Printable View
http://segaeu.vo.llnwd.net/o37/alien...mark-v1.03.msi
The folks at AMD have let us know that Rebellion, SEGA and Twentieth Century FOX have just released the Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11 Benchmark to the public.
About 303 meg download.
Source (Hardocp)
Cheers!
Thanks for the heads up :)
Heres a run at default settings -
--------
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 4139
Average Frame Time: 25.3ms
Average FPS: 39.5
--------
Its worth mentioning that texture quality defaults to medium and not high.
The results file outputs to your user/documents folder by default. The config can be changed in the install directory to alter video settings as well.
Note: Disregard this result as it was achieved with 1 run only. Additional runs resulted in much higher performance.
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 23:55:35
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 5878
Average Frame Time: 17.8ms
Average FPS: 56.0
GTX 480 - 870/2150
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 14:49:47
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 14106
Average Frame Time: 7.4ms
Average FPS: 134.6
Use command-line option '-logframetime' to report performance frame-by-frame.
Stock 920 and 5870's
apparently ATI spank Nvida all around.
I have a quadro card so I wouldn't know.. I don't play many games anyway.
You guys should run a standard baseline res 1680X1050 (or something like that) to get a good picture of performance of the different hardware.
I think a parts list next to the benchmark would do some justice ;)
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 01:09:14
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 6823
Average Frame Time: 15.4ms
Average FPS: 65.0
Radeon HD 5870 1GB @ 900/1250 MHz
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 17:11:22
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Video Settings from file <config.txt>:
Resolution: 1600 x 1200
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 4289
Average Frame Time: 24.4ms
Average FPS: 40.9
GTX480 @ 800/1600/3700 - 257.15 drivers
Err what? Make sure you pay attention to the settings used. Look at my results and compare with post #3 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrench
Where is the results file, ran the benchmark and can't find it?
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 11150
Average Frame Time: 9.4ms
Average FPS: 106.4
cpu at 3.6ghz or 4.2 gave me same fps average.. -_-
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElSel10
http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...X6Tk_1_2_l.jpg
http://hardocp.com/news/2010/05/26/a..._now_available
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 18:13:23
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 5278
Average Frame Time: 19.9ms
Average FPS: 50.3
i7 @ 4ghz GTX480 800/1600/2000
Was wondering why my score was lower
I don't care what some benchmark site got. My GTX480 got higher performance on this benchmark than another user's 5870 (who had his card overclocked by a larger amount than mine), and mine had higher settings to boot. Results from other users in this thread are painting the same picture as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrench
Actually look at other posts.. Your not running the same baseline either.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElSel10
HTPC System as listed in Signature....
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 16:36:39
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 4667
Average Frame Time: 22.5ms
Average FPS: 44.5
Sorry I don't know what you are smoking. The results are pretty clear. No, my baseline wasn't the same than the one in post #3. Mine has the graphics turned up even higher. If I used the same baseline, the performance would be even higher.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrench
Maybe in the benchmark but not in the game itself. The second AA is turned on, the NV cards surge to the front. Without AA, ATI dominates.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrench
The AMD slides say that the benches were done with 197 Forceware drivers. The 257's might have changed the situation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
Oops my fault.
I was looking at some wrong columns.
http://www.hardocp.com/images/news/1...6Tk_1_13_l.jpg
That chart is about 15fps off from my matching system, with a slight OC.
you might want a better/more reliable source. for some reason AMD likes to put the 5000 series ahead of the 400 series.:shrug::DQuote:
Originally Posted by Wrench
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-13.html
this is the only site i could find that benched AVP.
Guys, we are all running the bench at medium settings without AA. We should run with the command line -config=name_of_your_config.txt and create a config file.
