timings mean shat to D2OL.

what chipset does the board you're using have?
03-17-2005, 01:08 PM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmaa

what chipset does the board you're using have?

VIA KT600
03-17-2005, 02:02 PM
WindForce

139s with the rig on my sig, 235x11 ( 2.58 ghz ) and mem @ 2.5-3-3-7 1T . I set up my rig this way since it's crunching 24/7 and NEVER shut it down ...
03-17-2005, 02:29 PM
jikdoc

if mem timings don't make much of a difference can someone try with 2gb ram?
03-17-2005, 03:32 PM
chunkylover77

1 Attachment(s)

Upped my FSB and ran it again. Just saw that you cant really see anything with my attachment. I got 145.
03-17-2005, 03:34 PM
shmaa

Little test I did...

This is on a XP-M 2600+ @ ~2.5Ghz with 1GB of Ram... timings on both tests were 2.5-3-3-11

218 x 11.5
http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/218.PNG

118 x 21
http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/118.PNG
03-17-2005, 05:49 PM
freecableguy

159 seconds with only one instance on my HT capable 4.42EE (Gallatin)
03-17-2005, 08:22 PM
shmaa

just ran it on another box... its a AXP @ 2ghz with 256mb of BH5 @ 2-2-2-11... got 209 sec out of it..
03-18-2005, 06:32 AM
RocKer

Alright i did some benches,

1:A643200+@9x260
2:A643200+@11x226
3:XPM2600+@12x200

and has you can see the MHZ do more for D2OL then FSB,i think so.

My a64 runs now at 11x226 and it runs a lot better then before at 9x260,weird is'n it.
03-18-2005, 07:23 AM
Rodzilla

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocKer

Alright i did some benches,

1:A643200+@9x260
2:A643200+@11x226
3:XPM2600+@12x200

and has you can see the MHZ do more for D2OL then FSB,i think so.

My a64 runs now at 11x226 and it runs a lot better then before at 9x260,weird is'n it.

145... Nice! :up:
03-18-2005, 03:38 PM
shmaa

More experimenting with the worthlessness of FSB to D2OL..

100 x 22
http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/100.PNG

220 x 10
http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/200.PNG
03-18-2005, 04:19 PM
shmaa

XP-M 2600+ @ 2.6 (200x13)

http://www.cas.uc.edu/~smithmd/mobile/2600d2ol.PNG
03-18-2005, 05:36 PM
Rodzilla

What was your mem speed in each of those test?????????
03-18-2005, 09:22 PM
matt9669

Coupla questions:

a) Sticky? :D

b) Anyone confirmed how this behaves in a multi-threaded/processor invironment? I.E. there a way to run 2 or 4 instances at once and combine the result? (or I suppose assuming 100% efficiency you could divide by 4, but let's stick to the real world here ;) )

c) Does the bench account for the random behavior inherent in D2OL task assignment i.e. how some tasks/targets take longer than others?

Just wondering . . .
03-19-2005, 08:01 PM
Helheim

P4 3.06 @ 3.2 = 423s
Celeron 1Ghz = 524s
PIII 550Mhz = 922s (better than nothing I guess :rolleyes: )

Maybe its time to get an A64 to replace the P4... Hmmm.
03-19-2005, 08:21 PM
[XC] moddolicous

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocKer

Alright i did some benches,

1:A643200+@9x260
2:A643200+@11x226
3:XPM2600+@12x200

and has you can see the MHZ do more for D2OL then FSB,i think so.

My a64 runs now at 11x226 and it runs a lot better then before at 9x260,weird is'n it.

The reason it might run better is because your not stresing the me at that high of an FSB anymore. Nice results btw.
03-20-2005, 06:22 AM
Charloz24

I would be interested in knowing if memory bandwith helps in D2OL. So can someone do some bench single channel VS dual channel?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:28 AM.

XtremeSystems