MSI NEO2
90NM 3200+
GS TCCD 256*2
AIR COOLER(HYPER 6)
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K16.JPG
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K17.JPG
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K19.JPG
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K21.JPG
Printable View
MSI NEO2
90NM 3200+
GS TCCD 256*2
AIR COOLER(HYPER 6)
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K16.JPG
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K17.JPG
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K19.JPG
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K21.JPG
:toast: very nice. now lets see some 300x9 benches
Impressive, how high have you had the Cpu itself and on what cooling?
Looks pretty stable. Nice clocks.What kind of bandwidth?
great job!!
Welcome :toast:
I hate you got better GSkill than mine...;)
hmm....niiicceee, i want to reach that with 2x512MB :D
Winnie 3200+ and MSI should come tomorrow or @ friday ;)
@ Kevin: i hope my sticks will even make their specs on the MSI...not like on the DFI.... :rolleyes: ;) :p:
The cutting off of every CPUZ checksum? For that many screen shot images not to have one visible is odd.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
In taiwan, we don't care about what's the checksum of CPU-z but the one's true ability of OC.
I will let every member at Coolalerbb member know that must be aware of that next time..
Thanks a lot.
How about this one? fair enough? :D
http://coolaler.nil.com.tw/images/tc...0/ddr662_1.gif
good job
From time to time we see sensational results posted here that are fakes. I am not calling these fakes but we would like to be able to confirm the posts.
I would like to see a screen shot of your FX-53 @ 3.4ghz (9K) with checksum. That would put everyone who questions your results at ease.
Thanks for understanding. This is not uncommon or singling you out. you posted scores onced verified are world records.
hes right, its nothing against you personally but we are used to see the checksum... i dont even check it but seeing it is normal and not seeing it is kinda weird...
very nice results! i didnt know they oc even higher with 3-6-6 :eek:
has any of you reached DDR700 yet? no matter what timings... :D
"so now is that fair enough? or I need to video tape this?"
I am honestly just a end user, I am from Taiwan,
I honestly don't know if this so called carp ram can do this.
Onepagebook is our moderator of 6 sectors at coolaler.com, I just know him for a long time, he doesn't BS anything just like OPP in you guys mind, same here, we respect him very much in Taiwan.
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K27.JPG
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K28.JPG
http://my.so-net.net.tw/xu1060/K29.JPG
Just post the checksum from now on and the "video tape is not needed"Quote:
Originally Posted by peter lu
OPP posts his checksum :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by peter lu
so do I...;)
And thank you for understanding why it should be shownQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
:toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomjr
I believe I always show that from my own test unless I post for my friends.
Thanks
Ya got question here..where is this reply..
Gogeta just speak it out but his reply got delete?
Well, so what 's the reason? Now I'm really confused.
http://www.e04hardware.com/xsreply.jpg
he removed it, pm him
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomjr
Now, Nomjr...
You are the second Mod I definitely respect! :toast:
Really? So why is coolaler's 4.7G prescott detected correctly as 4.7G on the 2003 ORB while everyone's elses after 4+G gets detected as 200Mhz less? And is he ever gonna publish that result?
http://coolaler.nil.com.tw/images/TOP/top2.gif
And why is the CPUZ checksum a 3.6G P4 when the screenie is of a 4.7G?
http://coolaler.nil.com.tw/images/TOP/top0.gif
Link to the "mean" overclocker's web page:
http://www.coolaler.com/article/article.php/158
So is he ever gona put up a screenie of his FX @ 3.4G with CPUZ check sum? Will he be kind enough to do a 2001 or 2005 3d mark run at 3.3 or 3.4G?
how do i calculate the checksum? :(
Probably you can use a tool called CPU-Z Frequency Checker. Check here: http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/Quote:
Originally Posted by tictac
To be honest lard don't taking pics of the physical computer screen mean they are real? I mean, wouldn't it be hard to alter something like that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
oh..if you wanna know why? I will suggest you to learn Chinese then you can ask Coolaler! :toast:
Hey, I suggest you go search the pics post on this forum, I found out there is one did not have check sum showed. Go buddy..You are good mod.
