Printable View
http://downloads.criminalcafe.com/re...0/IMG_0687.JPG
http://downloads.criminalcafe.com/re...0/IMG_0690.JPG
a quick test and i dont think its lowest voltage for these clock
http://downloads.criminalcafe.com/re...mhz%20cine.jpg
http://downloads.criminalcafe.com/re...ghz%20cine.jpg
mb - Biostar TP67XE rev B2
cpu - 2700K ES
cpu cooler - cpu370 koolance plus 480mm radiator
pump - eheim 1200l/hr
room temp is 24c
Nice post - doesn't seem any better binned that a costa rica 2600k but then again you haven't fine tuned lowering the voltage yet...
Awesome PC:up:
Just take a few seconds to see if it boot up to 55X:D
or 57x
hahahah
4.5GHZ at 1.22v very nice
nice! whats max clocks? Can boot at 53x (or more)?
very cool, first screens I have seen of a 2700k:up:
From 30.September :Quote:
Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3
http://translate.google.com/translat...p%3Ft%3D274604
I am more interesting if 2800K will be released.
E3-1280 3.5GHz => i7-2700K 3.5GHz,
E3-1290 3.6GHz => i7-2800K 3.6GHZ ? :shrug:
E3-1290 3.6GHz
http://ark.intel.com/products/55452
Thanks PcCI2iminal :up:
Waiting for more testing ... :yepp:
Hey Mojo..nice setup with your 2700K (ES)
Remember your last chess test result:
15) Cyclone xTreme II-8cpu 22/50 01:57 147.000.943 9.972.891 +0.28 Core i7 2600K @5,0Ghz DDR3: PcCI2iminal
So,when you have some time..you want to try to pass the 10 Milj. now :)
JP.
yeahhh great
What a joke bringing 2700k out so near to SB-E chips!
SB-E -> LGA2011Quote:
Originally Posted by bro20000
2700k -> LGA1155
Where's the joke ?
Meh. 2700K is a waste of money. Grab a 2500k or 2600k and wait for Ivy. I'm looking forward to some 6 core goodness from Ivy :yepp:
Ivy Bridge 1155 is a 4C/8T chip ...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ket
Nope, Ivy will also be available as a 6 core part.
Source ? :confused:
itll never be a 6 core part for the 1155 socket it, will be a 2011 sandy-e upgrade a year after the first chips come out , from what ive been reading . . 1155 isnt the enthusist socket to itll be tamed a bitQuote:
Originally Posted by Ket
I read here a while ago (and I think I saw it on some roadmap at the same time) Ivy will be 6 core part for 1155 and 8 core part for 2011.
Got my retail one. Pretty good! Don't test max multi yet.
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/973/pi32wprime5ghz.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/c111087...2efd4f4609.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Ket
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4830/i...ecture-exposed
pinto strikes again ! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by pinto
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinto
where did u bought that?
the retail will hit Japan at 24th :DQuote:
Originally Posted by kagula323
guys im stuck at 50x,me think its a bios issue or i got a very bad chip :)
anyway i will ask for a new bios ;)
Hi pinto.. may i ask what cooling were you using?Quote:
Originally Posted by pinto
One french e-tailer have it in stock :
http://www.materiel.net/processeur-s...00k-71502.html
do you know if they ship to the US?Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
No. They don't :(Quote:
Originally Posted by badatgames18
aaw :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
gonna have to wait, but if these are truly binned higher on average.. will be great.. hopefully more 57,58 multi chips :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Maybe its me, but I don't see any roadmap in that link :confused: Anyway, time will tell what intel decide to do :yepp:.
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/91d...6e3b3be9bf.jpg
QC means Quad Core and, for sure, IB 1155 will be 4C/8T, just look at the die.
Maybe once the 2700k sales have died down. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by stasio
You can try to raise BCLK .Quote:
Originally Posted by PcCI2iminal
If the cpu can run higher than 5000Mhz , wou will be able to reach it this way .
