Intel Cpu Test !!!!!!!!!!! I9 ???

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

08-14-2009, 08:08 AM
intel.proart

Intel Cpu Test !!!! I9 AND X58 EXTREME

:cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::c ool:

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8720/pic00013a.jpg
08-14-2009, 08:20 AM
Gamer

If you can't give more information, please stop posting.
08-14-2009, 10:26 AM
Zucker2k

Hey, I love it! Please post more teasers. :up:
08-14-2009, 09:01 PM
intel.proart

[QUOTE=intel.proart;3959721]:cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::cool::c ool:0.0

.....................
08-14-2009, 09:14 PM
NaMcO

Temperature stats would be nice.
08-14-2009, 11:15 PM
labs23

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaMcO

Temperature stats would be nice.

+1

Thats a nice voltage already, 1.4v for 4.35GHz and its from 2.40GHz.:eek: Yeah, I know its an ES.:rolleyes:

Some info on the cooling? Water, right?
08-15-2009, 01:49 AM
intel.proart

WATER 3.3XXG 26度...

http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/8111/pic00006f.jpg
08-15-2009, 02:46 AM
prznar1

first stepping of a gulftown will be crap as bloomfields right? how about a realtemp screen
08-15-2009, 02:51 AM
JohnZS

The i9 is what I am waiting for :)
Just wish people would "get over Windows XP already", why test such powerful CPU's on such an old OS!
08-15-2009, 02:56 AM
Paxi

He´s using Win7.. at least in vantage
08-15-2009, 03:03 AM
JohnZS

True, but the first shot does look suspiciously like Windows XP? ;)
08-15-2009, 03:26 AM
PytonOrm

This westmere/gulftown will run on x58 motherboard ? and can you run some Superpi 1M and 32M test please. Thanks
08-15-2009, 03:28 AM
Sam_oslo

Come'on lets see a real-temp shot on Prime-load with 1.3v.

So many people are asking, and it is the most existing part of gulftown to see how the 32nm-shrink will affect the temp.
08-15-2009, 03:32 AM
intel.proart

Quote:

Originally Posted by PytonOrm

This westmere/gulftown will run on x58 motherboard ? and can you run some Superpi 1M and 32M test please. Thanks

如果不是在X58的主機板上又怎樣可以OVERCLOCKING

REAL TEMP 的溫度跟EVEREST差不多..
08-15-2009, 04:03 AM
Amuro

Quote:

Originally Posted by intel.proart

如果不是在X58的主機板上又怎樣可以OVERCLOCKING

REAL TEMP 的溫度跟EVEREST差不多..

請問full load時核心溫度大約多少度﹖
08-15-2009, 04:37 AM
Korduo

Quote:

如果不是在X58的主機板上又怎樣可以OVERCLOCKING

Yea, its X58 mobo, other wise can't overclock.

Quote:

REAL TEMP 的溫度跟EVEREST差不多..

Real Temp and Everest temp are not too far off each other.

Quote:

請問full load時核心溫度大約多少度﹖

What is temp at full load?
08-15-2009, 07:18 AM
intel.proart

Nda Haha...............各位請原諒我有太多的測試我不能PO 只能說這是顆好U
08-15-2009, 07:25 AM
unclewebb

RealTemp does not yet correctly support the i9. No one has sent one my way for testing. :)

Core Temp was just updated. Maybe it can read all 6 cores.

http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/
08-15-2009, 07:31 AM
r1rhyder

intel.proart, why do you even bother if you are under NDA? What is your point?
08-15-2009, 07:35 AM
intel.proart

Core Temp 可以正常執行但是溫度確不準確..........
08-15-2009, 08:19 AM
Dark-Master

Will this be running on ASUS Rampage II Extreme ? I wonder if i need new mobo for it..............
08-15-2009, 09:33 AM
esdxx

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnZS

True, but the first shot does look suspiciously like Windows XP? ;)

It is XP. On other screens he just have pictures opened in paint brush (as his default picture viewer i guess :confused:)

[edit]
oh, i see 3rd picture is from win7... dunno, confused.
08-16-2009, 02:37 AM
intel.proart

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark-Master

Will this be running on ASUS Rampage II Extreme ? I wonder if i need new mobo for it..............