My default results with a HD5970 at 850MHz and 19x12 for comparison:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 9188
Average Frame Time: 11.4ms
Average FPS: 87.7
Stock 5870 using cat 10.4
Using Video Settings from file <config.txt>:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 3112
Average Frame Time: 33.7ms
Average FPS: 29.7
Fermi's do great with AA. Without AA the 5970 is 1.7 times faster than the 480, with 4xAA and AF the number drops to 1.4.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrench
1.7x faster? You mean 70% faster??Quote:
Originally Posted by annihilat0r
EDIT:
Oh, 5970. I thought you were talking about the 5870. That still seems kind of high though...
Yeah, even 1.4x is higher than the usual percentage by which 5970 is faster than 480.
This is more a less a TWIWMTBP game but in AMD favour, just look at the hardocp article and it becomes obvious. The graphs and marketing tools should make it more obvious those.
[H] reviews AMD slides ... Good ...
Yes and no. IMO, it's a lot like Far Cry 2 in terms of optimizations.Quote:
Originally Posted by tajoh111
When AvP was first released, ATI cards walked all over it in DX9 and DX10 (no mention of DX11 simply NVIDIA had nothing to compare). However, both ATI and NV have been at the top of their games when it comes to optimizations for it. Just like FC2 was a TWIMTBP game that proved to be quite even performance-wise for both companies.
Also -and unlike FC2- the developers themselves have rolled out SIGNIFICANT performance improvements over their last few patches for both vendors' products.
As such, I think AvP is one of the more vendor-agnostic games out there right now regardless of ATI's support. :up:
I ran the bench another 3 times after seeing Felix's 5870 results as my first result was much lower. Low and behold, the next 3 runs were magically higher :rolleyes:
-------------------------
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 6901
Average Frame Time: 15.2ms
Average FPS: 65.8
------------
Did a few more runs with textures set to high and 4x AA ;
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Video Settings from file <avp.txt>:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 4095
Average Frame Time: 25.6ms
Average FPS: 39.0
---------
@ ElSel
Although you are running 1600x1200, 1680x1050 is still 88% the pixel count so the difference will be marginal. You shouldn't have put so much weight in my initial result, especially in light of Felix's result. Don't be so quick to jump to conclusions my friend :up:
hmm does not seem to be CPU limited... Scaling sux max of 67%...
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...titled8777.png
This benchmark is definitely pro AMD, because it seems to use crossfire but not SLI. I just ran the test at default settings, and I checked my GPU usage and there was only activity on one GPU (second GPU didn't use no more than 10%):
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 2560 x 1600
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 2760
Average Frame Time: 38.0ms
Average FPS: 26.3
Keep in mind my benchmark was at 2560x1600 without SLI.
man mine suck big time
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 20:43:40
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 3380
Average Frame Time: 31.0ms
Average FPS: 32.2
Thats me
Quote:
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-26 @ 22:32:34
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 4817
Average Frame Time: 21.8ms
Average FPS: 45.9
Use command-line option '-logframetime' to report performance frame-by-frame.
They didnt review anything, just put it up on their front page newsQuote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Also, SLI does work in the actual game IIRC?
GUI time :D
http://www.framebuffer.com.br/sites/.../sshot-146.jpg
Alien vs Predator Benchmark Tool
Edit: Links updated at 7/14
x86 Systems
x64 Systems
Nobody with DX9/DX10 results? :(
does this benchmark have a dx9 codepath as well? thought it'd be dx11 only - downloading now ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by japamd
*edit* ok, seems like it doesn't run with winxp ;) cba to boot win7 now.
that was fast :DQuote:
Originally Posted by japamd
thanks :up:
DX11 only and from where I am standing, not a very good representation of the actual in-game performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by japamd
It's a shame too because we're sure to see AvP benchmarks using this tool to start popping up in numerous reviews due to its ease of use. Meanwhile, it doesn't give accurate results in relation to actual gameplay so hopefully sites will realize this and either use the game itself or not include AvP at all in their reviews.
Ooops, now you got me... maybe thats why nobody posted DX9/DX10 results? :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by RaZz!
I think it would be kinda stupid on dev side not supporting DX9/DX10 as well.