Keep up ! :)
I still think we will see 6 core on 1155, but even if we don't, in all honestly a upgrade to 2011 and 6 cores would be little more than a VERY expensive side-grade for extremely minimal performance gain.Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
I'm pretty sure 6c/12t will be limited to LGA 2011. I haven't seen/heard Intel or anyone say LGA 1155 will get 6 core love.
no one on XS has retail 2700k yet? PcCI2iminal can you please test your sample for max multi.. i really want to know if it's worth to buy some of these..
i don't want to buy it and find out that they average the same max multi (just are the same 2600k wafers with 100mhz bump)
I don't know how intel bins these.. do they just test if it's ok with 3.9mhz and say ok move to 2700k bin
My first 2700K max @ 55X:(
What voltage does it do 5GHz on?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
so they're high clockin already?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
thats good news hahhahah
already higher than 4 of my 2600k..Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
i thought it was suppose to be 330 somethin :( it's more than that everywhere else
5530Mhz max Mhz on cold and the show is over:(
where did you get it dumo? price?
EDIT: 55x not bad for first chip.. i think
how cold did you get it? just SS?
@ Bad...Its the same deal like 2600K, luck or quantity to find 58X/59X ones
Will get a few more from newegg.
Sorry for oot, PC
we tested CPUs over at UK while at LITS show, i think we were given a 5.4 chip that was tested out of 3 chips and also intel gave us another 4x chips and the worst one could not even clock to 5GHZ LMAO, and others were all 5, 5.1 chips JJJJJUNK
thank you dinoQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
already bought one from egg though :(
and sorry for the oot also.. just really wanted to know
guess these are exactly same as 2600k.. luck or quantity
Ugh, there is really no point in buying this then huh. Best to save the $ and buy the 2600k lotto ticket.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
i don't know why they have this damn clock wall but it sure as hell is there and makes me lose motivation to bench. Overclocking is still fun and all but it would be more challenging if an end user could tweak the system to get more speed out of it rather being stuck to the chip clock wall :(
No one would bother even thinking about AMD for benching/OCing if Intel didn't give them a good reason to do so.
Clock wall...that what BD doesn't seem to have, too bad its too slow (at least for now)
I bought a 2600k on saturday and it wudnt go above 4.4 without stupid volts.
Returned it on monday and ended up buying a 2700k on tuesday for £20 cheaper lol. Running it at 4.6 on 1.28volts!
Looks like intel have done one on us and simply rebadged the better binned 2600's
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
I like the low volts that is running - nice and cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomee
guys maybe offtopic but i would like to say this
the more i try chips the more i realize that real cores are the way to go, see most games are bugged with HT, look BF3 you enable HT and game is a stutter heaven, you disable and its smooth as should be
i want the 6 core thats for sure
cheers to all
Sergio
what a hell are you complain about :eek::mad::shakes: x55 is good..most chip dosent do that u know u are lucky man anywayQuote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
Sarcasm?
Doubt he's being sarcastic, as I'd be happy with a X55, too. As long as 5 ghz is reached with HT on at a low voltage, then you can do a lot worse than X55...it's not like you are going to get a X58 chip without going through hundreds, anyway....
I think he was hoping to get better results than 2600k; which can already be had in this range. His point is probably that you're better off with 2600k unless better 2700ks start showing up.
Thanks for the heads up Dumo. How does vcore scale before hitting a wall, better than the 2600k or about the same?
What the hell What??Quote:
Originally Posted by PytonOrm
55X is not good enough (for the price comparo to 2600K), less than 57X with any form of cooling won't get you anywhere for benching...to be honest.
Unless you just wanna bench 3D '11
Its the same S_OQuote:
Originally Posted by some_one
qftQuote:
Originally Posted by infrnl
x55 is pretty weak.
x57 or higher is where it's at Dumo is right, luckily it only took me 14 pcs to find a x57+, unlike some which have tested hundreds.
300pcs to find a 6ghz chip:eek:
passsssss
took me 14 also loud :)
thank you ebay lol
newegg was peddling me 52x, 53x all day... my highest was 53 from them.. all of them similar batch
price intel recommended was 330... whenever it drops down will be the time for me to buy some.. right now.. i think i'll pass also
. . . the grassssssQuote:
Originally Posted by Splave
i agree with Dumo less than 57x you can't do anything when benching is the prorpose
..so same crap as 2600K... that's a pity
for the record i tried about 18 pcs of 2600k and the best was 55x (the second one) :(
last 3 it tried were all duds.... max was like a 54x chip. i think latest batches are poo poo. intel's "cherry picking" for 2700K may have gobbled up all the 55x chips :rofl:.