這個問題你應該去問華碩才對.......:(
08-16-2009, 04:02 AM
PytonOrm

Quote:

Originally Posted by intel.proart

這個問題你應該去問華碩才對.......:(

Please answer in english we dont understand chinese or what language you speak
08-16-2009, 04:05 AM
JohnZS

Quote:

Originally Posted by PytonOrm

Please answer in english we dont understand chinese or what language you speak

I believe Intel Pro art was requesting that you ask ASUS this question. (as in ask ASUS if the Corei9 works on the ASUS Rampage II Extreme)
John
08-16-2009, 04:08 AM
JohnZS

Quote:

Originally Posted by r1rhyder

intel.proart, why do you even bother if you are under NDA? What is your point?

To titillate ;)

Intel Pro art said that he apologises but he has too many tests to do and cannot release any or take any requests, however this CPU is good for you :)

(I think)

The jist is, please do not ask for requests, I cannot release much, but this CPU is good :up:

John
08-16-2009, 05:27 AM
r1rhyder

I understand that under NDA that info is very limited but, no temp info? What motherboard and bios? Was Vantage run with physx on or off? He is using a Nvidia card so cpu results could be skewed in Vantage. These questions could be answered, no? To show a starving man a charcoal grilled steak, or to show an alcoholic a cold beer and say no, you can't have any is beyond cruel. If no other info than what has been provided by intel.proart can be released, than don't even bother. I pesronally do not see the point in it. Hype, hype, hype.
08-16-2009, 06:19 AM
dpa

Quote:

Originally Posted by r1rhyder

I understand that under NDA that info is very limited but, no temp info? What motherboard and bios? Was Vantage run with physx on or off? He is using a Nvidia card so cpu results could be skewed in Vantage. These questions could be answered, no? To show a starving man a charcoal grilled steak, or to show an alcoholic a cold beer and say no, you can't have any is beyond cruel. If no other info than what has been provided by intel.proart can be released, than don't even bother. I pesronally do not see the point in it. Hype, hype, hype.

with physx on the score would be MUCH higher.. so his running with it OFF.
08-16-2009, 06:22 AM
r1rhyder

I hear ya dpa, but I want to hear it from intel.proart.
08-16-2009, 07:02 AM
intel.proart

Quote:

Originally Posted by dpa

with physx on the score would be MUCH higher.. so his running with it OFF.

physx 一定要關掉不然cpu test沒有辦法完成
08-16-2009, 07:23 AM
r1rhyder

Thank you for the input intel.proart. Is there anything else you can share without breaking the NDA? Some extreme overclocking maybe?
08-16-2009, 05:01 PM
Security

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnZS

The i9 is what I am waiting for :)
Just wish people would "get over Windows XP already", why test such powerful CPU's on such an old OS!

Because there is no reason to go to Vista (except DX10).
There is nothing wrong with XP... why use a bloated OS when you don't have to?
08-16-2009, 05:12 PM
dinos22

intel.proart please use english even if you have to use traslator software
we all understand screens though :D post more of them heheh
08-17-2009, 01:21 PM
PytonOrm

Good work Buddy !!!!! :D:up:
08-17-2009, 01:38 PM
tdream

I'm just waiting for Apple to create a universal translator so I don't have to copy and paste foreign text.
08-17-2009, 02:05 PM
zalbard

Quote:

Originally Posted by tdream

I'm just waiting for Apple to create a universal translator so I don't have to copy and paste foreign text.

