Latest CPUZ Online Verification

Download CPU-Z 1.27 : http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpu-z-127.zip
*EDITed by IFMU* ~ New Download/Version, first link dead. ~ http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpu-z-135.zip
CPU-Z page : http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php
CPU-Z Validation page : http://valid.x86-secret.com/

Some words concerning the new validation system : this system, entirely online-based, allows to validate a CPU-Z screenshot. Validating an overclock consists in three steps :
- save the validation file
- submit it on http://valid.x86-secret.com/
- if the validation passes, it will provide you an ID. Enter this ID in CPU-Z, and it will be displayed in the main page.

IDs can be validated at this page : http://valid.x86-secret.com/

Enjoy !! :-)
Best regards,
Franck

thanks man, i appreciate the work youre putting into this so that we can have cheat free benchie :) :toast:

Split from CPUZ verification thread and Stuck! great work Franck :toast:

nice :)

excellent idea!

:up:

thx Franck ;)

Great job!

:toast:

that is extrem beautiful :)

:toast:

All we ever wanted! ;)

Nice !

Nice work.

Nice work!

Franck,
Your tireless work on CPU-Z and helping the OC community is greatly appreciated!

C

Sweetness..now I dont have to deal with any rude peeps anymore ;) :banana4:

Great work. And it now displays the correct real-time Xeon speed to boot. :up:

Awesome. :up: That should save Kunaak some time. :toast:

thanks!!

Thank you Franck ! :up:

Been using CPU-Z for years,great utility !

With Clockgen and all;you are like the OC community's Swiss Army knife !

great work, works like a charm

Hi there,

I'm the guy who coded the online CPU-Z Validation system :) I'm glad you love it ;) At this time, there is ~1250 overclocking submitted in 24H, that's great ! BTW, the code is still work in progress and if you saw some bugs or have some ideas about enhancements, please feel free to post here or send me an email (validator@x86-secret.com).

:)

Thx Franck!! :toast:

I still can't see my voltage in CPUz w/ a 560J

Good job on the online thing though

Sent a MSN message

At high speeds 1.27 failed to detect multiple correctly. I was at 17x333 and it recorded 14x333

Logical CPU #2 seems to report the right multiplier. BTW, there is something strange here. Franck told me about a bug in P4 with C1E/TM1 enabled. But i think it was in V1.26 but now solved in v1.27. Your dump show that TM1 is enabled here (MSR 1A0 - Bit 3) and then, that automatick clock modulation is enabled. Perhaps you can try again with TM1 off or with some CPU load.

Well, a bug exists with Prescott core and CPUID F41+ in CPU-Z V1.27.

Hope franck will solve it this week. BTW, others CPU (Prescott F3x, AMD) are not affected.

Err, i just checked with several PC and i can confirm that there is NO bug in CPU-Z 1.27. BTW, there is a bug in CPU-Z V1.26, Crystal CPUID and all other tools that currently fail to detect the CPU in C1E Mode. C1E Mode was introduced in Prescott F41 and is a power-saving feature that allow the CPU to switch to 14x multiplier when idle.

All old tools like CPU-Z 1.26 and Crystal CPUID can't detect this switch. CPU-Z V1.27 used a new detection code to detect it. Here is two screenshots from a Prescott F41, one in idle with CPU-Z V1.26 and V1.27 and one in full load. You can understand better what i'm talking about. In this case, V1.26 failed to detect the C1E switch correctly.

umm..why not included the voltage in the database?

Because the voltage measured is not reliable enough to include it, especially with Vmod.

[QUOTE=cpuz]Download CPU-Z 1.27 : http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpu-z-127.zip
CPU-Z page : http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php
CPU-Z Validation page : http://valid.x86-secret.com/

Some words concerning the new validation system : this system, entirely online-based, allows to validate a CPU-Z screenshot. Validating an overclock consists in three steps :
- save the validation file
- submit it on http://valid.x86-secret.com/
- if the validation passes, it will provide you an ID. Enter this ID in CPU-Z, and it will be displayed in the main page.

IDs can be validated at this page : http://valid.x86-secret.com/

Hi,
CPU-Z 1.28 is out :

1.28 - March 2005
- Support for SiS chipsets improved : 648FX, 649, 655FX, 655TX, 656
- Support for nVidia nForce4 SLI Intel Edition
- Support for Intel Pentium D, Pentium XE, AMD Turion, Opteron 252
- New F7 key to simplifiy the creation of the validation file

Download links :

http://www.cpuid.org/download/cpu-z-128.zip
http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpu-z-128.zip

BR,
Franck

Downloaded and happy :) Thanks, Franck :thumbsup:

I have one question, though... since you're here ;)

Are there any plans to actually integrate into CPU-Z itself all the information that has to be entered in the web browser (I mean, loading a file, entering email, name and "publish option") ?
And then CPU-Z connects to the database and just pops up information VALIDATED?

