http://www.overclockers.at/showthrea...49#post1540049
On oc.at a User postet a 18k Score with his 6800GT (PointofView) but he can't publish.
Printable View
http://www.overclockers.at/showthrea...49#post1540049
On oc.at a User postet a 18k Score with his 6800GT (PointofView) but he can't publish.
That would a core speed of 640 or so I guess assuming that the P4 speed does not have much effect on GT2 and GT3 ..but I thought it did, so that must mean that his core speed must be even higher perhaps, say 650-660.
What cooling is he using ?
Regards
Andy
I think Mach II on GPU and one on the CPU
I dont even think hes using any xtreme cooling...
its a bug ^_^
wow, thats excellent score. that would make that top of the ORB.
Yes but he cannot publish this Score.
why not? he is using approved 60.85 drivers.
We/He don't know-
It's simply not posible. :(
....it's obviously a fake....
:bash:
It is no fake !
Stylist is a good overclocker and not a faker
It's for sure no fake. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by bh2k
....it's obviously a fake....
But almost certainly a bug.
Here is a compare link to LardArse' 17117 result:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2603719
Apart from "Wings of Fury" LA's scores are lower. :confused:
I know you can select null pixel shaders to get a higher score, by how much I dunno, but the tests would have missing textures and so on. I havent tried nulling PS for benches yet, did he choose this? What volts is he running?
IMO he is on stock cooling :D no voltmodsQuote:
Originally posted by LardArse
I know you can select null pixel shaders to get a higher score, by how much I dunno, but the tests would have missing textures and so on. I havent tried nulling PS for benches yet, did he choose this? What volts is he running?
No tweaks either.
Must be a bug.
Stylist himself wrote the following in the Austrian Forum:
That means he is 100% sure it's a bug. He somehow managed to get the Ultra drivers working. So please stop debating this it would be nonsense...Quote:
Ich bin 100% sicher, dass es ein bug ist.
I can't read German, so he's saying its a bugged run?
of course he thinks its one cause hes benching at air on both CPU and GPU.
So I also think it. Or he just found a serious glitch in the drivers / bios or something and wont tell us.
Maybe he found a trick and don't know it.
Everything is posible I think.
I hope the score is not bugged :D
Hi,
Honestly at the moment I'm not 100% sure how I reached the value, but it is repeatable!
I benched a second and third time and reached 18059 or so.
I'm currently evaluating the reason but please consider the Ultra drivers.
I am not sure maybe because I run the Ultra drivers on the GT but it shouldn’t matter.
I am currently sure that it is a bug.
I saw an improvement in the 3DMark2001 too. But it wasn’t so significant because of the used CPU.
As you know 3DMark2001 is pretty CPU dependable.
I am sure that I would easily break the 20000 Points with this setup and an adequate CPU.
BTW: Could you help me with the BIOS (6800GT to Ultra flash) -> link
I took an image of the installation and will try to find out the reason.
Stylist
If it is a repeatable bug then that is a bit worrying to be honest as it reduces 03 down to people just exploiting the bug and this is far worse than say 44.03 driver opts in nature 2001.
I guess I should say nice score though even bugged :) , looking forward to your investigation so we know more about what might cause it, hopefully it will be a one off.
Not sure what you mean by Ultra drivers, there are no specific ultra drivers AFAIK or am I missing something here ?
Regards
Andy
Well, I just cracked 23k 3dmarks :D
http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/3dmscores/23k1.JPG
http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/3dmscores/23k2.JPG
This was with just 560/1270.
You can get scores like these by nulling the PS stuff, but it runs like crap. My highest score with 60.85 with full settings is 17375, unfortunately, it will be grouped as "cheat" scores due to this "bug" as I don't think there's a way to differentiate between the 2.
I have a video of 17306 run that some guys like Runmc and sierra bound has viewed, at least thats some kind of proof that it isn't a "crap-looking" run.
And even worse is that these scores can be published if they are under 15k I think.
where do you null the PS stuff?
Its pretty tough....
You'll have to right click on desk top and go to advanced properties and your graphics card tab, and then check the 3 null PS boxes.
Only then can you get uber scores like this
;)
I might not get uber scores like that, but my scores arnt bad ^_^
sarcasm is not funny :(
I wish I could publish with my Modded pro@xt
oh yea btw, a Mach II GT is cooling the X800XT.
I think reason why many of us can't publish legit scores might have something to do with this.
So I'm on Graphik Card shiet/tab and there ar no boxes ..Quote:
Originally posted by LardArse
Its pretty tough....
You'll have to right click on desk top and go to advanced properties and your graphics card tab, and then check the 3 null PS boxes.
Only then can you get uber scores like this
;)
Can ypu post a Screen ;)
When I say fake I don't mean he's trying to pass it off as real. I mean it's a bugged or not real score.
This is not a bug. This is a cheat. The ones who use this jolly well know they are cheating.
Aquamark gets a big boost as well. I do not consider this legit score, this is with just old drivers, 560/1260, but by nulling PS 1 and 2, the scores get boosted by 8-9K. My 100225 score was with full settings, but if you look at the ARC you can guess how some can easily hit 80K with 3.4C and air-cooled 6800 GT
http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/6800/aqmcheat1.JPG
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1487769217
These tricks can increase AQM scores by +/- 9K and 3D mark 2003 scores by 6-7K.
With this trick and running 61.36 + 600/1265 I should be quite close to the 120K milestone, but of course it can be considered a "cheat".
I can'r find these Boxes were you cann klick to get the PS off.
Can you post a Screen.
I want to test how far my scores are pushed with this cheat/bug ..!
Don´t bother, it´s like cheating in games online... Eventually you´ll use it all the time out of habit. The ppl who use this to boost their internet-penises deserve to be taken out and shot. This is NOT meant to flame Lardarse/shamino but the 80 K aquamark dudes.
its like this, if u think u should run 3dmark03 with it off, then you deserve to play all ur pretty games like far cry with it off... you'd find urself crying because its so ugly... dont do it. :D
Shamino, u should get Nvidia 6800 SLI, i'm sure 120k in A3 will be easily broken without any cheats.
uhh, of course , u will need a Xeon mobo with dual PCIe slots.
If AQM is even remotely CPU limited, the Xeon will kill the scores.Quote:
Originally posted by Kanavit
Shamino, u should get Nvidia 6800 SLI, i'm sure 120k in A3 will be easily broken without any cheats.
uhh, of course , u will need a Xeon mobo with dual PCIe slots.
Lardarse, have you asked Futuremark whether this is why they have put a stop on scores being published and if you have , or do, can you also ask them if they can put a stop on it ?
Regards
Andy
/I have, and its been a few weeks but I have no response from them. I'm doubtful they can stop this unless they come up with a new patch, which they probably are working on already.
man...tricky tricky...its so stupid for nyone to cheat ona benchmark...wats the point...everyone knows u cheated
120K will surely fall under this "cheat" demo
http://www.vr-zone.com.sg/Shamino/6800/119aqm.JPG
Even 3dmark 2001 gets a nice boost, 20+ fps in Drag low and even 2-3 fps in system limited test like lobby high. I can easily break 35K with Intel using this.
I think you are forgetting the P4EE is a Xeon processor running on a higher bus speed. And in fact the Xeons are now available with even more cache than the EE...Quote:
Originally posted by Hallowed
If AQM is even remotely CPU limited, the Xeon will kill the scores.
But this Xeons are very expensive :(Quote:
Originally posted by Soulburner
I think you are forgetting the P4EE is a Xeon processor running on a higher bus speed. And in fact the Xeons are now available with even more cache than the EE...
But would AquaMark benefit from a dual cpu setup?
I don't think so.
I thought I just read about a chipset that will support two PCIe x16 slots, for a desktop cpu (forgot if it was intle or amd, probably intel)
the nForce4 will support dual PCIe I think...
maybe this is a cheat like the lod bias settings?
does it spoil the image? so does lod do...and everybody uses it..
_zZz_
not if it breaks 20k in 3dmark03.Quote:
Originally posted by Hallowed
If AQM is even remotely CPU limited, the Xeon will kill the scores.