Why Apple in particular? :shocked:
08-17-2009, 05:02 PM
KILLER_K

I'm just not happy with the stock speeds they are releasing it at though. Or hear say and screens shots scattered here and there on the internet.
08-17-2009, 07:35 PM
freshy

Quote:

Originally Posted by KILLER_K

I'm just not happy with the stock speeds they are releasing it at though. Or hear say and screens shots scattered here and there on the internet.

i dont care what stock speeds they are released at, i care about what speeds they overclock too :D
08-21-2009, 03:15 AM
intel.proart

Cinebench R10 Test!! 3.38g

:cool::cool::cool::cool: WIN 7 32BIT

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/3218/pic00001.jpg
08-21-2009, 09:30 AM
FlanK3r

omg....Cinebench points. Ufffff
08-21-2009, 11:24 AM
SingWolf

3D06 @ 4.3GHz please!!! :eek:

Alex!
08-21-2009, 12:39 PM
FlanK3r

i cant conceive of Cinebench i9 at 4GHz :-D
08-21-2009, 03:12 PM
Hornet331

wth.. 22.5K points in cinebench (32bit) with only 3.4ghz..... arghhhhh ned this cpu nowwwwwww...... :slobber:

pls keep us updated. :up:
08-21-2009, 03:22 PM
Kondik

intel.proart if you please use simplified chineese I might be able to help with translation :p:
Otherwise it's a quite hard nut to crack
08-21-2009, 08:37 PM
imaolyon

intel.proart, 您现在是在用那一个主机板？测试结果令人满意！
08-21-2009, 08:42 PM
Kondik

Quote:

Originally Posted by imaolyon

intel.proart, 您现在是在用那一个主机板？测试结果令人满意！

英文要 ! 英文論壇 :shakes:
08-21-2009, 09:28 PM
lutjens

I'm hoping they don't nerf clock speeds too much with the new chip due to the extra cores...;)
08-22-2009, 01:36 AM
PytonOrm

http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/920...4ghzrender.jpg

core i7 920 Oc to 4ghz

got 45 sec in render
08-23-2009, 07:18 AM
FlanK3r

i9 and wprime? :) We want see it :)
08-23-2009, 11:23 PM
intel.proart

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlanK3r

i9 and wprime? :) We want see it :)

3.8G WPRIME OK??? WIN 7 32BIT

http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/7118/pic00001y.jpg

CINEBENCH R10 3.8G!!!! WIN 7 32BIT 34 SECOND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/733/pic00006z.jpg
08-23-2009, 11:33 PM
deaffob

lol every time he talks looks like he is yelling!!! LIKE THIS!!!
08-23-2009, 11:39 PM
Ashraf

Please write in English only. Thanks.
08-24-2009, 02:07 AM
intel.proart

1.2V 3.8G 3D MARK VANTAGE...... 1.216V WPRIME 1024M

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/1802/pic00007.jpg

http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7575/pic00005s.jpg
08-24-2009, 02:13 AM
..::G80::..

06 CPU test @ 4.2 - 4.5GHz? :D
Maximum stable oc?
08-24-2009, 02:45 AM
dinos22

ok thats enough
we dont want to see any more :D hahaha
08-24-2009, 02:51 AM
labs23

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

ok thats enough
we dont want to see any more :D hahaha

LOL. Well yeah, the results kind of makes me forgot its Lynnfield that is going to be released next month.:rolleyes: As if I can afford if it were.:ROTF:
08-24-2009, 02:55 AM
Hornet331

uhnnnn and we still have to wait soooo long for the cpu. :(

Btw. is it possible to post SPi results?

I know its not multithreaded, but you know its still a famouse benchmark. I want to see how the 12mb cache affects the score. :)
08-24-2009, 06:51 AM
FlanK3r

whau, nice, do u have too x64 windows? Cinebench is better in x64 ,-) (maybe 28 000 in x64)
08-24-2009, 08:03 AM
okorop

what motherboard do you use?
08-24-2009, 08:26 AM
PytonOrm

6 cores and 12MB Cache gives 2MB per core so it´s not so much faster i think until we have atleast 16-24MB of cache
08-24-2009, 08:52 AM
FlanK3r

lol, but its to time and for long time the highest performace CPU. But from i7 to i9 its no effective upgrade.
08-24-2009, 11:44 AM
fatguy1992

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hornet331

uhnnnn and we still have to wait soooo long for the cpu. :(

Btw. is it possible to post SPi results?

I know its not multithreaded, but you know its still a famouse benchmark. I want to see how the 12mb cache affects the score. :)

I'd also like to see some SP 1M and 32M runs :D
08-28-2009, 02:31 AM
intel.proart

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WINDOWS VISTA PHYSX OFF GTX 295 QUAD SLI

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/9315/e75350.jpg
08-28-2009, 02:46 AM
intel.proart

Quote:

Originally Posted by okorop

what motherboard do you use?

.....................................
08-28-2009, 02:51 AM
labs23

Did the 3.8GHz do that?:eek::D What was the cooling used?

Quote:

Originally Posted by intel.proart

X58 UD5 X58 EXTREME.........

X58:yepp:
08-28-2009, 03:04 AM
intel.proart

Quote:

Originally Posted by labs23

Did the 3.8GHz do that?:eek::D What was the cooling used?

X58:yepp:

AIR.....................4.3G.........
08-28-2009, 03:10 AM
Malik[A]

WOW that's quite insane..

@PytonOrm read what admin wrote and then write here again..
08-28-2009, 04:23 AM
PytonOrm

你是我的朋友和驚人的好成績有好友 :D:eek::clap::up:
08-28-2009, 07:43 AM
VRSpy

So COOL 1.2Vcore. Vantage score ! Oh BOY! never see it comes too soon.:clap: :eek:
08-28-2009, 08:10 AM
AceBaran

Impressive ! Tnx for posting !
08-28-2009, 08:22 AM
billdavis

thanks for the tease, your the man
08-28-2009, 10:00 AM
FlanK3r

OMG, this is monstrum...send me one chip to Czech republic :D.....u must test Cinebench in x64, it will be crazy score....
08-28-2009, 11:47 AM
The Water Dog

goodygoodygoody:clap:
08-28-2009, 05:36 PM
metro.cl

Can you do a super pi 1m run at 3.8GHz? i want to see how much the 12MB benefit.

Do you know if there are any tweaks in the IMC? what is your NB clock?, are you running triple channel?

great info keep it coming
09-01-2009, 06:26 AM
Gaul

@ intel = 4-4.2 GH for CPU score 3D mark 2006 plzzzzz :)
09-01-2009, 07:49 AM
..::G80::..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaul

@ intel = 4-4.2 GH for CPU score 3D mark 2006 plzzzzz :)

:up:
09-01-2009, 08:35 AM
d50man

can i have TWO one for benching and one for gaming damn thats nice PROART
09-02-2009, 03:20 PM
Dark-Master

I wonder how much it is when it's released. My I7 will just be a hard crap if this CPU price is low than $500.:ROTF:
09-02-2009, 10:04 PM
intel.proart

...............................................
09-03-2009, 08:46 AM
FlanK3r

and superpi 32M?:)
09-03-2009, 09:13 AM
ajaidev

maybe some gaming benchs :>

Also can you tell us what speed is it suppose to ship out in ??

What is the real vcore voltage can you tell because 1.2v is very very low.

也许有游戏benchs：“

另外，你能告诉我们什么速度是它想在出货？？

什么是真正的核心电压，因为，你能告诉1.2V的是非常非常低。
09-03-2009, 12:58 PM
mrcape

Wow best thread in a long time. Looks like I'm skipping i7.
09-03-2009, 05:40 PM
unclewebb

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark-Master

I wonder how much it is when it's released. My I7 will just be a hard crap if this CPU price is low than $500.:ROTF:

The i9 when released next year will have a price to go along with its power. At $999 when bought in quantities of a 1000, only Xtreme users with deep pockets will be able to afford one of these.
09-03-2009, 05:48 PM
mrcape

Is there only one i9?
09-03-2009, 08:04 PM
Dark-Master

Quote:

Originally Posted by unclewebb

The i9 when released next year will have a price to go along with its power. At $999 when bought in quantities of a 1000, only Xtreme users with deep pockets will be able to afford one of these.

Oh I see. I totally forgot that i9's made for high-end users.:up:

Going for extreme CPU like that is cool for extreme users like you said. I'm not that extreme, I think buying a dual-cpu mobo on LGA1366 later that would cost around $600 -$800(maybe) and another 920 to be using for workstation, plus memory. It's better and more valuable for workstation or server for ones who wants more performance in most calculation types for a computer, as long as applications or Operating Systems support for multi-task processing. I just think.:yepp:
09-03-2009, 08:17 PM
unclewebb

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcape

Is there only one i9?

The 6 core / 12 thread monster being tested here is the one and only at the moment. I'm sure if Intel sees a market for a $500 6 core CPU sometime in the future then they will release an i9 junior. Intel has a habit of filling every segment and price point of the market with a choice of CPUs.
09-03-2009, 10:17 PM
labs23

Quote:

Originally Posted by unclewebb

The i9 when released next year will have a price to go along with its power. At $999 when bought in quantities of a 1000, only Xtreme users with deep pockets will be able to afford one of these.

I just hope AMD's Thuban performs great and will be released earlier(Q3 when Gulfy is sched. Q1)http://www.operationsports.com/forum...ins/tongue.gif. It might lower Gulfy's pricing.
But for now, I don't know if it'll happen.:shrug:
09-03-2009, 11:33 PM
mrcape

That's right Unclewebb, I now remember seeing an intel road map that has the i9 as the top tier replacement for the i975.

Still, this is a pretty large improvement. I would definitely go for this over 975, 960, 950, 940, 3540, 3550, 3580. I also bet the mid range i7s will take a price drop when i9 comes out.
09-04-2009, 04:32 PM
Utnorris

OMG!! That Vantage score is unbelievable. I cannot imagine how much this will impact rendering. At $1k it might be worth it, but better start saving now. :D
09-04-2009, 05:07 PM
railmeat

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcape

Wow best thread in a long time. Looks like I'm skipping i7.

+1:up:
09-06-2009, 06:54 AM
intel.proart

EXTREME EDTION IS COOMING ?????????????????????????????????????

http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/7350/pic00002h.jpg

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5706/pic00001l.jpg
09-06-2009, 11:42 AM
FlanK3r

not bad :)
09-06-2009, 12:24 PM
Raptor-X

The GigaByte EasyTune screen shot in post 91 (above) implies that the cores, both physical & logical, can be independently clocked with different ratios (Multipliers). I have not seen this within the current i7 tool sets. However, I am not fluent with Gigabyte... Does anyone have insight into this? Has this been announced as an i9 feature?
09-07-2009, 04:21 AM
ajaidev

intel.proart 你为什么编辑某些职位和删除信息，如九十五瓦特1“和照片”？

intel.proart Why do you edit posts and the delete certain information, such as 95 watts 1 "and photographs"?
09-07-2009, 09:37 PM
labs23

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajaidev

intel.proart 你为什么编辑某些职位和删除信息，如九十五瓦特1“和照片”？

intel.proart Why do you edit posts and the delete certain information, such as 95 watts 1 "and photographs"?

What photo was that? The proc's actual photo? LOL.
09-07-2009, 09:41 PM
tool_462

So how does Counter Strike run at 12 threads? :p:
09-11-2009, 04:16 AM
Krautmaster

is this ES locked or unlocked?
09-11-2009, 04:48 AM
Camride

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krautmaster

is this ES locked or unlocked?

I'm going to assume that since it's showing a 19 multi and CPU-Z shows a range of 12-18 it's unlocked. But that's just a guess.
09-11-2009, 05:18 AM
Krautmaster

maybe turbo mode? Don't know what my CPUz shows, i'm not at home...
09-11-2009, 05:28 AM
crystogod

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camride

I'm going to assume that since it's showing a 19 multi and CPU-Z shows a range of 12-18 it's unlocked. But that's just a guess.

Maybe it's like an E8600 with a big multi for better overclocking, he doesn't seem to change the Multi on any of the different clock speeds, so maybe it's not unlocked

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 AM.

XtremeSystems