Just a thought ;)

Thanks again

BTW... What about support for AMD "Venice" ? Also, when you look at the AMD "Venice" CPU-Z screenshots, it seems that CPU-Z doesn't recognize correct amount of memory...

CPU-Z Version 1.28 was released on Friday the 25th of March. It has an F7 validation key binding.

To the thread starter. http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=8333
I find it cool that you can do this..
:) XeonUser is happy to know he can do this. :p:
Laters..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

Downloaded and happy :) Thanks, Franck :thumbsup:

I have one question, though... since you're here ;)

Are there any plans to actually integrate into CPU-Z itself all the information that has to be entered in the web browser (I mean, loading a file, entering email, name and "publish option") ?
And then CPU-Z connects to the database and just pops up information VALIDATED?

Just a thought ;)

Thanks again

BTW... What about support for AMD "Venice" ? Also, when you look at the AMD "Venice" CPU-Z screenshots, it seems that CPU-Z doesn't recognize correct amount of memory...

---

You mean directly upload the file ? I agree to say it would be much more convenient, but there are some security drawbacks.
Besides, the F7 key should simplify the save. BTW this feature was suggested by the xtremesys team, and everybody seems to appreciate it. Guys if you have more ideas like this please let me know ! :banana:

Venice is not supported, I've seen the screenshot after the release of the version. As usual I will patch :D

Franck

Franck,

F7 was a great idea, no doubt about it :thumbsup:

Thanks a lot for a great tool :toast:

thanx cpuz

CPUZ 1.28 got a big bug , when we use F7 to screen , with 2 sessions of cpuz , the validation of the 1st window of cpuz use FSB of the second for memory speed... And put The TRAS to 15
I tested it with 280 , 300 ...

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=9685

http://users.skynet.be/pt1t/utt320.PNG

Its true...

Here is my CH5 @ 386 Cas 2-2-2 :D

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=9739

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by krampak

Its true...

Here is my CH5 @ 386 Cas 2-2-2 :D

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=9739

---

Lol , yes it s true :D

Could you try to reproduce this with something other than "2-2-2-15" ?

I think this bug could only be reproduced with these value (may correspond to an unread 0xFFh register somewhere). If that's the case, Franck will correct this and i'll invalidate all 2-2-2-15 OC in the database (with V1.28/V1.28.1)

It happens too:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=9935

It was really with a 200:166 divisor (so ram was running at 200Mhz). Tras is always set to 15 when opening another CPUZ.

yep , that works with all CAS ... , But that put TRAS to 15 and other timming under TRAS to max but we cant see that in validation :p !

Well, Franck must correct this asap.

But cool news, i found a way to prevent these "wrong" results to be included in the validator. Could you try again ?

File cpuztest.cvf upload : OK
Checksum Computed : OK
Checksum Validated : YES
Dump corrupted

That doesnt work anymore :p

How do I find a lost ID? I accidently erased the e-mail which verified my Venice 3800+ ID? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

time for a new one. this one has been cracked

yeah I would say so. ;)

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=10937

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Franky 4 Finger

time for a new one. this one has been cracked

---

Not a crack, only a f*****g Asus BIOS cheat, as usual.

That's solved.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

How do I find a lost ID? I accidently erased the e-mail which verified my Venice 3800+ ID? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

---

Help??

great work guy...it make problems only with high speeds, but i think u will do another great work in the next version for resolving this problems ;)

Hi guys,

I'm quite finished with version 1.29, you can find a beta version here :

[edit : I'll put it online again tomorrow]

I made my possible to improve the clock computation and make it as stable and as reliable as I could. Nevertheless, a good test should tell if it works better.
So please : stress it ! :-)
(I removed the validation in this beta, just to avoid a possible bug to be submitted)

Thanks,
Franck

vcore bug on a venice

http://img135.echo.cx/img135/2305/cpuzbug2us.jpg

and i have see my bh5 at 311 1.5/2/2/5 :slobber: :D

I added an option for the vcore in the .ini file, in order to switch the voltage reading from the sensor.
Look for VCore=x in the .ini, and try 0, 1, 2 and so on for x.

ok with VCore=0 :yepp:

http://img135.echo.cx/img135/7389/cpuz0bq.jpg ... ;)

ok not sure if this is supposed to happen but i have dual xeon and when i click to open cpu-z more then 2 times it does this and i am just make sure your aware of this flaw

Could you please tell me if this version fixes the problem ?
http://www.cpuid.org/download/cpu-z-129.zip

Thanks
Franck

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr_Slinky

ok not sure if this is supposed to happen but i have dual xeon and when i click to open cpu-z more then 2 times it does this and i am just make sure your aware of this flaw

---

If that's not a #1 score, I'd really want to see what is :D

Im having a slight problem. Some things like voltage and fsb aren't showing. this has happened before with previous versions.

Edit: Its working fine now. :toast:

okay, new problem.


Edit: sometimes refreshing fixes the problem but only for a few seconds. it gets recognized as 2-15-15-15 and dual channel when i have 2-2-2-11 and single channel. agp is totally messed up but sometimes works right.

two things:

1. no newark support yet :p:
2. almost every time i start cpu-z for the first time i get a "previous verision running" error.. :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ozzimark

two things:
2. almost every time i start cpu-z for the first time i get a "previous verision running" error.. :confused:

---

I think that gets fixed by elevating the LDT voltage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aleman

I think that gets fixed by elevating the LDT voltage.

---

Just don't mix the cpuz versions. Changes in the drivers prevent 1.28.6 and 1.29 to work in the same time.

I add Newark, thanks :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cpuz

Just don't mix the cpuz versions. Changes in the drivers prevent 1.28.6 and 1.29 to work in the same time.

I add Newark, thanks :)

---

yep , in the now 1.29 version is fix it up :toast:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=30038

Little bug :p 220v athlon XP

Pt1t, got an answer: "This ID is valid, but not published" :D

new version of cpu-z: http://www.cpuid.org/download/cpu-z-130.zip

I am running a 540J 3.2ghz processor on a Epox 5PDAJ motherboard. This board uses the Intel 865 chipset When I use version 1.24 It will show my systems correct clocks but it will also show the right clock but with the wrong fsb speed and the wrong multiplier.l The newer 1.29 and 1.30 versions show the correct fsb but the wrong multiplier. They show a multiplier of 14 when the 3.2ghz has a multiplier of 16. The multiplier is locked at 16 on processor. Just something for you to work on
Version 1.24 is reporting correctly here. Now it will float though. It will always show the correct speed 4383mhz it will switch from a 273 x 16 equasion to a 313 x 14 but it will always show the right speed in ghz.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...la/Correct.jpg

Now here is a shot with the new 1.30 ver. It will show correct fsb but wrong mutplier.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...illa/wrong.jpg

Oh yes, both versions show incorrect cpu voltage I am actually running at 1.42V

Hope you get this worked out soon.

WZ

whts the last cpu-z version?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WeldZilla

I am running a 540J 3.2ghz processor on a Epox 5PDAJ motherboard (...)

---

No, 1.30 is right, you just see the effect of EIST.
Add some load, you should see the changes.

Hey CPUZ!! Thanks, I started ver. 1.3 then started pcmark02 to give it some load and it worked as you said. thanks for the tip!!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...lla/blowme.jpg

WZ

whats new in this version 1.3?

Faster updating among other things....helps reduce the OHHHH-so-easy cheat.

Id 43386

thanks man

Thanks cpuz for providing a great program :woot:

Testing 1.31-5 ATM... In order to find out if the "dead ram issue" is over.
Running 2 straight days and no bsods.... good job franck ;)

What is going on with the CPU-Z validator these days ?
It fails to validate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TaPaKaH

What is going on with the CPU-Z validator these days ?
It fails to validate.

---

ever since the 1.32 update, it hasn't worked. i dont know why, but they need to fix it. since it doesn't work, i haven't overclocked just for fun. since i wouldnt be able to prove it if id tell someone what ive done.

and what about vcore bug for dualcore proc?

I would buy is when all the bugs are fixed. Now i've to restart it a few times before it want to load :mad:

so bugy tool
I didn´t like it ....

buggy... but stil the best tool ;) franck is putting so much time in cpuz and i know its a great tool.. i use it and i stay using it!

okay you´re right

but since that SPD bug I didn´t use this tool

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C_B

okay you´re right

but since that SPD bug I didn´t use this tool

---

SPD bug!?

All good here matey, good job :)

Question to the editor of the CPU-Z validation
How come can`t I validate if I`m using "old" 1.32.1 version ???

thanks man ! will try now

Glad they finally included the hyper transport speed. Wish they would use real MT/s instead tho.