Phenom II Air/Water CPU-Z Validation Thread:

Rules:
1. Asking for normal 24/7 water or 24/7 air, nothing chilled...unless you chill your water everyday. :rolleyes:
2. Anything under a 16-17c+ ambient will not be added, if it looks suspiciously high I'm gonna ask about it. (PLEASE POST YOUR AMBIENT TEMP!)
3. All two/four cores!!!!!
4. Follow the format I have below, if you want, copy and paste and make your changes.

Thanks,
Beeps.

I will update this thread list no less than every two days.

To start off: (Follow this format!)

Validation:
Mad222 - 0942DPMW - Phenom II X4 955 BE C3 @ 4773.4 Mhz 1.568v XXc Air: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=866961
Moonman - 0946MPMW - Phenom II X4 955 BE C3 @ 4754 Mhz 1.55v 19c water : http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=906016
NCspecV81 - 09?????? - Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 @ 4715 Mhz 1.65v XXc Air: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=900672
chew* - ???????? - Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 @ 4680 Mhz 1.462v XXc Air: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&postcount=16
Charged3800z24 - 09?????? - Phenom II X4 BE C3 @ 4621 Mhz 1.55v XXc Air: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=90587
theoldtimer - 09?????? - Phenom II X4 955 BE C3 @ 4613 Mhz 1.50v XXc Air : http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=905898
Flank3r - 09?????? - Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 @ 4570 Mhz 1.55v 11c Ambient AIR http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=888341
mav2000 - 09?????? - Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 @ 4400 Mhz 1.55v XXc AIR http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=907125
BeepBeep2 - 0945DPEW - Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 @ 4368 Mhz 1.585v 20c AIR http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=890870
Raiderman - 0941CPMW - Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 @ 4200 mhz 1.52v 23c water - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=900094
Mav2000 - 0932DPMW - Phenom II X4 965 BE C2 @ 4200 Mhz 1.525v 25c AIR: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...7&postcount=13
RhoXeD - 0851APCW - Phenom II x4 940BE C2 @ 4120 Mhz 1.56V 19c AIR: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=941020
RhoXeD - 09?????? - Phenom II X3 720 BE C2 @ X4 4040 Mhz NB 2825Mhz 1.56V 22c AIR http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=901970

Stable:
Hedghawg71- 09?????? - Phenom II X4 955 BE C2 @ 3920 Mhz 1.475v XXc AIR: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=883631

As a newbie, show my support !

Mad222 - 0942DPMW - Phenom II X4 955 BE C3 @ 4773.4 Mhz 1.568v AIR: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=866961

This is the Highest I can get it stable.
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=898331
Even at 1.6v, I can;'t get 4.0GHz stable. I can boot windows at 4.1GHz.

I'm sorry I forget the stepping and dont have it written down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

Anything over a 17c ambient? :rolleyes:

Otherwise, I may include a list in this post...just to keep track of all the CPUs. Stepping and "0944FPMW" batch code included...voltage, CPU-Z link showing frequency and validation too.(All cores please!)

I'll go from highest frequency at the top to lowest at the bottom.

To start off: (Follow this format)

BeepBeep2 - 0945DPEW - Phenom II X4 965 BE C3 @ 4368.33 Mhz 1.585v AIR: CPU-Z Validation







Just a proposal...

---

is this a all core kinda result or can people run a single core out of 4 and still recieve credit for validation??

With 10c Ambient I can Give 4995Mhz Oc Core i7 920 ;)

http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/889495.png
Valid Link

CM Hyper 212, 1.55V, nothing special,just wait for valides from Titan, Chew master and nice air from Cele ,-)

4570MHz
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/888341.png
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=888341

VIVID: its brutal vcore for high-k 45nm, its similary comparsion as 1.68V with Phenoms!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlanK3r

CM Hyper 212, 1.55V, nothing special,just wait for valides from Titan, Chew master and nice air from Cele ,-)

4570MHz
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/888341.png
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=888341

VIVID: its brutal vcore for high-k 45nm, its similary comparsion as 1.68V with Phenoms!

---

flanker...nice one on air man......you do really good!:up:

Flanker isnt that in a 11c ambient? I was asking for 17c+...but I can take it I guess. Dunno bout the Core i7 in the AMD section though...:P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Titan7171

is this a all core kinda result or can people run a single core out of 4 and still recieve credit for validation??

---

All four cores please! :)

I can do 4.47 on one core, but it doesn't validate. I know guys are able to get it to validate but it's not really fair.

Beep beep why not just request a AOD screen for temps and K10 Pstate instead of a valid.......I can get any valid to say i used 4 cores when only using 1.....screen of k10 stat does not lie however.

Me personally I just wait till summer time to see whats really happening ;)

Sometimes the lack of posts/oc's tells alot more than what people post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

Beep beep why not just request a AOD screen for temps and K10 Pstate instead of a valid.......I can get any valid to say i used 4 cores when only using 1.....screen of k10 stat does not lie however.

---

I'm sure anyone can modify a screenshot too, and I'm having the hardest time getting ahold of K10stat...(been searching for days...) It's probably the best idea though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

I'm sure anyone can modify a screenshot too, and I'm having the hardest time getting ahold of K10stat...(been searching for days...) It's probably the best idea though.

---

you can find it here

Mav2000 - 0932DPMW - Phenom II X4 965 BE C2 @ 4200 Mhz 1.525v 25c Ambient AIR: CPU-Z Validation

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/3505/pi3p.jpg

Raiderman - 0941CPMW - 965 BE@4200mhz 1.52v - 23 deg. ambient - ambient water - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=900094

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Titan7171

flanker...nice one on air man......you do really good!:up:

---

thank u :), hope, with new mobo and next CPU il get better results :) (with normal ambients is limit about 4500MHz)

Whipped out one of the bad chips.......

http://chew.ln2cooling.com/qdig-file...epBeep%202.JPG

omg Chew...its watter or AIR? And only 1.465V?!

nothin that really compares in here but here is my 720BE unlocked @ 4.0

RhoXeD: 720BE X4 @ 4040Mhz NB 2825Mhz 1.56V Ambient Air: 22C :: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=901970

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlanK3r

thank u :), hope, with new mobo and next CPU il get better results :) (with normal ambients is limit about 4500MHz)

---

I also need to move to new mobo:yepp:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

All four cores please! :)

I can do 4.47 on one core, but it doesn't validate. I know guys are able to get it to validate but it's not really fair.

---

BeepBeep2,

What kind of problem are you having validating your good core?

Maybe i can help?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

BeepBeep2,

What kind of problem are you having validating your good core?

Maybe i can help?

---

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=902331 - 1 core


Also, I cant validate more than once anymore (1.53), if I hit validate that is the frequency which is recorded for the next ~40 mins. :rofl:

Just save the file and try later. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=902331 - 1 core


Also, I cant validate more than once anymore (1.53), if I hit validate that is the frequency which is recorded for the next ~40 mins. :rofl:

---

OK two things.

Your need a fresh install and when validating try not running ram and HT + NB so high ;)

I suggest you dig up an old cheap hard drive and use that to bench on seperate from your everyday OS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

OK two things.

Your need a fresh install and when validating try not running ram and HT + NB so high ;)

I suggest you dig up an old cheap hard drive and use that to bench on seperate from your everyday OS.

---

Oh really?

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=902538


It fails on both saving and quick validating...of course 4 core valids are completely fine...(sig)

This install is 2 days old and all thats on it is 3DMark06, CPU-Z 1.52.2 + 1.53, OCCT, AMD Overdrive, K10stat and Firefox...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

Oh really?

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=902538


It fails on both saving and quick validating...of course 4 core valids are completely fine...(sig)

This install is 2 days old and all thats on it is 3DMark06, CPU-Z 1.52.2 + 1.53, OCCT, AMD Overdrive, K10stat and Firefox...

---

Are using f7 to capture?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

Are using f7 to capture?

---

No...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

No...

---

Hmmm this is an odd issue. I haven't been able to get a rejected valid in a while. I will try a few things see if I can figure it out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

Oh really?

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=902538


It fails on both saving and quick validating...of course 4 core valids are completely fine...(sig)

This install is 2 days old and all thats on it is 3DMark06, CPU-Z 1.52.2 + 1.53, OCCT, AMD Overdrive, K10stat and Firefox...

---

are you using the installed version or the stand alone?

Am I misunderstanding the topic title? "Asking for normal 24/7 water or 24/7 air, nothing chilled"

Do you want 24/7 results or highest possible cpuz validation?

I hope I'm doing this right. I put all I could on this for proof. My validation is in my sig. I have been running this 955BE at a consistent stable 3.9 since July this year. Temps vary from when my wife decides she's cold and cranks up the heat. It is cooled with an H50 in a push/pull config.

http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/2589/247stats.th.jpg
Sorry for the small thumbnail but when shrinking it in paint it has a tendency to lose quality. I haven't installed GIMP on this machine yet. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charged3800z24

are you using the installed version or the stand alone?

---

Installed, I'm on a netbook atm but I'll test with the standalone when I get control over the PC I cant use but assembled...:down:
_________________________________________

Just to make it clear guys this is a "highest validation" thread, though I'd prefer you werent sticking your PC outside in the cold or using A/C...:P
__________________________________________________ _______________

1.53 is a pos. 1.52 validated no problem and seeing the issues above, it must be deneb related.



ReverendMaynard - 0932FPMW - Phenom II X4 B50 BE C2 @ 3903Mhz 1.52v 20c Ambient AIR: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=904174

I can't validate either :shrug:

http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/904559.png

This sucks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

This sucks.

---

They'll fix it up. Poop happens ;)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year guys :)

I can validate with 1.53

http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/904774.png

http://3800z24.info/Phenom/965/valid4.5ghz.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

Installed, I'm on a netbook atm but I'll test with the standalone when I get control over the PC I cant use but assembled...:down:
_________________________________________

Just to make it clear guys this is a "highest validation" thread, though I'd prefer you werent sticking your PC outside in the cold or using A/C...:P
__________________________________________________ _______________

---

There was already a highest validation thread I started........I dont see why this was started also? ambiant Air /water, cold air/cold water........it doesnt really make a difference in either case no one can run the cpu at their highest validation:shrug:

NM I guess no one hit the 4.6ghz except for me and 2 others.........continue on:p:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Titan7171

There was already a highest validation thread I started........I dont see why this was started also? ambiant Air /water, cold air/cold water........it doesnt really make a difference in either case no one can run the cpu at their highest validation:shrug:

NM I guess no one hit the 4.6ghz except for me and 2 others.........continue on:p:

---

That thread was a three man e-peen sword fight asking for 4.6ghz validations. This is much better...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard

That thread was a three man e-peen sword fight asking for 4.6ghz validations. This is much better...

---

Why's that?

Because some people used cold air to their advantage? Please explain to me what makes this thread better.

I'm not trying to pick a fight here, i just don't see the difference other than the other thread might have higher requirements? :shrug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zeus

Why's that?

Because some people used cold air to their advantage? Please explain to me what makes this thread better.

I'm not trying to pick a fight here, i just don't see the difference other than the other thread might have higher requirements? :shrug:

---

The title is what's wrong.

"Who here has 4.6ghz validation on air or water??"

First off, that is asking for a specific frequency, this thread is not. That thread has more of a competition feel, while this one is more for collecting a broad range of data.

This thread " Phenom II Air/Water CPU-Z Validation Thread:"

Much more inviting for everyone to participate.

Got it? :welcome:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard

The title is what's wrong.

"Who here has 4.6ghz validation on air or water??"

First off, that is asking for a specific frequency, this thread is not. That thread has more of a competition feel, while this one is more for collecting a broad range of data.

This thread " Phenom II Air/Water CPU-Z Validation Thread:"

Much more inviting for everyone to participate.

Got it? :welcome:

---

Exactly. I created this thread to be more of a database, to see which CPU's fit where, which weeks scale higher, and what C2/C3 revisions of several CPU's can do. If anyone was around back in the Athlon X2 stepping F3 days you would know there was a CPU-Z overclock "database" just like this thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Titan7171

NM I guess no one hit the 4.6ghz except for me and 2 others.........continue on:p:

---

hey, I can validate at 4.6ghz :p:

http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/905587.png

http://3800z24.info/Phenom/965/valid4.6ghz.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard

The title is what's wrong.

"Who here has 4.6ghz validation on air or water??"

First off, that is asking for a specific frequency, this thread is not. That thread has more of a competition feel, while this one is more for collecting a broad range of data.

This thread " Phenom II Air/Water CPU-Z Validation Thread:"

Much more inviting for everyone to participate.

Got it? :welcome:

---

Yes, got it.

Collecting useless data as i don't see any point in a system that's just stable enough to validate.

If it is more stable than that why not show a benchmark?

Putting in some competition like Titan7171 did makes it more of a challenge to me (and some others).

Each to their own i guess but calling it a e-peen sword fight because you feel left out isn't very kind imho.

Don't take it personal RM, just my opinion, feel free to have and speak out yours here. ;) :buddies:

I feel its important having a goal and 4.6ghz is pretty much 95-98% of what these cpu's can do on air or water ambiant or chilled.......If not you'll have people who dont want to push their cpu showing validations at 3.8ghz. That doesnt really help accumilate informative data.

People who are hitting 4520-4580mhz are so close to that goal its pleasing seeing them hit the number thats just out of reach and very satisfying to them I believe.

as for this quote originally by reverand

Quote:

---

That thread was a three man e-peen sword fight asking for 4.6ghz validations. This is much better...

---

We are all cool here, I dont think anyone is jealous of anyones skill here.......except possibly the people looking in on our little competitions....good luck with that lol

Congrats charged3800z24 on that 4.62 validation:up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Titan7171

Congrats charged3800z24 on that 4.62 validation:up:

---

Thanks, I tried 4.7ghz and my PC froze lol.

On the threads, I think both are fine. One gives you something to strive for and the other gives an overal look at things. No one needs to be jealous of anyone (though I have been chasing Titan7171 and Equanox :p:). I am just glad C3 is showing good results across the board.

Water temp. 19 °C.
All cores.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=905896

Cold > volts :yepp:

This is on all cores at the same clocks, NB and memory speed is clocked up somewhat. The cooling was ice water, mostly water with a few ice cubes floating around on the top, LOL. The validation on this version of cpu-z (1.53) was troublesome, I finally had to uninstall it, reboot then reinstall it. After that it has validated every time.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=905898
http://i262.photobucket.com/albums/i...mer/4612-2.jpg



The validation that I linked to below was done on core 0 while the other three cores 1-2-3 were down clocked using the multi set at 16. The NB and memory was down clocked also, same cooling as listed above.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=905768

Moonman - 0946MPMW - Phenom II X4 955 BE C3 @ 4754 Mhz 1.55v 19°C water : http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=906016

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charged3800z24

Thanks, I tried 4.7ghz and my PC froze lol.

On the threads, I think both are fine. One gives you something to strive for and the other gives an overal look at things. No one needs to be jealous of anyone (though I have been chasing Titan7171 and Equanox :p:). I am just glad C3 is showing good results across the board.

---

Lol I'm gonna try some new high on my days off and see what happens, I want to try a new mobo to see if it makes a difference on the CPU, but I have to wait for the cash.

Anyway let's see what happens...... Keep pushing everyone!:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zeus

Yes, got it.

Collecting useless data as i don't see any point in a system that's just stable enough to validate.

If it is more stable than that why not show a benchmark?

Putting in some competition like Titan7171 did makes it more of a challenge to me (and some others).

Each to their own i guess but calling it a e-peen sword fight because you feel left out isn't very kind imho.

Don't take it personal RM, just my opinion, feel free to have and speak out yours here. ;) :buddies:

---

I'll benchmark mine like it is anyway that is needed to show stability. I ain't Skard! :D (OCCT, Prime95, 3dmark06, 3dmark Vantage, whatever) It may not break world records but considering I won't run my setup at unstable conditions just to have something to brag about in a screenshot, I have no problems with it. I could easily get mine to 4.7ghz just long enough to validate it but I won't do that because that's just plain goofy.

Hey this is all suppose to be in fun :confused:, i happen to like competition myself, just validation of how fast a certain cpu can do, and what week it is to me is not worth much, it isnt like when you order from newegg or others you can say ohhh by the way can i have week 28 batch.......

. But if there is going to be a competition sort of thing with this, it should be named correctly, THE 4.5 AND ABOVE C3 CHALLENGE , etc. I love the competition, other wise it gets kinda boring, it gives you something to shoot for, to push your board and cpu, this is XS remember, but lets all just have fun and get along. But there is nothing wrong with this thread and it should be for the purpose of intended by the starter of this thread.

Hi...just got my C3 this afternoon and have been playing around with it...so here are some scores...will add more benchmarks as we go along.

Highest OC - Suicide run - 4.4Ghz - AIR

CPU-Z Validator 3.1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by neo mike

Hey this is all suppose to be in fun :confused:, i happen to like competition myself, just validation of how fast a certain cpu can do, and what week it is to me is not worth much, it isnt like when you order from newegg or others you can say ohhh by the way can i have week 28 batch.......

. But if there is going to be a competition sort of thing with this, it should be named correctly, THE 4.5 AND ABOVE C3 CHALLENGE , etc. I love the competition, other wise it gets kinda boring, it gives you something to shoot for, to push your board and cpu, this is XS remember, but lets all just have fun and get along. But there is nothing wrong with this thread and it should be for the purpose of intended by the starter of this thread.

---

If a guy can do 4.4 Ghz, then the thread is completely changed, all valids under 4.5 will be removed. Im not just asking for C3's, there are alot of guys with C2's out there too and I'd rather not turn this into a big "e-peen" event. :down:

4.715 validated on air with a 965c3 and 790fxta-ud5

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=900672

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zeus

Yes, got it.

Collecting useless data as i don't see any point in a system that's just stable enough to validate.

If it is more stable than that why not show a benchmark?

Putting in some competition like Titan7171 did makes it more of a challenge to me (and some others).

Each to their own i guess but calling it a e-peen sword fight because you feel left out isn't very kind imho.

Don't take it personal RM, just my opinion, feel free to have and speak out yours here. ;) :buddies:

---

Validation threads aren't useless when there is allot of unlockable chips in the mix. Nice to know what can do what. As for stability and overclocking....it get's to the point where you're on the razor edge of stability and validations of those can easily be considered just as useless.

No reason why both threads can't thrive together.

As for me feeling left out, na lol. This is my first AMD set up in 4 years, and while I think it's pretty fun on air I'm just learning the little nuances of it; I'll compete when the SS/DICE/LN2 hits it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chew*

Beep beep why not just request a AOD screen for temps and K10 Pstate instead of a valid.......I can get any valid to say i used 4 cores when only using 1.....screen of k10 stat does not lie however.

Me personally I just wait till summer time to see whats really happening ;)

Sometimes the lack of posts/oc's tells alot more than what people post.

---

Hi Chew

Congrats on your new AMD Ram OC WR
Thx for reminding me to correct my PII 550 record in HWbot. I appreciate that:)

I'd tried a few times & finally got the best I could do on the coldest day in HK this week

Hope to spare more time to read all your threads & learn more out of it.

Happy New Year:toast:
http://i967.photobucket.com/albums/a...blwk345/02.jpg

finally got around to my 940BE

Rhoxed - 0851APCW - Phenom II x4 940BE C2 @ 4120 Mhz 1.56V 19C AIR: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=941020

and stepping for the 720BE is 0904DPMW since you didnt have it before

Can I play?

http://i48.tinypic.com/1zxl3wg.jpg
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=833556

I don't recall the ambient, but somewhere around 72F.

I hate having a locked multi. This chip would do well over 4.0ghz I believe. 250x15 is the best I can get stable.

Alright, I'm a bit too lazy to update the list atm I'll get it tomorrow. ;-)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [XC] Synthetickiller

I hate having a locked multi. This chip would do well over 4.0ghz I believe. 250x15 is the best I can get stable.

---

Just curious Synth,

Did you try giving your Mobo NB (chipset) a little more juice?
I doubt anything over 1.3v would help, but if your running it on "auto" adding
a little more may help you get higher on the HTRef clock. :yepp:

this thing is spent. CM Hyper2, never hits more than 55C and doesn't take a sh1t when I rely on it so I guess that's stable :D

Ambient is 22C

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=941756

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard

this thing is spent. CM Hyper2, never hits more than 55C and doesn't take a sh1t when I rely on it so I guess that's stable :D

Ambient is 22C

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=941756

---

I hope your not complaining.... :D

For ~$99 you got a dual core, than unlocked to a quad and runs @ 3.96 Ghz..

How do you like that board Reverend?

I'm always a little leary of GBT's 1st edition bios...
Does it seem pretty stable?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daveburt714

I hope your not complaining.... :D

For ~$99 you got a dual core, than unlocked to a quad and runs @ 3.96 Ghz..

How do you like that board Reverend?

I'm always a little leary of GBT's 1st edition bios...
Does it seem pretty stable?

---

Not at all, I'm pretty pleased with it. the board is kick ass, not one single issue with it in XP, Vista or 7.

Hmm guys it makes it *alot* easier for me to update the list if it's already in the OP format...just saying...

It takes me nearly 10 minutes when I need to stick all the info into that format and publish it in the first post, 30 seconds if already in it.