DFI NF4 / BH5 @fsb 500 !!!! WR ?

Printable View

02-20-2005, 04:47 AM
boblemagnifique

DFI NF4 / BH5 @fsb 500 !!!! WR ?

:banana:

CPU-Z 1.27 validation -> ID : 3304

http://www.membres.lycos.fr/boblemag...nf4/fsb490.png

What it is me or nobody had to pass Superpi 1mo with Fsb of 500 :??: :D :D :D :D (Not optimised)

http://www.membres.lycos.fr/boblemag...nf4/fsb500.PNG
02-20-2005, 04:50 AM
Firefoxx

Sick results, this 2/1 divider really pushes these boards.
02-20-2005, 04:52 AM
eva2000

WOAH nice me gonna try that too :)
02-20-2005, 05:07 AM
Micutzu

Great job, mine locks up over 450Mhz (R.A02 Taiwan), i'm guessing the CPU can't take it.

http://crazypc.ro/forum/index.php?ac...e=post&id=1276
02-20-2005, 05:09 AM
joselord

:toast: :toast: :toast:
02-20-2005, 05:13 AM
mcnbns

:toast: Nice work. That's the highest HTT speed I've ever seen. :)
02-20-2005, 05:13 AM
misteroadster

héhé , congratz bobby :D
02-20-2005, 05:15 AM
saaya

wow, nice! :toast:
02-20-2005, 05:20 AM
misteroadster

Another French WR :toast:
02-20-2005, 05:53 AM
overcrash86

nice job bob :D
02-20-2005, 06:36 AM
boblemagnifique

Thank All !!!

Good this bios 2/18 walk really, I will try to test this day to outside see what that gives, I think of making a max screen has 505/510 without too much Problem, I do not imagine with the chipset cool with a dod and vmodée, that could go up very very high!!!!

If not my HTT is has 2 or 2.5, that doesn't change large thing has 500, I arrive has to hold a few minutes without freeze
02-20-2005, 06:44 AM
saaya

hmmm interesting, on my dfi nf3 board the highest fsb i could get was with htt 3x... but that board is fcked up anyways :D

but maybe try 3x htt? i heard the nf4 boards can go much higher on htt speed than nf3, some via k8t800pro boards hit 1500mhz htt, whats the max speeds nf4 chipsets can do so far? i heard they go much higher than nf3 chipsets but dont know how high...

see how that board likes 3x500 :cord: :D
02-20-2005, 08:03 AM
overcrash86

sorry bob :D :

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=3345

http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/30...939/FSB505.JPG
http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/30.../spiFSB501.jpg

i can screen at 508 i think :banana4: fut that freez,i'll retry :D
02-20-2005, 08:32 AM
overcrash86

it freez at 508 ,but i've take an screen at 507 :banana: :

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=3349

http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/30...939/FSB507.jpg

i'll try an SuperPI at 505 but it freez in saving :(
02-20-2005, 08:42 AM
GinTonic

Outrageous!

:slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
02-20-2005, 08:59 AM
overcrash86

508 without CPU-Z validation beacause freez :mad: ,but superPI at 505 :D :

http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/30...939/FSB508.jpg
http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/30.../fsb505spi.JPG
02-20-2005, 12:14 PM
boblemagnifique

Very Good Overcrash :toast: :toast:

DFI roxxxx :banana:
02-20-2005, 12:18 PM
overcrash86

Quote:

Originally Posted by boblemagnifique

Very Good Overcrash :toast: :toast:

DFI roxxxx :banana:

Tanks :D

+1 DFI POOOWWWAAAA :banana4:
02-20-2005, 12:53 PM
Rondrian

looooool :D
what the hell on this is great? thats crap! big htt is nothing without big memory clock!
02-20-2005, 01:01 PM
overcrash86

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rondrian

looooool :D
what the hell on this is great? thats crap! big htt is nothing without big memory clock!

my BH5 is at 250 it's not bad i think ,i'll try to set a better mem timing at 500HTT/250RAM clock ,to have good SuperPI score :D
02-20-2005, 01:03 PM
Rondrian

that'S not necessary as long as you don't have higher ram clocks.... only high htt won't give more performance....
02-20-2005, 01:05 PM
overcrash86

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rondrian

that'S not necessary as long as you don't have higher ram clocks.... only high htt won't give more performance....

i know ,but it's for fun :D
02-20-2005, 01:23 PM
bias_hjorth

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rondrian

that'S not necessary as long as you don't have higher ram clocks.... only high htt won't give more performance....

But its fun to push it to the limits of the boards anyway dont you think?
02-20-2005, 01:35 PM
Vincentvega18

Try superpi run at 1:1 250fsb and then try 2:1 with htt at 500, see how much difference..
02-20-2005, 01:51 PM
OCFreeze

overcrash86 ,congratz!!! :toast: :banana: :toast:
I think it's good to know how much HTT does the Board, isn't it???:D
02-20-2005, 02:02 PM
uwackme

hmmm

Please explain to me the point to running HTT bus faster? It governs the CPU to Northbridge communications, it has NOTHING to do with memory bus speed.

