Printable View
I just installed this everest benchmark thats a bit like sandra.
You can get it here
http://www.majorgeeks.com/download4181.html
I was interested to see what you guys get in the memory bench.
My 2X256mb Bh5 @ 250mhz 2,2,2,2 gets as follows.
Read = 3908
Write = 1690
Latency = 36.9
Im mostly interested in the latency figure (as im running tight timings)
This is all on DFI UT 754.
If other people can post there specs and results it might be interesting.
i get around 4300MB @282MHz 2.5-3-3-7 read. (Gskill TCCD)
Latency = 40.2
Everest (Aida before) is quite popular in Poland due to giving more accurate info than Sandra.
I @274MHz have 4233/1821/35.1.
4964 read, didn't bother to try the other 2 tests, will do when i oc next time.
See this thread:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=47018
Winchester 3200+ @ 280x9 2'5-3-3 1T (Geil Ultra X) ->8049MB/s on a MSI Neo 2.
Jesus, that's some nice bandwidth for only 280 and timings like that. Good stuff man :toast:
I know... my FX at same config "only" got 7500-7600MB/s.
With that winchie i got 8383Mb/s at 295 2'5-3-3 1T, but it freezed after do the test, so i only have a digital camera screenshot :D
Wow. How did you manage that huge increase?
Holy macaroons, Batman! That's over 60 more posts from cuddles in less than 12 hours. :lol: Sorry, man. I just couldn't help but notice.
http://webpages.charter.net/conrad-digital/cuddles.png
Haha, I told you guys, I work 10 hours a day and do tech support, so all I do is browse. I try not to spam, I think I make relevant posts and comments, I just have a lot of time to spare while working :)
I've only been posting for 4 days, since it took 6 or more to get my account 'verified' ;)
Actual post count is like 57 or something. But shhhh, keep it on the down low :p:
If your trying not to spam , why dont you post any benchmark results.
I was interested in the latency test guys, epecially for those of you running dual channel memory systems.
I'll edit this post with my results when I get home (tomorrow), I promise. Didn't mean to derail your thread. <3
2 x 512 BH6 @ 250 x10 2-2-2-10 and it gives me:-
Read = 3865
Write = 1537
Latency = 39.5ns
Specs as per sig.
Dropping TRas to 6 gave me
Read = 3880
Write = 1688
Latency = 39.6
I get better 3dmark scores when Tras is set to 10 though.
XP-M 2.6+, An7, (260x8) 2.5-3-3-7 2.7v cpc off (TCCD Geil UltraX 3200 2x512)
http://img54.exs.cx/img54/940/260x8.th.jpg
P4 3.0 (240x15), IC7 MAX3, (1:1) 2-2-2-5 3.1v KHX3000 Bh5
http://img124.exs.cx/img124/2687/6927everest.th.jpg
Bye
7709 MB/s Read
2552 MB/s Write
40.5 Latency
The benchmarking part of this program works fine. When I do a system summary I get a blue screen. Is this normal?
mike
MMMM..... interesting....goes to d/l
C
My 24/7 office computer:
IC7-G
3.0C @ 3.43gHz
GEIL PC3700
Its a good benchmark.. I really like using it.. Its tests latency well, something that sandra doesnt, which is the main reason i use it
There are some big differences on the latency side of things.
Rapra being best as he has high speed and low timings.
Heres some stuff I posted in the VX thread. CPU speed helps big time latency wise for everest. Also a pic of the best latency I was able to achieve in Everest after some tweaking with A64 tweaker, though I imagine I could get it down even farther with more playing possibly.
