Printable View
EDIT: MACCI'S REVENGE ^_^;;;
THE HUNT IS OVER
sorry for the lack in updates (holiday :D)
1. 10008 macci [www.akiba.fi] R9800XT+P4EE Muropaketin 3DMark03 Ranking :D :D :D :D
2. 9878 OPPAINTER,,AMD FX-51 **Xtremesystems.org 3DTeam**
3. 9808 FUGGER ** Xtremesystems 3DTeam ** 3.4EE :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
http://melkizedek.altervista.org/rank03h.gif
CONGRATULATION:toast: :toast::D
Whoa the new drivers are really that fast!?
Man I gotta rebench quickly and try 10k :D
Looks like the 3dmark dream team... ;) :hehe:
Looks like FUGGER has updated his Mark2001 and also broke the 30k barrier there :toast:
Fugger's 30.2k
congrats guys well done!!! :)
17x295 = 5015 ?Quote:
Originally posted by Melkizedek
OMG Fugger 9700 points with P4EE 3,4 (17 x 295?)and ATI 9800xt (621/466) + catalyst 4.2
I think that he is running w/ 15x multi
well that would make more sense :D
what drivers did you use for 9730 macci ?
The 3.9s (6396) which were the latest drivers available when I benched.
It seems that the new driver gets 100-150 marks extra.
Go for it Macci, be the first to 10K.
:D
or 9900 :D
Reminds me of when I had 19,994 3DMarks because of bad Car Low....being right on the edge sucks :D
great work, guys...
Thanks guys, I should have pushed a little harder but I was out of gas.
Yep we will see a 10K shortly.
Insane scores, just insane.
wow, just 30 pts separating! 10k, intel 1st
any chance of seeing Oppainter's 2k1 get taken down?
yeah and with opp working on a socket a setup we wont see him fighting back for a while.
congrats to everyone
keep chasing that rainbow. maybe we should go check the orb.
Just when you thought the P4EE has the power the FX51 steps back up to the plate & regains the crown...:slobber:
64pts seperating the top 3
1st = 9764 = Oppainter
2nd = 9730 = macci
3rd = 9700 = fugger
who's gonna break that 10K first??
:eek:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2068110
OPP CC and AMD back on top. :toast:
CONGRATULATIONS OPP, Macci and Fugger, you 3 are true pc enthusiast gods.
ps: opp, thanks for keeping amd on top :D
Cheers to everyone, oustanding stuff :)
Damn you guys are great inspiration but you take away the other competition. Creative the aussie benching guy has now quit because he can't match your setups :(
Time for someone to step up, Eva2000, r3b0rn we gotta get some insane clocking happening.
9800! :toast:Quote:
keep chasing that rainbow. maybe we should go check the orb.
Looks like I really have to wake the cascade up. :D
Need to edit the the thread topic...
OPPAINTER [aka FX51 KING] REVENGE.
Superb job:toast: :toast: 9800:slobber: :eek:
http://melkizedek.altervista.org/rank03.gif
lol 9800 and 9700, maadd.
Enough damage for one night:D
I'm heading home, it's late down here in LA.
OPP:toast:
awesome work guys, 10k is surely going down by the end of the month
lets not make these wild guesses, it takes away from the actual achievment... lets just say 10k will be here soon, and it will be most likely done by one of these fine oc'ers. good luck opp, macci and fugger, let the benching begin! :D
My vote goes for macci, because he is from scandinavia.. Or what about Tom Holck, what is his score?
Nice work guys :)
Congrats to FUGGER for the 30k especially.
That GT1 score of FUGGERS is excellent in 03, I wonder if it was the driver or the extra speed from the EE ?
If it is the driver then Macci has a good chance of trying to get #1 again.
I wonder why people like Creative and JC give up if they cannot be at the very top ? You can have fun ( maybe more fun without all that pressure ;) ) in the lower classes or just doing better than you did before. Oh well, JC and I am sure Creative are still helping people by trickling down their experience and skill.
Regards
Andy
Congrats, guys!! :toast: Those are some awesome scores. Do I hear Maccis' cascade running up! ;)
Guess us little ppl better get after it again.... :D
great score to every body :toast:
we are waiting for 10k
:toast:
Come on FUGGER and MACCI, take that AMD score down :hehe:
I'm sorry, I have a split personality, that was the EE fanboy speaking :D
Good job guys ;)
Look at macci's clocks though....i'd say he's back on top soon ;).
Macci's going for another attempt at it seemingly from the AMD side again if you check the AMD64 overclock thread in extreme overclocking .. new AMD64 chip that does over 3Ghz so depending on how far over 3Ghz it goes could be interesting
This is turning out to be like Forman v Ali, or perhaps more accurately Ali v Ali ( for fear of offending anyone :D )
I'm not counting FUGGER out either, everyones got cracking hardware at present.