FYI, I can speak mandarin and read chinese
bh2k, I'm wondering why that 4.7G screenie has a 3.6G checksum code...
Not impossible without good photoshop skills
Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
wow..you should tell me earlier about this, then you can pm me your phone number, I can explain more to you!:p
Ahem, is that even necessary, just to explain a screenshot? Is there a long story involved? :confused:
in this pic, u can see that all of his scores have have the "published" box greyed out, hmm i wonder whyQuote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
also shamino can u make the checksum checker available to the community, or are you worried about peope reverse engineering it to edit pictures with the correct checksum?
ok thanks... downloading the checksum... :toast:
Blinky, it was verified by Franck himself. You can email him the checksums and he will verify it for you, if he doesn't have too much on his hands that is :)
sometimes it`s just a glitch in the matrix. :p
Glitch has absolutely NOTHING to do with the checksum reading correctly. The link you included, is a bug in displaying fsb and clock frequency which IS reproduceable, and most likely effected by other software.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rukee
The actual Frequency/fsb display, and the checksum will still indicate the displayed information. Thus your link only shows a detection bug, or faked screenshot through manipulation.
Onepagebook, rather then explain this privately why don't you just post a translation of the incorrect checksum here.
I`m sorry for my ignorance, what is this checksum?
The checksum is the number above the CPU-Z logo in the bottom left of the application.
SORRY
YOU JUST ANSWERED MY QUESTION !!!!Quote:
Getting back to the the Original Post....
I dont get it, both the 3000+ and the 3500+ can go 2.6 on air....
How come the 3200 can only do 2.4 ??
Congrats, that is some :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: eyecandy?
I mean, thats what most FX-51s do on water - Sheesh
How did you manage that? DDR Booster ??
Perkam
Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
f you can get 3200+ like mine, you definitely can carack it up to 2.8g, 1.625v with hyper 6 HS. The reason is fairly obvious that 90nm is lot more overclockable than 130nm though!
You chose the hyper6 over the xp-90/120...Why ???
BTW, you still havent told me what ram you're using ?? :p: :p:
Here is a screenshot of the clockspeed indicated by the checksum.Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=18074
why is the voltage canceled out?....Quote:
Originally Posted by peter lu
300 2.5-3-3, nice! :toast:
is that speed 3dmark stable?
but yeah, why is the vcore blurred out?
That's pretty suspect that he has those secondary clockspeed boxes conveniently covering up the checksums in every picture. It's not like those clockspeed boxes show anything new.... it's the same information the other CPU-Z window already shows. No reason for those secondary clockspeed windows to even be open.....Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
:(
Sorry to say this but When one of most respect BOSS of Coolaler BB. Coolaler's result been treat like this but this is nothing because as a result as true as rock Coolaler will have nothing to scare about lo :D i'm sure he will confirm the result through OPB in no time la :cool:
if you see Coolaler's tool for OC (Lx2) you will be sure that result is easy to obtain, like stealing candy from children's hand ;)
and i'm a long member of Coolaler BB and also through OPB for the first time i know there is a place call xtremsystem.org and i also respect few of strong OCer in here. but as OPB said before in our fourm we don't know anything about CPU-Z check sum :confused: but we only care about the true abillity of OCing..............this stuff (check sum) is the first time as well!!
please LardArse even you are the mod and you got all the right you got to suspect anyone's result but i think you should given people time to confirm their result!! :)
welcome to XtremeSystems :toast: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by z24
we are waiting :)
Uncle Coolaler, he not only makes amazing overclocking records, he also helps many persons to overclock their computers, even linking the L1 bridges of Athlon for us (we couldn't use pencil any more at that time), totally kostlos!! We won't doubt what he did about overclocking, because he can show us whenever we want!