9x250.82mhz / 3.30v / 1:1 / 1T / 2800+ Clawhammer / DFI Lanparty-UT 10/15 4.0vdimm with OCZ Memtest 1.00 / 2x512 OCZ Voltage Extreme
Everest Read / write / latency
1.5-2-2-0 --- 3816 / 1432 / 41.4
1.5-2-2-5 --- 3824 / 1436 / 42.3
1.5-2-2-10 -- 3818 / 1437 / 42.3
2-2-2-0 ----- 3847 / 1575 / 41.5
2-2-2-5 ----- 3848 / 1579 / 41.6
2-2-2-10 ---- 3846 / 1576 / 41.5
2.5-2-2-0 --- 3824 / 1454 / 42.8
2.5-2-2-5 --- 3821 / 1442 / 42.8
2.5-2-2-10 -- 3815 / 1442 / 42.8
3-2-2-0 ----- 3797 / 1424 / 46.3
3-2-2-5 ----- 3804 / 1408 / 46.4
3-2-2-10 ---- 3809 / 1400 / 46.3
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=20252
and fastest I could get at 200mhz with 1.8ghz CPU:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=20251
I just got an OCZ Booster and now I can finally run the 3700EBs at DDR533. :D It took 3.1v.
Read= 5241Mb/s
Write=1906Mb/s
Latency= 54.9 ns
http://img79.exs.cx/img79/3443/1e-me...eat4ghz.th.jpg
http://img79.exs.cx/img79/7483/db-la...t4ghz1-.th.jpg
http://img79.exs.cx/img79/3261/c2-Me...at4Ghz3.th.jpg
EDIT: pics
on 280x8, read 4200 or so write 1400 or so and latency 41
i like everest... but i think it needs more than just RAM Benchmarks..
Looks like i'm beating your latency Holst. :D
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=20346&stc=1
Zeus,
Nice latency there.
What's are timings for that latency?
Hmm... I like this benchmark. :up: I'm only running a dual Xeon setup so nothing to spectacular from me.
Read: 4497 MB/s
Write: 1415 MB/s
Latency: 84.0 ns
Memory is only running at 2-2-2-6, 207MHz dual channel.
Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by agenda2005
You can my settings right here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=47018
:)
Right back at you mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Down to 36.2, this is at 260X10 with the below timings.
I did have 265 stable but ive tweaked my 3.3v line down to test this OCZ booster, so im Vdimm is very low ATM (stuck at 3.3)
260 at this low Vdimm isnt propperly stable either.. but once I get the booster working ill be able to get 265+ stable.
Nice going Holst! :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Holst
I gave my system hell but 36.5 was all she wrote. :D
Oh well, not too shabby for 2,5-3-3-7
another one from Polish OCer :)
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum - Q47353.1 0440A2 S Taiwan
A64 3200+ 90nm "Winchester" - CBBFD 0441UPCW
Thermalright XP-90 w/ YTech 120mm
CLICK for Full Size Screenshot - 2048x1536 384KB
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=20513
EDIT: oh, it looks like it's the best score so far :) let's wait until someone with FX shows up :stick:
Man! that's a sick latency! That's the kind of latency I'm dreaming about (34-35ns) in dual channel with >8000MB/s Bandwith. Good job, I'm sure that's the lowest latency I've seen so far.Quote:
Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
thanx agenda2005 :) i can do SuperPi 1M at 273x10, but not much changes in Latency department :(Quote:
Originally Posted by agenda2005
bah i had the crown for a bit :D
I got 39'3ns at 250 2-2-2.
Some number, from my FX-55 @ 3.330 in the Prometeia with 2 TCCD stick at 290Mhz, 2.5-3-3-6 with just 2.8v ..
http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/Eve...4600_Write.jpg
http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/EverestPC4600_Read.jpg
http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/Eve...0_Latencia.jpg
http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/EverestPC4600_FSB.jpg
:D
nice going Pedro, do you have any BH-5 > 270MHz ??? i'm curious what it looks like with FX-55.... i mean latency.
BTW, i just saw a whopping 32.8ns @ 277x10 !!!!!
Blimey Bachus, thats super low latency.