The data bandwidth needs from A64 to the IO devices, PCIe, etc off the Northbridge dont make a DENT in the bandwidth provided by 800Mhz HTT, so what is the point of having more unused bandwidth?

Call me when you have 4 512M sticks of ram doing 300Mhz @Tight.
02-20-2005, 02:12 PM
bias_hjorth

I dont think there´s a certain point by running this 24/7 or for overclocks - The point is pushing the hardware either way -
Btw. there´s no northbridge.

edit: Come on 4 x 512mb 300 with tight setting - Why patrionise him? Going through your sig doesnt actually reveal more impressive numbers than he´s showing atm.
02-20-2005, 02:20 PM
overcrash86

Quote:

Originally Posted by bias_hjorth

I dont think there´s a certain point by running this 24/7 or for overclocks - The point is pushing the hardware either way -
Btw. there´s no northbridge.

edit: Come on 4 x 512mb 300 with tight setting - Why patrionise him? Going through your sig doesnt actually reveal more impressive numbers than he´s showing atm.

i'v tested yesterday the stability when my max FSB is 488 ,484 in screen then 475 stable :

http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/30...ableFSB475.jpg

now ,i think it can be stable at 480-490
02-20-2005, 02:24 PM
uwackme

hmmm

Whatever the NForce3 and NForce4 chips are.... I call it a northbridge, guess its really a hybrid north/southrbidge with no memory controller.

My point is, pushing HTT does nothing for you, if you had 16way raid0 running then maybe you'd push the limits of the 800Mhz HTT, but nothing anyone does in normal use will make a dent in the bandwidth that is already sitting idle in the HTT bus.

On the 300Mhz comment, I mean _I_ would really be impressed by someone coming up with 300Mhz memory results at TIGHT timings, now THAT would be something worth getting crazy about.

As for HTT pushing for sport, why go looking for something that will yeild increased instability with no conter-benfit of increased real-use performance? Really no point really.
02-20-2005, 02:34 PM
bias_hjorth

Quote:

Originally Posted by uwackme

As for HTT pushing for sport, why go looking for something that will yeild increased instability with no conter-benfit of increased real-use performance? Really no point really.

I guess its the same thing as overclocking the AGP / PCI - If I remember correctly the big were doing this some month ago trying to reach the highest number (Charlie won :D)
But why do it ? Well for overclocking - That should pretty much explain it, there´s is no point than to push thing to the limits and beyond.
Thats to me overclocking basics :)
02-20-2005, 03:15 PM
Playful_Buffalo

would 3marks benefit from high HTT speeds?
02-20-2005, 11:28 PM
Punisher!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vincentvega18

Try superpi run at 1:1 250fsb and then try 2:1 with htt at 500, see how much difference..

Yeah. That would be a nice try.
02-20-2005, 11:28 PM
_Veseliq_BG

WOW - this will be my next board soon!
How much are these babies in France anyway ?
02-21-2005, 12:34 AM
blinky

Quote:

Originally Posted by uwackme

Whatever the NForce3 and NForce4 chips are.... I call it a northbridge, guess its really a hybrid north/southrbidge with no memory controller.

My point is, pushing HTT does nothing for you, if you had 16way raid0 running then maybe you'd push the limits of the 800Mhz HTT, but nothing anyone does in normal use will make a dent in the bandwidth that is already sitting idle in the HTT bus.

On the 300Mhz comment, I mean _I_ would really be impressed by someone coming up with 300Mhz memory results at TIGHT timings, now THAT would be something worth getting crazy about.

As for HTT pushing for sport, why go looking for something that will yeild increased instability with no conter-benfit of increased real-use performance? Really no point really.

its teh same thing as all OCing, its just for fun to see how far you can push ur hardware
02-21-2005, 12:36 AM
ZuMbAiU

Very cool,but i think that the synchronous mode is tiring out more the chipset and the mainboard can`t go so high like asynchronous mode can. I imagine the rezults of AN8 FATAL1TY Mobo. :banana4:
02-23-2005, 02:44 PM
overcrash86

new test :

http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/30...spi515mini.jpg

http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/30...939/FSB520.jpg

Validation
02-23-2005, 03:45 PM
dutchman.pt

Nice clocks and nice background, Overcrash86. :D
02-23-2005, 04:00 PM
overcrash86

Quote:

Originally Posted by dutchman.pt

Nice clocks and nice background, Overcrash86. :D

thank :D
02-24-2005, 01:42 AM
boblemagnifique

Nice !!!

World Record 529X5 !!!!!
02-24-2005, 08:35 AM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by boblemagnifique

Nice !!!

World Record 529X5 !!!!!

no
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=4075

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/4075.png
02-24-2005, 09:40 AM
vapb400

Quote:

Originally Posted by dutchman.pt

Nice clocks and nice background, Overcrash86. :D

who is that?
02-24-2005, 01:56 PM
flutie98

thats simply crazy, cant wait to test my winchester out
02-24-2005, 02:07 PM
HARDCORECLOCKER

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

no
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=4075

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/4075.png

:slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: !!!!!!!!!!!!!! :toast:
02-24-2005, 02:19 PM
bias_hjorth

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

no

Impressive numbers

Yours`?

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 PM.

XtremeSystems