I think they have mate.
My 2600k bought last week would only do 4.4Ghz @1.38v
My 2700k bought this week can do 4.6Ghz@1.28v - fully prime and IBT maximum stable.
Heres my 5Ghz run @ 1.38v:
http://i1022.photobucket.com/albums/...omee/5ghz2.jpg
Nice chip zoomee, please test at what max multi (x100) it wil boot at ~ 1.55v :up:
I gave it about 1.5v and it wudnt even boot at x53 :-(
Not sure if its me being an intel noob or my mainboard tbh
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
1.38 would be a decent 5G chip though what cooling are you on.
honestly guys why do you think a 2700k will be better than a 2600k ? same waffers...no changes they can do the same on 2600K as WE ALL get our 2600K above 4.5 so no big deal its just marketing
i want to see some 6 core if they hit 5Ghz easy and not burning i will get as real cores is the way to go, lazy programmers aint using HT, see brand new BF3 game...HT on game suxs, HT off lovely !!! same all with tons of apps...
cheers to all
Serg
No absolutely not, perhaps a few slightly higher clocks at best. We need a usable jump at a smaller die for a cool running six core not proof we can beat Bulldozer in all the benchmarks.
jesus fleshea AMD ??? i dont dig those benchmarks, i go real life gamming multistaking and SB die is the best thing ever madeQuote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
No doubt SB is the best but they jumped the grade to ensure a sweep which was certainly not required IMO. An extra 100mhz is just that and there is no fresh headroom compared to the 2600K which at the moment is the real deal.
Better yields/matured process/strained more!
All legit reason 2700ks could be using better silicon and that is way it always worked with better chips from centre of wafer (used to be peep worked for AMD on Winbeta years ago, he fixed machines that made the wafers)!
They could bin this silicon as any chip but possibly it is extra good so keeping for 2700's and rumours of a possible 2800K could happen as there is a Xeon that is 3.6GHZ and Turbo would be 4.0GHZ!
I have seen ES chips that were not to great and later batches doing better or same on lower volts (any CPU not talking today's SB)!
yeah im saying that no dif between a 2600k or 2700k i really doubt on binned-selected whatever. some ppl went thru 100 chips to get a x56 i had the luck or maybe good eye to spot the batches and jumped in and only took me 4 to get 2 x56Quote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
i dont think intel will sell us selected chips they would loose mine just like if henry ford still make the cars he did he would have been poor now lol, still some Ford A around lol
cheers
Sergio
I totally agree and I too got lucky early in the Sandy lottery with two out of the first four chips reaching 55+. My original L040B208 still runs great and can do 5650 on water. The 2700s may be better but so far I am not seeing any and the multi limit is the same so at best perhaps a better low volt chip up to 5G.
Cooling setup is as follows:Quote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
Thermochill 120.3 + 3 x Scythe 1450RPM GT's
EK Supreme HF + 2 x EK FC-5850's
Liang DDC + XSPC Res
etc etc.
http://i1022.photobucket.com/albums/...0-22185625.jpg
1.38 isn't fully stable - Passes IBT standard - but temps get too high on maximum and it only lasted a couple of minutes of prime95,
and this board is a nightmare trying to get it over 4.6Ghz! :(
Low 1.4v's is good for FULLY stable 5GHZ, peeps showing 5GHZ running with low volts benching PI are not fully stable!
You have just found out Prime or IBT will fail it!
nice setup mate and sorryQuote:
Originally Posted by zoomee
seems i'm right 2700k just marketing
ZOOME
YOUR GFX creates too much heat, until there is room for more OC on your CPU
you ned a 2x360
made this for my son to run 5.4GHZ 24 / 7, same motherboard/tower as your vcpu 1.56v whit 1 XSPC RX360
http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/2179/img0572rr.jpg
Thanks guys, but I don't think the graphics cards are the problem as they run at 30Degrees when Idling. Obviously they don't get used when priming. You'll also notice my loop goes through to my Radiator and then straight to my CPU for max cooling performance for the only overclocked item (i.e. the cpu - I dont overclock my graphics cards).