Somebody's cascade is going to blow at this rate either taking out half the USA or half of Europe.....
Regards
Andy
good thing i have back-up cascade systems:D
Nice job Oppainter!! :eek: w o w
errmm, i thought AMD will never take 3d03 from intel. my pride is hurt.
Not a problem. Huge video card clocks sererate us by 100points
isnt that what the difference usually is between 1st, 2nd, and 3rd?
card clocks no, points yes.
Ill try to get some runs in tonight
G O FUGGER! U only have 621mhz on the XT atm, if you can somehow find 30mhz more , i think you can beat Oppainter's score.
Macci may be able to edge Oppainter, this remains to be seen, but Oppainter does have the cpu edge though. Has Macci gotten a socket 939 mobo and 3700+ over 3GHz?
:up: :up: :up:
9839
:YIPPIE:
- 161 to 10000
WOW you guys are amazing.
Oppainter has really emerged this year. He has taken both 3dmark2k1 and 3dmark03 titles, and is extreme champion. congrats.:toast: :slobber:Quote:
Originally posted by Melkizedek
:up: :up: :up:
9839
:YIPPIE:
Amazing what he has done.
Moving up again, macci passed for the moment and we know he cant let that ride for too long.
I found some more card clocks.
makes ya wonder what oppainter would get with the 4.2's... he's still using 4.1's. :p:
wow fuggers at 9785 with lower clocks than Macci but he does have a faster cpu :D
he also has newer drivers... and he is up to 9808 as of this post. ;)
Fugger putting up a good fight now, lets see only 30 pts seperating the two. Catalyst 4.2 drivers are a good set too. For awhile, I thought that the EE's were safely ahead of FX in 3dmark03, but Oppainter really have something to prove.
opp, fugger and macci - u guys so freaky :slobber:
"there benchmark fighting!" lol
Great improvements there guys :toast:
Lets see if there is room for 10k :D
Nice work FUGGER.
OPP, macci and FUGGER will all be checking the orb as soo as they get out of bed :)
I wonder if anyone will be able to get 10k before nv40 / r420 come out and move the game on yet again ? It will be difficult I guess, I think it will be a hard slog in 10's from here.
Has Captain Cascade or Chilly1 have anything colder being built at present ?
Regards
Andy
daily update...
http://melkizedek.altervista.org/rank03c.gif
OPPAINTER -161 (9839)
FUGGER -192 (9808)
MACCI -270 (9730)
Macci is waiting...
I'm quite sure that he can reach 9900 with new drivers...
ooo 10 k gonna happen this time easy.
Just cant wait to see 10k
macci is still behind, maybe he can get 9850 ;)
Opp, are you really running a gig of ram in that system?
he's running 2 x 512 Corsair RE AFAIKQuote:
Originally posted by sandman
Opp, are you really running a gig of ram in that system?
it's only sold in 512MB sticks ;)
OPP at 9878 now :D
Must do a 3dmark sessio ASAP. :D
Should give a decent score if I can get the card up to the clocks I had last year. I haven't used the card since the 9730 bench (thats almost 2months now).
I'm sure she'll do a nice run thou :)
Good luck to you all :toast:
And make the best man win...:p:
im sure the cat 4.2's will give macci a good boost right there... ;) they seem to have helped everyone else out on 3dmark03.
though, OPP isnt using the 4.2's i think, he has the 4.1's last i checked.
All right got the 3dmark up and running :D
over 9.8k already, CPU at 4055MHz :D
go macci, go! :D
well then.. something that p!sses me off..
3d2k3
#1 12.760 doboy, r9800p @467/386, 170fps mother nature, yea right
#2 9.878 opp
#3 9.808 fugger
#4 9.730 macci - for the moment at least :D
#5 9.483 owned, r9600 @398/297, 146fps trolls lair, 19.6fps mother nature.. yea right
what the fack gives? isn't this doboy dork up there for a day now with his fake scores? and what about #5 - didn't bother looking further down there... can't these a**holes just keep hiding in their ratholes? bah.. anyone mind telling fm about these?
sorry had to release some pressure...
daily update
;)
http://melkizedek.altervista.org/rank03d.gif
Macci is still waiting :p:
OPPAINTER -122 (9878)
FUGGER -192 (9808)
MACCI -270 (9730)
Man you did that update a bit too soon :D
Check again in 10mins ;)
ready:comp10:
oooo here we go:) looks like maccis about to bring out the big guns :D, im of to check the orb...
http://melkizedek.altervista.org/rank03e.gif
big update!!!