Is that the same timings as in the pic above?
pretty much.... just TRTW lowered to 1 and Refresh Rate at 15.6ns :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Holst
EDIT we need to invite Onepagebook here to see what his BH-5 @ 287 can do :D
Nice numbers Bachus! :up:
This once again proves how much faster the winnies are over the socket 754 winchesters.
I need 2830MHz for 31s SuperPi, but 32m takes me a little over 28 mins to finish, your 26 min 39sec is a lot better.
However latency doesn't suprise me, your timings are a lot better than mine.
For now you seem to have the best latency score. :cool:
and all the glory for Bachus...
Bachus, remember which whisper give You that :)
I have 35.1 in single channel - so Poland wins in Latencies! (for a moment)
:thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by rapra
38.0ns latancy
1572mb/swrite
3828MB/s read
I am more Interested in Latency values. Here you go.
A64 3500+ DDR400 200MHz 2-2-2-10 Latency = 46.5ns
A64 3500+ DDR434 217MHz 2-2-2-10 Latency = 42.9ns
My BH-5 will be on ground tommorrow. I will play with higher Mem speed to see what happen. DDR533 2-2-2-10 will be interesting to compare with Intel DDR2. From the latency value, DDR2 sucks big time.
Here is what I got...havent tweaked it yet...
Latency @ 46.7ns
250x10.0 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3-0
Memory Write @ 1633MB/s
Memory Read @ 3849MB/s
Not sure if computer being rebooted fresh start would make a difference...my PC has been on for 3 days straight at these results...does anyone know if that makes a difference or not?
some, but note a huge one.
Yeah after rebooting my Latency is 47.3ns...not really a big difference.
That latency is not good at DDR500, even with cas 2.5. I guess rebooting your computer makes no difference either.Quote:
Originally Posted by ugp
Well what I am trying to go for from my memory is bandwidth:D And I am assuming the higher the bandwidth the higher the latency goes up with it alittle right...well at CL2.5 anyway...Quote:
Originally Posted by agenda2005
Wrong assumption mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by ugp
Check my bandwidth, it's over 5K in Sandra, my latency is as low as 36,5ns.
It has to do with memory settings.
While I was messing around with this TCCD stuff I checked the latency at each stage here is what I found:-
All tests run at 2.5-3-3-7
240 - 48.6
250 - 46.6
260 - 44.9
270 - 43.2
280 - 41.6
To see the difference the timings made I checked it at
216 2-2-2-5 = 50.4
216 2.5-3-3-7 = 53.9
Dunno if its useful, but it was interesting to see the difference.
I think as you get higher mhz the timings will make a proportionally bigger difference to latency.
so at 216 the difference is 3.5, but at 280 the difference would be more with tighter timings.
To do well in the latency test you need tight timings and high mhz... very high mhz may also work... can anybody get over 300mhz on there ram with a64?
cpu mhz helps a ton, too.
best so far
3846 mb/s
1511 mb/s
37.3
Look at mine, mem was at 316.5MHz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Holst
CPU speed 9x316.5 ;)
BH5- low latency and high voltage memory :D
(aircooled system, Vdimm- 3,8V, MSI Neo2, winxpsp2.)
I'm sure, that below 30ns is possible :p:
http://www.hot.ee/winchester/latency...0-BH5-32.8.PNG
I'm getting 6486/2889/46.2ns at 245x11 1:1 with a 3500+, 512x2 3700EB(3-3-2-8) and an A8V.
Jaan,Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaan
That latency is sweet! How's your memory controller able to keep up? They are actually desighn to work at 50, 60 and 70ns.
Congrats! I think that should be the world record.
Here are my DDR400 and DDR 434 2-2-210 results from GSkill memory. My BH-5 just arrive and I'll be playing with it soon.
I could not upload my result pics. What's going on with my account? Do I need some sort of permission to do that? Who should I contact? Could it be my own fault? I use manage attchment --> upload ---> post rely. What else am I missing?
resize and compress them as well as use an accepted file format?