I'm sure this board requires more voltage than usual and still finding it VERY fiddly to get stable with anything above 4.6ghz. This is my first Intel chip in a long time - I'm great with overclockign AMD stuff, but not good with overclocking intel especially SB stuff! Any pointers more than welcome.
@@ Martin V.R. - Any chance you could post the settings you are using for your sons setup please? thanks.
You can finde en help here,also has a post in the thread,
have a different motherboard today, but there is hardly any difference between them,MaximusIV-Extreme.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...owners-welcome
Best Beta bios forum
http://www.pctreiber.net/forum/intel_mainboards/
martin i cant get info on bios 2050 for MIVE you postedQuote:
Originally Posted by Martin.v.r
right then!
I've managed to get it both IBT and prime95 blend stable @ 5ghz on only 1.41v
however - the temp on it is just too high - Can't believe I am hitting 80Degrees (70-ish on average) with my watercooling setup.
My previous 1090T running 4Ghz @ 1.47v was only kicking out 56-59Degrees C and then I could feel the heat being dumped out of my rad. This 2700k is hitting nearly 80Degrees but I can't feel any heat coming out of the rad?
Any ideas guys?
I use this from EK
so I can get a high pressure water block
http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/8012/img0644sg.jpg
I've got the same on mine mate - only cost me a fiver :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin.v.r
So you saying my Supreme HF isn't a high pressure waterblock? :shrug:
One thing I have noticed is that by the time the water goes through the two gfx card blocks, round the rad it sort of trickles through the CPU (I can tell because when I bleed the system and re-add water it trickles through the pipe going from the rad to the CPU block).
If I moved the loop around so it went like this would it help?
RAD>RES>PUMP>CPU>GPU1>GPU2>RAD?
I have exactly the same heat problem with my 2600k and the supreme hf nickel block. Ive proved "everything" , different TIMs, refit, i open the block to see if there was something wrong with it but im getting the same "high" temps. My chip needs 1.47v in order do 5ghz so my cores can go up to 90 degrees during prime or ibt. I decided to try my "oldie" nickel plated heatkiller v3.0 and i got i better results. I dont know what to say:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomee
Did u try different jetplates mate? I know EK have just released a new one today on their website
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
My block came without extra jetplates. I think ill give the new jetplate a try and I really hope that it'll work because i expected more from this block but unfortunately, until now it was a disappointment...
RAD>RES>PUMP>CPU>GPU1>GPU2>RAD? is super
have a cpu more there will x56, but I am building out, so I will run with 2 pumps + 4 360 radiator XSPC RX360
I'm maybe a little crazy :D
will see if I can get it to wPrime 1024 at 5.5GHZ
perhaps more on water
lol martin on water ? take it to the snow lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Martin.v.r
good luck on the tests
Sergio
So I took this to the next level and removed the GPU blocks.
My CPU is definately prime and IBT stable @ 5ghz on 1.41v but just needed the temps bringing down.
So now I currently have a Thermochill 120.3 (3x1450 GT's) running on JUST the CPU. I've reseated - checked TIM etc and temps are better but still in the high 70Degrees C when priming - IBT (normal) can hit 80 still :(
http://i1022.photobucket.com/albums/...109_164647.jpg
before you say it - yer I know the pumps wonky lol ;) Will hopefully sort that when I get the newer EK jetplate
I run the #3 jet plate in mine with great results.
How do you spread the paste?
With my old Amex card.:yepp:
Try to put a small grain (pea-size) in the middle of the IHS and let the block to spread it. When you spread the paste with a card there is a chance air gets trapped in-between, screwing up badly the performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
Pea sized method works best as tested at hardwaresecrets.com
I use a mouse drop size centered, I also do not have any temp problems though I believe that was zoomee.
A drop the size of a mouse? :shocked:
Do as maker tell you to on their site!
Lol. I use the rice size drop method in the middle too. Think ive got to the bottom of my temp issues. Seems the second hand rad i bought is the problem. God knows what the last user was using but i keep getting green bits of gunk (think it was his coolant/colour mixture) stuck in the cpu block. Grrrr. I've also got llc issues with my board (its unstable at high volts i.e 1.4v) so im settling for 4.8 at ~1.35v for 24 useage for now. Prime95 temps are about 65 with IBT maximum hitting 70. Liveable for now
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk