OPB Broke self Bandwidth record again

Printable View

02-10-2005, 12:38 PM
Onepagebook

OPB Broke self Bandwidth record again

Not with previous fsb, but more about 100mb/s:

9576mb/s:

http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/...opb9576mbs.jpg

took it from digicam:

http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/...b9576mbsdc.jpg
02-10-2005, 12:38 PM
conrad.maranan

Good job, Kevin! Now let's see 10,000MB/s. :D
02-10-2005, 12:45 PM
bachus_anonym

Almost there, OPB! just little bit more and you get 10K....

I can tell you that with a little tweak on Server2003 (actually, that tweak is right in front of your eyes, when Sandra results are ;) ) you could get 9700MB/s at same mem speed :) and efficiency could go up by aboyt 2%....
02-10-2005, 12:46 PM
Onepagebook

yup, buddy
If I got 3 stage cascade running 345x11,
I will...I might need to drive my Nissan altima all the way from columbus ohioo to Vegas.;)
02-10-2005, 12:49 PM
conrad.maranan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

I will...I might need to drive my Nissan altima all the way from columbus ohioo to Vegas.;)

I'll drive my 530i and meet you there. We can pull off some mafia-type raid and take everything from chilly1's garage. I'm sure he's got some top-secret 6-stage cascades ;)

bachus_anonym - What's the tweak in Server 2003, in case I ever get a hold of a copy?
02-10-2005, 12:52 PM
NiCKE^

Great results man!
02-10-2005, 12:54 PM
Onepagebook

ya, that's what I wondering..
Actually win2k is not bad though(this bw was runnig under win 2k):D

BTW** oh ya..chilly 1 is just recoverd from his arm surgeory, so we might have chance hehe..:D
02-10-2005, 12:59 PM
blander

:up:
nice bandwidth
02-10-2005, 01:06 PM
zA.Gosu

Nice OPB, what kinda volts needed? Is that TCCD?
02-10-2005, 01:13 PM
wfarid

yea what ram did u use?
02-10-2005, 01:16 PM
jjcom

I'm going to guess its Gskill TCCD RAM. You know...that one kind lol i forgot the name :eek:

jjcom
02-10-2005, 01:16 PM
J-Mag

344mhz WOW! :slobber:

Whats the max you can pull in 1gb Dual chan?

Could it be anything, but TCCD? (well I guess, with OPB you never know...)
02-10-2005, 01:18 PM
jayjaya29

Holy crap, nice results. Will be awesome if you break 10,000.
02-10-2005, 01:22 PM
THunDA

Now thats some bandwidth.. :)
02-10-2005, 01:26 PM
enok

OMFG! :o
02-10-2005, 01:31 PM
wfarid

i was asking what PARTICULAR brand of gskill ram opb was using LA, LE?
02-10-2005, 01:35 PM
conrad.maranan

Quote:

Originally Posted by µnrealneo²

Download the 180 day trial.

But what's the tweak? Don't tell me that the 180-day trial version is the actual tweak. :confused:
02-10-2005, 01:40 PM
Zeus

Quote:

Originally Posted by conrad.maranan

But what's the tweak? Don't tell me that the 180-day trial version is the actual tweak. :confused:

LOL, the tweak is that the time limit pushes you to the edge. :D
02-10-2005, 01:40 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by wfarid

i was asking what PARTICULAR brand of gskill ram opb was using LA, LE?

LA, 2x256 :D
02-10-2005, 01:52 PM
bachus_anonym

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by conrad.maranan

bachus_anonym - What's the tweak in Server 2003, in case I ever get a hold of a copy?

Let's see if it helps OPB get higher bandwidth... But It helped me gain about 150MB/s....

The tweak is to enable Lock pages in memory option in Group Policy Editor ( gpedit.msc ).
It would be great if someone else besides myself can see if it helps...
I see no reason why it wouldn't.
One thing, though... Sandra 2005 Lite seems to not use it even though option Use large memory pages
is on YES in Memory Bandwidth benchmark options.
Sandra 2004 works fine, though...