OPPAINTER -122 (9878)
MACCI -122 (9878) ON TOP AGAIN
FUGGER -192 (9808)
:toast: :toast: :toast:
OOO macci just posted a score 98783dmarks, SAME AS OPPAINTER!!, but maccis only at 4065MHz, crank the CPU speed up n lets see some 10K goodness.
also i must say macci that is one hell of R9800XT 660/470:slobber: :slobber: :slobber: !!
Ok ok, firing up my beast in a few minutes to join the fun.
:eek:
I REALLY NEED TO SLEEP
I'm italian... it's 1:34 AM
Hehe its 2:37AM here :D
you have an overclocked body:bows: :bows:
mine is "stock"... lol
http://fugger.netfirms.com/9935.jpg
A huge jump in nature without that fade to black. Not sure why its happening but its happened a few times.
61fps nature
Too much mem clocks perhaps? :)
Good luck for your bench session. Im off to bed now :D
It happened at lower mem clocks and I am at minimal tearing on
screen.
It just ends without the fade to black and gives score. I feel its a bug and wont post the score.
Have you seen this problem before?
Havent seen nature buggin on mine yet. It does it in mark2001 when too much mem clocks but not in mark03 so far.
Unless your running at 670/480 you wont see 60+ fps in nature without a bug of somekind.
Yep, fade to black must be a seperate routine in the benchmark it to quit and still give score. My memory was at 459 iirc
Thats plainly insane, same score and with only 4GHz cpu speed.Quote:
I just camt my head around how you peeps can improve your score like that. Have a top score then someone beats it. Then your another run and there you go, a top score again.
This is intresting to watch!
BTW, macci why dont you get a FX? And go for top in 01?
Macci,
Nice score my friend. Gotta love those numbers:D
OPP
Wow this is pretty exciting to watch... It's nice to see you guys encourage each other, shows a great deal of sportsmanship! Keep up the great work guys!
"OOO macci just posted a score 98783dmarks, SAME AS OPPAINTER!!, but maccis only at 4065MHz, crank the CPU speed up n lets see some 10K goodness."
3dmark 2003 doesnt really care about cpu speed but yea if Macci can get his cpu stable any higher clocks he just might do 9900 marks :D not much but enough to be #1
Great Job fellas! Man , I would love to see 60fps nature in 3dmark03 on my system. Wow, it seems Fugger has gotten a pretty high score , but a bugged run which is too bad.
my 3dmark03 score increased from 3649 to 3798 pts. stock, when i upgraded just the cpu from 2.4 to 2.8ghz. So cpu speed can be a factor too.
CPU speed only plays a large role when it is your bottleneck.
For example, when I overclock my CPU from 2400 to 3200 my score increases fro 6,600 to 7,100 - a 500 point increase. Obviously I was overpowered in the video area and underpowered in the system area.
Otherwise it doesn't make as much of a difference.
Then I hope macci is able to get his p4 past 4050MHz, like 4.3GHz would be sweet :D
my god!
Why does 3dmark read clock speeds incorrectly? It reads the FSB right and no matter what 1:1 5:4 3:2 it is always posts lower than the actual clock speed.Quote:
Originally posted by Geforce4ti4200
Then I hope macci is able to get his p4 past 4050MHz, like 4.3GHz would be sweet :D
Mad scores guys!!!! I think a great bon voyage to the R360's will be the 10k mark by all 3 overclocking madmen!!!
It reads mine correctly...
Hopefully FUGGER can sort his bug out.
When are you benching 3dmark01 macci ? Nice video card clocks.
With r420/nv40 maybe they'll be powerful enough with their new shaders to start showing cpu effects in GT2-4 ?
Regards
Andy
It looks like Macci has got back on top!
http://imagehost.vendio.com/preview/...vitc/macci.JPG
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2083510
yeh i know dude, but if he can run his EE at like 4.3G-4.4Hz then that will be enough to get him 10K for sure, 3dmark 03 is pretty damn ignorant of CPU speed, but not THAT ignorantQuote:
Originally posted by Geforce4ti4200
"OOO macci just posted a score 98783dmarks, SAME AS OPPAINTER!!, but maccis only at 4065MHz, crank the CPU speed up n lets see some 10K goodness."
3dmark 2003 doesnt really care about cpu speed but yea if Macci can get his cpu stable any higher clocks he just might do 9900 marks :D not much but enough to be #1
:up:
good morning...
hi mg84 :D
waiting for the next update...
:DQuote:
Originally posted by Melkizedek
:up:
good morning...
hi mg84 :D
waiting for the next update...
Go macci go, go macci go.
All i will say, good competition.
wow Macci could make history! 4.1GHz and 77 more marks to go! another couple hundred MHz on the cpu and 10k is his!!!!!!!! I think he can do it, lets find out!