http://img57.photobucket.com/albums/...n520/FX939.jpg
MB:K8T800Pro
Printable View
is there also a super pi 1m result?
http://home.pchome.com.tw/net/boss_50/539391.JPGQuote:
Originally posted by EmineM
is there also a super pi 1m result?
this CPU-Z is Old
socket 939?
really?
so how much faster is it in 3dmark? and I cant see the numbers of superpi and I wouldnt understand the differences anyway. also that ram timing is bad. 2-2-2-5 rocks.
I dont know IF 35s at Pi 1M, 304 for cpumark or 31 min at Pi 32M is good compared to the FX53 S940 with the same timings of course.
ya.....use this MainboardQuote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
socket 939?
really?
http://img57.photobucket.com/albums/...0/DSCF0005.jpg
I was wondering what the importance of this was. You got the board and the 939 chip already? Yikes. Sweet.
ok 28+28+27+27 + 27*31-8 = 939 pinsQuote:
Originally posted by sxs112
ya.....use this Mainboard
http://img57.photobucket.com/albums/...0/DSCF0005.jpg
U are a beta tester?? :D
Good ole Asus board eh?
How you like it though?
`s
35s SuperPi 1M stock is not bad. Could you say something about o/cing potential? Is it possible to tighten the timings at least tRCD?
3DMark run?
ASUS takes to my question to be least, therefore I only then am willing to use their product. If has a better choice, I certainly or can choose others' productQuote:
Originally posted by `schr0et
Good ole Asus board eh?
How you like it though?
`s
Friend of mine tests:p:Quote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
ok 28+28+27+27 + 27*31-8 = 939 pins
U are a beta tester?? :D
That's a pretty insane score I think for a chip at stock speeds! I can only do 34 seconds at the speed in my sig!
Because is the VIA ES board, therefore the not O/C option, runs 3dmark2001 is does not have the questionQuote:
Originally posted by QuadDamage
35s SuperPi 1M stock is not bad. Could you say something about o/cing potential? Is it possible to tighten the timings at least tRCD?
3DMark run?
I have my 940 pin FX53 running 32m atm with your timings. i can tell that that 939s is faster. im getting 13m 07s @ loop 10. I also have antivirus running and a bunch of other junk running tho.
I will post a screeny as soon as its done.
damn fast...
sxs112:
you can use clockgen to overclock that maybe
soft not support:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by Evil_Spork
sxs112:
you can use clockgen to overclock that maybe
Ok here is a stock 940s FX53 on a untweaked OS with nortons runnning.
http://24.158.154.102/images/32mfx53.jpg
http://24.158.154.102/images/1mfx53.jpg
i'm sure clockgen doesn't support this chipset yet.Quote:
Originally posted by Evil_Spork
sxs112:
you can use clockgen to overclock that maybe
I can tell it's very fast. Too bad it's an ES mobo.
Im going to run it again with nortons and everything turned off with auto timings in the bios which i feel is better to find a stock score..
edit: stock fx53 940 run with nothing running in the background
http://24.158.154.102/images/32mfx53stock.jpg
Hmmmm....
So the 939 looks APPRECIABLY faster... now the next questions are:
How does it OC?
How will the Mobo/Chipsets perform?
When will it be here?
How does it do with BH-5 and tight timings/high fsb with locked pci/agp??
C
yes it does :)Quote:
Originally posted by charlie
Hmmmm....
So the 939 looks APPRECIABLY faster... now the next questions are:
How does it OC?
How will the Mobo/Chipsets perform?
When will it be here?
How does it do with BH-5 and tight timings/high fsb with locked pci/agp??
C
btw since i was at it i ran a max bench also (temps @ 3c)
http://24.158.154.102/images/1m29sec.jpg
Nice, this is looking promising...
Now I just have to decide between a 939 or a 3.0c
hmmmmmm
I hope your're kidding. Whats there to decide?? 939 will eat 3.0c for breakfast, lunch,dinner u name it.Quote:
Originally posted by Gogeta
Nice, this is looking promising...
Now I just have to decide between a 939 or a 3.0c
hmmmmmm
yes, BUT
when FX-53 939 comes out (maybe in late June) it WILL be $899. The first 939/nF3250/K8T800Pro mobo's WILL BE $209-$239...
P4 3.0C is what? like $189 and a great 875P mob is <$100. SO depending on what your using it for...the P4 may be every bit as "wise" as a 939FX. Me for example, I'll grab a 939 just for benching sport, but I'd never own such an expensive rig for my desktop, lol. My new desktop is:
XP-M 2600+ @ 2600mHz
Abit NF7-S v2
BH-6
Fortron 350W Hi-Q
with low budget watercooling. Now I'm waiting for the Sapphire 9800 Pro 256/256 r360 models to dip under $200 and I'm all over it. I can't stand having a "depreciating" rig on my desktop... the "above" rig will be VERY fast for gaming, internet, editing family piccies from the digi-cam and such things :D
I think the P4 3.0C/IC7/R9800Pro combo will be the "next" hot budget combo!