RAD & OOP rules :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Loque
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 19:20:12
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 2560 x 1600
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 5927
Average Frame Time: 17.7ms
Average FPS: 56.6
980x @4 -- 2x 5870 stock
5870 @ 1050/1275
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 6721
Average Frame Time: 15.6ms
Average FPS: 64.1
1090T-stock/5870E6-stock
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 00:01:11
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 5908 x 1080
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 2687
Average Frame Time: 39.0ms
Average FPS: 25.6
your gona kick yourself here, im 10 FPS faster with same settings and card :yepp: im more up with the 480 resultsQuote:
Originally Posted by evoted
this is a GTX470 on default clocks :up:
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 20:04:08
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 4807
Average Frame Time: 21.8ms
Average FPS: 45.8
THIS TEST IN GAME
http://i40.tinypic.com/30shfgm.jpg
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im...5870SOC-33.jpg
Try in Vain AMD :down:
hey whats going here :P mine is a SC overclocked :SQuote:
Originally Posted by DosDuoNo
where do you find the benchmark results?. Edit; I found it.
Cpu: i7 930 @ 4,00 Ghz
MoBO: Asus P6x58D Premium
Ram: 3 x 2GB
Vga: GTX480
OS: Win 7 X64
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-28 @ 11:19:16
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 2048 x 1152
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 6021
Average Frame Time: 17.4ms
Average FPS: 57.4
Cpu: E8600 @ 4,25 Ghz
MoBO:biostar tpower i45
Ram: 2 x 1gb ddr2 800 @ 1001 mhz 5-5-5-15
Vga:sapphire 5870
Hdd:seagate 7200.12 1tb sata 2
Psu:pc power & cooling 750 watts silencer
* Report Created: 2010-05-27 @ 21:19:58
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 6200
Average Frame Time: 16.9ms
Average FPS: 59.1
it goes to show how hard it is to compare these graphics cards when in the same game, depending on the settings, a 5870 can be faster than a gtx 480, or slower than a gtx 470.
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-28 @ 11:37:05
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 7608
Average Frame Time: 13.8ms
Average FPS: 72.5
well settings that people would actually use with a high end card like 4xaa it becomes clearerQuote:
Originally Posted by grimREEFER
Any chance of getting an option to point to the program? To get SLI forced you can rename the actual benchmark to something else, for example 3dmarkvantage. However, once you do this your gui doesn't load b/c its not finding the file.Quote:
Originally Posted by japamd
Leave 2 or more copies of AvP_D3D11_Benchmark.exe file (e.g. AvP_D3D11_Benchmark.exe and 3dmarkvantage.exe) on benchmark folder to make AvP Tool ask you to pick the one will be used for benchmarking. You can mark the checkbox to make your selection permanent. If you decide to use another executable, keep pressed Control key while opening AvP Tool to make it ask you again.Quote:
Originally Posted by NCspecV81
Download the new build, the link is the same. :)
wow man thanks! SLI now works =o) e-man hug!
These results are confusing. Are some of you not mentioning your'e running Xfire?
I think teh better results are just right but some here are getting strangely bad results. Heres what I got with E8400@3920Mhz & HD5870@990/1275Mhz:Quote:
Originally Posted by mAJORD
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 6464
Average Frame Time: 16.2ms
Average FPS: 61.6
3x gtx 480 @ 800
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-05-29 @ 17:05:52
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 2560 x 1600
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 9306
Average Frame Time: 11.3ms
Average FPS: 88.8
sad i don't have dx11 hardware to detect!!!
here's my result :
GTX 480 SLI @ default
http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8577/48652702.jpg
a little update :
EVGA GeForce GTX 480 SLI @ 800/2000
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/3966/87096012.jpg
imo everyone should bench at max settings.... we want the test to be gpu limited.... dont we????
Anywhere else to get the AvP GUI? japamds links are dead :(
Thanks, that was fast!
:up: :woot: :buddies:Quote:
Originally Posted by japamd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Ket
Nathan from Legit Reviews asked for them the other day, the links were already ready ;)
Sorry for taking down the other links, my script for RadeonPro moves all files from download directory to a different place when a new version is uploaded, that's why I can't keep the old links.
No Problem :D AVP sure looks pretty.. think I'll have to buy it now :p:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz
CPU ID: Intel64 Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 5
Motherboard: Gigabyte X58A-UD7 x.x
Installed RAM: 12.00 GB
Operating System: Windows 7 x64
Video adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Video Processor: GeForce GTX 480
Video driver: 8.17.12.5896 ()
1920 x 1080/Very High/High/16/SSAO On/TS On/AS On/4X
Used AvP_D3D11_Benchmark.exe
Number of frames: 4165
Average Frame Time: 25.2ms
Average FPS: 39.7
===========================================
Is this normal? I have a i7 950 at stock clocks and a single GTX 480 using the latest driver.
AvP D3D11 Benchmark Report
==========================
**************************************************
* Report Created: 2010-07-15 @ 00:22:05
**************************************************
* Executable Build: V1.03, Apr 19 2010
**************************************************
*DX11 Hardware Detected*
Using Default Video Settings:
Resolution: 1920 x 1200
Texture Quality: 2
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 1
Benchmark Summary:
Number of frames: 5341
Average Frame Time: 19.6ms
Average FPS: 50.9
GTX480 726/950/1451
Quite the beefy overclock on the 460, but its also quite a bit cheaper. That card continues to impress.
257.15Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
vs
259.32
http://i54.tinypic.com/27zl0s7.jpg
max settings
http://i52.tinypic.com/2nc31a9.png
2560x1600 cat 10.8
HD5770
http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/1999/benchs.jpg
HD5850
http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/3695/4595.jpg
GTX 460
http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/772...3021264053.png
GTX 470
http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/9617/444adsz.jpg
Trifire HD5870
http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/9...s1280x1024.jpg
3WAY SLi GTX 480
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/1607/avpt.jpg
2560.. show off!! :)
dont have 2560 but heres 1280 for comparo
same 900/1800/2200 as earlier
http://i52.tinypic.com/35174o6.png
Now try that with 10.8 and updated 10.8a applications profiles ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
that's some overclock and cool score :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
Thanks for feedback.. i'll inform my friend to use it :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by hurleybird
thanks.. that 3 way sli not bad either :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
Hi, I have a little problem AvP.
When I set resolution to 1440x900 the image isn't centered and/or properly scaled.
With other resolutions it's ok but that is what I want to use.
When this happens with other games I just press "auto image adjusment" monitor buttom and problem is solved but with AvP it doesn't work.
I thought it could be driver's issue so I changed catalyst 10.9 to 10.8 unsuccessfully.
Any suggestion?
Thanks in advance.-
http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/9...g0016rd.th.jpg
PC specs: Q6600@3.2GHz, X48T-DQ6, 4GB DDR3-1600, HD5670
Here is my Gigabyte GTX460 OC :up:
http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/4872/avpg.jpg
stock cooler :up:
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/3629/68523122.png
Did you have to hardmod it? To bypass the stupid limiter chip... Or did you use a BIOS workaround?
here's mine..... :D
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/9286/benchie.jpg
no hardmod no bypass no bios workaroundQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
virgin :)
@ kaktus1907 = here 4 u'r database
http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/9410/avpz.jpg
is it me or does the 5970 still hold its own???
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuroikenshi
Its you:yepp:
Where do I donwload the GUI bench application. The links posted in the thread does not seem to work from my side.
stock cooling no modsQuote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7199/75912997.png
I really wish benchmarks would start including min fps as a standard in the output - average fps isn't as important as min for overall smoothness of gameplay.
AvP 1.03 Bench 1920x default, single HD 6850 @ 945|1150, 47.1 FPS avg
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/9332/avp16850a.jpg
AvP 1.03 Bench 1920x default, HD 5870 Crossfire @ 1000|1275, 111.4 FPS avg
http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/1597/avp2.jpg
One is from my old Ph II 940 rig and two is from my 1055T rig.