Good luck :thumbsup:
02-10-2005, 01:54 PM
zeebs

:D Nice bandwith bench OPB, care to share some of that :rolleyes:
02-10-2005, 02:13 PM
Mag Master 21

I just "aquired" server2003 enterprise edition.. Hoping to do some benching on it pretty soon..
02-10-2005, 02:17 PM
actionB52

omg, i'm only 6000mb/s behind!!!! :slobber:

great job

btw, will there be g.skill ram with the new bh-5 chippies? :confused:
02-10-2005, 08:40 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

Let's see if it helps OPB get higher bandwidth... But It helped me gain about 150MB/s....

The tweak is to enable Lock pages in memory option in Group Policy Editor ( gpedit.msc ).
It would be great if someone else besides myself can see if it helps...
I see no reason why it wouldn't.
One thing, though... Sandra 2005 Lite seems to not use it even though option Use large memory pages
is on YES in Memory Bandwidth benchmark options.
Sandra 2004 works fine, though...

Good luck :thumbsup:

too bad, win2k doesn't like it... :(
02-10-2005, 10:22 PM
cpulloverclock

I dont know if u'll get a little boost with that

read bypass at 16x
bypass max at 7x
refresh rate at 200 3.9µs
row refresh cycle time at 12-14
02-10-2005, 10:25 PM
Damien

Hahahaha, and my best bandwidth is like 4,000...of course this is with 512mb, but even then i'd be far behind...
02-11-2005, 01:33 AM
STEvil

bachus - any realworld performance gains? Wonder if there is a way to enable it on WinXP.. maybe this tweak will offset 1T vs. 2T enough to make 2T more useable? :D
02-11-2005, 02:42 AM
DemonEyez

I tried to enable it under Windows XP Pro. The setting is available and has been set just like the example, but Sandra still refuses to Use large Memory Pages.
I'm running Sandra 2005 Pro
02-11-2005, 04:38 AM
Entity_Razer

is that 9GB effectivly or 9GB in dual channel mode?

I'm guessing single channel but just to be sure .....

Nice benches dude!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :stick: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
02-11-2005, 04:52 AM
cpulloverclock

tried Lock pages in memory enabled and +10/+20 but Sandra writes OFF.... :rolleyes:
02-11-2005, 05:39 AM
Saliman

just... WOW
02-11-2005, 07:22 AM
Punisher!

onepagebook I am using Windows XP and I have much more than your efficiency... if you had mine you would go over 10K.

http://m4tribes.m4d.it/puni/sandra1.jpg

(200 fsb on nforce2 | 2-2-2-5)

What about tweaking the o.s.?
02-11-2005, 08:44 AM
Chr0n1c

:slobber:

Nice work man. :toast:
02-11-2005, 09:02 AM
quicksilverXP

Punisher, that's because you have such low latencies, as you increase latencies bandwidth efficiency lowers... so there's nothing you can do to change that unless there's some miraculous ram out there that can run at 344 at 2-2-2-5.
02-11-2005, 09:40 AM
aCidbAbY

amazing indeed:up:
02-11-2005, 10:16 AM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by quicksilverXP

Punisher, that's because you have such low latencies, as you increase latencies bandwidth efficiency lowers... so there's nothing you can do to change that unless there's some miraculous ram out there that can run at 344 at 2-2-2-5.

also the hight multipler;)
02-11-2005, 11:10 AM
aCidbAbY

so OPB how much is the gskill LA 512x2 going for?
02-11-2005, 12:19 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by aCidbAbY

so OPB how much is the gskill LA 512x2 going for?