C
the next hot budget combo will be a 2800+ ath 64 + kv8 pro or something, newer chips seem to hit 2.6Ghz easy on water, on a very fast chipset, the board is £76, which for a new board on new chipset is extremely cheap in the uk, boards like this, the k8v and all other s754 boards are £90-100 , the 3000+ in the uk is at £145 ish now, the 2800+ must be like £125 which is cheaper than a 3.0C and will go down again once the s939 stuff is out, will be cheaper, and faster.
Honestly thats not cheap even its not budget, its merely the cheapest way to get high end kit. BUdget and plenty fast for anything you need to do is a 2400+ mobile barton, and a nf2 say infinity board.
Either way socket 939 is damned fast but i thought we all knew that? IT will be nice, there should be fx53 on 939 release and probo a 3800+ which shouldn't be more than £330, the boards shouldnt' be that expensive either, the 940's are that much now and the s939 boards will be 4 isntead of 6 or 6 instead of 8 layer(i forget which) so will be much cheaper. Theres no reason they will be much more than current nf250 boards, same chipset, layout features, simply diff socket. It will cost more due to marketing and stuff, but shouldn't jump to that high.
Interesting...From where have you got it ?
He got it from a friend that is a beta tester :) read page 1Quote:
Originally posted by root
Interesting...From where have you got it ?
Komplett.no have the A8V (K8T800 PRO) listed for NOK 1265... without VAT it's around USD 148, EUR 125 or GBP 84.Quote:
Originally posted by charlie
yes, BUT
when FX-53 939 comes out (maybe in late June) it WILL be $899. The first 939/nF3250/K8T800Pro mobo's WILL BE $209-$239...
P4 3.0C is what? like $189 and a great 875P mob is <$100. SO depending on what your using it for...the P4 may be every bit as "wise" as a 939FX.
PCutstyr.no have it listed for NOK 971 (w/o VAT), that's USD 141, EUR 119 or GBP 80.
Socket 939 no contest;)Quote:
Originally posted by Gogeta
Nice, this is looking promising...
Now I just have to decide between a 939 or a 3.0c
hmmmmmm
yep, I'm working with this really busted up mobo that randomly reboots and crashes (even at stock speeds) just waiting for 939 to come out, then I'll buy the best 939 mobo and the cheapest 939 chip.
ASUS A8V :p:
http://bbs.gzeasy.com/uploads/post-5-1084496059.jpg
sxs112
Do you have it? We'd love ya to o/c that chip.
One more thing - can you post a picture of a stock S939 cooler?
I hope this isn't off topic but when is AMD including PCI-E? I'm torn on weather or not to go A64 before PCI-E or wait until after and save the turnover
edit: I mean this as in do you beta testers have a timetable?
Socket 939 is turning out to be quite satisfactory :D. No more registered ram for the FX series and dual-channel goodness for plain A64s :). I have to resist...until 90nm A64s come out...:p:.
sxs112,
please run 3DMark2001 and post results. I'm interested in seeing Car High Detal framerate. Sandra Memory benchmark also and Hexus PiFast. Please:)
The thing is will the S939 Mobo support PCI-Xpress?
Thermaltake Silent Tower CL-P0025Quote:
Originally posted by IvanAndreevich
sxs112
Do you have it? We'd love ya to o/c that chip.
One more thing - can you post a picture of a stock S939 cooler?
http://www.clubic.com/photo/00086090.jpg
I would like to know this as well, because the next time I do a full system upgrade I really don't want to still be running AGP (it won't be for a while).Quote:
Originally posted by Arkangyl
I hope this isn't off topic but when is AMD including PCI-E? I'm torn on weather or not to go A64 before PCI-E or wait until after and save the turnover
At present prearranges in the travelling schedule, SIS 756, K8T890 all has supports PCI-XpressQuote:
Originally posted by Djuice
The thing is will the S939 Mobo support PCI-Xpress?
NV had not temporarily seen supports PCI-Xpress
awesome dude
939 is gonna be good for the whole A64 line in general
sxs112,
3DMark2001, Sandra Memory? In progress i take it?
heck this looks like Intel Tejas cooler
:eek:
Thermaltake Silent Tower CL-P0025 supportQuote:
Originally posted by QuadDamage
sxs112,
3DMark2001, Sandra Memory? In progress i take it?
heck this looks like Intel Tejas cooler
:eek:
Intel P4 Socket T
Intel P4 478
AMD Athlon 64
Athlon 64 FX
Four kind of platforms
http://home.pchome.com.tw/net/boss_50/539392.JPG
K8T800Pro non OC FX-53
DDR400 3-3-3-8
http://img51.photobucket.com/albums/v156/BOSS50/nf3.jpg
NF3 250 939 non OC FX-53
DDR400 3-3-3-8
sxs112
Will we be seing any 3D-benches from you? What kind of videocard do you have in there?
Could you maybe run something to test memory latency, like CacheMem32? Then we could get yuri to run it @ the same timings as you have and get a great comparison.
yuri
Could you run SuperPi 32M @ 5-3-3 CAS 2.5 like sxs112 so we can judge purely on the performance of the chipset? Of course, I mean do a clean run with those timings.
