Nehalem @ 3DMark

I posted up some results for your guys to pick through.
Intel I7 965
Gigabyte X58 UD5
3 Stage cascade -100c
Corsair 2133 Dominator DDR3


No GPU Clocks
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/17.JPG

Mild air clocks
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/16.JPG

Physx enabled
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/15.JPG

Entry
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/12.JPG

Entry with Physx
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/11.JPG

High Preset, mild clocks
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/13.JPG

03 Nvidia Tri-SLI
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/14.JPG

03 ATI Crossfire
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/6.JPG

05 Single card
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/2.JPG

05 Crossfire
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/5.JPG

06 tri-SLI
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/18.JPG

06 Crossfire
http://fugger.netfirms.com/nhm/4.JPG

thanks for sharing, why not higher vcore ?

Looks good times are almost there, thanks for sharing.

WoW... very impressive results from new chip and new performance :up:

waiting to see more WR broken time :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hey

thanks for sharing, why not higher vcore ?

---

its just warm up bro, isn't it? :D


good work, nice to show them :up:

btw RIP yorkfield :down:

Wow! Some awesome scores there. How bout 3dm01? 200k barrier breaking time? :D

go Fugger go!

Very nice. hope i can afford one this year.:up:

That is all the vcore that is needed for that speed. Its fairly accurate in all my screen shots on all boards.

GREAT work Fugger :D

KICK ASS PRODUCT hahah ;)

great scores Fugger! that cpu is one of the best it seems like ;)

wow in that 05 single card the ram is at 930mhz 6-7-7-24? i'd love to see some sandra scores for that :D not sticking to 1.65 vdimm hehe

5ghz+ @ 1.52v is very promising.. just a few hours to go before the flood :up::D:yepp:

Damn, you have a pretty good cpu there :D How do you find the Gigabyte board?

Very nice, fun times ahead.

Nice results there Charles,

any indication of more voltage yielding higher clocks?
is this the new breaking point as opposed to 1.9v of the past?

Nice score very impresive.....:):)

Thanks guys, higher volts dont equate to higher overclocks. 1.525v is all that is needed to run at max clocks.

The GB board is very stable at high clocks

Sweet Charles !!!- I will be there soon hardware wise ;)

Very impressive. Can't wait till I get my hands on one now..

Thanks for sharing...nice results :)

Nice chip & nice performance ;)

very nice setup and results! :-) thx for sharing!

sweet results

surprisingly good '05 single there :)

:up: kikken butt:D

wow that's some big bang for that new chip :D that chip destroys everything in '06 :D tri sli 03 also stunning - great work charles! any am3 yet?

very nice looking 03 & 06 (vantage is a given). cant wait till this goes 32nm :D

Congrats FUGGER!

You are benching alone on the 5G+ :D

good work once again, you really good a sweet chip compared to the ones seen so far

Elmor Bala did also say it rocks @ giga x58

keep pushing it Charles

Looking good Charles, thanks for both CF & SLI numbers :up:

Congrats Charles :D

Nice runs fugger. thanks for the compairisons.

You have one nice chip there, Charles.....you seem to be getting better clocks than almost anyone else I've seen so far.

Question....what is the cascade evap reading at full load?? -90c?

i want 01 results :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bellisimo

i want 01 results :(

---

i'm waiting too :rolleyes:

Very nice scores. What do you think max clocks on DICE would be?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bellisimo

i want 01 results :(

---

for 3d i think these chips are only better in vantage and 06...err right?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cowie

for 3d i think these chips are only better in vantage and 06...err right?

---

They give much better crossfire/sli/tri-sli results then yorkfield.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cold Fussion

They give much better crossfire/sli/tri-sli results then yorkfield.

---

but that doesnt matter on 01 :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cowie

for 3d i think these chips are only better in vantage and 06...err right?

---

well the ONLY 3D W.R. nehalem help take is 3DMARK Vantage Performance with tripple SLI

that's it

let's see what happens this weekend i guess but it's not all great for a new CPU launch

what´s the max bclk you´ve got with the UD5?

This chip is killer in Vantage :D Other scores are also nice, gratz :)

also 3d05 is pretty good for those clocks i would say 15 % more than with core 2 at same clocks which is surprising as generally 05 is more about higher cpu speed, to match fuggers scores in 3d05 you'd need a 6.1ghz plus e8600,, is the ddr3 used in the x58 standard ddr3 meaning running at normal volts as i see somewhere saying that 1.65 volt for ddr3 in this board

whats it like on aquamark fugger

i want to play

thanks for sharing

Nice 5GHz+ benchable at 1.55v. What are your thoughts about the Gigabyte UD5 board?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cowie

for 3d i think these chips are only better in vantage and 06...err right?

---

Good E8600s will pwn 3Ds still for some time, no matter what Nehalem are capable of ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GLENBOY

also 3d05 is pretty good for those clocks i would say 15 % more than with core 2 at same clocks which is surprising as generally 05 is more about higher cpu speed, to match fuggers scores in 3d05 you'd need a 6.1ghz plus e8600,, is the ddr3 used in the x58 standard ddr3 meaning running at normal volts as i see somewhere saying that 1.65 volt for ddr3 in this board

whats it like on aquamark fugger

---

thats what i cant understand the very big increase per clock on fuggers 05 score compare to a dc but i'v seen shaminos ss at 5.0 on the i7 8300 cpu test points
here
http://d.imagehost.org/0189/4980.jpg

and on qx9650@5.0 same cpu test score 8300?
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8827837

hiya cowie maybe the slightly lower cpu score is down to fugger using an higher multiplier and lower fsb (qpi now) on the cpu also hes using windows server 2008 operating system so that might have something to do with it

It was the bios revision, fixed and shown in Hicookies thread where he ran 32m at a slower speed and beat me by a few seconds.

I will rerun

cheers fugger thanks

sry guys i must have lost you.
i ment that the i7 at 5.0 has same cpu score as Penryn at 5.0 in 06 but o5 is way improved?
i did not mean fugger's score was low

ah right get ya cowie, the overall score though in 06 is higher clock for clock as all the others with 33kish with a qx quad and 2 x 4870x2's need 5600-5800 cpu speed so overall seems to be 10-15% improvement here as fuggers 4870x2's are not clocked ridiculously high

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FUGGER

Thanks guys, higher volts dont equate to higher overclocks. 1.525v is all that is needed to run at max clocks.

The GB board is very stable at high clocks

---

1.525?? wow that seems low.. does that mean i can pump 1.525v for a suicide run with a water loop?? if so, that is excellent news!

Good job :up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FUGGER

It was the bios revision, fixed and shown in Hicookies thread where he ran 32m at a slower speed and beat me by a few seconds.

I will rerun

---

can you run 3dmark01 please?