I have never had chance to play 2x512 LA yet.
personally, I don't think 1G LA is better than 1G LE :)
02-11-2005, 02:11 PM
Cornelious0_0

VERY nice bro.....saw this on the XS front page and kinda knew what I was in for......I'm in awe. :slobber:

It's stuff like this that keeps me pressing forward to start benching again.
02-11-2005, 02:24 PM
perry_78

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

I have never had chance to play 2x512 LA yet.
personally, I don't think 1G LA is better than 1G LE :)

We'll see :) Once i figure out what the hell all those options in A64 tweaker and th DFI BIOS are I'll try to go over 300 2,5-4-3-7 with my LA 1G :) BTW what are the records for 1G LE and 1G LA from what you (OPB + this delightful society) know?

My Idle Timer is 256, doesnt really compare to yours (at 16) does it? :D '

Where can you acquire the 0.5 A64 tweaker and Sandra 2005 Pro (I'm guessing you have to pay). 2004 was free wasn't it?

Bachus, if you get 8K+ at 300*9 2,5-4-3-7, looks like I'll have a shot at that with my LA 1G :)
02-11-2005, 02:30 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juliette

We'll see :) Once i figure out what the hell all those options in A64 tweaker and th DFI BIOS are I'll try to go over 300 2,5-4-3-7 with my LA 1G :) BTW what are the records for 1G LE and 1G LA from what you (OPB + this delightful society) know?

My Idle Timer is 256, doesnt really compare to yours (at 16) does it? :D '

Where can you acquire the 0.5 A64 tweaker and Sandra 2005 Pro (I'm guessing you have to pay). 2004 was free wasn't it?

Bachus, if you get 8K+ at 300*9 2,5-4-3-7, looks like I'll have a shot at that with my LA 1G :)

I think A64tweaker is from one of our XS Master--Codered. He is also a nice guy though. pm him get a copy
sandra 2005 lite is free though. :D

OPB
02-11-2005, 07:48 PM
Bloody_Sorcerer

OPB, thats ungodly. What ICs/voltage? *drools*
only... 6500 to go!
02-11-2005, 08:33 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer

OPB, thats ungodly. What ICs/voltage? *drools*
only... 6500 to go!

It's Samsung TCCD 0440 chip, 2.9v
Gskill Model # 512 LA kit(2x256) :)
02-12-2005, 01:49 AM
Punisher!

Quote:

Originally Posted by quicksilverXP

Punisher, that's because you have such low latencies, as you increase latencies bandwidth efficiency lowers... so there's nothing you can do to change that unless there's some miraculous ram out there that can run at 344 at 2-2-2-5.

Actually from 2-2-2-5 to 2,5-3-3-6 I lose just 2 percentage points:
http://m4tribes.m4d.it/puni/sandra3.jpg
(200 fsb nforce2 | 2,5-3-3-6)

OPB just try your efficiency @ 200 bus 2-2-2-5, if it is lower than mine I will suggest st to tweak the o. s..
02-12-2005, 01:53 AM
bachus_anonym

@Punisher

that efficiency (97-98% / 92-93%) is just not gonna happen on A64 S939....
02-12-2005, 01:55 AM
Punisher!

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

@Punisher

that efficiency (97-98% / 92-93%) is just not gonna happen on A64 S939....

Yeah, actually I had imagined it.
02-12-2005, 02:00 AM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

@Punisher

that efficiency (97-98% / 92-93%) is just not gonna happen on A64 S939....

actually, I will take that back....

it is possible but you would need to work with high multiplier, like x12 maybe, and high CPU clocks... as bandwidth efficiency is also dependant on CPU frequency.

I would assume that 250x12 with FX and BH-5 would give you probably 96% / 93% or something like that.
02-12-2005, 03:18 AM
SteveOCZ

Thats one smokin fast system. Where is the super PI or prime?
02-12-2005, 06:30 AM
Paxi

i wasnt online yesterday so i´ve just read it..
really nice OPB.. ;)
02-12-2005, 05:55 PM
B5I8

Punisher, you're comparing apples and oranges. You can't compare a Socket A Nforce2 mobo to a Socket 939 Nforce4 board.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 PM.

XtremeSystems