:confused: no, all new fx cpus will cost 733Quote:
Originally posted by charlie
yes, BUT
when FX-53 939 comes out (maybe in late June) it WILL be $899.
yuri, you were running the 1m @ 2.5-3-3-8 , he was running the 1m @ 3-3-3-8, so his sys is probably a sec faster.
No, I don't think CL 2.5 vs 3.0 is worth 1 whole second, but someone can try to prove me wrong.Quote:
Originally posted by saaya
yuri, you were running the 1m @ 2.5-3-3-8 , he was running the 1m @ 3-3-3-8, so his sys is probably a sec faster.
Quote:
Originally posted by Soulburner
No, I don't think CL 2.5 vs 3.0 is worth 1 whole second, but someone can try to prove me wrong.
I agree.. CAS doesn´t matter much on the A64.. if it were tRCD 2 go 3.. then maybe.
http://img57.photobucket.com/albums/...20/9800pro.jpg
user Catalyst 4.4
Interesting.. you cannot find CAS 2 5-2-2 memory to test with this? Can you show detailed report of the 3DMark score?
Because uses infineon memory Chip pellet therefore to be unable to make CAS 2 5-2-2Quote:
Originally posted by IvanAndreevich
Interesting.. you cannot find CAS 2 5-2-2 memory to test with this? Can you show detailed report of the 3DMark score?
http://bbs.gzeasy.com/uploads/post-19-1084518790.jpg
user Catalyst 4.5
This test is I is called him which I the friend tests not to emit the show detailed report me also not to have the means:(
http://bbs.gzeasy.com/uploads/post-19-1084519850.jpg
Thermaltake Silent Tower CL-P0025
Mighty pimp looking, big copper coolers are fine as long as they don't make a racket. A big plus is also if they cool decently =)
tRCD and tRP at 3 cost a lot of marks, cas doesn't matter at all though. Your ram can't do tRCD/tRP "2", i take it?
no, but it might be the missing miliseconds to get a lower score...Quote:
Originally posted by Soulburner
No, I don't think CL 2.5 vs 3.0 is worth 1 whole second, but someone can try to prove me wrong.
Interesting score, this is will show in the long run that 939 is alot faster than 940, and prescott.
A fx53 (940) stock 1m is 34secs on a fresh formatted drive with memory set to auto in the bios.Quote:
Originally posted by saaya
:confused: no, all new fx cpus will cost 733
yuri, you were running the 1m @ 2.5-3-3-8 , he was running the 1m @ 3-3-3-8, so his sys is probably a sec faster.
But at what timings? 2-2-2-5?Quote:
Originally posted by yuri
A fx53 (940) stock 1m is 34secs on a fresh formatted drive with memory set to auto in the bios.
All they say is cas 2 :confused:Quote:
Originally posted by Soulburner
But at what timings? 2-2-2-5?
http://www.amdzone.com/pics/cpus/ath...00/superpi.gif amdzone
Probably 5-2-2-2 then..
my guess is 2/3/2/6/11/16 because unless you vmodd the board tRCD is very hard to run @ 2Quote:
Originally posted by IvanAndreevich
Probably 5-2-2-2 then..
isnt that 3dmark score kinda low, considering its got a s939 and a 9800pro?
i built a rig for my friend with an opteron (1.8ghz) and a 9800pro and it got 20k stock
Boyne7
That's kinda high..
Initial screenshot for super pi (first post) shows a cpu-z package result of socket 939 yet the cpu-z package result for screenshot of super pi 1M (next posting) shows socket 940? What gives? Older version of cpu-z used straight after initial super pi result?
Maybe with a 9800xt, a opteron 144 / 9800pro doesn't score 20k stockQuote:
Originally posted by Boyne7
isnt that 3dmark score kinda low, considering its got a s939 and a 9800pro?
i built a rig for my friend with an opteron (1.8ghz) and a 9800pro and it got 20k stock
Quote:
Quote:
1 pic has socket 939 and the other 940?! surely cpu-z wouldnt miss count the socket?!??!?!?!
Didn't they have a discount on Photoshop last week?
Just gotta wait till it's official to be certain. You can wait, right?
Personally, I doubt we will see any performance revelations from Socket939. Maybe 1-3%... still same core and same Mhz. The reason I'm waiting for it is: 1. Unlocked AGP/PCI and multiplier. 2. Doesn't need registered memory... can finally use pimping BH5 sticks 3. Hopefully really good overclocking because of 1&2. ;)
PS: Does anybody have BH5 that can do 273 @ 2-2-2-5??
with enough volts.......BH-5 can go 270...like 3.6-3.8V.
C
lol agreedQuote:
Originally posted by ***Deimos***
Didn't they have a discount on Photoshop last week?
Just gotta wait till it's official to be certain. You can wait, right?
Personally, I doubt we will see any performance revelations from Socket939. Maybe 1-3%... still same core and same Mhz. The reason I'm waiting for it is: 1. Unlocked AGP/PCI and multiplier. 2. Doesn't need registered memory... can finally use pimping BH5 sticks 3. Hopefully really good overclocking because of 1&2. ;)
PS: Does anybody have BH5 that can do 273 @ 2-2-2-5??