Without CPU-Z frequency checker, checksum is useless,
so even Coolaler covered it, I don't care.
I think uncle Coolaler won't cover the checksum in the future.
Because it is Coolaler's style ------ "You wanna see? Show you!"
welcome to xtremesystems :)
are you from germany? :D
and you can send any checksum you want to check to vr-zone or cpuid.com and they will tell you if its faked or not :)
there are a lot of fakes and showing the checksum makes it much better!
its just a tiny spot, so there is no need to hide it, no problem to show it on a 1024x768 screenshot :P
Vielen Dank, Sie sind sehr nett.Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
I am a Taiwanese.
Ich liebe Taiwan und Deutschland.:)
You said we can send the checksum, yes, you are right, thanks, I didn't know the checksum until I got in XS.
Can we get the RAM frequency from the checksum?
We can get CPU type, CPU frequency and what else from the checksum?
It is Octobor now...a raining month in Germany?
yeah, within the last week the time without sunlight has increased by 4 hours! :eek:
sun getting up 2 hours later and setting to hours earlier... and its getting cold! 12°C outside :S
i think the checksum only shows cpu speed and cpu type, i hope franck upgrades it to show fsb speed, memory speed and maybe timings and vcore :D
how come you speak german?
have you lived in germany?
Ich liebe Hamburg, weil dort kalt nicht ist, und es gibt auch billiger Sachen von Taiwan.Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
HAHA,12°C , cold weather is good for overclocking, I think coolaler will envies you very much!! :)
I just think...if we can only get CPU type and frequency information from checksum now, then could we ignore the checksum when someone just wanna show other things such as FSB or RAM bandwidth?
ja,nur 4 Monate...
Ich moechte in Deutschland studieren...
Aber...weil ich stomachache hatte...
anyway, like Arnold Schwarzenegger said, I will be back! For a trip :)
please show the checksum in future! even if it only shows cpu speed and fsb, its better than nothing :)
if you dont show it some people will say you cheat or lie... just show the checksum, its no big thing :)
Yes, it is better than nothing, I think Coolaler will show checksum in the future. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
It is very good to get something to prove someone cheats or not.
For CPU type and CPU frequency, yes, the checksum is very good to distinguish.
However, what a pity, checksum is not so powerful now.
We can not say the bandwidth is fake because there is no checksum in someone's screen capture.
We can not say the bandwidth is true because there is a checksum in someone's screen capture either.
I don't want to oppose against you, I just tell the truth.
We can't judge something by a wrong evidance, right?
i also think there should be a checksum in other programms as well.. like sandra and other benchmarks... and cpuz should include the fsb/mem ratio and maybe timings and vcore into the checksum :)
Yes, I hope so as well, then the checksum will be very perfect! even it will become many digits. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by saaya
...just trying to understand what`s going on, when you open 2 cpu-z programs, you get two diffrent checksums, what`s up with that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rukee
The purpose of the checksum would be defeated by a static display of values.
The checksum serves another purpose, not just confirming the clock numbers. The checksum can almost be considered a digital signature, it provides verification of clockspeed, and processor type, as well as offering a semi-unique signature wich helps deter the "save a picture and say its mine scenario".
EDIT: Each time CPUZ is executed it generates a NEW, semi-unique checksum value.
1 in 10 billion semi-uniqueness to be exact :hehe:
And how can I consider, if a checksum is valid or not??Quote:
Originally Posted by Karnivore
Greetz, Flox
Well, checksum value is only a point if 1) someone is using YOUR screeenshot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Flox
2) If the screenshot is suspicious. And the only need for confirmation of correct checksum would be #2, and this is a relatively rare happening. So if you have a suspect checksum you have 2 choices.. Email the author to verify, or know, and contact someone who has gotten the CPUZCheck from the author, (like one of the staff members here @ Xtreme).